95-6143. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding and Initiation of Status Review for a Petition To List the Southern Population of the Walleye as Endangered  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 13397-13398]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6143]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 17
    
    
    Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding and 
    Initiation of Status Review for a Petition To List the Southern 
    Population of the Walleye as Endangered
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition finding and initiation of status 
    review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces a 90-
    day finding for a petition to list the southern population of walleye 
    (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) under the Endangered Species Act of 
    1973, as amended. The Service finds that the petition presents 
    substantial information indicating that listing this species may be 
    warranted. A status review is initiated.
    
    DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on January 26, 
    1995. Comments and materials should be submitted to the Service by May 
    12, 1995, to be considered in the 12-month finding.
    
    ADDRESSES: Data, information, comments, or questions concerning this 
    petition should be submitted to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and 
    Wildlife Service, Jackson Field Office, 6578 Dogwood View Parkway, 
    Suite A, Jackson, Mississippi 39213. The petition finding, supporting 
    data, and comments are available for public inspection, by appointment, 
    during normal business hours at the above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Hartfield, Biologist, at above 
    address (601-695-4900, ext. 25). [[Page 13398]] 
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as 
    amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that the Service make a 
    finding on whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species 
    presents substantial scientific or commercial information to 
    demonstrate that the petitioned action may be warranted. This finding 
    is to be based on all information available to the Service at the time 
    the finding is made. To the maximum extent practicable, this finding is 
    to be made within 90 days of the date the petition was received, and 
    the finding is to be published promptly in the Federal Register. If the 
    finding is that substantial information was presented, the Service also 
    is required to promptly commence a review of the status of the species 
    involved if one has not already been initiated under the Service's 
    internal candidate assessment process.
        The Service announces a 90-day finding on a petition requesting the 
    Service to list as endangered the southern population of the walleye 
    (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). The petition, dated August 20, 1994, 
    was submitted by Robert R. Reid, Jr. of Birmingham, Alabama, and was 
    received by the Service on August 22, 1994. The petition requested that 
    the southern population of the walleye be emergency listed as 
    endangered. The petitioner stated that the southern population of the 
    walleye is a genetically distinct population, deserving of specific or 
    subspecific rank, which merits listing because: (1) It has declined in 
    the Tombigbee River drainage, (2) remaining populations in the 
    Tombigbee River drainage are threatened by existing and proposed water 
    projects, and (3) it is rare in other Mobile River Basin drainages in 
    Alabama.
        The Service has reviewed the petition, the literature cited in the 
    petition, other literature, information available in the Service's 
    files, and has consulted with knowledgeable fisheries biologists. On 
    the basis of the best scientific and commercial information available, 
    the Service finds the petition presents substantial information that 
    listing this species may be warranted. Emergency listing is allowed 
    under the Act whenever immediate protection is needed to prevent 
    extirpation of a species. Based on currently available information, 
    emergency listing is not needed for the southern population of walleye.
        Electrophoretic analyses (Murphy 1990) and mitochondrial DNA 
    comparisons (Billington et al. 1992) have confirmed the genetic 
    uniqueness of the upper Tombigbee River population of walleye. Ongoing 
    studies of walleye populations in the Mobile River basin drainages of 
    Alabama have indicated that this distinct Gulf Coast strain of walleye 
    extends into that State (Mike Mecina, University of Auburn, Alabama, 
    pers. comm. 1994). The relationship of other Gulf Coast drainage 
    populations of walleye (e.g., Apalachicola River, Florida, Georgia; 
    Pearl River, Mississippi) to the Mobile River Basin population is 
    unknown and needs further investigation.
        Populations of walleye appear to be low in the Tombigbee River 
    drainage of Mississippi. Recent reports of walleye are documented in 
    several Tombigbee River tributaries in Mississippi, including the 
    Buttahatchee River, Sipsey, Bull Mountain, Yellow, Luxapalila, 
    Sucarnoochee, and Hashuqua Creeks (Dennis Riecke, Mississippi 
    Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, pers. comm. 1994). 
    Current information on the distribution of walleye in the Mobile Basin 
    drainages of Alabama is limited. Walleye collection localities within 
    the past 10 years in Alabama include the Black Warrior, Alabama, Little 
    Cahaba, Locust Fork, and lower Tallapoosa Rivers, and Euphappee, 
    Oakmulgee, and Hatchet Creeks (Fred Harders, Alabama Department of 
    Conservation, pers. comm. 1994; Malcolm Pierson, Alabama Power Company, 
    pers. comm. 1994).
        Service records indicate that potential walleye habitat throughout 
    the Mobile River Basin may have been affected or eliminated due to 
    impoundment of approximately 1,000 miles of river habitat, and/or by 
    extensive stream channelization. Erosion due to headcutting, a proposed 
    channelization project, and proposed impoundments pose additional 
    threats to the population. Walleye appear to require clean, relatively 
    swift streams for reproduction (Schultz 1971). Potential threats to 
    stream habitat quality in the Mobile River Basin include various point 
    source effluents (e.g. coal surface mining and sand/gravel mining), as 
    well as sediments, nutrients, and toxicants from non-point runoff.
        The Service solicits further information regarding occurrence and 
    distribution of the species, threats to its continued existence, and 
    any additional comments and suggestions from the public, other 
    concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community, industry, or 
    any other interested parties concerning the status of the southern 
    population of the walleye. Of particular interest is information 
    regarding:
        (1) Genetic composition of other walleye populations in Gulf Coast 
    drainages;
        (2) Additional historic and current population data that may assist 
    in determining range and long-term population trends;
        (3) Pertinent information on biology and life history; and,
        (4) Biological, commercial trade, or other relevant data concerning 
    any threat (or lack thereof) to populations of the southern walleye.
        After consideration of additional information, submitted during the 
    indicated time period (see DATES section), the Service will prepare a 
    12-month finding.
    
    References Cited
    
    Billington, N., R.J. Barrette, and P.D.N. Hebert. 1992. Management 
    implications of mitochondrial DNA variation in walleye stocks. North 
    American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:276-284.
    Murphy, B.R. 1990. Evidence for a genetically unique walleye 
    population in the upper Tombigee River system of northeastern 
    Mississippi. SFC Proceedings (22):14-16.
    Schultz, C.A. 1971. Survey of the walleye population and related 
    parameters in the Tombigee River system in Mississippi. Mississippi 
    Game and Fish Commission Final Report, Project F-23.
    
        Author: The primary author of this document is Paul Hartfield, 
    Jackson, Mississippi, Field Office (see ADDRESSES section).
        Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered 
    Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
    
        Dated: January 26, 1995.
    Mollie H. Beattie,
    Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-6143 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/13/1995
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of 90-day petition finding and initiation of status review.
Document Number:
95-6143
Dates:
The finding announced in this document was made on January 26, 1995. Comments and materials should be submitted to the Service by May 12, 1995, to be considered in the 12-month finding.
Pages:
13397-13398 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-6143.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 17