95-6206. Forrest L. Roudebush, Kansas City, Missouri; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities and Requiring Certain Notification to NRC  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 13739-13741]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6206]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    Forrest L. Roudebush, Kansas City, Missouri; Order Prohibiting 
    Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities and Requiring Certain 
    Notification to NRC
    
    I
    
        Mr. Forrest L. Roudebush has been, from its inception, the owner 
    and president of Piping Specialists Incorporated (PSI or Licensee), 
    also known as PSI Inspection, which was the holder of Byproduct 
    Material License No. 24-24826-01 issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 30 and 34 on 
    March 6, 1987. The license authorized the use of byproduct material 
    (iridium-192 and cobalt-60) for industrial radiography in devices 
    approved by the NRC or an Agreement State. The facility where licensed 
    materials were authorized for storage was located at 1010 East 10th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri. The use of licensed materials was 
    authorized at temporary job sites anywhere in the United States that 
    the NRC maintains jurisdiction for regulating the use of licensed 
    materials. On October 17, 1991, the NRC staff issued an Order 
    Suspending License (Effective Immediately) to PSI. On April 22, 1992, 
    the NRC staff issued to PSI an Order Modifying Order Suspending License 
    (Effective Immediately) and Order Revoking License. The revocation of 
    the license was upheld by a decision of the NRC Atomic Safety and 
    Licensing Board (ASLB), Piping Specialists, Inc. and Forrest L. 
    Roudebush, LBP 92-25, 36 NRC 156 (1992), which the Commission declined 
    to review, CLI-92-16, 36 NRC 351 (1992).
    
    II
    
        NRC Region III initiated an inspection of the Licensee on September 
    4, 1991, and on September 24, 1991, the NRC Office of Investigations 
    (OI) commenced an investigation based on information received on August 
    29, 1991, that the PSI radiation safety program was not being conducted 
    in compliance with NRC rules, regulations, and license 
    [[Page 13740]] conditions. The inspection and investigation focused on 
    the Licensee's compliance with NRC regulations, including possible 
    willful violations involving: (1) False statements to NRC inspectors 
    and investigators; (2) use of unauthorized and/or unqualified 
    radiographer's assistants while conducting radiography; (3) preparation 
    of false, inaccurate, and incomplete records; (4) failure to provide or 
    use personnel dosimetry devices while conducting radiography; and (5) 
    failure to survey and post radiation area boundaries to provide notice 
    of radiation hazards to the public while performing radiography.
        The OI investigation was completed on February 21, 1992, and 
    identified the following deliberate violations of NRC requirements 
    attributable to Mr. Roudebush:
        A. In violation of 10 CFR 30.9, the PSI Radiation Safety Officer 
    (RSO), with the prior knowledge of Mr. Roudebush, deliberately provided 
    incomplete and inaccurate information to NRC inspectors during 
    inspections conducted on March 21 and September 17-18, 1991. 
    Specifically, the RSO presented to the inspectors the Licensee's 
    utilization log, records of pocket dosimeter readings, and records of 
    surveys of radiographic exposure devices performed at the time of the 
    storage of the device at the end of the work day. Those records were 
    neither complete nor accurate because: (1) The records did not document 
    the Licensee's uses of the radiographic exposure devices which occurred 
    during periods when the Licensee's personnel dosimetry service was 
    interrupted due to the nonpayment of service fees; and (2) the 
    information in the records had not been recorded daily as required, but 
    instead, had been fabricated en masse shortly before the inspections. 
    Further, the RSO and Mr. Roudebush knew that the records were 
    inaccurate and that the records had been fabricated by the RSO 
    immediately before the inspections.
        B. In violation of 10 CFR 30.9, during an interview with OI on 
    October 16, 1991, Mr. Roudebush, under oath, after defining a 
    radiographer's assistant as one who ``* * * handles and operates the 
    enclosure, handle [sic] and operates the device, handles and operates 
    the survey meter, takes charge of that dosimeter'', denied to an OI 
    investigator that he had performed work as a radiographer's assistant. 
    This statement was deliberately false because during the NRC inspection 
    conducted on September 17-18, 1991, Mr. Roudebush acknowledged that he 
    had attached the control cable and guide tube to a radiographic 
    exposure device and had exposed and retracted the source during 
    radiographic operations. Mr. Roudebush was not qualified as a 
    radiographer or assistant radiographer.
        The investigation found other deliberate violations of NRC 
    requirements, as well as a number of violations that in the aggregate 
    represented a breakdown in the management of the PSI radiation safety 
    program. Those violations are discussed in the October 17, 1991 Order 
    Suspending License (Effective Immediately), EA 91-136; and the April 
    22, 1992 Order Modifying Order Suspending License (Effective 
    Immediately) and Order Revoking License, EA 92-054. Those orders 
    discuss why the staff does not have reasonable assurance that the 
    licensee or Mr. Roudebush would comply with NRC requirements in the 
    future.
        The ASLB conducted a hearing from April 28 to May 1, 1992 on the 
    October 17, 1991 Order Suspending License (Effective Immediately) and 
    the April 22, 1992 Order Modifying Order Suspending License (Effective 
    Immediately) and Order Revoking License.
        The ASLB, in its Final Initial Decision (Revoking License), LBP-92-
    25, 36 NRC 156 (1992), stated:
    
