94-5478. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Relating to Telephones Located on the Floor of the Exchange  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-5478]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 10, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-33701; File No. SR-CBOE-93-24]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Relating to 
    Telephones Located on the Floor of the Exchange
    
    March 2, 1994.
        On June 7, 1993, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'' 
    or ``Exchange''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
    Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
    a proposed rule change to incorporate into the rules of the Exchange 
    the conditions imposed by the Exchange governing the use of member-
    owned and Exchange-owned telephones located at equity option trading 
    posts on the floor of the Exchange. Notice of the proposal appeared in 
    the Federal Register on July 21, 1993.\3\ No comment letters were 
    received on the proposed rule change. This order approves the 
    Exchange's proposal.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1992).
        \3\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32633 (July 14, 
    1993), 58 FR 33471 (July 21, 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        CBOE Rule 6.23 prohibits members from establishing or maintaining 
    any telephone or other wire communications between their offices and 
    the Exchange floor without prior approval by the Exchange, and it 
    authorizes the Exchange to direct the discontinuance of any 
    communication facility terminating on the Exchange floor.
        In October 1992, the Exchange determined to permit the installation 
    of both Exchange-owned and member-owned telephones at equity option 
    posts on the trading floor,\4\ and it promulgated Information Circular 
    IC92-118 (``Circular'') to inform the membership of this new policy and 
    the fees, charges, and conditions associated with the use of such 
    telephones. At the time the Circular was issued, the Exchange 
    determined that the conditions applicable to the use of floor 
    telephones would not be treated as rules of the Exchange, and 
    accordingly, no surveillance obligations were imposed on the Exchange 
    nor were members subject to formal disciplinary proceedings for 
    violations of the polices contained in the Circular.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\The Exchange has not allowed telephones to be installed at 
    index option trading posts for use by market markers. Telephone 
    conversation between Pat Cerny, Market Surveillance, CBOE, and Brad 
    Ritter, Attorney, Office of Derivatives Regulation, Division of 
    Market Regulation, SEC, on February 24, 1994.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange now proposes to incorporate into its rules those 
    conditions set forth in the Circular as applying to the use of 
    telephones at equity options trading posts. Specifically, these 
    conditions are as follows:
        1. There will be no restrictions on where a member may call.
        2. Floor telephones may not be used to receive orders, although 
    they may be used to provide quotations.
        3. Members may give their clerks their personal identification 
    (``PIN'') access codes. Although both members and clerks may use the 
    post telephones, members will have priority. Liability for all calls 
    made using a member's PIN access code will be that of the member.
        4. Stock clerks will not be permitted to establish a base of 
    operations utilizing post telephones.
        5. Members and their clerks using the telephones consent to the 
    Exchange requiring that any telephone or line be subject to tape 
    recording.
        6. The telephones will be used for voice service only. Data (PC's, 
    fax, etc.) will remain subject to Exchange consent under a separate 
    program.
        7. Cellular or portable telephone may not be used on the trading 
    floor.
        8. Telephone headsets may not be used on the equity options floor.
        The Exchange shall republish the Circular as a Regulatory Circular 
    in order to inform members that these conditions are rules and that 
    violations may lead to disciplinary proceedings. The Exchange believes 
    it is now appropriate to treat these conditions as Exchange rules in 
    order to be able to utilize both informal and formal disciplinary 
    proceedings and sanctions to promote compliance.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\The Exchange has represented that it has received no 
    complaints, nor has it detected any violations of the procedures 
    contained in the Circular since telephones have been installed at 
    the equity options trading posts. Telephone conversation between Pat 
    Cerny, Market Surveillance, CBOE, and Brad Ritter, Attorney, Office 
    of Derivatives Regulation, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, on 
    February 23, 1994 (``February 23 Conversation'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange intends to police compliance with these conditions by 
    means of customary floor surveillance procedures, including reliance on 
    surveillance by floor officials and Exchange employees. Additionally, 
    the Exchange represents that it has in place a surveillance sharing 
    agreement with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') whereby 
    transaction information is continually made available to the CBOE by 
    the CME regarding futures transaction activity by CBOE members that is 
    above certain defined parameters.\6\ The CBOE also receives New York 
    Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') program trading information and analyzes this 
    information against options activity to conduct surveillance for 
    options strategies implemented ahead of and in anticipation of 
    programmed equity trades.\7\ Finally, the Exchange represents that it 
    has systems in place to detect and deter frontrunning.\8\ These systems 
    generate a report of options trades occurring within a certain time 
    period prior to the purchase or sale of blocks of 10,000 or more shares 
    of the securities underlying the options.\9\ The Commission finds that 
    the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act 
    and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national 
    securities exchange, and, in particular, the requirements of section 
    6(b)(5),\10\ in that it is designed to promote just and equitable 
    principles of trade, prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
    practices, and maintain fair and orderly markets. Specifically, the 
    Commission agrees with the Exchange's position as stated in the 
    Circular that the proposed rule change may facilitate efficient access 
    to underlying markets by providing market makers with more immediate 
    access to those markets. Providing procedures whereby market makers in 
    the equity options crowds can readily communicate with the off-floor 
    offices of member firms as well as other locations off of the 
    Exchange's trading floor, will allow them to obtain and transmit 
    information more efficiently which may result in benefits to investors 
    by improving execution of orders.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\Id.
