98-6618. Tomatoes Grown in Florida and Imported Tomatoes; Final Rule to Change Minimum Grade Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 12396-12401]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-6618]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 966 and 980
    
    [Docket No. FV98-966-1 FR]
    
    
    Tomatoes Grown in Florida and Imported Tomatoes; Final Rule to 
    Change Minimum Grade Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule increases the minimum grade requirements for 
    Florida and imported tomatoes. The grade requirements are changed from 
    U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2. The change in grade requirements will help 
    the Florida tomato industry meet domestic market needs, increase 
    returns to producers, and provide consumers with higher quality 
    tomatoes. Application of the increased grade requirements to imported 
    tomatoes is required under section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Nissen, Southeast Marketing 
    Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 301 Third Street, N.W., Suite 206, 
    Winter Haven, Florida 33881; telephone: (941) 299-4770, Fax: (941) 299-
    5169; or George Kelhart, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-
    6632. Small businesses may request information on compliance with this 
    regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
    Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 
    96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 
    205-6632.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 125 and Marketing Order No. 966, both as amended (7 CFR 
    part 966), regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in certain 
    designated counties in Florida, hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
    674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, 
    or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
    
    [[Page 12397]]
    
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Section 8e of the Act specifies that whenever certain specified 
    commodities, including tomatoes, are regulated under a Federal 
    marketing order, imports of those commodities must meet the same or 
    comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements as those in 
    effect for the domestically produced commodity. There are no 
    administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial 
    challenge to the provisions of import regulations issued under section 
    8e of the Act.
        Under the order, tomatoes produced in the production area and 
    shipped to fresh market channels outside the regulated area are 
    required to meet grade, size, inspection, and container requirements. 
    These requirements are specified in Sec. 966.323 of the handling 
    regulation issued under the order. These requirements apply during the 
    period October 10 through June 15 each year. The regulated area 
    includes the portion of the State of Florida which is bounded by the 
    Suwannee River, the Georgia border, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Gulf of 
    Mexico. That is, the entire State of Florida, except the panhandle. The 
    production area is part of the regulated area. Specialty packed red 
    ripe tomatoes, yellow meated tomatoes, and single and double layer 
    place packed tomatoes are exempt from container net weight 
    requirements.
        Under Sec. 966.323, all tomatoes, except for pear shaped, paste, 
    cherry, hydroponic, and greenhouse tomatoes, must be inspected as 
    specified in the United States Standards for Grades of Fresh Tomatoes 
    (7 CFR part 51.1855 through 51.1877; standards). Through February 3, 
    1998, such tomatoes had to be at least 2\8/32\ inches in diameter, and 
    sized with proper equipment in one or more of the following ranges of 
    diameters.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Inches     Inches 
                      Size designation                    minimum   maximum 
                                                         diameter  diameter.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Medium.............................................   2\8/32\   2\17/32\
    Large..............................................  2\16/32\   2\25/32\
    Extra Large........................................  2\24/32\  .........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        These size designations and diameter ranges are the same as 
    specified in Sec. 51.1859 of the standards. All tomatoes in the Medium 
    size designation were required to grade at least a U.S. No. 2, while 
    tomatoes in the larger size designations were only required to grade at 
    least a U.S. No. 3. Section 966.52 of the order provides authority for 
    the establishment and modification of regulations applicable to the 
    handling of particular grades, sizes, and size designations of 
    tomatoes.
        This rule increases the minimum grade requirements from U.S. No. 3 
    to U.S. No. 2 for all tomatoes regardless of size. This change in grade 
