94-5829. Licensing Policies and Procedures, Domestic Common Carrier Satellite Service  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-5829]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 14, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Parts 25 and 94
    
    [CC Docket No. 92-166; FCC No. 94-11]
    
     
    
    Licensing Policies and Procedures, Domestic Common Carrier 
    Satellite Service
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On January 19, 1994, the Commission adopted a Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking seeking comments on its proposed rules to govern 
    the licensing and regulation of mobile satellite systems operating in 
    the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz frequency bands (1.6/2.4 GHz MSS). The 
    proposed qualification requirements and technical rules are intended to 
    facilitate the provision of new domestic and international satellite 
    services.
    
    DATES: Comment date: May 5, 1994; Reply comment date: June 6, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC 20554.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Fern Jarmulnek, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 634-1682; Kathleen 
    Campbell, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 634-1952.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
    of Proposed Rulemaking adopted January 19, 1994, and released February 
    18, 1994. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
    inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
    Reference Center (room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20554. 
    A complete text of this decision also may be purchased from the 
    Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
    Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., suite 140, Washington, DC 
    20037.
        The following collection of information contained in this proposed 
    rule has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for 
    review under section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3504(h)). Copies of the submission may be purchased from the 
    Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
    Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., suite 140, Washington, DC 
    20037. Persons wishing to comment on this collection of information 
    should direct their comments to Timothy Fain, (202) 395-3561, Office of 
    Management and Budget, room 3235 NEOB, Washington, DC 20503. A copy of 
    any comments filed with the Office of Management and Budget should also 
    be sent to the following address at the Commission: Federal 
    Communications Commission, Records Management Division, room 234, 
    Paperwork Reduction Project, Washington, DC 20554. For further 
    information contact Judy Boley, (202) 632-7513.
        Title: Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and 
    Policies Pertaining to a Mobile Satellite Service in the 1610-1626.5/
    2483.5-2500 MHz Frequency Bands, CC Docket No. 92-166.
        OMB Number: None.
        Action: Proposed new and revised collection.
        Respondents: Businesses or other for profit, including small 
    businesses.
        Frequency of Response: On occasion, annually.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          No. of         Hours per                  
                         Reporting requirements                         responses        response          Total    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Proposed Sections 25.143(b), 25.213, 25.203 (j), (k)............               6             900            5400
    Proposed Section 25.143(e)(1)...................................               5              15              65
    Proposed Section 25.143(e)(2)...................................               5               3              15
    Proposed Section 25.143 (c), (d)................................               5               2              10
    Proposed Sections 25.115, 25.130, 25.213........................              10             320            3200
    Proposed Section 25.133(b)......................................              10               2              20
                                                                     -----------------------------------------------
        Total.......................................................              41  ..............           8710 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Note: These requirements will not all be triggered in the same 
    year.
    
        Needs and Uses: The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking solicits public 
    comment on the Commission's proposals for rules and policies to govern 
    the licensing and provision of service by voice and data mobile 
    satellite service (MSS) systems in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz band 
    (1.6/2.4 GHz MSS).
        As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the 
    Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 
    (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals 
    suggested in this document.
    
