2016-05406. Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Review; 2014-2015  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

    SUMMARY:

    In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (“Department”) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”) for the period of review February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. The Department preliminarily determines that sales by the Minh Phu Group [1] and Stapimex,[2] the two mandatory respondents, were made below normal value (“NV”). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.[3]

    DATES:

    Effective: March 10, 2016.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Irene Gorelik or Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905, or (202) 482-9068, respectively.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description, available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, remains dispositive.[4]

    Methodology

    The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”). Constructed export prices and export prices were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because Vietnam is a nonmarket economy within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV was calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.

    For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via the Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (“ACCESS”). ACCESS is available to Start Printed Page 12703registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

    Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) information and information provided by a number of companies, we preliminarily determine that 15 companies [5] did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In addition, the Department finds, consistent with its refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy cases, that it is appropriate not to rescind the review in part in these circumstances, but to complete the review with respect to these 15 companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.[6] For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

    Partial Rescission of Review

    On July 2, 2015, both Petitioner and ASPA filed timely withdrawals of their review requests for Seavina Joint Stock Company.[7] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Because both Petitioner and ASPA withdrew their requests for administrative review of Seavina Joint Stock Company within 90 days of the date of publication of the Initiation Notice, and no other interested party requested a review of this company, the Department is rescinding this review with respect to Seavina Joint Stock Company, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).

    Preliminary Results of Review

    The Department finds that 51 companies for which a review was requested have not established eligibility for a separate rate and are considered to be part of the Vietnam-wide entity for these preliminary results.[8] The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the Vietnam-wide entity applies to this administrative review.[9] Under this policy, the Vietnam-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the Vietnam-wide entity, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change. For companies for which a review was requested and that have established eligibility for a separate rate, the Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist:

    Exporter 10Weighted-average margin (percent)
    Minh Phu Group:
    Minh Phu Seafood Corp., aka Minh Phu Seafood Corporation, aka Minh Qui Seafood Co., Ltd., aka Minh Phat Seafood Co., Ltd., aka Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood Joint Stock Company2.86
    Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company, aka Stapimex4.78
    Bac Lieu Fisheries Joint Stock Company3.56
    C.P. Vietnam Corporation3.56
    Cadovimex Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint Stock Company3.56
    Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corporation, aka Camau Seafood Factory No. 43.56
    Can Tho Import Export Fishery Limited Company3.56
    Camau Seafood Processing and Service Joint Stock Corporation3.56
    Cuulong Seaproducts Company3.56
    Gallant Dachan Seafood Co., Ltd.3.56
    Green Farms Seafood Joint Stock Company3.56
    Hai Viet Corporation3.56
    Investment Commerce Fisheries Corporation3.56
    Kim Anh Company Limited, aka Kim Anh Co., Ltd.3.56
    Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint-Stock Company3.56
    Minh Hai Joint-Stock Seafoods Processing Company3.56
    Nha Trang Fisheries Joint Stock Company3.56
    Nha Trang Seafoods Group:
    Nha Trang Seaproduct Company, aka NT Seafoods Corporation, aka Nha Trang Seafoods—F89 Joint Stock Company, aka NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company, aka3.56
    Ngoc Tri Seafood Joint Stock Company3.56
    Start Printed Page 12704
    Phuong Nam Foodstuff Corp.3.56
    Quang Minh Seafood Co., Ltd.3.56
    Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd.3.56
    Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company, aka Fimex VN, aka Saota Seafood Factory3.56
    Seaprimexco Vietnam3.56
    Taika Seafood Corporation3.56
    Thong Thuan Company Limited, aka T&T Co., Ltd3.56
    Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading Corporation3.56
    Trong Nhan Seafood Company Limited3.56
    UTXI Aquatic Products Processing Corporation, aka Hoang Phuong Seafood Factory, aka Hoang Phong Seafood Factory3.56
    Viet Foods Co., Ltd.3.56
    Vietnam Clean Seafood Corporation3.56
    Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd.3.56

    Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the publication of these preliminary results, and rebuttal comments within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs. Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[11] Rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs.[12]

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.[13] Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review.

    The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of issues raised in the written comments, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register.

    Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.[14] The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., is 0.50 percent or more) in the final results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).[15] We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the final results, if we continue to treat the 51 companies identified above as part of the Vietnam-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 25.76 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by those companies.

    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.

    Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, which have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Vietnam and non-Vietnam exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Vietnam exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the existing rate for the Vietnam-wide entity of 25.76 percent; and (4) for all non-Vietnam exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Vietnam exporter that supplied that non-Vietnam exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

    Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Start Printed Page 12705regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

    This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Start Signature

    Dated: March 3, 2016.