    requirements was recommended by the Florida Tomato Committee 
    (Committee) on September 5, 1997, by a vote of 10 in favor and 2 
    opposed. The grade requirement change eliminates shipments of U.S. No. 
    3 grade tomatoes from the regulated area. The opponents of this change 
    stated that there were good markets for U.S. No. 3 tomatoes in years of 
    short supply, and when crop quality was down due to adverse weather 
    conditions. The members in favor countered stating that during normal 
    seasons U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes comprised a small share of total 
    shipments and that such shipments had a price depressing effect on the 
    higher quality tomatoes shipped during those seasons.
        At the same meeting, the Committee unanimously recommended an 
    increase in the diameter size requirement for Florida tomatoes from 
    2\8/32\ inches to 2\9/32\ inches, that the size designations of Medium, 
    Large, and Extra Large be changed to numeric size designations of 
    6 x 7, 6 x 6, and 5 x 6, respectively, and that the diameter size 
    ranges for the designated sizes be increased slightly. These size 
    ranges are different from those specified in Sec. 51.1859 of the 
    standards. The minimum size and size designation changes were addressed 
    in a separate rulemaking action. That action was published in the 
    Federal Register on October 6, 1997 (62 FR 52047). Interested persons 
    were invited to submit written comments until October 16, 1997. 
    Subsequently, the period for comments was reopened until November 5, 
    1997, by a document published in the Federal Register on October 22, 
    1997 (62 FR 54809). After evaluating all comments received, the 
    Department issued a final rule on December 30, 1997, implementing the 
    recommended size increase and size designation changes. That final rule 
    was published on January 5, 1998, with the changes effective on 
    February 4, 1998 (63 FR 139).
        The changes in that final rule require tomatoes to be at least 2\9/
    32\ inches in diameter, and sized with proper equipment in one or more 
    of the following ranges of diameters (63 FR 139; January 5, 1998). 
    These size designations and diameter ranges are not the same as those 
    specified in Sec. 51.1859 of the standards.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Inches    Inches 
                      Size designation                     minimum   maximum
                                                          diameter  diameter
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    6 x 7 (Formerly Medium).............................   2\9/32\  2\19/32\
    6 x 6 (Formerly Large)..............................  2\17/32\  2\27/32\
    5 x 6 (Formerly Extra Large)........................  2\25/32\  ........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Based on an analysis of markets and demands of buyers, the 
    Committee believes that increasing the minimum grade from U.S. No. 3 to 
    U.S. No. 2 will improve the marketing of Florida and foreign produced 
    tomatoes, and protect the entire market from the price depressing 
    effects of poorer quality tomatoes from both domestic and foreign 
    supply sources. The increase in grade requirements is expected to 
    prevent low-quality tomatoes from reaching the marketplace, and improve 
    the overall quality of tomatoes in fresh market channels. This is 
    expected to benefit the marketers of both Florida and imported 
    tomatoes.
        Tomatoes grading U.S. No. 3 must be well developed, may be 
    misshapen, and cannot be seriously damaged by sunscald (7 CFR 51.1858). 
    Tomatoes grading U.S. No. 2 have to be well developed, reasonably well-
    formed, and free from sunscald (7 CFR 51.1857). Sunscald is an injury 
    which usually occurs on the sides or upper half of the tomato, but may 
    occur wherever the rays of the sun strike most directly. Sunscald 
    results in the formation of a whitish, shiny, blistered area on the 
    tomato. The affected tissue gradually collapses, forming a slight 
    sunken area that may become pale yellow, and wrinkle or shrivel as the 
    tomato ripens. This detracts from the overall quality of the tomato.
        The difference between tomatoes grading U.S. No. 3 and U.S. No. 2 
    with regard to development, shape, and sunscald is especially 
    noticeable in smaller sized tomatoes, but also noticeable in larger 
    sized tomatoes. U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes are generally of very poor 
    quality, and are not desired by the consumer.
        The Committee indicated that when tomatoes of this quality are 
    offered for sale to consumers in a normal season these tomatoes have an 
    adverse affect on the demand and sale of other Florida tomatoes. The 
    increase in grade requirements is expected to improve the quality of 
    the tomato packs shipped from Florida.
        The proponents of the change indicated that the marketplace is
    
    [[Page 12398]]
    