    Summary of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
    
        This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking represents the next step in the 
    process of licensing the world's first commercial low-earth orbit 
    satellites offering both voice and data mobile satellite services 
    (MSS). These satellites are to operate in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 
    MHz frequency bands (1.6/2.4 GHz bands). The proposed systems are to 
    provide a wide range of services, including cellular-like mobile 
    services to users anywhere, telephone service to remote areas that are 
    not linked to a communications network, position location services, 
    search and rescue communications, disaster management communications, 
    environmental monitoring, paging services, facsimile transmission 
    services, cargo tracking, educational communications, and industrial 
    monitoring. In addition to offering these services to users in the 
    United States, the proposed low-earth orbit systems have the capability 
    to extend these offerings throughout the world. This can potentially 
    expand markets for U.S.-developed goods and services and to make a 
    major contribution to U.S. global competitiveness. It also offers the 
    potential for significant economic and social advances in developing 
    countries by providing an ``instant'' telecommunications infrastructure 
    at minimum cost.
        Six applications to construct satellite systems in these frequency 
    bands were filed by the cut-off date. Five proposed low-Earth orbit 
    (LEO) systems. These were filed by Ellipsat Corporation, Motorola 
    Satellite Communications Inc., Constellation Communications, Loral/
    Qualcomm Corporation, and TRW, Inc. The other application was filed by 
    American Mobile Satellite Corporation. AMSC proposed to add the 
    additional MSS frequencies to its geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) 
    MSS system that was authorized in 1989. An international allocation for 
    MSS in these frequency bands was made in February 1992; a domestic 
    allocation was adopted in December 1993.
        A negotiated rulemaking was undertaken from January through April 
    1993 to assist the Commission in establishing technical and operational 
    rules to govern this new service (hereinafter 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS) and in 
    developing an arrangement by which all six pending system proposals 
    could be accommodated. Neither the Commission nor the applicants were 
    able to fashion a spectrum sharing compromise that was acceptable to 
    all. The Committee did, however, reach consensus regarding other major 
    technical issues. After the Negotiated Rulemaking was concluded, the 
    LEO applicants, in two new ``partial settlement'' groups, submitted two 
    new sharing proposals they assert would permit all LEO applications to 
    be granted. Both proposals are premised on excluding GSO systems from 
    consideration for licensing in these frequency bands.
    
    Licensing Procedure
    
        If the applicants can develop or agree to an engineering solution 
    or sharing scheme by which all proposed systems can be accommodated, 
    the Commission generally adopts this approach if it is otherwise in the 
    public interest. In situations where all applicants' proposed systems 
    cannot be accommodated, the Commission must devise a method consistent 
    with the public interest for choosing among them. In such cases, the 
    Commission has, as an initial matter, imposed rigorous financial and 
    technical requirements as a means of ensuring that those granted 
    licenses are capable of expeditiously implementing state-of-the-art 
    systems that will serve the public interest. If it is not possible to 
    accommodate all qualified applicants, a further processing mechanism 
    must be selected.
    
    Qualification Requirements
    
        As a means of encouraging new technology and of realizing the 
    unique benefits that a global system can provide, the Commission 
    proposes a LEO design requirement (proposed rule Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(i)). 
    It solicits comment on this proposal from both applicants and potential 
    users, requesting that commenters address the potential for 1.6/2.4 GHz 
    MSS systems to generate social, economic, and technical benefits, both 
    domestically and globally, and the extent to which these benefits are 
    realizable with LEO and GSO satellites. The Commission further proposes 
    that systems be capable of serving all areas of the world, except for 
    the polar regions, for at least 75% of each day. Specifically, the 
    Commission proposes that satellite systems be designed so that at least 
    one satellite is visible above the horizon at an elevation angle of at 
    least 5 deg. for at least 18 hours each day at latitudes less than 
    80 deg. (proposed rule Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(11)). To provide efficient and 
    ubiquitous service to users throughout the United States, the 
    Commission also proposes to require systems to be capable of providing 
    continuous voice services to all areas of the United States (proposed 
    rule Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(iii)). That is, satellite systems must be 
    designed so that at least one satellite is visible above the horizon at 
    elevation angles of at least 5 deg. at any given time in all areas of 
    the United States.
        Further, the Commission proposes strict financial qualification 
    requirements identical to those in the domestic fixed-satellite 
    service, where applications to implement space stations regularly 
    exceed the number that can be accommodated (proposed 
    Sec. 25.143(b)(3)). Specifically, the Commission proposes that MSS 
    applicants be required to provide evidence of current assets or 
    irrevocably committed debt or equity financing sufficient to meet the 
    estimated costs of constructing and launching all planned satellites 
    and operating the system for one year. These requirements stem from the 
    Commission's repeated experience that licensees without sufficient 
    resources spend a significant amount of time attempting to raise the 
    capital needed to finance a satellite system (here, $97 million to $2 
    billion), that these attempts often end unsuccessfully, and that 
    qualified fully-financed applicants may be blocked from entry during 
    this several-year period.
        All applicants will be given the opportunity to amend their 
    applications to bring them into compliance with any final rules.
    
