[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11600-11605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-5316]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[NH-9-1-5823a; A-1-FRL-5969-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
New Hampshire; Revised Regulations and Source-Specific Reasonably
Available Control Technology Plans Controlling Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions and Emission Statement Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of New Hampshire. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act. EPA is approving the revisions to the New
Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of New
Hampshire on December 21, 1992, July 10, 1995, June 28, 1996, October,
24, 1996 and December 9, 1996. These SIP revisions consist of source
specific VOC RACT determinations for L.W. Packard and Company, Textile
Tapes Corporation, and Kalwall Corporation. They also consist of
revisions to the State's volatile organic compound (VOC) regulations in
Chapter Env-A 1204 (but not including section 1204.06), certain testing
and monitoring requirements in Chapter Env-A 800, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements in Chapter Env-A 900, all of which require the
implementation of
[[Page 11601]]
reasonably available control technology (RACT) for certain sources of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as required by the Clean Air Act.
These regulations are applicable in the entire State of New Hampshire
and are required pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA has evaluated the RACT plans and the revisions of
the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. EPA is also finalizing a limited
approval on section Env-A 1204.27.
DATES: This action will become effective May 11, 1998, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment on the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking by April 9, 1998. Should the agency receive such comments,
it will timely publish a timely document withdrawing this rule.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Deputy Director,
Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAA), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, MA 02203.
Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support document are
available for public inspection during normal business hours, by
appointment at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston,
MA and Air Resources Division, Department of Environmental Services, 64
North Main Street, Caller Box 2033, Concord, NH 03302-2033.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne Cosgrove, (617) 565-9451.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act, ozone nonattainment areas were
required to adopt reasonably available control technology (RACT) rules
for sources of VOC emissions. EPA issued three sets of control
technique guidelines (CTGs) documents, establishing a ``presumptive
norm'' for RACT for various categories of VOC sources. The three sets
of CTGs were (1) Group I--issued before January 1978 (15 CTGs); (2)
Group II--issued in 1978 (9 CTGs); and (3) Group III--issued in the
early 1980's (5 CTGs). Those sources not covered by a CTG were called
non-CTG sources. EPA determined that the area's SIP-approved attainment
date established which RACT rules the area needed to adopt and
implement. Under section 172(a)(1), ozone nonattainment areas were
generally required to attain the ozone standard by December 31, 1982.
Those areas that submitted an attainment demonstration projecting
attainment by that date were required to adopt RACT for sources covered
by the Group I and II CTGs. Those areas that sought an extension of the
attainment date under section 172(a)(2) to as late as December 31, 1987
were required to adopt RACT for all CTG sources and for all major
(i.e., 100 ton per year or more of VOC emissions) non-CTG sources.
Section 182(b)(2) of the amended Act requires States to adopt RACT
rules for all areas designated nonattainment for ozone and classified
as moderate or above. There are three parts to the section 182(b)(2)
RACT requirement: (1) RACT for sources covered by an existing CTG--
i.e., a CTG issued prior to the enactment of the CAAA of 1990; (2) RACT
for sources covered by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) all major sources
not covered by a CTG. This RACT requirement applies to nonattainment
areas that previously were exempt from certain RACT requirements and
requirements and requires them to ``catchup'' to those nonattainment
areas that became subject to those requirements during an earlier
period. In addition, it requires newly designated ozone nonattainment
areas to adopt RACT rules consistent with those for previously
designated nonattainment areas.
Portions of New Hampshire are classified as marginal and serious
nonattainment areas for ozone.1 In addition, New Hampshire
is located in the northeast ozone transport region that was statutorily
created by section 184 of the CAA. Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the amended
Act requires all states in an Ozone Transport Region (OTR) to adopt the
RACT provisions for all sources covered by a CTG document issued by EPA
before or after enactment of the CAAA of 1990. Section 184(b)(2)
mandates that all states in the OTR subject 50 ton per year and greater
VOC sources to those requirements that would be applicable to major
stationary sources in a moderate nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These areas were designated as nonattainment prior to
enactment of the amended Act. They retained their designation of
nonattainment and were classified by operation of law pursuant to
Sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon enactment of the amendments. See 56
FR 56694.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To meet the RACT catch-up requirement, New Hampshire needed to
submit a RACT rule for an external floating roof VOC storage category.
