98-6557. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad CorporationConstruction and Operationin Campbell, Converse, Niobrara, and Weston Counties, WY, Custer, Fall River, Jackson, and Pennington Counties, SD and Blue Earth, Nicollet, and Steele Counties, MN  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 12576-12577]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-6557]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Surface Transportation Board
    [STB Finance Docket No. 33407]
    
    
    Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation--Construction 
    and Operation--in Campbell, Converse, Niobrara, and Weston Counties, 
    WY, Custer, Fall River, Jackson, and Pennington Counties, SD and Blue 
    Earth, Nicollet, and Steele Counties, MN
    
    AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
    
    ACTION: Notice of construction and operation application and request 
    for comments on procedural schedule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Board is publishing notice of an application filed by the 
    Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM&E) requesting 
    authority to construct and operate 280.09 miles of new railroad line, 
    which would provide for an extension of DM&E's existing rail lines into 
    the Powder River Basin coal fields in northeastern Wyoming. 
    Specifically, the railroad seeks authority to build: (1) a 262.03-mile 
    rail line between DM&E's existing main line in western South Dakota and 
    the coal producing region of the Powder River Basin (PRB) south of 
    Gillette, WY; (2) a 13.31-mile rail bypass around a portion of the line 
    currently used by DM&E in and near Mankato, MN; and (3) a new 2.94-mile 
    rail connection in Owatonna, MN, between DM&E's line and the line of 
    I&M Rail Link, LLC.1 This notice also requests comments on a 
    procedural schedule based on a schedule that DM&E has asked the Board 
    to establish for this proceeding.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ DM&E also plans several related projects, which it states 
    are not subject to the Board's jurisdiction. These include the 
    comprehensive rebuilding of approximately 597.8 miles of its 
    existing rail lines consisting of: (1) a 467.55-mile segment of DM&E 
    main line between Wasta, SD, and Mankato; (2) a 117.4-miles segment 
    of DM&E main line between Mankato and Winona, MN; and (3) a 12.85-
    mile segment of DM&E branch line north of Oral, SD, to a point south 
    of Smithwick, SD. DM&E plans to perform a substantial upgrading of 
    an additional 239.3 miles of its existing rail lines, including the 
    relocation and upgrading of an existing connection with Canadian 
    Pacific Railroad near Winona/Minnesota City.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be filed by April 2, 1998 and concurrently 
    served on applicant's representatives. Each comment must be accompanied 
    by a certificate of service. Applicant's reply must be filed by April 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    7, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to 
    STB Finance Docket No. 33407 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office 
    of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, 
    DC 20423. A copy of each comment shall concurrently be served upon 
    DM&E's representative: Paul A. Cunningham, Harkins Cunningham, 1300 
    19th Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036-1609 [Fax (202) 973-
    7610]. Comments should contain the name and address of the commenting 
    party, any recommendations for changes to the attached proposed 
    procedural schedule and support for any such changes.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 565-1600. 
    [TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Along with its application, DM&E has 
    submitted a petition to establish a procedural schedule for this 
    proceeding. DM&E's proposed schedule would establish various due dates 
    for submissions and due dates for Board action, both in considering the 
    merits of the application and in carrying out the environmental review 
    process.
        We believe it would be premature at this point to establish any 
    sort of environmental review schedule for the Board to meet its 
    responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
    (NEPA) and related environmental laws. We lack substantive input from 
    other Federal and state agencies (for example, the U.S. Forest Service, 
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 
    Wyoming State Historic Preservation Division) that may have an interest 
    in this proceeding. Without information from these agencies, we cannot 
    anticipate the range of potential environmental impacts that may be 
    involved with DM&E's proposal and how long the Environmental Impact 
    Statement (EIS) process is likely to take.2 We have, 
    however, directed our Section of Environmental Analysis to begin 
    preparation of a notice of intent to prepare an EIS and to initiate the 
    public scoping process. This will enable us to begin to determine key 
    environmental issues to be addressed in our NEPA analysis as 
    expeditiously as possible.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Of course, if DM&E could work with these agencies to secure 
    appropriate permits, identify potential environmental impacts, and 
    minimize or avoid such effects, the time required for us to meet our 
    NEPA obligations might be reduced.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        With regard to the merits of the application, DM&E has proposed 
    alternative schedules of 90 and 180 days in which to develop the record 
    and issue a decision on the merits, conditioned upon completion of the 
    environmental review process and consideration of the results of that 
    process in a final decision.3 The proposal by DM&E that we 
    issue a decision in 90 days does not warrant further consideration, and 
    we will not request comments on it. That proposal simply does not 
    provide adequate opportunity for public participation. Nor does it 
    provide adequate time for the necessary evaluation of the record in 
    light of the statutory considerations we must undertake in this case. 
    The proposed 180-day alternative, however, does appear to provide 
    adequate opportunity for public participation and for development of a 
    sufficient record on which to base a conditional grant of the 
    application and make the findings required by the statute. Therefore, 
    we are seeking comments on the proposal by DM&E that we issue a 
    decision in 180 days approving the applicant's construction proposal 
    under section
    