    Processing Alternatives
    
        While a sharing solution could not be developed during the 
    Negotiated Rulemaking, the Commission believes that the recent LEO 
    sharing proposals may form the basis for allowing it to proceed 
    expeditiously with licensing. Both of the LEO applicants' proposals 
    appear to allow up to five LEO systems to be accommodated in the 16.5 
    MHz of spectrum allocated to MSS in each transmission direction. This 
    may be sufficient to allow all qualified applicants to be licensed.
        The Commission proposes to assign licensees implementing code-
    division multiple access (CDMA) systems to 11.35 MHz of shared 
    bandwidth at 1610-1621.35 MHz. It further proposes to assign a 
    frequency division multiple access (FDMA)/time division access (TDMA) 
    system to 5.15 MHz of dedicated bandwidth at 1621.35-1626.5 MHz. When a 
    system is launched and read to begin operating, it will be permitted to 
    operate over the entire assigned bandwidth for that technology. Any in-
    orbit CDMA system will be required to operate compatibly with any newly 
    launched CDMA system. If only one CDMA system is implemented, the plan 
    proposes to adjust the assignments for the system to 8.25 MHz at 1610-
    1618.25 MHz, leaving the freed spectrum available for possible 
    reassignment to the FDMA licensee or for new entry. The Commission 
    believes that 8.25 MHz should be ample to support a first-generation 
    system and should provide some flexibility in coordinating the system 
    internationally.
        The plan includes the 1.6 GHz band only. While CDMA systems will 
    use the 2.4 GHz band for downlink transmissions, an FDMA/TDMA system 
    will use the 1.6 GHz band for both uplink and downlink transmissions. 
    This may free some spectrum in the 2.4 GHz band and provide some 
    flexibility in assigning specific downlink spectrum segments to CDMA 
    licensees. For example, the Commission may decide to avoid licensing in 
    those portions of the 2.4 GHz band that are especially susceptible to 
    inter-service interference. Thus, while the Commission proposes to 
    license CDMA operators to share the same amount of 2.4 GHz downlink 
    spectrum as 1.6 GHz uplink spectrum, it does not propose specific 
    frequencies for downlink operations at this time.
        The commission requests comment on all aspects of its sharing 
    proposal.
    