    Paul Piquado,

    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    End Signature

    Appendix I

    List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

    1. Summary

    2. Background

    3. Extension of Preliminary Results

    4. Respondent Selection

    5. Scope of the Order

    6. Partial Rescission of Review

    7. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    8. Non-Market Economy Country

    9. Separate Rates

    10. Separate Rate Calculation

    11. Vietnam-Wide Entity

    12. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data

    a. Surrogate Country

    b. Economic Comparability

    c. Significant Producers of Comparable Merchandise

    d. Data Availability

    e. Public Availability and Broad-Market Average

    f. Specificity

    g. Contemporaneity and Tax and Duty Exclusive

    13. Date of Sale

    14. Comparisons to Normal Value

    a. Determination of Comparison Method

    b. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis

    15. U.S. Price

    a. Export Price

    b. Constructed Export Price

    16. Normal Value

    a. Exclusion Requests

    17. Factor Valuations

    18. Currency Conversion

    19. Verification

    20. Conclusion

    Appendix II

    Companies Subject to Review Determined To Be Part of the Vietnam-Wide Entity

    1. Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. Ngoc Tri Seafood Company (Amanda's affiliate)

    2. Amanda Seafood Co., Ltd.

    3. An Giang Coffee JSC

    4. Anvifish Joint Stock Co.

    5. Asia Food Stuffs Import Export Co., Ltd.

    6. B.O.P. Limited Co.

    7. Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company

    8. Can Tho Agricultural and Animal Product Import Export Company (“CATACO”)

    Can Tho Agricultural and Animal Products Imex Company

    Can Tho Agricultural and Animal Products Import Export Company (“CATACO”)

    Can Tho Agricultural Products

    Can Tho Agricultural Products

    9. Can Tho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company (CASEAMEX)

    10. Cau Tre Enterprise (C. T. E.)

    11. Cautre Export Goods Processing Joint Stock Company

    12. CL Fish Co., Ltd. (Cuu Long Fish Company)

    13. Danang Seaproducts Import Export Corporation (“Seaprodex Danang”)

    Danang Seaproducts Import-Export Corporation (“Seaprodex Danang”) (and its affiliates)

    Danang Seaproducts Import-Export Corporation (and its affiliate, Tho Quang Seafood Processing and Export Company) (collectively “Seaprodex Danang”)

    Seaprodex Danang

    Tho Quang Co.

    Tho Quang Seafood Processing and Export Company

    Frozen Seafoods Factory No. 32 (Tho Quang Seafood Processing and Export Company)

    14. D & N Foods Processing (Danang Company Ltd.)

    15. Duy Dai Corporation

    16. Gallant Ocean (Quang Ngai) Co., Ltd.

    17. Gn Foods

    18. Hai Thanh Food Company Ltd.

    19. Hai Vuong Co., Ltd.

    20. Han An Trading Service Co., Ltd.

    21. Hoang Hai Company Ltd.

    22. Hua Heong Food Industries Vietnam Co. Ltd.

    23. Huynh Huong Seafood Processing (Huynh Houng Trading and Import Export Joint Stock Company)

    24. Interfood Shareholding Co.

    25. Khanh Loi Seafood Factory

    26. Kien Long Seafoods Co. Ltd.

    27. Luan Vo Fishery Co., Ltd.

    28. Minh Chau Imp. Exp. Seafood Processing Co., Ltd.

    29. Minh Cuong Seafood Import Export Frozen Processing Joint Stock Company (“Minh Cuong Seafood”)

    30. Mp Consol Co., Ltd.

    31. Ngoc Chau Co., Ltd. and/or Ngoc Chau Seafood Processing Company

    32. Ngoc Sinh

    Ngoc Sinh Fisheries

    Ngoc Sinh Private Enterprises

    Ngoc Sinh Seafood Processing Company

    Ngoc Sinh Seafood Trading & Processing Enterprise

    Ngoc Sinh Seafoods

    33. Phu Cuong Jostoco Corp.

    Phu Cuong Jostoco Seafood Corporation

    34. Quang Ninh Export Aquatic Products Processing Factory

    35. Quang Ninh Seaproducts Factory

    36. Quoc Ai Seafood Processing Import Export Co., Ltd.

    37. S.R.V. Freight Services Co., Ltd.

    38. Sustainable Seafood

    39. Tan Thanh Loi Frozen Food Co., Ltd.

    40. Thanh Doan Seaproducts Import & Export Processing Joint-Stock Company (THADIMEXCO)

    41. Thanh Hung Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Co., Ltd.

    42. Thanh Tri Seafood Processing Co. Ltd.

    43. Thinh Hung Co., Ltd.

    44. Tien Tien Garment Joint Stock Company

    45. Tithi Co., Ltd.

    46. Trang Khan Seafood Co., Ltd.

    47. Viet Cuong Seafood Processing Import Export Joint-Stock Company

    48. Vietnam Fish One Co., Ltd.

    Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd.