In addition, the major source definition for serious areas and areas
designated as part of an OTR has been lowered under the amended Act to
sources that emit greater than 50 tons per year of VOC. Therefore, the
State was required to adopt RACT rules for all sources that exceed this
cut-off. New Hampshire was also required to reduce the applicability
level for certain coating sources from 100 tons per year of VOC to 10
tons per year, as recommended in the CTGs. These sources include: can
coating; paper fabric, film and foil coating; vinyl and urethane
substrate coating; metal furniture coating; and magnet wire insulation
coating.
VOCs contribute to the production of ground level ozone and smog.
New Hampshire's rules were adopted as part of an effort to achieve the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This Final
Rule discusses EPA's evaluation and final action for New Hampshire's
amendments to the Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 regulations, and source
specific VOC RACT Orders submitted pursuant to Env-A
1204.27.
II. State Submittals
A. Parts Env-A 800, 900, and 1204
On June 28, 1996, New Hampshire Air Resources Division (ARD)
submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revision consists of amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 of the
New Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution. The
revision consists of changes made pursuant to the requirements of
Sec. 182(b)(2) of the Act to the following New Hampshire Regulations
for the Abatement of Air Pollution:
Part Env-A 803: VOC testing;
Part Env-A 804 Capture Efficiency;
Part Env-A 901: Recordkeeping and Reporting by Sources;
Part Env-A 1204: Stationary Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs), including new sections controlling VOC emissions from the
coating of wood furniture, burial caskets and gunstock; and the coating
of plastic parts. In Env-A 1204.03, New Hampshire revised the
definition of exempt VOC to include parachlorobenzotriflouride,
perchloroethylene, acetone, and volatile methyl siloxanes.
On November 21, 1997, New Hampshire submitted a letter to EPA
requesting withdrawal of section Env-A 1204.06 from the SIP package
pursuant to EPA's request. This section contains provisions for
``equivalent substitute control techniques.'' EPA requested that New
Hampshire withdraw this section from the SIP because it does not
provide for EPA approval of the equivalent substitute control
techniques chosen.
On December 21, 1992, New Hampshire submitted a SIP revision to EPA
consisting of the amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 of the New
Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution. As part of this
SIP revision, NH revised its Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204 rules to
comply with
[[Page 11602]]
the requirements of reasonably available control technology (RACT)
provisions for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), as required by
Section 182(b)(2) and Section 184(a) and (b) of the Clean Air Act. In
response to these CAA requirements, New Hampshire revised its rules to
include:
1. The addition of an external floating roof VOC storage category.
2. The addition of a regulation requiring RACT for non-CTG sources
exceeding 50 tons per year.
3. The adoption of the ``theoretical potential emissions''
definition used to determine RACT applicability for coating and
printing sources.
4. The incorporation of lower applicability cutpoints for coating
source emissions, consistent with EPA guidance.
5. The addition of urethane substrates in the vinyl substrate
coating category.
6. Revisions to the compliance schedule section of the rules to
facilitate compliance for all applicable VOC sources by the statutory
deadline of May, 1995.
7. Revisions to include additional NOX and VOC
recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
8. Various revisions to the VOC rules to make them fully consistent
with EPA guidance.
In addition to the VOC regulations in Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204,
New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT determination for L.W.
Packard & Company on July 10, 1995 which covers processes subject to
the miscellaneous VOC RACT provisions of Part Env-A 1204. On October
24, 1996, New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT
determination for Kalwall Corporation in Manchester, NH which covers
processes subject to the VOC RACT provisions of Part Env-A 1204. On
December 9, 1996, New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT
determination for Textile Tapes in Gonic, NH.
