94-4559. Duke Power Co.; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-4559]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 1, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket No. 50-414]
    
     
    
    Duke Power Co.; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment 
    to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards 
    Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    NPF-52 issued to Duke Power Company (the licensee) for operation of the 
    Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 2, located in York County, South 
    Carolina.
        The proposed amendment would change the method of measuring the 
    reactor coolant system flow rate (Technical Specifications 2.0 and 3/
    4.2) during the 18-month surveillance for Catawba, Unit 2.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations.
        The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        (1) This amendment will not significantly increase the 
    probability or consequence of any accident previously evaluated.
        No component modification, system realignment, or change in 
    operating procedure will occur which could affect the probability of 
    any accident or transient. The change in method of flow measurement 
    will not change the probability of actuation of any Engineered 
    Safeguard Feature or other device. The actual flow rate will not 
    change. The consequences of previously-analyzed accidents will not 
    change as a result of the new method of flow measurement.
        (2) This amendment will not create the possibility of any new or 
    different accidents not previously evaluated.
        No component modification or system realignment will occur which 
    could create the possibility of a new event not previously 
    considered. The elbow taps are already in place, and are used to 
    monitor flow for the Reactor Protection System. They will not 
    initiate any new events.
        (3) This amendment will not involve a significant reduction in a 
    margin of safety.
        As described in [the licensee's application], the change in 
    method of RCS [reactor coolant system] flow measurement will provide 
    a more accurate indication of the flow. The actual flow rate will 
    not be affected. The revised setpoints for low reactor coolant flow 
    are driven by changes to statistical allowances and do not represent 
    substantive, or less conservative, changes. There is not significant 
    reduction in a margin of safety.
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
    this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
    satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
    amendment request involves no signficiant hazards consideration.
        The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
    determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
    publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
    determination.
        Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
    expiration of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances 
    change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely 
    way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, 
    the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of 
    the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that 
    the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final 
    determination will consider all public and State comments received. 
    Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the Federal 
    Register a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing 
    after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this 
    action will occur very infrequently.
        Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Rules Review and 
    Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and Publications 
    Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555, and should cite the publication date and page 
    number of this Federal Register notice. Written comments may also be 
    delivered to room P-223, Phillips Building, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, 
    Bethesda, Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. 
    Copies of written comments received may be examined at the NRC Public 
    Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC 
    20555.
        The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to 
    intervene is discussed below.
        By March 31, 1994, the licensee may file a request for a hearing 
    with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility 
    operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the local 
    public document room located at York County Library, 138 East Black 
    Street, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730. If a request for a hearing or 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the 
    Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the 
    Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
    Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or 
    the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of 
    hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be made party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of 
    the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
    proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be 
    entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition 
    should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of 
    the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person 
    who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been 
    admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of 
    the Board up to 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy 
    the specificity requirements described above. Not later than 15 days 
    prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, a 
    petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which 
    must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated 
    in the matter. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of 
    the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the 
    petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases of the 
    contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert 
    opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner 
    intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The 
    petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and 
    documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner 
    intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion. Petitioner 
    must provide sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute 
    exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact. 
    Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the 
    amendment under consideration. The contention must be one which, if 
    proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails 
    to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with 
    respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate 
    as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
    determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
    final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves 
    no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
    amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
    request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
    of the amendment.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a 
    significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place 
    before the issuance of any amendment.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Services 
    Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 
    the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, by the 
    above date. Where petitions are filed during the last 10 days of the 
    notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform 
    the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-
    (800) 248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union 
    operator should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the 
    following message addressed to David B. Matthews: petitioner's name and 
    telephone number, date petition was mailed, plant name, and publication 
    date and page number of this Federal Register notice. A copy of the 
    petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and to Mr. Albert 
    Carr, Duke Power Company, 422 South Church Street, Charlotte, North 
    Carolina 28242, attorney for the licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1) (i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated January 10, 1994, which is available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
    Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the 
    local public docket room located at the York County Library, 138 East 
    Black Street, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of February 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Robert E. Martin,
    Project Manager, Project Directorate II-3, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-4559 Filed 2-28-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/01/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-4559
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 1, 1994, Docket No. 50-414