    changing and that the Florida industry has been shipping fewer U.S. No. 
    3 grade tomatoes than it had in past seasons in response to those 
    changes. During the last three shipping seasons, the quantity of U.S. 
    No. 3 grade tomatoes shipped as a percentage of total shipments ranged 
    from a low of 4.4 percent to a high of 7.6 percent.
        At the meeting, the Committee discussed whether eliminating U.S. 
    No. 3 tomatoes would diminish the quality of the U.S. No. 2 grade pack 
    by handlers trying to commingle more U.S. No. 3 grade as U.S. No. 2 
    grade. The proponents acknowledged that some of the tomatoes currently 
    being sold at the U.S. No. 3 grade could be reworked to make U.S. No. 2 
    grade. They stated, however, that they were interested in eliminating 
    the true U.S. No. 3 grade which in normal seasons has tended to detract 
    from the overall pack and depress prices for higher quality tomatoes.
        The grade increase is expected to improve the overall tomato pack, 
    provide consumers with the quality of tomatoes desired, and, thus, 
    encourage repeat purchases. In other words, the new grade requirements 
    will allow handlers to respond better to market preferences which is 
    expected to benefit producers and handlers of Florida tomatoes.
        Section 8e of the Act requires that when certain domestically 
    produced commodities, including tomatoes, are regulated under a Federal 
    marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or 
    comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity requirements for the 
    domestically produced commodity. The current import regulations are 
    specified in 7 CFR 980.212. Similar to the order, regulations apply 
    during the period October 10 through June 15 when the Florida handling 
    requirements are in effect. Because this action increases the minimum 
    grade for domestic tomato shipments, this increase will apply to 
    imported tomatoes.
        Florida tomatoes must be packed in accordance with three specified 
    size designations, and tomatoes falling into different size 
    designations may not be commingled in a single container. These pack 
    restrictions do not apply to imported tomatoes. Because pack 
    requirements do not apply, different sizes of imported tomatoes may be 
    commingled in the same container.
        Beginning February 4, 1998, and until the effective date of this 
    final rule import requirements specify that all lots with a minimum 
    diameter of 2\19/32\ inches and larger shall meet at least a U.S. No. 3 
    grade. All other tomatoes shall meet at least a U.S. No. 2 grade. Any 
    lot with more than 10 percent of its tomatoes less than 2\19/32\ inches 
    in diameter is required to grade at least U.S. No. 2. This final rule 
    changes these requirements by requiring all lots of imported tomatoes 
    to grade at least U.S. No. 2, regardless of size.
        This change is expected to benefit the marketers of both Florida 
    and imported tomatoes by providing consumers with the higher quality 
    tomatoes they desire. The Department contacted a few tomato importers 
    concerning imports. The importers indicated that they will not have 
    difficulty meeting the U.S. No. 2 grade requirements. Thus, the 
    Department believes that the increase will not limit the quantity of 
    imported tomatoes or place an undue burden on exporters, or importers 
    of tomatoes. The expected increase in customer satisfaction should 
    benefit all tomato importers regardless of size.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, the AMS 
    has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility. Import regulations issued under 
    the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders 
    which regulate the handling of domestically produced products. Thus, 
    this final rule will have small entity orientation, and will impact 
    both small and large business entities in a manner comparable to those 
    rules issued under marketing orders.
        There are approximately 65 handlers of Florida tomatoes who are 
    subject to regulation under the order and approximately 75 tomato 
    producers in the regulated area. In addition, at least 170 importers of 
    tomatoes are subject to import regulations and would be affected by 
    this final rule. Small agricultural service firms have been defined by 
    the Small Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.601) as those having 
    annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small agricultural 
    producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than 
    $500,000.
        Committee data indicates that approximately 20 percent of the 
    Florida handlers handle 80 percent of the total volume shipped outside 
    the regulated area. Based on this information, the shipment information 
    for the 1996-97 season, and the 1996-97 season average price of $7.97 
    per 25 pound equivalent carton, the majority of handlers would be 
    classified as small entities as defined by the SBA. The majority of 
    producers of Florida tomatoes also may be classified as small entities. 
    Moreover, the Department believes that most importers may be classified 
    as small entities.
        Under Sec. 966.52 of the Florida tomato marketing order, the 
    Committee, among other things, has authority to recommend changes in 
    the minimum grade requirements for tomatoes grown in the defined 
    production area and handled under the order. This final rule increases 
    the minimum grade from U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2. As provided under 
    section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, the 
    grade increase must apply to imported tomatoes.
        The Committee recommended the grade increase to improve the 
    marketing of Florida tomatoes and follow the recent industry trend of 
    shipping higher grade tomatoes. This trend is in response to a strong 
    consumer demand for such tomatoes. The Committee noted that a U.S. No. 
    3 grade tomato can have a negative impact on the market for higher 
    quality tomatoes.
        According to the Committee, when supplies are not short or crop 
    quality is not lowered due to adverse weather conditions, U.S. No. 3 
    grade tomatoes comprise a small share of total shipments. During the 
    last three shipping seasons, the quantity of U.S. No. 3 grade shipped 
    as a percentage of total shipments ranged from a low of 4.4 percent to 
    a high of 7.6 percent. Thus, the increase in the minimum grade 
    requirements is not expected to significantly impact the total number 
    of Florida shipments. It is, however, expected to have a positive 
    effect in the marketplace by providing a strong price base for the 
    industry. As mentioned earlier, the Committee believes that U.S. No. 
    3's have a price depressing effect on higher grade shipments.
        According to the Committee, during the 1996-97 season, about 47.9 
    million 25 pound equivalents were shipped from Florida. Of that amount, 
    only 4.9 percent were U.S. No. 3 grade. The value of all sales during 
    that season totaled about $381.4 million. The value of the U.S. No. 3 
    grade tomatoes totaled about $16.6 million, or about 4.4 percent of 
    total sales during that season. In 1995-96, the total of all tomatoes 
    shipped was 47.3 million 25 pound
    