EPA's review of the SIP submittal indicates that New Hampshire has
addressed the applicable RACT requirements and deficiencies in the
existing VOC regulations that were identified by EPA in its letters of
October 31, 1991, March 10, 1992, and June 24, 1992. New Hampshire's
regulation and EPA's evaluation are detailed in the following
memoranda: Technical Support Document--New Hampshire SIP Revision
Concerning Amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204 of the New
Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution, July 7, 1993
and Amendment to the TSD-New Hampshire VOC RACT SIP Revisions. Copies
of these documents are available, upon request, from the EPA Regional
Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
B. Emission Statement Requirements
The CAA requires states to submit SIP revisions by November 15,
1992 requiring that all sources of VOC and NOX emissions
submit emission statements on an annual basis beginning in 1993 for the
calendar year 1992. EPA proposed a limited approval/limited disapproval
of the emission statement provisions in a separate Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPR) published on September 20, 1994, 59 FR 48195. In that
NPR, EPA identified provisions in New Hampshire's regulations which
were inconsistent with EPA guidance. New Hampshire's submittal of June
28, 1996 addresses the deficiencies identified in the September 20,
1994 NPR.
C. VOC RACT for L.W. Packard in Ashland
On July 10, 1995, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for L.W.
Packard as a SIP revision. L.W. Packard and Company of manufactures
fine woolen cloth at its Ashland, New Hampshire facility. VOC are
emitted primarily from the carding oil process and the wet finishing
and dyeing process. The coating processes are subject to section Env-A
1024.27, ``Emission Standards and Control Options for Miscellaneous and
Multicategory Stationary VOC Sources.'' Order number ARD-94-001 defines
VOC RACT for L.W. Packard's processes. The Order requires L.W. Packard
to use a low VOC carding oil with a maximum VOC content of 0.05 lbs
VOC/gallon. The Order also limits formic acid emissions, and requires
L.W. Packard to install at least one pressurized dye vessel. The Order
also sets recordkeeping and reporting requirements. New Hampshire held
a public hearing on April 11, 1995. The final Order was issued on May
5, 1995.
D. VOC RACT for Textile Tapes Corporation in Gonic
On December 9, 1996, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for
Textile Tapes Corporation in Gonic. Textile Tapes applies surface
coatings on fabrics using the knife coating process. The facility
operates three coating lines. Order number ARD-96-001 defines VOC RACT
for all coatings at Textile Tapes except for the ``5000 series
adhesive'' to comply with the provisions of Part Env-A 1204.10,
Applicability Criteria and Compliance Standards for Coating of Paper,
Fabric, Film and Foil Substrates which limits the emission rate of VOC
at all times to 2.9 lb VOC/gallon of coating, as applied, excluding
water and exempt VOC. For the coating described as ``5000 series
adhesive,'' the Order requires the facility to increase the solids
content from 33% by weight to 40% by weight and to limit the VOC
emission rate to 4.7 lb VOC/gallon of coating, as applied, less water
and exempt compounds. New Hampshire held a public hearing on February
16, 1996. The final Order was issued on October 4, 1996.
E. VOC RACT for Kalwall in Manchester
On October 24, 1996, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for
Kalwall Corporation in Manchester. Kalwall Corporation of Manchester,
New Hampshire produces building panels used in architectural and light
construction applications. Coatings containing VOC are applied to the
panels. Order number ARD-95-010 defines VOC RACT for Kalwall's coating
processes. The order sets VOC emission limits for the three coating
process and requires Kalwall to improve transfer efficiency of one
coating process. The Order also sets recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. New Hampshire held a public hearing on February 16, 1996.
The final Order was issued on September 10, 1996.
