94-5502. CNG Transmission Corp., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-5502]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 10, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP94-236-000, et al.]
    
     
    
    CNG Transmission Corp., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings
    
    March 1, 1994.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. CNG Transmission Corp.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-236-000]
    
        Take notice that on February 18, 1994, CNG Transmission Corporation 
    (CNG), 445 West Main Street, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301, filed in 
    Docket No. CP94-236-000 a request, as supplemented on February 28, 
    1994, pursuant to Section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under 
    the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) for authorization to construct and 
    operate additional measuring and regulating facilities at an existing 
    delivery point to Washington Gas Light Company (WGL) under CNG's 
    blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-537-000 pursuant to 
    Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
    request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
    inspection.
        Specifically, CNG proposes to construct and operate additional 
    measuring and regulating facilities at its existing Dickerson M & R 
    Station in Montgomery County, Maryland. CNG states that it would use 
    the facilities to deliver natural gas to WGL for service to the 
    Montgomery County Resource Recovery Facility. CNG further states that 
    service to WGL would be provided under an existing firm transportation 
    contract dated September 30, 1993, and CNG's Rate Schedule FTNN. The 
    maximum daily volume under the contract is 60,224 Dt per day, it is 
    stated. CNG estimates the average daily delivery to the Montgomery 
    County facility would be 110 Mcf per day.
        CNG estimates the cost of the facilities to be $550,000, which 
    would be paid for by WGL. CNG asserts that CNG and WGL would equally 
    share costs in excess of $550,000.
        CNG states that it has sufficient system delivery capacity to 
    deliver the existing contract quantities to WGL without disadvantaging 
    its existing customers and that such deliveries will have a de minimis 
    impact on its systemwide peak and annual deliveries.
        Comment date: April 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    G at the end of this notice.
    
    2. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-238-000]
    
        Take notice that on February 22, 1994, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
    Company (Algonquin), 1284 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, MA 02135, filed 
    in Docket No. CP94-238-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205(b) and 
    157.212 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization 
    to add a delivery point for New England Power Company (NEP), an 
    existing customer, for service under Algonquin's existing Rate Schedule 
    X-38 under the certificate issued in Docket No. CP87-317-000, pursuant 
    to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
    request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
    inspection.
        Algonquin states that the proposed delivery point would have a 
    maximum daily delivery obligation of zero for NEP under Rate Schedule 
    X-38, and would be located at an existing meter station in Milford, 
    Massachusetts constructed for deliveries to Milford Power Limited 
    Partnership. Algonquin avers that the addition of the proposed delivery 
    point will not increase the Maximum Daily Transportation Quantity under 
    Rate Schedule X-38 and that no additional facilities are required. 
    Algonquin indicates that NEP requested that Algonquin establish the 
    additional delivery point.
        Comment date: April 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    G at the end of this notice.
    
    3. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-244-000]
    
        Take notice that on February 22, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
    Company (Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in 
    Docket No. CP94-244-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.216 
    of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
    157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon delivery facilities 
    under Gateway's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430-000 
    pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
    forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
    public inspection.1
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Gateway was formerly United Gas Pipe Line Company. Gateway 
    indicates that the name change was effective August 24, 1993.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Gateway proposes to abandon approximately 5,000 feet of 12-inch 
    lateral pipeline and the associated meter station by sale of the 
    pipeline to Liquid Carbonics, Inc. (Liquid Carbonics), and the transfer 
    of the metering facilities to Gateway's inventory. Gateway states that 
    the facilities have been used to provide transportation service to 
    Arcadian Corporation's (Arcadian) ammonia plant located in Calcasieu 
    Parish, Louisiana. Gateway explains that, due to a catastrophic failure 
    caused by an explosion at the plant in July 1992 and since Arcadian 
    does not plan to rebuild the facility, Gateway has arranged to sell the 
    12-inch pipeline to Liquid Carbonics. Gateway advises that Arcadian is 
    the only Gateway customer served through the line. Gateway further 
    explains that the pipeline would be used by Liquid Carbonics for the 
    transmission of hydrogen gas and not for the transportation of natural 
    gas in interstate commerce. Gateway states that (a) the facilities 
    originally cost $868,563, (b) Liquid Carbonics would pay $275,000 for 
    the lateral, (c) the salvage value of the metering facilities is 
    $203,739 and (d) the removal cost is estimated to be $41,000.
        Comment date: April 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    G at the end of this notice.
    
    4. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-250-000]
    
        Take notice that on February 24, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
    Company (Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in 
    Docket No. CP94-250-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.212 
    of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
    157.205, 157. 212) for authorization to construct and operate a new 
    delivery point for deliveries of natural gas to East Kentucky Power 
    Cooperative, Inc. (East Kentucky), under Tennessee's blanket 
    certificate issued in Docket No. CP87-115-000 pursuant to section 7 of 
    the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
    on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Specifically, Tennessee proposes to install two 12'' hot tap 
    assembles at an estimated cost of $112,935, of which, 100% would be 
    reimbursable by East Kentucky.
        Comment date: April 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    G at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs
    
        G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
    issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
    214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
    intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
    Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
    request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
    proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
    after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
    not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
    protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
    authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-5502 Filed 3-9-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/10/1994
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-5502
Dates:
April 15, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 10, 1994, Docket No. CP94-236-000, et al.