    [[Page 12399]]
    
    equivalents. The U.S. No. 3 grade portion was 7.9 percent. That season, 
    the value of all sales totaled about $369.7 million, and the U.S. No. 
    3's comprised 7.6 percent of the total value. The percentages for the 
    1994-95 season were similar with U.S. No. 3's making up about 6.8 
    percent of the total shipments, and the sales value of the U.S. No. 3 
    grade making up about 6.1 percent of the total value. That season, 
    total industry shipments totaled about 55.5 million 25 pound 
    equivalents, and the total value was about $388.3 million.
        The Committee also noted that a recent voluntary elimination of 
    U.S. No. 3 grade by the industry had been successful in strengthening 
    the market and in supporting grower returns. This action is expected to 
    continue those successes. Without an increase in grade requirements, 
    the Committee believes that an erosion of market confidence and 
    producer returns could occur.
        The raising of the minimum grade from U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2 is 
    expected to impact all handlers uniformly, whether small or large, 
    because all handlers, regardless of size, currently pack about the same 
    percentage of U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes. The benefits of the higher 
    prices resulting from eliminating the U.S. No. 3's will be distributed 
    evenly among all handlers, and are expected to be greater than the 
    minimal costs expected to be incurred.
        Direct costs to the industry associated with the minimum grade 
    requirement increase will include sorting and packing line adjustments 
    to operate under the new requirements. These costs are expected to be 
    minimal relative to the benefits expected. Other costs will include 
    possible losses because handlers will no longer be able to ship U.S. 
    No. 3 grade tomatoes outside of the regulated area, as defined in the 
    marketing order. However, these losses also are expected to be minimal 
    because tomatoes lower in quality than U.S. No. 2 could continue to be 
    shipped within the regulated area, or shipped for processing.
        Foreign tomato shippers also have alternative markets for lower 
    grade tomatoes which should lessen any losses as a result of this 
    action. That is, foreign tomatoes lower in grade than U.S. No. 2 could 
    be marketed in locations other than the United States.
        Additionally, the marketplace price and quality benefits expected 
    for Florida growers and handlers as a result of this action will also 
    benefit exporters and importers of tomatoes. Consumers will also 
    benefit as a result of the higher quality product available in the 
    marketplace. As mentioned earlier, the benefits of this rule are not 
    expected to be disproportionately greater or lesser for small entities 
    than for large entities.
        The Committee discussed alternatives to this recommendation, 
    including leaving the grade requirements unchanged. However, after 
    thoroughly discussing the issue the majority of the Committee members 
    agreed that the grade increase was necessary to improve pack appearance 
    and effectively compete in the present market. During the discussion, 
    most Committee members acknowledged that U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes 
    could be important to the market in years of short supply and lower 
    than normal quality resulting from adverse weather conditions. However, 
    those members also pointed out that during normal seasons U.S. No. 3 
    tomatoes were not popular in the marketplace, and that the lower grade 
    had a price depressing effect on better grade tomatoes.
        Mexico is the largest exporter of tomatoes to the United States. 
    Over the last 10 years, Mexican exports to the United States averaged 
    32,527,000 containers of 25 pound equivalents per season (October 5-
    July 5) and comprised about 99 percent of all imported tomatoes to the 
    United States during that time. Total imports during that period 
    averaged 32,752,000 containers of 25 pound equivalents (October 5-July 
    5). Some of the imports from Mexico may have been transhipped to 
    Canada. Small quantities of tomatoes are imported from Caribbean Basin 
    countries. Domestic shipments for the past 10 years averaged 
    108,577,000 containers of 25 pound equivalents (October 5-July 5). 
    Florida shipments comprised about 48 percent of the total shipments for 
    the same period. This information is from AMS Market News Branch data 
    that most closely approximates the Florida shipping season.
        The grade increase is expected to benefit the marketers of both 
    Florida and imported tomatoes by providing consumers with higher 
    quality tomatoes. The Department contacted a few tomato importers 
    concerning imports. The importers indicated that they will not have 
    undue difficulty meeting the higher grade requirements. Also, 
    Department fresh products inspectors at the Port of Nogales, Arizona, 
    the port where most Mexican produced tomatoes enter the United States, 
    estimated that only 2 to 3 percent of the total tomato imports from 
    Mexico were U.S. No. 3 grade. The remainder were U.S. No. 2 grade and 
    higher. Thus, the Department believes that the increase will not limit 
    the quantity of imported tomatoes or place an undue burden on 
    exporters, or importers of tomatoes. The expected increase in customer 
    satisfaction and more positive marketplace atmosphere resulting from 
    providing the desired quality should benefit all tomato importers 
    regardless of size.
        This action will not impose any additional reporting or record 
    keeping requirements on either small or large handlers. As with all 
    Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically 
    reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry 
    and public sector agencies.
        The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
    duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
        In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized 
    throughout the Florida tomato industry, and all interested persons were 
    invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee 
    deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the September 
    5, 1997, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
    small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested 
    persons were invited to submit information on the regulatory and 
    informational impacts of this action on small businesses. One comment 
    on the regulatory impacts of this action was received from a handler of 
    Florida tomatoes and is discussed below.
        The proposed rule regarding this action was published in the 
    Federal Register on December 18, 1997 (62 FR 66312). Interested persons 
    were invited to submit written comments until January 20, 1998. Copies 
    of the proposed rule were faxed and mailed to all known interested 
    persons. Also, the rule was made available through the Internet by the 
    Office of the Federal Register. A total of 11 comments were received.
        Seven favorable comments were received. One comment was received 
    from a voluntary agricultural cooperative association of Florida tomato 
    producers representing about 90 percent of the total volume of tomatoes 
    produced under the marketing order each year. Another comment was 
    received from a cooperative agricultural association composed of first 
    handlers of fresh Florida tomatoes grown in Central and South Florida. 
    An association representing the interests of fruit and vegetable 
    growers throughout Florida also supported the proposed grade increase. 
    A comment was received from the Commissioner of the Florida Department 
    of Agriculture and Consumer Services supporting the
    
    [[Page 12400]]
    
