96-5968. Exemption of the Securities of the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Argentina, and the Republic of Venezuela Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Purposes of Trading Futures Contracts on those Securities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 13, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 10271-10274]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-5968]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    17 CFR Part 240
    
    [Release No. 34-36940, International Series Release No. 948, File No. 
    S7-34-95]
    RIN 3235-AG68
    
    
    Exemption of the Securities of the Federative Republic of Brazil, 
    the Republic of Argentina, and the Republic of Venezuela Under the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Purposes of Trading Futures 
    Contracts on those Securities
    
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
    ``Commission'') is adopting an amendment to Rule 3a12-8 under the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that would designate debt obligations 
    issued by the Federative Republic of Brazil (``Brazil''), the Republic 
    of Argentina (``Argentina''), and the Republic of Venezuela 
    (``Venezuela'') (collectively the ``Additional Countries'') as 
    ``exempted securities'' for the purpose of marketing and trading 
    futures contracts on those securities in the United States. The purpose 
    of this amendment is solely to permit futures on the sovereign debt of 
    the Additional Countries to be traded in the United States. This change 
    is not intended to have any substantive effect on the operation of the 
    Rule.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 1996.
    
    
    [[Page 10272]]
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James T. McHale, Attorney, Office of 
    Market Supervision (``OMS''), Division of Market Regulation 
    (``Division''), Securities and Exchange Commission (Mail Stop 5-1), 450 
    Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at (202) 942-0190.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        Under the Commodity Exchange Act (``CEA''), it is unlawful to trade 
    a futures contract on any individual security, unless the security in 
    question is an exempted security (other than a municipal security) for 
    the purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act'') or the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').\1\ Debt obligations 
    of foreign governments are not exempted securities under either of 
    these statutes. The Commission, however, has adopted Rule 3a12-8 under 
    the Exchange Act (``Rule'') \2\ to designate debt obligations issued by 
    certain foreign governments as exempted securities under the Exchange 
    Act solely for the purpose of marketing and trading futures contracts 
    on those securities in the United States. The foreign governments 
    currently designated in the Rule are Great Britain, Canada, Japan, 
    Australia, France, New Zealand, Austria, Denmark, Finland, the 
    Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, the Republic of Ireland, Italy, the 
    Kingdom of Spain, and Mexico (the ``Designated Foreign Governments''). 
    As a result of being included in the Rule, futures contracts on the 
    debt obligations of these countries may be sold in the United States, 
    as long as the other terms of the Rule are satisfied.
    
        \1\ The term ``exempted security'' is defined in Section 3 of 
    the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 77c, and Section 3(a)(12) of the 
    Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78c(a)(12).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.3a12-8
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        On December 13, 1995, the Commission issued a release proposing to 
    amend Rule 3a12-8 to designate the debt obligations of the Additional 
    Countries as exempted securities, solely for the purpose of futures 
    trading.\3\ No comment letters were received in response to the 
    proposal.
    
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36580 (``Proposing 
    Release'') (December 13, 1995), 60 FR 65607 (December 20, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission is adopting this amendment to the Rule, adding 
    Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela to the list of countries whose debt 
    obligations are exempted by Rule 3a12-8. In order to qualify for the 
    exemption, futures contracts on debt obligations of the Additional 
    Countries would have to meet all the other requirements of the Rule.
    
    II. Background
    
        Rule 3a12-8 was adopted in 1984 \4\ pursuant to the exemptive 
    authority in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act in order to provide a 
    limited exception to the CEA's prohibition on the trading of futures 
    overlying individual securities.\5\ As originally adopted, the Rule 
    provided that debt obligations of the United Kingdom and Canada would 
    be deemed to be exempted securities, solely for the purpose of 
    permitting the offer, sale, and confirmation of ``qualifying foreign 
    futures contracts'' on such securities, so long as the securities in 
    question were neither registered under the Securities Act nor the 
    subject of any American depositary receipt so registered. A futures 
    contract on such a debt obligation is deemed under the Rule to be a 
    ``qualifying foreign futures contract'' if delivery under the contract 
    is settled outside the United States and is traded on a board of 
    trade.\6\
    
