95-6419. Pesticide Tolerances for 2-[1-(Ethoxyimino)Butyl]-5-[2- (Ethylthio)Propyl]-3-Hydroxy-2-Cyclohexen-1-One  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 13941-13943]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6419]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162/P602; FRL-4936-1]
    RIN 2070-AC18
    
    
    Pesticide Tolerances for 2-[1-(Ethoxyimino)Butyl]-5-[2-
    (Ethylthio)Propyl]-3-Hydroxy-2-Cyclohexen-1-One
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA proposes to establish time limited tolerances for the 
    combined residues of the herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-
    (ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one (also referred to in 
    this document as sethoxydim) and its metabolites in or on various raw 
    agricultural commodities. The Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-
    4) requested the proposed regulation to establish maximum permissible 
    levels for residues of the herbicide. These time-limited tolerances 
    would expire on December 31, 1996.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3909, 
    2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162/P602], must be received on or before 
    April 14, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this notice may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will 
    not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 
    CFR part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be 
    submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked 
    confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All 
    written comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at 
    the address given above, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, 
    Registration Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 
    2800 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-308-8783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interregional Research Project No. 4 
    (IR-4), New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 231, 
    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, has submitted pesticide 
    petitions (PP) 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162 to EPA on 
    behalf of the named Agricultural Experiment Stations.
        These petitions request that the Administrator, pursuant to section 
    408(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 
    346a(e), amend 40 CFR 180.412 by establishing time-limited tolerances 
    for combined residues of the herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-
    (ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one) and its metabolites 
    containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one moiety (calculated as the herbicide) 
    in or on certain raw agricultural commodities as follows:
        1. PP 0E3909. Petition submitted on behalf of the Experimental 
    Stations of Massachusetts, Washington, and [[Page 13942]] Wisconsin 
    proposing a tolerance for cranberry at 2.0 parts per million (ppm).
        2. PP 2E4052. Petition submitted on behalf of the Experimental 
    Stations of South Dakota and Washington proposing tolerances for 
    peppermint and spearmint at 30 ppm.
        3. PP 2E4065. Petition submitted on behalf of the Experimental 
    Station of Florida proposing a tolerance for endive at 2.0 ppm. The 
    petitioner proposed that use of sethoxydim on endive be limited to 
    Florida based on the geographical representation of the residue data 
    submitted. Additional residue data will be required to expand the area 
    of usage. Persons seeking geographically broader registration should 
    contact the Agency's Registration Division at the address provided 
    above.
        4. PP 2E4092. Petition submitted on behalf of the Experimental 
    Stations of California, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North 
    Carolina, and Tennessee proposing a tolerance for carrot at 1.0 ppm.
        5. PP 3E4162. Petition submitted on behalf of the Experimental 
    Stations of Arkansas, Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and 
    Washington proposing a tolerance for asparagus at 4.0 ppm.
        The scientific data submitted in the petitions and other relevant 
    material have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in 
    support of the proposed tolerances include:
        1. Several acute toxicology studies place technical sethoxydim in 
    acute toxicity category IV for primary eye and dermal irritation and 
    acute toxicity category III for acute oral, dermal, and inhalation. The 
    dermal sensitization - guinea pig study was waived because no 
    sensitization was seen in guinea pigs dosed with the end-use product 
    Poast (18 percent a.i.).
        2. A 1-year feeding study with dogs fed diets containing 0, 8.86/
    9.41, 17.5/19.9, and 110/129 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day (males/
    females) with a no-observed-effect-level (NOEL) of 8.86/9.41 mg/kg/day 
    (males/females) based on equivocal anemia in male dogs at the 17.5-mg/
    kg/day dose level.
        3. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study with mice fed 
    diets containing 0, 40, 120, 360, and 1,080 ppm (equivalent to 0, 6, 
    18, 54, and 162 mg/kg/day) with a systemic NOEL of 120 ppm (18 mg/kg/
    day) based on non-neoplastic liver lesions in male mice at the 360-ppm 
    (54 mg/kg/day) dose level. There were no carcinogenic effects observed 
    under the conditions of the study. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 
    not achieved in female mice.
        4. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenic study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 2, 6, and 18 mg/kg/day with a systemic NOEL greater than 
    or equal to 18 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested). There were no 
    carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study. This 
    study was reviewed under current guidelines and was found to be 
    unacceptable because the doses used were insufficient to induce a toxic 
    response and an MTD was not achieved.
        5. A second chronic feeding/carcinogenic study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 360, and 1,080 ppm (equivalent to 18.2/23.0, and 55.9/
    71.8 mg/kg/day (males/females). The dose levels were too low to elicit 
    a toxic response in the test animals and failed to achieve an MTD or 
    define a lowest effect level (LEL). Slight decreases in body weight in 
    rats at the 1,080-ppm dose level, although not biologically 
    significant, support a free-standing no-observed-adverse-effect-level 
    (NOAEL) of 1,080 ppm (55.9/71.8 mg/kg/day (males/females)). There were 
    no carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study.