    proposed grade increase. These commenters supported the belief that 
    increasing the minimum grade requirements from U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2 
    will help increase customer satisfaction, improve demand, and improve 
    the overall quality of tomatoes in the market.
        The Committee also submitted a favorable comment. In its comment, 
    the Committee mentioned that the statement in the proposed rule at 
    column one on page 66313 of the Federal Register (62 FR 66313; December 
    18, 1997) stating that ``Based on an analysis of markets and demands of 
    buyers, the Committee believes that increasing the minimum grade from 
    U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2 would improve the marketing of Florida 
    tomatoes, and help the industry protect its markets from foreign 
    competition.'' misleads and confuses the reader. The Committee asserted 
    that the proposed rule is not intended to limit and, in fact, would not 
    protect the Florida tomato industry from foreign competition. The 
    proposal is designed to protect the entire market from the price 
    depressing effect of poorer quality tomatoes from both domestic and 
    foreign supply sources and would provide a better product for the 
    consumer. Accordingly, this statement has been clarified in the final 
    rule. The Committee also suggested that the use of 25 pound and 25,000 
    pound equivalents in different parts of the proposed rule could confuse 
    the reader, and suggested that only 25 pound equivalents be used 
    because this is the common standard used by the Florida industry. 
    Appropriate modifications have been made in response to these suggested 
    changes.
        Another favorable comment was received from a national 
    confederation of Mexican vegetable growers indicating that the increase 
    in requirements for minimum grade to U.S. No. 2 will help improve the 
    overall quality of tomatoes in the market and will contribute to better 
    marketing and increase the growers' income.
        A final favorable comment was received from a trade association 
    representing over 100 distributors, shippers, brokers, and affiliated 
    companies who are directly involved with the receipt, handling, and 
    sale of perishable agricultural commodities grown in the Republic of 
    Mexico. This comment supported the proposal to increase the minimum 
    grade requirement to U.S. No. 2, but expressed the belief that the 
    proposed change does not tighten quality restrictions enough. The trade 
    association requested the Department to establish a minimum grade of 85 
    percent U.S. No. 1.
        The trade association stated that it strongly agrees that the 
    presence of U.S. No. 3 tomatoes in the marketplace hurts grower 
    returns. The comment pointed out that tomatoes grading U.S. No. 2 are 
    of poor cosmetic quality and this discourages many shoppers from buying 
    tomatoes. The comment noted that with the rapid expansion of the 
    availability and affordability of greenhouse-grown tomatoes, field 
    grown tomatoes are now in direct competition for shelf-space and 
    consumer demand with greenhouse tomatoes. The comment stated that if 
    the intent of the proposed rule is to have a positive effect in the 
    marketplace by providing a strong price base for the industry, the 
    minimum grade requirement should be tightened to 85 percent U.S. No. 1 
    or better.
        It would not be appropriate to act upon this recommended change at 
    this time. The recommended change is more restrictive than proposed. 
    Because of this, AMS believes that further review and analysis is 
    needed and that notice and comment rulemaking should be used before 
    implementation. Also, this recommended change has been sent to the 
    Committee for future consideration.
        Four opposition comments were received. These comments were from 
    handlers of Florida tomatoes, and an import broker. The Florida 
    handlers stated that this past fall, as well as several occasions last 
