94-5730. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-5730]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 11, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [ER-FRL-4709-3]
    
     
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared February 21, 1994 through 
    February 25, 1994 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
    under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of 
    EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 
    (202) 260-5076.
        An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in Federal Register dated April 
    10, 1993 (58 FR 18392).
    
    Draft EISs
    
    ERP No. D-CGD-D50005-VA
    
        Rating EO2, Parallel Crossing of the Chesapeake Bay, Construction 
    and Operation, US 13 between the Delmarva Peninsula and southeastern 
    Virginia, Funding, COE section 10 and 404 Permits and CGD Bridge 
    Permit, Virginia Beach, Northampton County, VA.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections to the project as 
    proposed, especially to the stated purpose and need, and the direct and 
    indirect impacts from such actions. EPA also objected to the impacts to 
    habitat from the dredging and the noise generated by this project.
    
    ERP No. D-FHW-J40131-ND
    
        Rating EC1, ND-57 Improvements, US 281 to ND-20, Funding, Right-of-
    Way, NPDES and COE Section 404 Permits, City of Bismarck, ND.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the lack of 
    sufficient identification of project area wetland resources, and the 
    relationship of proposed mitigation activities to the resources being 
    impacted. EPA requested that these issues be addressed in the final 
    EIS.
    
    ERP No. DS-AFS-J65193-MT
    
        Rating LO, Beaver-Dry Timber Sales, Timber Harvest and Road 
    Construction, Updated Information, Implementation, Helena National 
    Forest, Lincoln Ranger District, Lewis and Clark and Powell Counties, 
    MT.
        Summary: EPA had no objections to the proposed action as all points 
    of concerns raised in response to the final EIS have been resolved.
    
    Final EISs
    
    ERP No. F-AFS-J61091-00
    
        Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Comprehensive Plan, 
    Designation, Construction and Reconstruction, Implementation, Medicine 
    Bow National Forest, Hayden Ranger District, WY to Rio Grande National 
    Forest, Conejos Peak Ranger District, CO.
        Summary: EPA believed that the Forest Service had adequately 
    addressed EPA concerns.
    
    ERP No. F-AFS-J65200-MT
    
        Little Snowies Vegetative Management and Public Access, Fire and 
    Timber Management Practices, Lewis and Clark National Forest, 
    Musselshell Ranger District, City of Harlowton, Fergus and Golden 
    Valley Counties, MT.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about cumulative 
    effects to water quality, stream and riparian conditions from the 
    proposed project and domestic grazing.
    
    ERP No. F-AFS-J65201-CO
    
        Fish Creek Reservoir Enlargement, Special Use Permit, Routt 
    National Forest, Steamboat Springs, Routt County, CO.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections to the preferred 
    alternative since the final EIS identified practicable, less damaging 
    alternatives such as the combined alternatives. EPA wishes to work with 
    the Forest Service and Streamboat Springs to ensure that a less 
    damaging alternative is arrived at that will also ensure future water 
    supply needs.
    
    ERP No. F-AFS-J65204-MT
    
        Tolan Creek Timber Sale, Timber Harvest and Road Construction, 
    Tolan Creek, Bitterroot National Forest, Sula Ranger District, Ravalli 
    County, MT.
        Summaryu: EPA expressed environmental concerns about air quality 
    impacts to the anacondapintler wilderness area from precribed burning.
    
    ERP No. F-AFS-L65156-ID
    
        Big Eightmile, North Fork of Timber and Alder Creek Timber Sale, 
    Reforestation and Road Construction, Implementation, Lemhi Range 
    Roadless Area, Salmon National Forest, Lemhi County, ID.
        Summary: EPA continued to have environmental concerns with the 
    preferred alternative (Alternative J) since the air quality analysis 
    did not provide the basis for the no effect conclusion.
    
    ERP No. F-BLM-J65187-UT
    
        Diamond Mountain Resource Area, Resource Management Plan, 
    Implementation, Daggett, Duchesne and Uintah Counties, UT.
        Summary: EPA felt that the Bureau of Land Management had adequately 
    addressed EPA concerns.
    
    ERP No. F-FHW-J40117-CO
    
        CO-82 Transportation Improvements, East of Basalt to the Buttermilk 
    Ski Area West of Aspen, Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, Pitkin 
    County, CO.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding wetland and 
    air quality mitigation.
    
    ERP No. F-FHW-J40127-UT
    
        West Valley Highway Transportation Improvement, 9000 South to 12600 
    South, Funding and Right-of-Way Acquisition, Salt Lake County, UT.
        Summary: EPA encouraged the use of less impactive de-icing 
    alternatives, including a reduction in road salt application.
    
    ERP No. F-NOA-L90023-WA
    
        Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary, Management Plan, Site 
    Designation, NPDES Permit and COE Permit, Olympic Peninsula, WA.
        Summary: EPA had no objections to the activities suggested in this 
    document.
    
    ERP No. F-NRC-J22004-UT
    
        Uranium and Thorium Byproduct Material Disposal Project, 
    Construction and Operation, Licenses, Salt Lake City, Tooele County, 
    UT.
        Summary: EPA continued to have a lack of objections for the project 
    as proposed in the final EIS.
    
        Dated: March 7, 1994.
    Marshall Cain,
    Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Federal Activities.
    [FR Doc. 94-5730 Filed 3-10-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/11/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-5730
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 11, 1994, ER-FRL-4709-3