95-5246. Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, - 200A, and -300A Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 13620-13621]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-5246]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-126-AD; Amendment 39-9168; AD 95-05-01]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, -
    200A, and -300A Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to all British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -
    300A series airplanes, that requires conducting closed loop tests to 
    determine the setting of the underfrequency trip level on suspect 
    generator control units (GCU), and either the correction of 
    discrepancies or replacement of the GCU. This amendment is prompted by 
    several malfunctions of in-service GCU's due to the effects of setting 
    the underfrequency trip level too high. The actions specified by this 
    AD are intended to correct GCU's that may have the underfrequency level 
    set too high, which could result in the unwanted shut down of an 
    electrical generator; this condition may lead to loss of all generated 
    electrical power on the airplane when other generator faults or 
    failures occur.
    
    DATES: Effective April 13, 1995. -
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of April 13, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from British Aerospace Holdings, Inc., Avro International 
    Aerospace Division, P.O. Box 16039, Dulles International Airport, 
    Washington, DC 20041-6039. This information may be examined at the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Schroeder, Aerospace Engineer, 
    ANM-113, Standardization Branch, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2148; fax (206) 227-1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to all British Aerospace Model BAe 
    146-100A, -200A, and -300A series airplanes was published in the 
    Federal Register on November 16, 1994 (59 FR 59179). That action 
    proposed to require checking the part and serial number on the data 
    plate of each GCU to identify discrepant units, and conducting closed 
    loop tests on affected GCU's to determine the setting of the 
    underfrequency trip level. That action also proposed to require either 
    adjusting the underfrequency trip level or replacing the discrepant GCU 
    with a serviceable unit, and conducting post assembly testing. -
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received. -
        The commenter supports the proposed rule. -
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been added to this final rule to clarify this long-standing 
    requirement. -
        After careful review of the available data, including the comment 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD. -
        The FAA estimates that 43 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per 
    airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor 
    rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,580, or $60 
    per airplane. -
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. -
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment. -
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a [[Page 13621]] ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will 
    not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for 
    this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may 
    be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 -
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment -
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES -
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13   [Amended] -
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-05-01  British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Limited, Avro 
    International Aerospace Division (Formerly British Aerospace, plc; 
    British Aerospace Commercial Aircraft Limited): Amendment 39-9168. 
    Docket 94-NM-126-AD.
    
         -Applicability: All Model British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, 
    -200A, and -300A series airplanes, certificated in any category.
    
         -Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD. -
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously. -
        To correct generator control units (GCU) that may have the 
    under-frequency trip level set too high, which could lead to the 
    unwanted shut down of an electrical generator, accomplish the 
    following: -
        (a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, check 
    the part and serial number on the data plate of each generator 
    control unit (GCU). If the part number is one of those affected and 
    the serial number is listed in Addendum 1 of GEC-Marconi Service 
    Bulletin HGE 24-23, dated March 11, 1994, prior to further flight, 
    conduct a closed loop test to determine the setting of the 
    underfrequency trip level, in accordance with that service 
    bulletin.-
        (1) If the level exceeds that specified in GEC-Marconi Service 
    Bulletin HGE 24-23, dated March 11, 1994, prior to further flight, 
    adjust the level in accordance with that service bulletin; or 
    replace the GCU with a serviceable unit, in accordance with Avro 
    Service Bulletin S.B. 24-103, dated March 24, 1994. -
        (2) Prior to further flight, after adjustment or replacement of 
    the GCU as required by paragraph (a)(1) of this AD, conduct the post 
    assembly testing in accordance with Avro Service Bulletin S.B. 24-
    103, dated March 24, 1994. -
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
         -Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        -(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. -
        (d) The closed loop test and adjustment shall be done in 
    accordance with GEC-Marconi Service Bulletin HGE 24-23, dated March 
    11, 1994. The replacement and post assembly test shall be done in 
    accordance with Avro Service Bulletin S.B. 24-103, dated March 24, 
    1994. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director 
    of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from British Aerospace Holding, 
    Inc., Avro International Aerospace Division, P.O. Box 16039, Dulles 
    International Airport, Washington, DC 20041-6039. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. 
    -
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on April 13, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 27, 1995.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-5246 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/13/1995
Published:
03/14/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-5246
Dates:
Effective April 13, 1995. -
Pages:
13620-13621 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-NM-126-AD, Amendment 39-9168, AD 95-05-01
PDF File:
95-5246.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13