    Other Alternatives if Mutual Exclusivity is Not Resolved
    
        If the Commission's spectrum sharing plan, or some variation of it, 
    does not permit the applications of all qualified applicants to be 
    granted, the Commission must devise a procedure for choosing among 
    those applicants. Possibilities include a comparable hearing, an 
    auction, or a lottery. These alternatives are briefly discussed and, to 
    expedite licensing if mutual exclusivity is not resolved, the 
    Commission proposes structures for both an auction and a lottery.
        The Commission's experience with comparative hearings has shown 
    they usually are prolonged. Here, they would not only delay the 
    provision of needed service to the United States public, but the delay 
    could disadvantage the United States in coordinating a licensed system 
    internationally. For these reasons, it may not be advisable to hold a 
    comparative hearing.
        The 1993 Budget Act gives the Commission the authority to employ 
    competitive bidding procedures to select licensees from among two or 
    more mutually exclusive applicants provided that certain criteria are 
    met. The Commission believes it mutual exclusivity among the applicants 
    cannot be resolved, an auction may be considered. Specifically, MSS 
    licensees will be providing a commercial subscription-based service 
    that will enable subscribers to transmit or receive MSS transmissions 
    in the frequencies on which the MSS space stations will be licensed to 
    operate. A competitive bidding system should permit a new service to be 
    more rapidly introduced than would a comparative hearing. It should 
    also allow the public to recover the value of the public spectrum 
    resource being made available for commercial use. Further, it should 
    encourage efficient use of the electromagnetic spectrum by encouraging 
    applicants to bid on only the minimum amount of spectrum needed. The 
    Commission recognizes that the statute also directs it to promote 
    economic opportunity by disseminating licenses to a wide variety of 
    licensees, including small and minority businesses. It requests comment 
    on the manner in which this statutory obligation can be taken into 
    account. The Commission also recognizes that an auction may have 
    unintended consequences internationally by encouraging other countries 
    to impose licensing costs on MSS systems. The Commission will carefully 
    consider these concerns.
        The Commission envisions that if an auction is employed, it will be 
    conducted pursuant to the general framework adopted in its Competitive 
    Bidding Implementation Proceeding (PP Docket No. 93-253). The 
    Commission also proposes service-specific criteria. To maximize 
    multiple entry and to encourage applicants to bid only for the minimum 
    amount of spectrum they require, the Commission proposes to auction the 
    16.5 MHz of bandwidth in each transmission direction in eight paired 
    2.0625 MHz uplink and downlink segments. Based on the applicants' 
    proposals, it appears that some MSS systems could be implemented with 
    as little as 2 to 4 MHz of spectrum in each transmission direction. To 
    afford licensees some flexibility, however, the Commission proposes to 
    allow applicants to big successfully on up to four segments, for a 
    total of 8.25 MHz of bandwidth in each transmission direction. Given 
    the CDMA applicants' proposals to share spectrum, the Commission also 
    questions whether it should permit successful bidders to agree to pool 
    their spectrum and implement co-frequency systems.
        Section 309(i) of the Budget Act also authorizes the use of a 
    lottery to select from among one or more mutually exclusive applicants 
    if the applications are accepted for filing before July 26, 1993. The 
    Commission tentatively concludes that if mutual exclusivity cannot be 
    resolved, the statutory requirements for a system of random selection 
    are met. The Commission proposes to implement a lottery in a manner 
    similar to its proposed auction framework. Specifically, eight 2.0625 
    MHz paired segments would be offered, and each selectee would be 
    limited to four segments. The Commission questions whether it may be 
    advisable to permit applicants to agree among themselves that they will 
    implement co-frequency systems if one of them is chosen as the 
    tentative selectee, allowing the Commission to grant licenses to all 
    qualified applicants in the pool.
        The Commission requests comment on all aspects of these alternative 
    processing mechanisms.
    
    Interservice Sharing
    
        The radioastronomy service (RAS), the aeronautical radionavigation 
    service (ARS), the instructional television fixed-service (ITFS), a 
    variety of terrestrial services, and industrial, scientific and medical 
    (ISM) equipment all operate in portions of the bands allocated to MSS 
    or in adjacent bands. The Committee studied the potential for 
    interference between MSS and these services.
        The Committee, which included an RAS representative, reached a 
    consensus regarding MSS-RAS sharing. These recommendations, which form 
    the basis for the Commission's proposed rules (Sec. 25.213(a)), 
    establish fixed radius protection zones around the sixteen radio 
    astronomy sites in the United States and set technical requirements for 
    MSS downlink transmissions.
        GLONASS, the Russian Global Navigation Satellite System, is 
    operating in the 1610-1616 MHz band pursuant to International Radio 
    Regulation RR 732. MSS stations may not cause harmful interference to 
    or claim protection from stations operating under RR 732. During the 
    Negotiated Rulemaking, the FAA indicated that it sought to use GLONASS 
    in conjunction with the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) to provide 
    aircraft ground approach and terminal communications. The Committee 
    determined that MSS can coexist with GLONASS now, but if GLONASS were 
    used as proposed by the FAA, the GLONASS/MSS interference problems at 
    1610-1616 MHz would be unresolvable. The Committee proposed that 
    GLONASS be moved below the 1610 MHz band or, in the alternative, that 
    U.S. reliance on GLONASS be lessened or eliminated. Both inter-agency 
    and international negotiations have been initiated on this issue. We 
    are encouraged that even if GLONASS is used for aircraft approach 
    communications, it will be moved to frequencies below 1610 MHz. The 
    Committee's proposed rules regarding e.i.r.p. limits pursuant to RR 
    731F and limitations on the use of MSS terminals on aircraft fall 
    within accepted international standards and are set forth for comment 
    (proposed Sec. 25.213(c)).
        The Committee also suggested a variety of solutions to the likely 
    interference problems between MSS and other services, ranging from 
    relocating existing licensees (e.g., ``grandfathered'' terrestrial 
    stations operating in the 2483.5-2500 MHz band) to imposing stricter 
    suppression requirements on transmissions in adjacent frequency bands 
    (e.g., ITFS stations operating above 2500 MHz). However, these 
    interests were not represented on the Committee, nor were the interests 
    of ISM operators in the 2483.5-2500 MHz band. In these cases, the 
    Commission does not believe that it can propose sharing rules without 
    developing the record more fully. It therefore requests comment on the 
    interference environment and possible solutions from affected 
    operators.
    