        We conclude that there have been extensive failures on the part 
    of PSI and Mr. Roudebush to comply with NRC regulations. The Board 
    finds that the Licensee has failed to act as a reasonable manager of 
    licensed activities; failed to detect and correct violations caused 
    by an employee; willfully attempted to conceal violations from NRC 
    Staff, and given untruthful information to the Staff during its 
    inspections and investigations. Moreover, we find that Mr. Roudebush 
    was untruthful in some aspects of his testimony both during a formal 
    investigation and this Licensing Board. Id., at 186.
    
        Pursuant to a plea agreement, on August 18, 1994, Mr. Roudebush 
    pled guilty in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of 
    Missouri to one criminal count of violating Title 42, United States 
    Code, Sections 2273 and 2201 (b) and (i) (Secs. 161b, 161i, and 223 of 
    the Atomic Energy Act). Specifically, the agreement describes the 
    nature of the offense as the failure to provide dosimetry devices to 
    employees. As a result, on December 12, 1994, an amended judgment was 
    filed whereby Mr. Roudebush was sentenced to two years probation. The 
    terms of the probation, in part, provide that Mr. Roudebush shall not 
    apply for or obtain a license for radiography during the probation 
    period.
    
    III
    
        Based on the above, the NRC concludes that Forrest L. Roudebush, 
    the owner and president of PSI, engaged in deliberate misconduct that 
    caused the Licensee to be in violation of 10 CFR 30.9, 30.10, and 
    34.33. Mr. Roudebush deliberately provided information to NRC 
    inspectors and investigators that he knew to be incomplete or 
    inaccurate in some material respect to the NRC, and Mr. Roudebush was 
    deliberately untruthful during portions of his testimony to the ASLB, 
    in violation of 10 CFR 30.9 and 30.10. Further, Mr. Roudebush 
    deliberately failed to provide dosimetry devices to his employees, in 
    violation of 10 CFR 34.33 and 30.10. The NRC must be able to rely on 
    its licensees, including their officers and employees, to comply with 
    NRC requirements, including the requirement to provide information and 
    to maintain records that are complete and accurate in all respects 
    material to the NRC. The deliberate actions of Forrest L. Roudebush in 
    causing the Licensee to violate 10 CFR 30.9, 30.10, and 34.33, and his 
    misrepresentations to the NRC have raised serious doubt as to whether 
    he can be relied on to comply with NRC requirements and to provide 
    complete and accurate information to the NRC.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    Forrest L. Roudebush will conduct licensed activities in compliance 
    with the Commission's requirements or that the health and safety of the 
    public will be protected if Forrest L. Roudebush were permitted at this 
    time to be involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public 
    health, safety and interest require that, for a period of five years 
    from October 17, 1991, the date that the PSI license was suspended by 
    Immediately Effective Order, Forrest L. Roudebush be prohibited from 
    any involvement in NRC-licensed activities for either: (1) An NRC 
    licensee, or (2) an Agreement State licensee performing licensed 
    activities in areas of NRC jurisdiction in accordance with 10 CFR 
    150.20. In addition, for a period of five years commencing after 
    completion of the five year period of prohibition, Mr. Roudebush must 
    notify the NRC of his employment or involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities to ensure that the NRC can monitor the status of Mr. 
    Roudebush's compliance with the Commission's requirements and his 
    understanding of his commitment to compliance. If Mr. Roudebush is 
    currently involved with another licensee in NRC-licensed activities, 
    Mr. Roudebush must immediately cease such activities, and inform the 
    NRC of [[Page 13741]] the name, address and telephone number of the 
    employer, and provide a copy of this order to the employer.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 182 and 186 of 
    the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is 