        \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 20708 (``Original 
    Adopting Release'') (March 2, 1984), 49 FR 8595 (March 8, 1984) and 
    19811 (``Original Proposing Release'') (May 25, 1983), 48 FR 24725 
    (June 2, 1983).
        \5\ In enacting the Futures Trading Act of 1982, Congress 
    expressed its understanding that neither the SEC nor the Commodity 
    Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') had intended to bar the sale 
    of futures contracts on debt obligations of the United Kingdom of 
    Great Britain and Northern Ireland (``United Kingdom'') to U.S. 
    persons, and its expectation that administrative action would be 
    taken to allow the sale of such futures contracts in the United 
    States. See Original Proposing Release, supra note 4, 48 FR at 24725 
    [citing 128 Cong. Rec. H7492 (daily ed. September 23, 1982) 
    (statements of Representatives Daschle and Wirth)].
        \6\ As originally adopted, the Rule required that the board of 
    trade be located in the country that issued the underlying 
    securities. This requirement was eliminated in 1987. See Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 24209 (March 12, 1987), 52 FR 8875 (March 
    20, 1987).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The conditions imposed by the Rule were intended to facilitate the 
    trading of futures contracts on foreign government securities in the 
    United States while requiring offerings of foreign government 
    securities to comply with the federal securities laws. Accordingly, the 
    conditions set forth in the Rule were designed to ensure that markets 
    for futures on these instruments would not be used to avoid the 
    securities law registration requirements.
        Subsequently, the Commission amended the Rule to include the debt 
    securities issued by Japan, Australia, France, New Zealand, Austria, 
    Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Ireland, 
    Italy, Spain, and, most recently, Mexico.7
    
        \7\ As originally adopted, the Rule applied only to British and 
    Canadian government debt securities. See Original Adopting Release, 
    supra note 4. In 1986, the Rule was amended to include Japanese 
    government debt securities. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    23423 (July 11, 1986), 51 FR 25996 (July 18, 1986). In 1987, the 
    Rule was amended to include debt securities issued by Australia, 
    France and New Zealand. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    25072 (October 29, 1987), 52 FR 42277 (November 4, 1987). In 1988, 
    the Rule was amended to include debt securities issued by Austria, 
    Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and West Germany. 
    See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 26217 (October 26, 1988), 53 
    FR 43860 (October 31, 1988). In 1992 the Rule was again amended to 
    (1) include debt securities offered by the Republic of Ireland and 
    Italy, (2) change the country designation of ``West Germany'' to the 
    ``Federal Republic of Germany,'' and (3) replace all references to 
    the informal names of the countries listed in the Rule with 
    references to their official names. See Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 30166 (January 6, 1992), 57 FR 1375 (January 14, 1992). 
    In 1994, the Rule was amended to include debt securities issued by 
    the Kingdom of Spain. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34908 
    (October 27, 1994), 59 FR 54812 (November 2, 1994). Finally, in 1995 
    the Rule was amended to include Mexican sovereign debt. See 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36530 (November 30, 1995) 60 FR 
    62323 (December 6, 1995) (``Mexico Adopting Release'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') has informed the 
    Commission that U.S. citizens may be interested in futures products 
    based on the debt obligations of the Additional Countries, and has 
    requested that Rule 3a12-8 be amended to facilitate such trading.8 
    The CME has represented that it intends to develop a futures contract 
    market in Brady bonds issued by the Additional Countries.9 Brady 
    bonds are issued pursuant to the Brady plan, which allows developing 
    countries to restructure their commercial bank debt by issuing long-
    term dollar denominated bonds.10 The Commission
    
    [[Page 10273]]
    understands that Brady bonds issued by the Additional Countries are 
    currently traded primarily in the over-the-counter market in the United 
    States.
    
        \8\ See Letter from William J. Brodsky, President and Chief 
    Executive Officer, CME, to Arthur Levitt, Jr., Chairman, Commission, 
    dated November 10, 1995 (``CME Petition''). The Commission 
    subsequently received a request from the New York Cotton Exchange 
    (``NYCE'') to amend the Rule to include the same Additional 
    Countries. See Letter from Philip McBride Johnson, Esq., Skadden, 
    Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, 
    Commission, dated November 30, 1995.
        \9\ The marketing and trading of foreign futures contracts is 
    subject to regulation by the CFTC. In particular, Section 4b of the 
    CEA authorizes the CFTC to regulate the offer and sale of foreign 
    futures contracts to U.S. residents, and Rule 9 (17 CFR 30.9), 
    promulgated under Section 2(a)(1)(A) of the CEA, is intended to 
    prohibit fraud in connection with the offer and sale to U.S. persons 
    of futures contracts executed on foreign exchanges. Additional rules 
    promulgated under 2(a)(1)(A) of the CEA govern the domestic offer 
    and sale of futures and options contracts traded on foreign boards 
    of trade. These rules require, among other things, that the domestic 
    offer and sale of foreign futures be effected through the CFTC 
    registrants or through entities subject to a foreign regulatory 
    framework comparable to that governing domestic futures trading. See 
    17 CFR 30.3, 30.4, and 30.5 (1991).
        \10\ There are several types of Brady bonds, but ``Par Bradys'' 
    and ``Discount Bradys'' represent the great majority of issues in 
    the Brady bond market. In general, both Par Bradys and Discount 
    Bradys are secured as to principal at maturity by U.S. Treasury 
    zero-coupon bonds. Additionally, usually 12 to 18 months of interest 
    payments are also secured in the form of a cash collateral account, 
    which is maintained to pay interest in the event that the sovereign 
    debtor misses an interest payment.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission is amending Rule 3a12-8 to add Brazil, Argentina, 
    and Venezuela to the list of countries whose debt obligations are 
    deemed to be ``exempted securities'' under the terms of the Rule. Under 
    this amendment, the existing conditions set forth in the Rule (i.e., 
    that the underlying securities not be registered in the United 
    States,11 that the futures contracts require delivery outside the 
    United States,12 and that the contracts be traded on a board of 
    trade) would continue to apply.
    
