94-5787. Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program; Proposed Rule DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-5787]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 14, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part II
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    
    
    
    Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program; Proposed Rule
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    RIN 1018-AC37
    
     
    Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) herein proposes to 
    amend the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program (Program) 
    regulations. The Service plans to add Texas and Maryland (beginning 
    with the 1994-95 hunting season) to the list of participating States, 
    and to implement some additional modifications to the Program. This 
    regulatory action will require that licensed hunters in all 
    participating States have evidence of current participation in the 
    Program on their person while hunting migratory game birds. The quality 
    and extent of information about harvests of migratory game birds must 
    be improved in order to better manage these populations. Hunters' names 
    and addresses are necessary to provide a sampling frame for a voluntary 
    hunter survey to improve harvest estimates for all migratory game 
    birds.
    
    DATE: The comment period for the proposed rule will end on May 13, 
    1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to the Chief, Office of 
    Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 10815 
    Loblolly Pine Drive, Laurel, Maryland 20708-4028. Comments received 
    will be available for public inspection during normal business hours in 
    Building 158, 10815 Loblolly Pine Drive (Gate 4, Patuxent Wildlife 
    Research Center), Laurel, Maryland 20708-4028.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert L. Jessen, Migratory Bird 
    Harvest Information Program Coordinator, Office of Migratory Bird 
    Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 10815 Loblolly Pine Drive, 
    Laurel, Maryland 20708-4028, (301) 497-4986, FAX (301) 497-5981.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this rule is to expand the 
    Harvest Information Program (Program) to include the States of Texas 
    and Maryland beginning in the 1994-95 hunting season, and to make minor 
    modifications to the Program. One such modification is proposed to 
    limit the requirement for participation to only State-licensed 
    migratory bird hunters. Another modification would require compliance 
    with the Program in each State in which an individual hunts migratory 
    game birds.
    
    Background
    
        A notice of intent to establish the Program was published in the 
    Federal Register on June 24, 1991. The proposed rule was published in 
    the Federal Register on June 10, 1992. State wildlife agencies 
    expressed a number of concerns in response to the proposed rule. The 
    majority of comments were positive and constructive in nature. However, 
    many States were severely disappointed that the sole remaining option 
    placed the major cost burden on the State wildlife agency. The 
    identification of licensed migratory bird hunters and the collection of 
    names, addresses and other information from them would be the State's 
    responsibility and represents the major portion of the cost burden; 
    while conduct of the harvest survey would be a Federal responsibility.
        Many States would have preferred the opportunity of using a 
    separate Federal permit card. A State/Federal technical working group 
    is continuing to develop procedures that would improve harvest 
    estimates without placing unnecessary burdens on State agencies, 
    license vendors or the hunters. Alternative survey designs continue to 
    be investigated. Specifically, alternative survey methods for special 
    groups of unlicensed hunters (e.g., junior and senior hunters) are 
    being investigated to determine if any resulting biases in the 
    estimates would compromise the quality of the survey and if other 
    procedures could be developed that would conform to accepted 
    statistical standards.
        The final rule was published in the Federal Register on March 19, 
    1993. The effect of that final rule was to establish the Program and 
    implement the pilot phase in three States.
    
    Implementation of Pilot Phase
    
        State wildlife agencies and the Service began implementing and 
    studying the Program in 1992 with a 2-year pilot phase in three 
    volunteer States (California, Missouri, and South Dakota). These States 
    are providing the names and addresses of migratory bird hunters and 
    other necessary information, from which the Service is conducting a 
    national Migratory Bird Harvest Survey.
        The pilot phase of the Program is being preliminarily evaluated to 
    determine the adequacy and timeliness of the sample and the time 
    burden, cost, and other impacts on hunters, State license agents, State 
    wildlife agencies, and the Service. The approaches used in different 
    States are being compared for costs, efficiency, convenience and survey 
    performance.
        The Service previously stated that after evaluation in 1994 of this 
    pilot phase and consideration of any proposed changes, other States 
    will be phased into the Program until all States will participate in 
    1998. The suggested schedule was published in the June 10, 1992, 
    proposed rule. Consistent with that schedule, Texas will participate in 
    the Program beginning in 1994. Maryland has requested to participate in 
    the Program earlier than scheduled. Revision of the implementation 
    schedule is being proposed in this rulemaking document.
    