    hereby ordered that:
        1. Forrest L. Roudebush is prohibited until October 17, 1996 from 
    engaging in any NRC-licensed activities. NRC-licensed activities are 
    those activities that are conducted pursuant to a specific or general 
    license issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those 
    activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the 
    authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
        2. For a period of five years, beginning October 17, 1996, after 
    the five-year period of prohibition has expired, Forrest L. Roudebush 
    shall, within 20 days of his acceptance of each employment offer 
    involving NRC-licensed activities or his becoming involved in NRC-
    licensed activities, as defined in Paragraph IV.1 above, provide notice 
    to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, of the name, address, and telephone 
    number of the employer or the entity where he is, or will be, involved 
    in the NRC-licensed activities. In the first such notification, Forrest 
    L. Roudebush shall include a statement of his commitment to compliance 
    with regulatory requirements and the basis why the Commission should 
    have confidence that he will now comply with applicable NRC 
    requirements.
        3. If Forrest L. Roudebush is currently involved with any NRC 
    licensee or Agreement State licensee engaging in NRC-licensed 
    activities, then Forrest L. Roudebush must, as of the effective date of 
    this Order, cease such activities and inform the NRC of the name, 
    address and telephone number of the licensee, and provide a copy of 
    this Order to the licensee.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
    rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr. Roudebush 
    of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Forrest L. Roudebush must, and any 
    other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to 
    this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of 
    the date of this Order. The answer may consent to this Order. Unless 
    the answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, in writing and 
    under oath or affirmation, specifically admit or deny each allegation 
    or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the matters of fact 
    and law on which Mr. Roudebush or other person adversely affected 
    relies and the reasons as to why the Order should not have been issued. 
    Any answer or request for a hearing shall be submitted to the 
    Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Chief, Docketing 
    and Service Section, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be sent to 
    the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for 
    Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, and to the Regional 
    Administrator, NRC Region III, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 
    60532-4531 if the answer or hearing request is by a person other than 
    Mr. Roudebush. If a person other then Mr. Roudebush requests a hearing, 
    that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his 
    or her interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address 
    the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Mr. Roudebush or a person whose 
    interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order 
    designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, 
    the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether, on the 
    basis of the matters described in: (1) this Order; (2) EA 91-136; (3) 
    EA 92-054; and (4) LBP-92-25, 36 NRC 156 (1992), this Order should be 
    sustained.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, the provisions specified 
    in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order 
    without further order or proceedings.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 3rd day of March 1995.
    
        From the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Hugh L. Thompson, Jr.,
    Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards and 
    Operations Support.
    [FR Doc. 95-6206 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/14/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-6206
Pages:
13739-13741 (3 pages)
PDF File:
95-6206.pdf