        \11\ The Commission notes that while no Brady bonds issued by 
    the Additional Countries are currently registered in the United 
    States, certain sovereign debt issues of Argentina and Venezuela 
    have been so registered. Futures on U.S.-registered debt securities 
    of Argentina and Venezuela (or any sovereign debt which in the 
    future becomes so registered) would not be deemed exempt securities 
    under Rule 3a12-8.
        \12\ The CME's proposed futures contracts will be cash-settled 
    (i.e., settlement of the futures contracts will not entail delivery 
    of the underlying securities). The Commission has recognized that a 
    cash-settled futures contract is consistent with the requirement of 
    the Rule that delivery must be made outside the United States. See 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 25072 (October 29, 1987), 52 FR 
    42277 (November 4, 1987).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        For the reasons discussed below, the Commission finds that it is 
    consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors 
    that Rule 3a12-8 be amended to include the sovereign debt obligations 
    of the Additional Countries. The Commission believes that the trading 
    of futures contracts on the sovereign debt of the Additional Countries 
    could provide U.S. investors and dealers with a vehicle for hedging the 
    risks involved in holding debt instruments of the Additional Countries 
    and that the sovereign debt of the Additional Countries should be 
    subject to the same regulatory treatment under the Rule as that of the 
    Designated Foreign Governments.
        In determining whether to amend the Rule to add proposed countries, 
    the Commission has considered whether there is an active and liquid 
    secondary trading market in the particular sovereign debt. In this 
    regard, the amount of outstanding sovereign debt of Brazil, Argentina, 
    and Venezuela is large and secondary trading appears to be active and 
    liquid. According to the CME, as of December 31, 1993, the total public 
    and publicly guaranteed debt 13 of Brazil, Argentina, and 
    Venezuela was approximately US$86 billion, US$55 billion, and US$74 
    billion, respectively.14 Moreover, the cash market for Brady bonds 
    issued by the Additional Countries evidences relatively active trading. 
    Based on data provided by the CME, the total 1994 trading volume in the 
    Brady bonds of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela was approximately 
    US$371 billion, US$360 billion, and US$320 billion, 
    respectively.15 As is the case for all sovereign issuers, there 
    are less actively traded sovereign debt instruments issued by the 
    Additional Countries, but the Commission believes that as a whole the 
    sovereign debt market for the Additional Countries is sufficiently 
    liquid and deep for purposes of Rule 3a12-8. Accordingly, the 
    Commission believes that it is appropriate to exempt the sovereign debt 
    of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela because of the overall depth and 
    liquidity of the existing cash market in the Additional Countries 
    sovereign debt.
    
