99-3097. Brian K. Rogers; Confirmatory Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6387-6388]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3097]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 98-062]
    
    
    Brian K. Rogers; Confirmatory Order Prohibiting Involvement in 
    NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Brian K. Rogers is employed by March Metalfab, Inc. (MMI) as a 
    Quality Assurance (QA) Manager. MMI is a subcontractor of Sierra 
    Nuclear Corporation (SNC), which holds NRC Certificate of Compliance 
    72-1007 for the VSC-24 cask, used by general licensees, Palisades 
    Nuclear Plant (PNP) and Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO). The general license 
    (10 CFR 72.210) relied on by PNP and ANO is for the storage of spent 
    nuclear fuel under 10 CFR part 72.
    
    II
    
        In March 1995, PNP loaded spent fuel into a multi-assembly sealed 
    basket (MSB) spent fuel cask that had been supplied by SNC and 
    fabricated by MMI. When the cask was pressurized with helium, two leaks 
    were identified in the wall of the MSB adjacent to the closure weld. 
    Subsequent analysis by PNP metallurgical personnel determined that the 
    defects were caused by underbead or hydrogen cracking, resulting from a 
    base metal weld repair to the MSB shell inner wall that was performed 
    during MSB manufacturing. The NRC staff learned of the problem 
    experienced by PNP as a result of inspection activities following a 
    similar closure weld failure at ANO. The staff became concerned that 
    undetected cracks in other MSBs, produced by SNC that were already 
    loaded with spent fuel, could propagate while the casks were in 
    storage, affecting the integrity of the cask confinement boundary. As a 
    result, during the week of March 17-21, 1997, a special inspection was 
    conducted at SNC and MMI.
        During the special inspection, five MMI employees who were 
    considered most likely to have been aware of the fabrication activities 
    during the manufacture of the MSBs that failed were interviewed. In his 
    interview at this time, Mr. Rogers stated that he never saw any 
    temporary attachments being installed or removed from the MSBs and had 
    no knowledge of any unauthorized welding being conducted on the MSBs. 
    He stated that there was no reason to conduct welding on the inside top 
    area of the MSBs above the structural support ring area.
    
    [[Page 6388]]
    
        In July 1997, the NRC conducted a further inspection of MMI and 
    SNC. During that inspection, employees of both companies acknowledged 
    that undocumented welds had been made on casks sold to ANO and PNP. In 
    the course of this inspection, both Mr. Rogers, the Quality Assurance 
    Manager and the Project Manager for MMI admitted that they were aware 
    that repair welding had been performed on the inside of the MSBs during 
    fabrication and that they had not informed the NRC inspectors of those 
    welds during the March 1997 inspection interviews. The NRC continued to 
    investigate the matter and the Office of Investigations issued its 
    report on October 16, 1998.
        The NRC has concluded that because Mr. Rogers was knowledgeable 
    about the fabrication process and was aware that welding had been done 
    on the insides of the MSBs, he deliberately made statements in March 
    1997 to SNC and to the NRC that were inaccurate concerning the the 
    internal welding. The information involved was material to the NRC's 
    understanding as to the quality of the MSBs and delayed the NRC's 
    action to ensure integrity of MSBs. As a result, the NRC has further 
    concluded that in providing the information, Mr. Rogers violated 10 CFR 
    72.11, ``Completeness and Accuracy of Information'' and 10 CFR 72.12, 
    ``Deliberate Misconduct.'' The NRC believes that the circumstances of 
    this matter raise questions as to Mr. Rogers willingness to comply with 
    Commission requirements. Mr. Rogers has not admitted that a violation 
    occurred.
    
    III
    
        In a telephone call on December 7, 1998, Mr. Rogers agreed to 
    issuance of a Confirmatory Order prohibiting him from engaging in NRC-
    licensed activities for a period of five years from the date that the 
    Order is issued. The staff believes that this will adequately protect 
    the public heath and safety and, therefore, finds this acceptable. MMI 
    and Mr. Rogers requested that if the Order is issued, they be allowed 
    to complete work on one small existing contract to supply 10 plug 
    assemblies for a NUHOMS cask. This provision is acceptable, as the 
    assemblies have a limited safety function that can be verified by 
    measurement at the time of use. On January 6, 1999, the staff forwarded 
    to Mr. Rogers a copy of the factual basis of the proposed order and the 
    implementation paragraph. On January 11, 1999, Mr. Rogers consented to 
    the issuance of the order with those provisions and waived his rights 
    to a hearing on this action.
        I find that Mr. Rogers' commitments as set forth in Section IV are 
    acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments the 
    public health and safety are reasonably assured. In view of the 
    foregoing, I have determined that the public health and safety require 
    that Mr. Rogers' commitments be confirmed by this Order. Based on the 
    above and Mr. Rogers' consent to this action, this Order is immediately 
    effective upon issuance.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 53, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR part 72 and 10 CFR 72.12, it is 
    hereby ordered, effective immediately, as follows:
        A. Except as noted in paragraph B, Mr. Rogers is prohibited for 
    five years from the date of this Order from any involvement in NRC-
    licensed activities. For purposes of this Order, licensed activities 
    include providing or supplying, whether directly to NRC licensees or 
    Certificate of Compliance holders, or as a contractor or subcontractor 
    to a licensee or Certificate of Compliance holder, structures, systems, 
    or components, subject to a procurement contract specifying compliance 
    with 10 CFR Ch. I.
        B. Mr. Rogers may complete work on the contract that MMI entered 
    into prior to the date of this order to fabricate a total of 10 plug 
    assemblies for a NUHOMS cask.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Rogers of 
    good cause.
    
    V
    
        Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other 
    than Mr. Rogers, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. 
    Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the 
    time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made 
    in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of 
    good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be 
    submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: 
    Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also 
    shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Deputy Assistant 
    General Counsel for Enforcement, and to the Director, Office of Nuclear 
    Materials Safety and Safeguards, at the same address, and to Sierra 
    Nuclear Corporation. If such a person requests a hearing, that person 
    shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his or her 
    interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the 
    criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely 
    affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and 
    place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered 
    at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be 
    sustained.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received.
    
        Dated this 27th day of January, 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 99-3097 Filed 1-8-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/09/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-3097
Pages:
6387-6388 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 98-062
PDF File:
99-3097.pdf