    Description of Program (1992-1994)
    
        Currently, all migratory game bird hunters in participating States 
    are required to have a Program validation indicating that they have 
    provided their names and addresses to the State wildlife agency. 
    Validations are printed on their annual State hunting license or 
    supplementary permit. The State may charge hunters a small handling fee 
    to compensate agents and to cover the State's administrative costs 
    associated with conducting this Program. Individual migratory bird 
    hunters are not required to obtain evidence of Program participation in 
    more than one State per year.
        The names, current addresses, and necessary information for an 
    adequate sample of migratory bird hunters are needed in time for 
    hunting-record forms to be distributed to selected hunters before they 
    forget the details of their hunts. Because of this fundamental need, 
    States have only a short time to obtain hunter names and addresses from 
    license vendors and to provide those names and addresses to the 
    Service.
    
    Proposed Modifications to the Program
    
        In addition to implementation of the Program in Texas and Maryland, 
    the Service is proposing several other modifications to the Program. 
    One such modification would require persons who hunt migratory game 
    birds in more than one State to identify themselves as migratory game 
    bird hunters and provide their names, addresses, and dates of birth to 
    each State in which they hunt migratory game birds. Currently, 
    individual hunters are not required to participate in more than one 
    State per year; however, hunters must still adhere to the licensing 
    requirements of all individual States in which they hunt.
        Another modification being proposed is to exempt hunters from a 
    permit requirement if they are also exempt from State-licensing 
    requirements. This would include several categories of hunters such as 
    junior hunters, senior hunters, landowners, and other special 
    categories. These exemptions vary on a State-by-State basis.
        Excluding those hunters who are not required to obtain an annual 
    State hunting license from the Program also excludes their harvest from 
    the estimates. The importance of their harvest depends on how many 
    hunters are excluded and on the number of birds they bag. Excluding 
    these hunters may result in serious bias. Therefore, the Service is 
    currently evaluating the effects of excluding these hunters and would 
    appreciate any information that may be available. Minimum survey 
    standards are also being developed for exempt categories. One 
    suggestion is to allow a class of hunters to be excluded from 
    participating in the Program if 1) it is periodically demonstrated that 
    only minimal bias in the estimates results from their exclusion or 2) a 
    statistically sound alternate sampling procedure is implemented. States 
    entering the program will individually address the effects of exempting 
    unlicensed hunters through a cooperative agreement with the Service.
    
    NEPA Consideration
    
        The establishment of this Harvest Information Program and options 
    have been considered in the ``Environmental Assessment: Migratory Bird 
    Harvest Information Program.'' Copies of this document are available 
    from the Service at the address indicated under the caption FOR FURTHER 
    INFORMATION CONTACT.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        On June 14, 1991, the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and 
    Parks concluded that the rule would not have a significant effect on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act 5 USC 601 et seq. This rule will eventually affect about 3-5 
    million migratory game bird hunters when it is fully implemented. It 
    will require licensed migratory game bird hunters to identify 
    themselves and to supply their names, addresses, and birth dates. 
    Additional information will be requested in order that they can be 
    efficiently sampled for a voluntary national harvest survey. Hunters 
    will be required to have evidence of current participation in the 
    Program on their person while hunting migratory game birds.
        The States may require a small handling fee to compensate their 
    hunting-license vendors and to cover their administrative costs. Many 
    of the State hunting-license vendors are small entities, but this rule 
    should not economically impact those vendors. Only migratory game bird 
    hunters, individuals, would be required to provide this information, so 
    this rule should not adversely affect small entities.
        The collection of information contained in this rule has been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq. and assigned clearance number 1018-0015. The information is 
    required from licensed hunters to obtain the benefit of hunting 
    migratory game birds.
        The public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
    estimated to average 0.015 hours per response, including the time for 
    reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
    maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    collection of information. Comments regarding the burden estimate or 
    any other aspect of these reporting requirements should be directed to 
    the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, ms 224--ARLSQ, 
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
    20240, or the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction 
    Project 1018-0015, Washington, DC 20503.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
    under Executive Order 12866.
    