    season, overall tomato demand and price allowed them to pack and sell 
    all of their U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes above the minimum price in 
    effect for Mexican grown tomatoes through the settlement of a trade 
    action brought against Mexico. One of these handlers indicated that had 
    the grade increase been implemented earlier, it would have caused an 
    economic loss to farms in Florida, as they were able to sell all of the 
    U.S. No. 3 tomatoes they packed. Another handler stated that the 
    elimination of U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes would reduce the overall grade 
    due to commingling of the product, and that the proposal was a step 
    backward in competing with their international competitors. All three 
    of the Florida handlers pointed out that there is currently a mechanism 
    in place under a tomato growers exchange that would remove U.S. No. 3 
    grade tomatoes from the market under a certain pricing structure. 
    However, not all Florida production would be covered by this mechanism 
    at all times. The import broker indicated that there was a market for 
    lower priced imported U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes.
        As indicated earlier, in making its recommendation the Committee 
    discussed leaving the grade requirements unchanged. However, after 
    discussing the merits of this alternative, the majority of the 
    Committee members agreed that the grade increase was necessary to 
    improve pack appearance and effectively compete in a market whose 
    buyers are requesting higher quality product. These members 
    acknowledged that U.S. No. 3 tomatoes could be important to the market 
    in years of short supply and lower than normal quality resulting from 
    adverse weather conditions. They also pointed out that during normal 
    seasons U.S. No. 3 tomatoes were not popular in the marketplace, and 
    that the lower grade had a price depressing effect on better grade 
    tomatoes.
        Opposition commenters may have been able to market their U.S. No. 3 
    grade tomatoes because a small market exists for such tomatoes. 
    However, the Committee made its recommendation because it believes that 
    higher quality and the expansion of consumer demand are keys to 
    improving the tomato industry in the long term. When short term quality 
    problems occur due to adverse weather or other causes and sufficient 
    supplies of U.S. No. 2 or better grade tomatoes are not available to 
    meet market needs, appropriate action could be taken to address such 
    problems. The Committee could meet and request the Department to 
    implement emergency rulemaking which would allow handlers to ship 
    tomatoes lower than U.S. No. 2 grade.
        The proponents of the change on the Committee acknowledged that 
    some of the tomatoes currently being sold at the U.S. No. 3 grade level 
    could be reworked to make U.S. No. 2 grade. However, they indicated 
    that they were interested in eliminating the true U.S. No. 3 grade 
    which has depressed the market for better quality tomatoes in normal 
    seasons.
        Most of the commenters requested that the proposed grade increase 
    be implemented as soon as possible. The need for prompt implementation 
    is appropriate because Florida handlers are more than half-way through 
    the 1997-98 shipping season, and they want to accrue the benefits 
    anticipated. Moreover, the comment from the trade association 
    representing importers requested prompt action stating that there is 
    little modification that must be made to existing packing equipment 
    that would result in unusual additional expenditures for importers or 
    packers. However, sufficient time must be provided for the Florida and 
    import tomato industries to comply with the new grade requirement and 
    to allow tomatoes already picked and packed, and certified as U.S. No. 
    3 grade to be shipped. Further, handlers and
    