F. Env-A 1204.27 Applicability Criteria and Compliance Options for
Miscellaneous and Multicategory Stationary VOC Sources
For major non-CTG sources of VOCs, the addition of this section
sets forth both presumptive RACT norms and processes by which RACT can
be established for those sources that cannot meet the presumptive
norms. However, Section 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act requires that a
SIP revision be submitted by November 15, 1992 including ``provisions
to require the implementation of reasonably available control
technology.'' In addition, the necessary SIP revision is required to
``provide for the implementation of the required measures as
expeditiously as practicable but no later than May 31, 1995.'' Since
the first four control options of Env-A 1204.27(d) define presumptive
norms for RACT, and are consistent with EPA's Model VOC RACT Rules for
other facilities that emit volatile organic compounds, that portion of
the regulation meets the requirements of Section 182 and is approvable.
However, since control option 5 describes a process by which RACT can
be defined but does not specifically define RACT for each source to
which such options apply, that portion of the rule is not fully
[[Page 11603]]
approvable. Therefore, EPA is only granting a limited approval of Env-A
1204.27. To receive full approval, New Hampshire will need to define
explicitly, and have approved by EPA, RACT for all of those sources
which do not conform to the presumptive RACT options outlined in the
regulation. New Hampshire will need to define RACT for the following
sources before EPA will grant full approval: Harvard Industries, New
Filcas of America Inc., Sturm Ruger Inc., and Anheuser Busch.
III. Final Action
EPA review of the regulations in Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204
(except for Env-A 1204.27 and 1204.06) indicates that New Hampshire has
sufficiently defined the VOC RACT and emission statement requirements.
EPA review of the miscellaneous VOC RACT for L.W. Packard, Textile
Tapes Corporation, and Kalwall Corporation in Manchester, indicates
that New Hampshire has sufficiently defined the VOC RACT requirements
for these facilities. Therefore EPA is approving Part Env-A 800, 900,
and 1204 (except 1204.06), and the source specific VOC RACT Order #ARD-
95-010 for Kalwall in Manchester, VOC RACT Order #ARD-96-001 for
Textile Tapes Corporation, and VOC RACT Order #ARD-94-001 for L.W.
Packard. As noted above, New Hampshire withdrew Env-A 1204.06 from its
SIP submittal. Therefore, this action does not approve that section as
part of the SIP.
EPA has evaluated New Hampshire's submittal for consistency with
the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has determined that the
changes made to Part Env-A 800, Part Env-A 900 and Part Env-A 1204,
except for Env-A 1204.06 and 1204.27 of New Hampshire's Regulations
Controlling Air Pollution meet the requirements of the Act. Therefore,
EPA is approving under Section 110(k)(3) those changes. However, EPA
has determined that Env-A 1204.27 does not meet all of the Act's
requirements for the reasons described above. EPA believes that
approval of the submitted rule will strengthen the SIP but because of
the above-mentioned deficiencies, the rule does not meet the
requirements of Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA. In light of such
deficiencies, EPA cannot grant full approval of this rule under section
110(k)(3) and Part D. However, EPA may grant a limited approval of the
submitted rule under Section 110(k)(3) and EPA's authority pursuant to
Section 301(a) to adopt regulations necessary to further air quality by
strengthening the SIP. The approval is limited due to the fact that
this rule does not meet the requirement of Section 182(b)(2) because of
the deficiencies noted above. Thus, in order to strengthen the SIP, EPA
is taking action on New Hampshire's submitted Section Env-A 1204.27 as
a limited approval under Section 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the CAA.
EPA's evaluation of all the submitted regulations is detailed in
the Technical Support Document. Copies of that document are available,
upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this action. Interested parties may participate in the
Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA
Regional office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this action.
EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective May 11, 1998, without further notice, unless, the agency
receives relevant adverse comments by April 9, 1998, or the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking.
If the EPA receives such comments, it will publish a document
informing the public that this rule did not take effect. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If
no such comments are received, the public is advised that this action
will be effective on May 11, 1998.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any State implementation plan. Each request for revision to
the State implementation plan shall be considered separately in light
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from review under Executive Order
12866.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the
Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on
any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the
Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility
analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base
its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.
EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
C. Unfunded Mandates
Under Sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes
[[Page 11604]]
no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local,
or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this
action.