    Vietnam Fish-One Co., Ltd. (“Fish One”) (Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd.)

    49. Vietnam Northern Viking Technologies Co. Ltd.

    50. Vinatex Danang

    51. Vinh Loi Import Export Company (“VIMEX”)

    Vinh Loi Import Export Company (“Vimexco”)

    End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.  Minh Phu Seafood Corporation, Minh Qui Seafood Co., Ltd., Minh Phat Seafood Co., Ltd., and Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood Joint Stock Company (collectively, the “Minh Phu Group”). The Department previously collapsed the companies within the Minh Phu Group in the ninth administrative review. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014, 80 FR 55328 (September 15, 2015). There have been no changes since the preceding administrative review regarding the corporate or legal structure of the companies within the Minh Phu Group. Thus, we continue to find that these companies are affiliated and comprise a single entity to which we will assign a single rate.

    Back to Citation

    2.  Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company (“Stapimex”).

    Back to Citation

    3.  Further, as explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review is now March 4, 2016. See Memorandum to the Record, from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, “Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm Jonas,” dated January 27, 2016.

    Back to Citation

    4.  For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled “Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; 2014-2015,” dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice (“Preliminary Decision Memorandum”).

    Back to Citation

    5.  These 15 companies are: (1) BIM Seafood Joint Stock Company; (2) Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd.; (3) Cafatex Fishery Joint Stock Corporation; (4) Camranh Seafoods Processing Enterprise Pte.; (5) Coastal Fisheries Development Corporation; (6) Bentre Forestry Aquaproduct Import-Export Joint Stock Company; (7) Fine Foods Co.; (8) Gallant Ocean (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.; (9) Long Toan Frozen Aquatic Products Joint Stock Company; (10) Nhat Duc Co., Ltd.; (11) Ngo Bros Seaproducts Import-Export One Member Company Limited; (12) Thong Thuan Seafood Company Limited; (13) Tacvan Seafoods Company; (14) Tan Phong Phu Seafood Co., Ltd.; and (15) Vinh Hoan Corporation.

    Back to Citation

    6.  See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (“Assessment Notice”); see also “Assessment Rates” section below.

    Back to Citation

    7.  See Petitioner's and ASPA's July 2, 2015, “Partial Withdrawal of Request for Review.”

    Back to Citation

    8.  See Appendix II for a full list of the 51 companies; see also Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 12-13.

    Back to Citation

    9.  See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).

    Back to Citation

    10.  Due to the issues we have had in the past with variations of exporter names related to this Order, we remind exporters that the names listed in the rate box are the exact names, including spelling and punctuation which the Department will provide to CBP and which CBP will use to assess POR entries and collect cash deposits. See, e.g., Minh Phu Seafood Corporation's Separate Rate Certification dated May 4, 2015, at Attachment A, page 1, where Minh Phu Seafood Corporation stated that the initiated name of “Minh Phu Seafood Export Import Corporation (and affiliates Minh Qui Seafood Co. Ltd. and Minh Phat Seafood Co., Ltd.) and/or Minh Phu Seafood Export Import Corporation (and affiliates Minh Qui Seafood Co. Ltd. and Minh Phat Seafood Co., Ltd.) (collectively “Minh Phu Group”)” was requested for initiation as such by Petitioners but that “the company does not use this combined name.” Indeed, many of the names requested for review by Petitioners and ASPA are, in fact, non-existent combinations of company names.

    Back to Citation

    15.  In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2016-05406 Filed 3-9-16; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/10/2016
Published:
03/10/2016
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2016-05406
Dates:
Effective: March 10, 2016.
Pages:
12702-12705 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-552-802
PDF File:
2016-05406.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Requests for Nominations: Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China; Recission
» Determinations of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Brazil, South Africa, and Republic of Turkey
» Meetings: United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board
» Investigations; Determinations, Modifications, and Rulings, etc.: Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Republic of Turkey
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from People's Republic of China
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Pasta from Italy
» Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Truck and Bus Tires From People's Republic of China
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review