    [[Page 12401]]
    
    exporters need to adjust their sorting and packing lines to meet the 
    higher grade requirement. Therefore, the Department has decided that 
    the effective date of this action should be March 30, 1998. This period 
    of time is reasonable and consistent with the provisions of the Act, 
    and will allow both the domestic and imported tomato industries 
    sufficient time to adjust to the new grade requirement and to ship 
    commodity that is already picked and packed.
        In view of all the foregoing, the Department has concluded that the 
    increase in the minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 3 to U.S. No. 2 
    will advance the interests of the Florida and foreign tomato industries 
    and should be implemented.
        In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade 
    Representative has concurred with the issuance of this final rule.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, and the comments received, it is hereby found 
    that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the 
    declared policy of the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found that good cause exists 
    for not postponing the effective date of this action until 30 days 
    after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) Florida tomato 
    handlers are aware of this action, which was discussed at various 
    industry and association meetings and was recommended by a majority of 
    the Committee; (2) the Committee meeting was a public meeting and all 
    interested parties had an opportunity to provide input; (3) the grade 
    increase needs to be in place as soon as possible to cover the balance 
    of the 1997-98 shipping season which ends in June; and (4) an adequate 
    amount of time has been provided for handlers and importers to adjust 
    their packing and sorting lines to meet the higher grade requirement.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 966
    
        Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Tomatoes.
    
    7 CFR Part 980
    
        Food grades and standards, Imports, Marketing agreements, Onions, 
    Potatoes, Tomatoes.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 966 and 980 
    are amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 966 and 980 continues to 
    read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    PART 966--TOMATOES GROWN IN FLORIDA
    
        2. In Sec. 966.323, paragraph(a)(1) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 966.323  Handling regulation.
    
    * * * * *
        (a) Grade, size, container, and inspection requirements. (1) Grade. 
    Tomatoes shall be graded and meet the requirements specified for U.S. 
    No. 1, U.S. Combination, or U.S. No. 2 of the U.S. Standards for Grades 
    of Fresh Tomatoes. When not more than 15 percent of the tomatoes in any 
    lot fail to meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 grade and not more than 
    one-third of this 15 percent (or 5 percent) are comprised of defects 
    causing very serious damage including not more than 1 percent of 
    tomatoes which are soft or affected by decay, such tomatoes may be 
    shipped and designated as at least 85 percent U.S. No. 1 grade.
    
    PART 980--VEGETABLES; IMPORT REGULATIONS
    
        3. In Sec. 980.212, paragraph (b)(1) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 980.212  Import regulations; tomatoes.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) From October 10 through June 15 of each season, tomatoes 
    offered for importation shall be at least 2 \9/32\ inches in diameter. 
    Not more than 10 percent, by count, in any lot may be smaller than the 
    minimum specified diameter. All lots of tomatoes shall be at least U.S. 
    No. 2 grade.
    * * * * *
        Dated: March 9, 1998.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 98-6618 Filed 3-12-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/30/1998
Published:
03/13/1998
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-6618
Dates:
March 30, 1998.
Pages:
12396-12401 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV98-966-1 FR
PDF File:
98-6618.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 966.323
7 CFR 980.212