[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10339-10341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-5952]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. CP96-212-000, et al.]
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, et al., Natural Gas Certificate
Filings
March 6, 1996.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Colorado Interstate Gas Company
[Docket No. CP96-212-000]
Take notice that on February 26, 1996, Colorado Interstate Gas
Company (CIG), Post Office Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944,
filed in Docket No. CP96-212-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to operate in interstate
commerce certain facilities previously constructed or operated to
effectuate transportation services pursuant to Section 311 of the
Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA), and to construct and operate a new
delivery facility. CIG makes such request, under its blanket
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-21-000 pursuant to Section 7 of
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
Specifically, CIG indicates that it has constructed the following
facilities for the purpose of Section 311 transportation:
Cattle Guard Delivery Facility in Sherman County, Texas
Gooseberry Creek Delivery Facility in Washakie County, Wyoming
Dudley Bluffs Delivery Facility in Rio Blanco County, Colorado
Wilburton Delivery Facility in Morton County, Kansas
CIG seeks certificate authorization to construct and operate the
Town of Burlington, Wyoming Delivery Facility which is proposed to be
installed in Big Horn County, Wyoming.
By its request, CIG seeks authority to operate these facilities
pursuant to the blanket certificate provision of Section 7(c) of the
NGA so that any transportation shipper, without regard to Section 311
of the NGPA, may receive service when capacity on these facilities is
available.
CIG indicates that the operational constraints under Section 311,
have made it difficult for CIG to compete and be market responsive,
because Section 311 does not provide the operational flexibility
provided under Section 7.
CIG states that it believes that it would experience no significant
impact on its peak day or annual requirements resulting from the
operation of the subject facilities in interstate commerce, and that
operation other than strictly for Section 311 purposes can be performed
without detriment or disadvantage to CIG's other existing customers.
Comment date: April 22, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
G at the end of this notice.
2. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
[Docket No. CP96-213-000]
Take notice that Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia),
a Delaware corporation, having its
[[Page 10340]]
principal place of business at 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston,
West Virginia 25314-1599, filed on February 28, 1996, an abbreviated
application pursuant to Sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act,
as amended, for a certificate of public convenience and necessity
authorizing: (i) an increase in the performance capabilities of certain
existing storage fields; (ii) the construction and operation,
upgrading, and replacement of certain natural gas facilities; (iii) the
abandonment of certain natural gas facilities and certain base storage
gas; and (iv) such other authorizations and/or waivers as may be deemed
necessary to implement Columbia's Market Expansion Project (Project),
all as more fully set forth in the application on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
Columbia proposes to make certain improvements at a total estimated
cost of approximately $350 million (in current year dollars) to expand
the capacity of its pipeline and storage systems in order to serve
customers' requests for new or increased firm services. Columbia
requests that it be granted rolled-in rate treatment for the Project's
costs.
In total, Columbia will provide 506,795 dekatherms per day (dth/d)
of additional daily firm entitlements, comprised of 417,931 dth/d of
Firm Storage Service (FSS) and Storage Service Transportation (SST);
88,864 dth/d of Firm Transportation Service (FTS); and 24,197,764 dth
of additional FSS Storage Contract Quantity (SCQ), to be phased in over
a three-year period beginning in 1997.
Columbia proposes construction in its storage and transmission
systems. The proposed storage system work includes increasing the
performance capabilities of 14 existing storage fields by constructing
and operating certain new facilities and replacing certain facilities
in order to increase seasonal turnover of approximately 18,500 MMcf and
additional maximum deliverability of approximately 370 MMcf/d. This
work also includes increasing the maximum capacity of Columbia's
Crawford Storage Field by approximately 10,200 MMcf. Columbia also
proposes to confirm the storage boundaries for certain of its storage
fields. Columbia's proposed transmission work includes construction of
approximately 88 miles of new pipeline, replacement of approximately
8.5 miles of existing pipeline and increasing the maximum Allowable
Operating Pressure of approximately 282 miles of pipeline.
