[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 51 (Thursday, March 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10570-10572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-6119]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1197-000, et al.]
Portland General Electric Company, et al. Electric Rate and
Corporate Regulation Filings
March 8, 1996.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Portland General Electric Company
[Docket No. ER96-1197-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE), tendered for filing under FERC Electric Tariff, 1st
Revised Volume No. 2, an executed Service Agreement between PGE and El
Paso Electric Company.
Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11 and the Commission's order issued July 30,
1993 (Docket No. PL93-2-002), PGE respectfully requests the Commission
grant a waiver of the notice requirements of 18 CFR 35.3 to allow the
executed Service Agreement to become effective March 1, 1996.
Copies of this filing were served upon El Paso Electric Company.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
2. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and The Toledo Edison
Company Market Responsive Energy, Inc.
[Docket Nos. EC96-14-000, ER95-1104-000 and ER95-1295-000]
Take notice that on February 29, 1996, The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company (CEI) and The Toledo Edison Company (TE) tendered
for filing revised open access tariffs for point-to-point transmission
service and for network integration service that are to be implemented
by Centerior Electric Company (Centerior), and service agreements for
service to be rendered under the Point-to-Point Transmission Service to
the City of Cleveland, Ohio and to American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.
as agent for the City of Painesville, Ohio. CEI and TE have proposed to
make their open access transmission tariffs effective upon the
consummation of the merger of CEI and TE into Centerior.
CEI and TE also submitted testimony and exhibits of witnesses on
behalf of Centerior that constitute it case-in-chief in support of the
proposed tariffs. CEI and TE state that their filing is fully
responsive to the Commission's Order Finding Transmission Tariffs
Deficient and Deferring Action on Related Applications for Merger and
Market-Based Rates issued December 20, 1995 in the above-captioned
proceedings. CEI and TE further state that their revised open access
transmission tariffs are in conformance with the applicable Commission
policies and request that the Commission promptly approve the merger of
CEI and TE.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
3. Southern California Edison Co.
[Docket No. ER96-1198-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Southern California Edison
Company (Edison), tendered for filing changes in rates for transmission
service as embodied in Edison's agreements with the following entities:
[[Page 10571]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entity FERC rate schedule No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. City of Anaheim........................ 130, 246.6, 246.8, 246.13,
246.29, 246.32, 246.33,
246.36
2. City of Azusa.......................... 160, 247.4, 247.6, 247.8,
247.24, 247.29
3. City of Banning........................ 159, 248.5, 248.7, 248.9,
248.24, 248.29
4. City of Colton......................... 162, 249.4, 249., 249.8,
249.24, 249.29
5. City of Riverside...................... 129, 250.6, 250.8, 250.10,
250.15, 250.21, 250.27,
250.30, 250.35
6. City of Vernon......................... 149, 154.7, 172, 207, 272,
276, 338
7. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative..... 131, 161
8. Arizona Public Service Company......... 185, 348
9. California Department of Water 38, 112, 113, 181, 342
Resources.
10. City of Burbank....................... 166
11. City of Glendale...................... 143
12. City of Los Angeles Department of 102, 118, 140, 141, 163,
Water and Power. 188, 219
13. City of Pasadena...................... 158
14. Coastal Electric Services Company..... 347
15. Imperial Irrigation District.......... 259, 268
16. Metropolitan Water District of 292
Southern California.
17. M-S-R Public Power Agency............. 153, 339
18. Northern California Power Agency...... 240
19. Pacific Gas and Electric Company...... 117, 147, 256, 381
20. PacifiCorp............................ 275
21. Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation.. 346
22. San Diego Gas & Electric Company...... 151, 274, 302
23. Western Area Power Administration..... 120
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to these rate schedules, the rate changes result from a
change in the rate of return from 9.80% to 9.55% authorized by the
California Public Utilities Commission, effective January 1, 1996.
Edison is requesting waiver of the 60-day prior notice requirement
and requests that the Commission assign an effective date of January 1,
1996, to the changes in rates for transmission service.
Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California and all interested parties.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
4. Cinergy Services, Inc.
[Docket No. ER96-1199-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Cinergy Services, Inc.
(Cinergy), tendered for filing a service agreement under Cinergy's Non-
Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Tariff (the Tariff) entered
into between Cinergy and Tennessee Valley Authority.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
5. Southern Company Services, Inc.
[Docket No. ER96-1201-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Southern Company Services,
Inc., acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company and Savannah Electric and
Power Company (Southern Companies), tendered for filing an Interchange
Service Contract between Southern Companies and InterCoast Power
Marketing Company. The Interchange Service Contract establishes the
terms and conditions of power supply, including provisions relating to
service conditions, control of system disturbances, metering and other
matters related to the administration of the agreement.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
6. Northern Indiana Public Service Company
[Docket No. ER96-1202-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Northern Indiana Public
Service Company tendered for filing an executed Service Agreement
between Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Southern Energy
Marketing, Inc.
Under the Service Agreement, Northern Indiana Public Service
Company agrees to provide services to Southern Energy Marketing, Inc.
under Northern Indiana Public Service Company's Power Sales Tariff,
which was accepted for filing by the Commission and made effective by
Order dated August 17, 1995 in Docket No. ER95-1222-000. Northern
Indiana Public Service Company and Southern Energy Marketing, Inc.
requests waiver of the Commission's sixty-day notice requirement to
permit an effective date of March 1, 1996.
Copies of this filing have been sent to the Indiana Utility
Regulatory Commission and the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer
Counselor.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
7. Southern Company Services, Inc.
[Docket No. ER96-1203-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Southern Company Services,
Inc., acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company and Savannah Electric and
Power Company (Southern Companies), tendered for filing an Interchange
Service Contract between Southern Companies and Entergy Power, Inc. The
Interchange Service Contract establishes the terms and conditions of
power supply, including provisions relating to service conditions,
control of system disturbances, metering and other matters related to
the administration of the agreement.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
8. Great Bay Power Corporation
[Docket No. ER96-1204-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Great Bay Power Corporation
(Great Bay) tendered for filing a service agreement between PECO Energy
Company and Great Bay for service under Great Bay's Tariff for Short
Term Sales. This Tariff was accepted for filing by the Commission on
November 11, 1993, in Docket No. ER93-924-000. The service agreement is
proposed to be effective February 1, 1996.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
9. Maine Public Service Company
[Docket No. ER96-1205-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, Maine Public Service Company
submitted agreements under its Umbrella Power Sales tariff.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
10. PECO Energy Company
[Docket No. ER96-1206-000]
Take notice that on February 28, 1996, PECO Energy Company (PECO),
tendered for filing a letter from the
[[Page 10572]]
Executive Committee of the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP),
indicating that PECO had completed all the steps for pool membership
(the WSPP Letter). PECO requests that the Commission amend the WSPP
Agreement to include it as a member.
Because PECO has completed the arrangements set forth on page two
of the WSPP Letter, PECO requests the Commission allow PECO membership
in the WSPP to become effective immediately upon the date of this
filing. Accordingly, PECO requests waiver of the Commission's notice
requirements for good cause shown.
Copies of the filing were served upon the WSPP Executive Committee.
Comment date: March 21, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraph
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426,
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-6119 Filed 3-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