    Executive Order 12612--Federalism
    
        The regulations do not have significant federalism effects as 
    provided in Executive Order 12612. Due to the migratory nature of 
    certain species of birds, the Federal Government has been given 
    responsibility over these species by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. 
    State harvest surveys presently cannot provide adequate national 
    estimates of migratory game bird harvests for the following reasons: 
    Some States do not now conduct annual harvest surveys or maintain 
    accessible lists of hunter names and addresses. Comparable information 
    is not available from all States because States have different 
    licensing laws regulating who must buy a hunting license and different 
    survey procedures. Currently, many State license lists are not 
    available in time to permit distribution of hunter records early in the 
    hunting season. Budget constraints often prevent States from conducting 
    harvest surveys during certain years or could cause some States to 
    eliminate them completely.
        These rules do not have a substantial direct effect on fiscal 
    capacity, change the roles or responsibilities of Federal or State 
    Governments, or intrude on State policy or administration. Therefore, 
    these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and do not 
    have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a 
    Federalism Assessment. In fact, the Service would cooperate with States 
    in providing special surveys to meet mutual management needs, and 
    increased cooperation between Federal and State agencies would reduce 
    duplication of survey efforts.
    
    Executive Order 12360--Taking of Individual Property Rights
    
        Executive Order 12360 discussed guidelines for the taking of 
    individual property rights. These rules, authorized by the Migratory 
    Bird Treaty Act, do not affect any constitutionally-protected property 
    rights. These rules would not result in the physical occupancy of 
    property, the physical invasion of property, or the regulatory taking 
    of any property.
    
    Authorship
    
        The primary authors of this rule are Robert L. Jessen and William 
    O. Vogel, Office of Migratory Bird Management.
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
    
        Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 20 is proposed 
    to be amended as set forth below.
    
    PART 20--MIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING
    
        1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (July 3, 1918), as 
    amended, (16 U.S.C. 703-711); the Fish and Wildlife Improvement Act 
    of 1978 (November 8, 1978), as amended, (16 U.S.C. 712); and the 
    Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (August 8, 1956), as amended, (16 
    U.S.C. 742 a-d and e-j).
    
        2. Section 20.20 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec.  20.20  Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program.
    
        (a) Information collection requirements. The collections of 
    information contained in Sec. 20.20 have been approved by the Office of 
    Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned 
    clearance number 1018-0015. The information will be used to provide a 
    sampling frame for the national Migratory Bird Harvest Survey. Response 
    is required from licensed hunters to obtain the benefit of hunting 
    migratory game birds. Public reporting burden for this information is 
    estimated to average 0.015 hours per response, including the time for 
    reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
    maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 
    or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 
    suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Service Information 
    Collection Clearance Officer, MS-224 ARLSQ, Fish and Wildlife Service, 
    Washington, DC 20240, or the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork 
    Reduction Project 1018-0015, Washington, DC 20503.
        (b) General provisions. Each person hunting migratory game birds in 
    California, Maryland, Missouri, South Dakota, and Texas shall have 
    identified himself or herself as a migratory bird hunter and given his 
    or her name, address, and date of birth to the respective State hunting 
    licensing authority and shall have on his or her person evidence, 
    provided by that State, of compliance with this requirement.
        (c) Tribal exemptions. Nothing in paragraph (b) shall apply to 
    hunters on Federal Indian Reservations or to tribal members hunting on 
    ceded lands.
        (d) State exemptions. Nothing in paragraph (b) shall apply to those 
    hunters who are exempt from State-licensing requirements in the State 
    in which they are hunting.
        (e) Implementation schedule. The Service is implementing this 
    Program over a 5-year period from 1994-1998 which will incorporate 
    approximately a half million additional migratory bird hunters each 
    year. States must participate on or before the following schedule:
    
        1994 - California, Maryland, Missouri, South Dakota, and Texas.
        1995 - Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania
        1996 - Alabama, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, 
    Oklahoma, and Tennessee.
        1997 - Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, South 
    Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
        1998 - Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, 
    Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New 
    Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, 
    Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and 
    Wyoming.
    
        Dated: February 11, 1994.
    George T. Frampton,
    Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
    [FR Doc. 94-5787 Filed 3-11-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/14/1994
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
94-5787
Dates:
The comment period for the proposed rule will end on May 13, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 14, 1994
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 20.20