    [[Page 12577]]
    
    10901 of the ICC Termination Act, conditioned upon consideration of the 
    environmental impacts of the proposed construction. Under that 
    proposal, we would issue a subsequent decision after the completion of 
    the EIS process, allowing construction to begin, if appropriate, based 
    on a consideration of the potential environmental impacts of the 
    proposed transaction.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ No actual construction could begin prior to issuance of that 
    decision.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We understand that the DM&E has caused notices to be published 
    stating that comments on the application are due March 27, 1998. While 
    interested parties may file comments by March 27, 1998, the Board will 
    establish a new due date for comments on the merits of the proposed 
    transaction in any procedural schedule it ultimately adopts. 
    Accordingly, we will require DM&E to cause notices to be published in 
    the same places as the prior notices advising that comments will not be 
    due until the Board establishes a procedural schedule. And after the 
    Board publishes such a schedule, DM&E must cause to be published new 
    notices setting forth the schedule adopted by the Board, including the 
    due date for comments on the merits of the proposed transaction.
        The purpose of this notice is to solicit input as to the 
    establishment of a procedural schedule that provides adequate time for 
    the submission and consideration of comments while still enabling the 
    proceeding to move forward as expeditiously as possible.4 
    After reviewing the comments, the Board will establish an appropriate 
    procedural schedule for consideration of the merits of the construction 
    application.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ DM&E's proposed 180-day schedule is set forth in the 
    attached Appendix, but is modified to reflect the removal of the 
    portion of the schedule pertaining to environmental review and to 
    reflect the current status of this matter.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Board's review of construction applications is governed by both 
    49 U.S.C. section 10901 and the requirements of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. sections 4321-4370d. The 
    Board intends to prepare an EIS to assess the environmental impacts of 
    DM&E's proposal. The Board's Section of Environmental Analysis will 
    separately publish a notice of intent to prepare an EIS and request 
    comments on its scope.
        Copies of the application are available for public inspection at 
    the offices of the Board and the offices of the applicant, 337 22nd 
    Avenue South, Brookings, SD 57006.
    
        Decided: March 9, 1998.
    
        By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
    Vernon A. Williams,
    Secretary.
    
    Appendix--Procedural Schedule on the Merits
    
        In the following schedule, the term ``P'' refers to the date 
    that the Board issues a procedural schedule based on the comments 
    received from this notice and ``P + n'' means ``n'' days following 
    that date.
    
    P
        Procedural schedule established by the Board.
    P + 7
        Due date for publication by DM&E of newspaper notice announcing 
    the procedural schedule.
    P + 35
        Due date for written comments on Application.
    P + 40
        Due date for DM&E's replies to written comments on Application.
    P + 70
        Board decision ordering hearing under modified procedures.
    P + 115
        Due date for evidence and argument in opposition to the 
    Application.
    P+ 135
        Due date for DM&E's reply evidence and argument in support of 
    the Application.
    P + 180 (or earlier)
        Service of decision (a) conditionally approving Application, 
    contingent on completion of environmental review process, or (b) 
    disapproving Application.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-6557 Filed 3-12-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/13/1998
Department:
Surface Transportation Board
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of construction and operation application and request for comments on procedural schedule.
Document Number:
98-6557
Dates:
Written comments must be filed by April 2, 1998 and concurrently served on applicant's representatives. Each comment must be accompanied by a certificate of service. Applicant's reply must be filed by April
Pages:
12576-12577 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
STB Finance Docket No. 33407
PDF File:
98-6557.pdf