        \7\Id.
        \8\Frontrunning is the practice of effecting an options 
    transaction based upon non-public information regarding an impending 
    block transaction in the underlying stock, in order to obtain a 
    profit when the options market adjusts to the price at which the 
    block trades.
        \9\February 23 Conversation, supra note 5.
        \10\15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Further, incorporating the procedures contained in the Circular 
    into the Rules of the Exchange will enable the Exchange to monitor 
    better the use of the floor telephones and to discipline members for 
    violations of those rules. As noted above, because the proposed 
    telephone policy does not restrict where a member may call, the 
    telephones may be used to place orders in underlying stocks and in 
    futures markets.\11\ With respect to equity-related transactions, while 
    the telephones may give options market makers more immediate access to 
    the market in the underlying securities, the Commission believes that 
    the CBOE's surveillance systems currently in place are adequate to 
    detect and deter any such attempts at manipulation including 
    frontrunning. Although the surveillance procedures will not directly 
    detect that a potential frontrunning may have been attempted through 
    use of the floor telephones, the Exchange's existing surveillance 
    procedures will ensure that the CBOE is aware of any options 
    transactions that raise frontrunning concerns. Accordingly, although 
    the placement of telephones on the equity options trading floor may 
    make it easier for a market maker to place hedging orders in the 
    underlying security, the use of the floor telephones will not diminish 
    the ability of the Exchange to detect and deter manipulation. 
    Similarly, the CBOE will continue to analyze options trading against 
    NYSE program trading data for potential frontrunning.\12\ With respect 
    to futures-related transactions, the Commission believes that the 
    Exchange would be able to adequately conduct surveillance for improper 
    activities as a result of the transaction information provided to the 
    Exchange by the CME pursuant to the Exchange's surveillance sharing 
    agreement with CME.\13\ Although the surveillance information obtained 
    by the Exchange will not indicate that the floor telephones were used 
    to enter into a potentially improper futures transactions, the 
    Exchange's ability to conduct surveillance for potential manipulation 
    will not be hindered because of the existence of floor telephones at 
    the equity options posts on the floor of the Exchange. Additionally, 
    the Commission also notes that surveillance information is shared 
    through the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'').\14\ Because of 
    potential opportunities for trading abuses involving stock index 
    futures, stock options, and the underlying stock and the need for 
    greater sharing of surveillance information for these potential 
    intermarket trading abuses, the CME and the Chicago Board of Trade 
    joined the ISG as affiliate members in 1990.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\The proposed rule change also allows members to use the 
    floor telephones for the purpose of providing quotations on equity 
    options. In using the telephones for this purpose, members may only 
    provide quotations that have been publicly disseminated pursuant to 
    CBOE Rule 30.11.
        \12\See supra note 7 and accompanying text.
        \13\See supra note 6 and accompanying text.
        \14\ISG was formed on July 14, 1983 to, among other things, 
    coordinate more effectively surveillance and investigative 
    information sharing arrangements in the stock and options market. 
    See Intermarket Surveillance Group Agreement, July 14, 1983.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange's proposal also prohibits the use of portable and 
    cellular telephones on the equity options trading floor. Prohibiting 
    the use of portable telephones aids in ensuring that market makers will 
    be physically present at the equity options trading posts where the 
    options classes to which they have been appointed are traded. The 
    Commission believes that ensuring the physical presence of market 
    makers at the trading posts helps to promote the maintenance of fair 
    and orderly markets. As a result, the Commission believes that this 
    restriction is within the discretion of the Exchange and does not raise 
    regulatory concerns.
        Finally, the Exchange has represented that since the Circular was 
    issued and telephones at equity options trading posts have been 
    installed, the Exchange has not received any complaints concerning 
    their use, nor detected any violations of the procedures set forth in 
    the Circular.\15\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \15\February 23 Conversation, supra note 5.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In summary, because the Commission believes that installing 
    telephones at the equity options posts on the floor of the Exchange may 
    result in benefits to investors by allowing market makers to more 
    efficiently hedge their options positions through improved immediate 
    access to underlying markets while not impairing or diminishing the 
    ability of the Exchange to conduct surveillance for improper equity-
    related or futures-related trading activity, the Commission finds that 
    the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the 
    Act.
        It is therefore ordered, Pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\16\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CBOE-93-24) is 
    approved.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \16\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-5478 Filed 3-9-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/10/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-5478
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 10, 1994, Release No. 34-33701, File No. SR-CBOE-93-24