D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
E. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 11, 1998. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) EPA encourages
interested parties to comment in response to the proposed rule rather
than petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after
the comment period allowed for in the proposal.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 9, 1998.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE--New Hampshire
2. Section 52.1520 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(51) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(51) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
New Hampshire Air Resources Division on December 9, 1996, June 28,
1996, October 24, 1996, and July 10, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letters from the New Hampshire
Air Resources Division dated December 9, 1996, June 28, 1996, October
24, 1996, July 10, 1995 and December 21, 1992 submitting revisions to
the New Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP), and a letter dated
November 21, 1997 withdrawing Env-A 1204.06 from the SIP submittal.
(B) Regulations Part Env-A 801 ``Purpose;'' Part Env-A 802
``Testing and Monitoring for Stationary Sources: General
Requirements;'' Part Env-A 902 ``Malfunctions and Breakdowns of Air
Pollution Control Equipment;'' and Part Env-A 903 ``Compliance
Schedules'' all effective November 15, 1992.
(C) Regulations Part Env-A 803 ``VOC Testing;'' Part Env-A 804
``Capture Efficiency;'' Sections Env-A 901.01 through 901.05, 901.08
and 901.09 of Part Env-A 901 ``Recordkeeping and Reporting by
Sources;'' and Part Env-A 1204 ``Stationary Sources of Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs) (except 1204.06),'' all effective on August 31, 1995.
(D) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-94-001, concerning L.W.
Packard, effective May 5, 1995.
(E) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-95-010, concerning Kalwall in
Manchester, NH, effective September 10, 1996.
(F) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-96-001, concerning Textile
Tapes Corporation, NH, effective October 4, 1996.
3. In Sec. 52.1525 Table 52.1525 is amended by adding new entries
in numerical order to existing state citations ``Part Env-A 801; Part
Env-A 802; Part Env-A 803; Part Env-A 804; Part Env-A 805; Part Env-A
806; Part Env-A 807; Part Env-A 901, sections Env-A 901.01 through
901.05, 901.08 and 901.09; Part Env-A 902; Part Env-A 903; Part Env-A
1204 (except 1204.06);'' ``Order ARD-94-001,'' ``Order ARD-95-010,''
and ``Order ARD-96-001'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1525--EPA--approved New Hampshire state regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.1525.--EPA--Approved Rules and Regulations--New Hampshire
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State citation Date adopted by Date approved by Federal Register
Title/subject chapter State EPA citation 52.1520 Comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Purpose......................... CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Env-A 801. monitoring
procedures.
Testing and Monitoring for CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Stationary Sources: General Env-A 802. monitoring
Requirements. procedures.
VOC Testing..................... CH air 800, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Env-A 803. monitoring
procedures.
Capture Efficiency.............. CH air 800, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Env-A 804. monitoring
procedures.
[[Page 11605]]
Continuous Emission Monitoring.. CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Env-A 805. monitoring
procedures.
Testing for Diesel Engines and CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Motor Vehicles. Env-A 806. monitoring
procedures.
Approval of Alternate Methods... CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and
Env-A 807. monitoring
procedures.
* * * * * * *
Recordkeeping and Reporting by CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping
Sources. Env-A 901, and reporting
sections 901.01, requirements.
901.03, 901.09.
Recordkeeping and Reporting by CH air 900, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping
Sources. Env-A 901, and reporting
sections 901.02, requirements.
901.04, 901.05,
and 901.08.
Malfunctions and Breakdowns of CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping
Air Pollution Control Equipment. Env-A 902. and reporting
requirements.
Compliance Schedules............ CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping
Env-A 903. and reporting
requirements.
* * * * * * *
Stationary Sources of Volatile CH air 1204, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds VOC RACT
Organic Compounds. Env-A 1204 requirements.
(except 1204.06). Limited approval
only of Env-A
1204.27.
Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-94-001.. May 5, 1995....... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for L.W.
Packard.
* * * * * * *
Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-95-010.. September 10, 1996 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for Kalwall,
Manchester.
Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-96-001.. October 4, 1996... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for Textile
Tapes.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 98-5316 Filed 3-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