    Feeder Links
    
        Since the fixed-satellite frequencies to be used for LEO MSS feeder 
    links may also be used by GSO satellites, the Committee studied the 
    sharing potential between LEO and GSO satellites. It concluded that 
    sharing was feasible. The Committee also studied the obligations of the 
    United States under RR 2613, which essentially requires a LEO operator 
    to cease operations when unacceptable interference is cause to a GSO 
    system. To afford LEO operators some protection, the Committee 
    suggested that the U.S. seek international agreement that RR 2613 will 
    not be invoked to require a LEO operator to terminate transmissions 
    unless: (1) The affected administrations reach agreement as to a level 
    of ``accepted interference,'' (2) the LEO system is operating in excess 
    of these levels, and (3) the excess interference is caused by the LEO 
    satellite's failure to maintain sufficient angular separation between 
    the satellites.
        The Commission accepted the Committee's analysis that sharing 
    between LEO feeder links and GSO systems is feasible with coordination. 
    Further, the Commission agrees with the Committee's interpretation of 
    RR 2613 and has already begun to explore, in international forums, 
    issues relating to international coordination of and protection for LEO 
    system feeder links.
        Several applicants request feeder links in the 5/6 GHz frequency 
    bands (C-band); other request the 20/30 GHz bands (Ka-band). The FAA 
    opposes feeder links at 5 GHz, arguing that feeder link operations 
    would be incompatible with its intended use of the band for new 
    navigation aids. In a related Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    regarding the Local Multi-point Distribution Service (CC Docket No. 92-
    297; FCC No. 94-12) 59 FR 7964, February 17. 1994 adopted the same day 
    as this Notice, the Commission proposes to conduct a negotiated 
    rulemaking to assist it in assigning the 27.5-30.0 GHz frequency band. 
    It expects, in the context of that proceeding, to be able to identify 
    sufficient spectrum to satisfy 1.6/2/4 GHz MSS operators. The 
    Commission will, however, continue to pursue feeder links at 5 GHz and 
    will allow applicants to incorporate these bands or other bands if they 
    become available.
    
    Intersatellite Links
    
        Motorola's proposed system system includes intersatellite links in 
    the 23.18-23.38 GHz band. The Committee concluded that Motorola's use 
    of this band would be compatible with other operations in the band. The 
    Committee's recommended rules regarding intersatellite service 
    frequencies, coordination with government agencies, and sharing 
    criteria are contained in proposed rule Sec. 25.279.
    
    Service Rules
    
    Regulatory Classification
    
        The 1993 Budget Act requires that the provision of space segment 
    capacity directly to commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers 
    be treated as common carriage. However, the Act gives the Commission 
    the discretion to determine whether the provision of space segment 
    capacity to CMRS providers should be treated as common carriage. (Most 
    of the pending applicants propose to offer service through resellers.) 
    The Commission tentatively concludes that 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS offering 
    will, in most cases, fall within the definition of CMRS. The Commission 
    requests comment on whether 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS space station licensees 
    making satellite capacity available to CMRS providers should be 
    required to operate as common carriers. Specifically, the Commission 
    requests comment regarding whether there may be any public interest 
    reasons to impose a legal compulsion upon 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS operators to 
    serve the public indifferently, and whether a decision to exempt 
    operators from common carriage requirements will allow them to engage 
    in unreasonable or anticompetitive practices. The Commission recognizes 
    that requiring common carriage may limit the amount of foreign 
    participation in these inherently global systems, potentially impeding 
    international coordination of these satellites. The Commission requests 
    comment on the extent to which applicants are seeking foreign 
    investment and the extent to which a common carriage requirement may 
    impact their plans. The Commission also requests comment regarding the 
    likelihood that 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS space station capacity will inherently 
    be offered as an indifferent holding out to the public.
    