Further, Columbia proposes to construct, relocate (abandon and re-
install) and uprate approximately 35,750 total horsepower at 14
existing transmission compressor stations; approximately 18,500 total
horsepower at two new transmission compressor stations; and increase
certificated horsepower levels of nine existing units at six
transmission stations by a total of 5,579 horsepower. In addition,
Columbia proposes to modify, upgrade, or construct 14 measuring and
appurtenant facilities which relate to increases in Maximum Daily
Delivery Obligations and new points of delivery associated with
Columbia's firm service increases.
The Commission's Staff will defer processing Columbia's proposal
pending the submission of complete environmental information which is
necessary to evaluate its application.
Comment date: March 27, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
3. Transwestern Pipeline Company
[Docket No. CP96-214-000]
Take notice that, on February 27, 1996, Transwestern Pipeline
Company (Transwestern), 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed
an abbreviated application in Docket No. CP96-214-000, pursuant to
Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of the Commission's
regulations, for authorization to abandon, by sale to West Texas Gas,
Inc. (WTG), 59 farm tap facilities located in Texas and New Mexico,
along with the related service Transwestern renders through those
facilities, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
Transwestern states that the farm tap facilities it seeks to
abandon, by sale to WTG, are currently jurisdictional. The subject
facilities are located downstream of Transwestern's first above-ground
valve, and consist of the pipe, measuring instruments, regulating
equipment, relief devices, valves, fittings, fence and other equipment
appurtenant to each farm tap. Transwestern states that it will retain
the facilities upstream of each first above-ground valve, including the
valve and associated riser.
Transwestern further states that: (1) WTG already provides service
to customers at 24 of the subject farm taps under an interruptible
transportation agreement with Transwestern; (2) another 20 of the
subject farm tap facilities are being served under agreement with
Transwestern (under Transwestern's Rate Schedule FTS-2); and (3)
Transwestern's records list the remaining 15 farm tap facilities as
``inactive'' or ``no flows.''
According to Transwestern, after it abandons and WTG acquires the
subject facilities, WTG will operate them as part of its local
distribution activities, subject to the jurisdiction of the applicable
state regulatory authority. Transwestern asserts that the public
convenience and necessity requires the approval of the proposed
abandonment, by sale to WTG, because: (1) Transwestern no longer has a
merchant function; (2) entities such as WTG have assumed the merchant
role and now engage in the sale and distribution of gas to former
Transwestern customers; (3) the subject facilities will remain in place
after the proposed change in ownership and will continue to be operated
by WTG, since WTG has no plans to abandon service through these
facilities; and (4) the proposed change in ownership will enable
Transwestern to operate its own system more efficiently and
effectively.
Comment date: March 27, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
4. Northern Natural Gas Company
[Docket No. CP96-215-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern) filed an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural
Gas Act and Sections 157.7 and 157.18 of the Commission's Regulations,
for approval to abandon, by sale to West Texas Gas, Inc. (WGT), certain
pipeline facilities with appurtenances, in Irion and Reagan Counties,
Texas, and services rendered thereby. Northern also requests permission
and approval to abandon, by sale to WGT, certain small volume measuring
stations, with appurtenances, located in various counties in Texas, all
as more fully set forth in this request which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
Comment date: March 27, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
5. CNG Transmission Corporation
[Docket No. CP96-222-000]
Take notice that on February 29, 1996, CNG Transmission Corporation
(CNGT), 445 West Main Street, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301, filed in
Docket No. CP96-222-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act to increase the horsepower at CNGT's Finnefrock
Compressor Station (Unit #4) in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, all as
more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection.
[[Page 10341]]
CNGT requests authorization to increase the certificated operating
horsepower of its Unit #4 at Finnefrock Compressor Station from 3,400
to 4,000 horsepower. CNGT states that it will not be necessary to
modify any facilities as a result of the upgrade.
Comment date: March 27, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
F. Any person desiring to be heard or make any protest with
reference to said filing should on or before the comment date file with
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) and the Regulations under
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the
Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate
action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties
to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding
or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion
to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this filing if no motion to intervene is filed within the time required
herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a
grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for the applicant to appear or be represented at
the hearing.
G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after
the issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to
Rule 214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion
to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205
of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed
therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized
effective the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-5952 Filed 3-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