        \13\ Public debt is an external obligation of a public debtor, 
    including the national government, a political subdivision (or any 
    agency of either) and autonomous public bodies. Publicly guaranteed 
    debt is an external obligation of a private debtor that is 
    guaranteed for repayment by a public entity.
        \14\ See Letter from Carl A. Royal, Senior Vice President and 
    Special Counsel, CME, to James T. McHale, Attorney, OMS, Division, 
    Commission, dated November 30, 1995 (citing the World Bank's 1995 
    World Debt Tables as the source for this information) (``November 30 
    letter''). As mentioned earlier, the Commission recently amended the 
    Rule to include the debt securities of Mexico. As of March 31, 1995 
    there was approximately US$87.5 billion face amount Mexican 
    government debt issued and outstanding of various classes and 
    maturities. See Mexico Adopting Release, supra note 7.
        \15\ See November 30 letter, supra note 14. The total 1994 
    dollar-based trading volume in Mexican Brady bonds was approximately 
    US$282.3 billion. See Mexico Adopting Release, supra note 7.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also believes that the amendment offers potential 
    benefits for U.S. investors. As stated above, the amendment will allow 
    U.S. boards of trade to offer in the United States, and U.S. investors 
    to trade, a greater range of futures contracts on foreign government 
    debt obligations. Specifically, the trading of futures on the sovereign 
    debt of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela should provide U.S. investors 
    with a vehicle for hedging the risks involved in holding positions in 
    the underlying sovereign debt of the Additional Countries. The 
    Commission does not anticipate that the amendment will result in any 
    direct cost for U.S. investors or others. The amendment will impose no 
    recordkeeping or compliance burdens, and merely would provide a limited 
    purpose exemption under the federal securities laws. The restrictions 
    imposed under the amendment are identical to the restrictions currently 
    imposed under the terms of the Rule and are designed to protect U.S. 
    investors.
        In the Proposing Release the Commission solicited comment on the 
    general application and operation of the Rule given the increased 
    globalization of the securities markets since the Rule was adopted. The 
    Commission intends to consider this issue further, but does not believe 
    it should delay the inclusion of the Additional Countries in the list 
    of countries whose debt obligations are exempted under Rule 3a12-8. 
    Nevertheless, the Commission continues to welcome suggestions on 
    potential restructuring of Rule 3a12-8 to adapt to the ever-increasing 
    internationalization of the securities markets.
    
    IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act Consideration
    
        Chairman Levitt has certified in connection with the Proposing 
    Release that this amendment, if adopted, would not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The 
    Commission received no comments on this certification.
    
    V. Effects on Competition and Other Findings
    
        Section 23(a)(2) of the Exchange Act 16 requires the 
    Commission, in adopting rules under the Exchange Act, to consider the 
    competitive effects of such rules, if any, and to balance any impact 
    with the regulatory benefits gained in terms of furthering the purposes 
    of the Exchange Act. The Commission has considered the amendment to the 
    Rule in light of the standards cited in Section 23(a)(2) and believes 
    that adoption of the amendment will not impose any burden on 
    competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes 
    of the Exchange Act. As stated above, the amendment is designed to 
    assure the lawful availability in this country of futures contracts on 
    the government debt of the Additional Countries that otherwise would 
    not be permitted to be marketed under the terms of the CEA. The 
    amendment thus serves to expand the range of financial products 
    available in the United States and enhances competition in financial 
    markets. Insofar as the Rule contains limitations, they are designed to 
    promote the purposes of the Exchange Act by ensuring that futures 
    trading on government securities of the Additional Countries is 
    consistent with the goals and purposes of the federal securities
    
    [[Page 10274]]
    laws by minimizing the impact of the Rule on securities trading and 
    distribution in the United States.
    
        \16\ 15 U.S.C Sec. 78w(a)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Because the amendment to the Rule is exemptive in nature, the 
    Commission has determined to make the foregoing action effective 
    immediately upon publication in the Federal Register.17
    
        \17\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 553(d).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    VI. Statutory Basis
    
        The amendment to Rule 3a12-8 is being adopted pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 78a et seq., particularly Sections 3(a)(12) and 23(a), 15 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 78c(a)(12) and 78w(a).
    
    List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 240
    
        Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.
    
    Text of the Adopted Amendment
    
        For the reasons set forth above, the Commission is amending Part 
    240 of Chapter II, Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as 
    follows:
    
    PART 240--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 
    1934
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 240 continues to read in part as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77eee, 77ggg, 
    77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78d, 78i, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78p, 
    78q, 78s, 78w, 78x, 78ll(d), 79q, 79t, 80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-
    37, 80b-3, 80b-4 and 80b-11, unless otherwise noted.
    * * * * *
        2. Section 240.3a12-8 is amended by removing the word ``or'' at the 
    end of paragraph (a)(1)(xv), removing the ``period'' at the end of 
    paragraph (a)(1)(xvi) and adding ``;'' in its place, and adding 
    paragraph (a)(1)(xvii), paragraph (a)(1)(xviii), and paragraph 
    (a)(1)(xix) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 240.3a12-8  Exemption for designated foreign government securities 
    for purposes of futures trading.
    
        (a) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (xvii) the Federative Republic of Brazil;
        (xviii) the Republic of Argentina; or
        (xix) the Republic of Venezuela.
    * * * * *
        Dated: March 7, 1996.
    
        By the Commission.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-5968 Filed 3-12-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/13/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-5968
Dates:
March 13, 1996.
Pages:
10271-10274 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36940, International Series Release No. 948, File No. S7-34-95
RINs:
3235-AG68
PDF File:
96-5968.pdf
CFR: (1)
17 CFR 240.3a12-8