    System License and License Term
    
        The Commission also proposes licensing and service rules (proposed 
    rules Secs. 25.143(a), (c) and (d), 25.120(e), and 25.143(e) and (g)). 
    These include blanket licensing for the space segment, a ten year 
    operating license that begins to run when the first LEO satellite is 
    launched, authority to replace older satellites as they are retired, a 
    filing window for next-generation system proposals, system 
    implementation milestones, and an annual reporting requirement.
    
    Mobile Earth Station Licensing
    
        The Commission proposes to license gateway and tracking, telemetry 
    and control (TT&C) stations as fixed-satellite earth stations under 
    part 25 of the Commission's Rules. It also proposes a blanket licensing 
    approach for mobile user transceivers under which a service vendor 
    would hold the authorization for a specified number of technically 
    identical units. The Commission's proposals for earth station licensing 
    are contained in Secs. 25.115(d) (applications for earth station 
    authorizations); 25.130(b) (filing requirements for transmitting earth 
    stations); 25.133(b) (period of construction; commencement of 
    construction); 25.136 (operating provisions for earth station networks 
    in the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service); and 25.213 (technical 
    requirements for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service). The 
    Commission requests comment on these proposals.
        To help maintain an interference-free environment, the Commission 
    proposes to require an end user to obtain the authorization of the 
    space station operator, either directly or through an authorized 
    service vendor, before the user may transmit to that system. The 
    Commission believes that this approach will facilitate roaming by 
    international user while still protecting the domestic electromagnetic 
    environment.
        The regulatory treatment of earth station licensees will depend 
    upon whether they will be providing CMRS, although the Commission 
    expects that they will. Earth station licensees that provide CMRS must 
    be regulated as common carriers.
    
    International Coordination
    
        All space segment licensees will be required to provide the 
    Commission with all information required for international 
    coordination. The Commission will follow the coordination procedures 
    prescribed by the International Telecommunication Union and will work 
    with the global community to promote mobile satellite services through 
    the development of sharing techniques and the exploration of other 
    technical issues. The Commission will also require United States 
    licensees to meet all international obligations any national 
    requirements imposed by other licensing administrations regarding 
    operations within their borders. All decisions relating to implementing 
    1.6/2.4 GHz MSS within a country's territory will remain solely within 
    that country's jurisdiction and control.
    
    Procedural Matters
    
        This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. 
    Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda 
    period, provided that they are disclosed in accordance with Commission 
    rules. See generally 47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206(a).
        Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 603, 
    this proceeding could affect the marketing opportunities of potential 
    new service providers or equipment manufacturers, who may be small 
    entities, in the voice mobile-satellite services. As this is a new 
    service, the number of such small businesses is unknown. Public comment 
    is requested on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis set out in 
    full, in the Commission's complete decision.
        Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Secs. 1.415 and 
    1.1415 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.419, interested 
    parties may file comments on or before May 5, 1994, and reply comments 
    on or before June 6, 1994. All relevant and timely comments will be 
    considered by the Commission before final action is taken in this 
    proceeding.
    
    Ordering Clauses
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 4(i) and 
    303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) 
    and 303(r), we hereby give notice of our intent to adopt the 
    regulations and licensing policies described above.
        It is ordered that the Secretary shall send a copy of this Notice 
    of Proposed Rulemaking to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
    Business Administration in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (1981).
    
    List of Subjects
    
    47 CFR Part 25
    
        Communications common carriers, Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Satellites.
    
    47 CFR Part 94
    
        Communications equipment, Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William F. Caton,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-5829 Filed 3-11-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/14/1994
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
94-5829
Dates:
Comment date: May 5, 1994; Reply comment date: June 6, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 14, 1994, CC Docket No. 92-166, FCC No. 94-11