        6. A developmental toxicity study in rats fed dosages of 0, 50, 
    180, 650, and 1,000 mg/kg/day with a maternal NOAEL of 180 mg/kg/day 
    and a maternal LEL of 650 mg/kg/day (irregular gait, decreased 
    activity, excessive salivation, and anogenital staining); and a 
    developmental NOAEL of 180 mg/kg/day, and a developmental LEL of 650 
    mg/kg/day (21 to 22 percent decrease in fetal weights, filamentous 
    tail, and lack of tail due to the absence of sacral and/or caudal 
    vertebrae, and delayed ossification in the hyoids, vertebral centrum 
    and/or transverse processes, sternebrae and/or metatarsals, and pubes).
        7. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits fed doses of 0, 80, 
    160, 320, and 400 mg/kg/day with a maternal NOEL of 320 mg/kg/day and a 
    maternal LOEL of 400 mg/kg/day (37% reduction in body weight gain 
    without significant differences in group mean body weights and 
    decreased food consumption during dosing); and a developmental NOEL 
    greater than 400 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested).
        8. A two-generation reproduction study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 150, 600, and 3,000 ppm (approximately 0, 7.5, 30, and 
    150 mg/kg/day) with no reproductive effects observed under the 
    conditions of the study.
        Although the dose levels were insufficient to elicit a toxic 
    response, the Agency considers this study usable for regulatory 
    purposes and has established a free-standing NOEL of 3,000 ppm 
    (approximately 150 mg/kg/day).
        9. Mutagenicity studies including: Ames assays were negative for 
    gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, 
    and TA 1537, with and without metabolic activity; a Chinese hamster 
    bone marrow cytogenetic assay was negative for structural chromosomal 
    aberrations at doses up to 5,000 mg/kg in Chinese hamster bone marrow 
    cells in vivo; and recombinant assays and forward mutations tests in 
    Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and S. typhimurium were all 
    negative for genotoxic effects at concentrations of greater than or 
    equal to 100 percent.
        10. In a rat metabolism study, excretion was extremely rapid and 
    tissue accumulation was negligible.
        The reference dose (RFD) is calculated at 0.09 mg/kg of body 
    weight/day, based on a NOEL of 8.86 mg/kg/day from the 1-year feeding 
    study in dogs and an uncertainty factor of 100. The theoretical maximum 
    residue contribution (TMRC) from existing tolerances for the overall 
    U.S. population is estimated at 0.031961 mg/kg of body weight/day, or 
    36% of the RfD. The proposed tolerances for asparagus, carrot, 
    cranberry, endive, peppermint, and spearmint will increase the TMRC by 
    0.000701 mg/kg of body weight/day and will utilize less than 1 percent 
    of the RfD for the overall U.S. population. EPA estimates indicate that 
    dietary exposure will not exceed the RfD for any population subgroup 
    for which EPA has data.
        These tolerances are proposed as time-limited tolerances since an 
    acceptable carcinogenicity study is needed in one rodent species. A 
    repeat chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats is underway and is 
    due to be submitted to EPA in November of 1995. The Agency will 
    reassess sethoxydim tolerances based on the outcome of the rat chronic 
    feeding/carcinogenicity study and, if appropriate, will establish 
    permanent tolerances for asparagus, carrot, cranberry, endive, 
    peppermint and spearmint. In the interim, the Agency concludes that 
    there is little risk from establishment of the proposed tolerances 
    since available studies in rats and mice indicate no carcinogenic 
    effects, there are adequate data to establish a RfD, existing 
    tolerances and the proposed tolerances do not exceed the RfD, and the 
    proposed tolerances utilize less than 1 percent of the RfD.
        The nature of the residue is adequately understood, and adequate 
    analytical methods are available for enforcement purposes. Enforcement 
    methods for sethoxydim are listed in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, 
    Vol. II (PAM II). Enforcement methods have [[Page 13943]] also been 
    submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for publication in PAM 
    II. Because of the long lead time for publication of the analytical 
    methods in PAM II, the analytical methods are being made available in 
    the interim to anyone interested in pesticide enforcement when 
    requested from: Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program Resources 
    Branch, Field Operations Divisions (7506C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-5937.
        There is no reasonable expectation that secondary residues will 
    occur in milk, eggs or meat of livestock and poultry from the proposed 
    uses of sethoxydim on asparagus, cranberries, endive, and mint; there 
    are no livestock feed items associated with these commodities. Any 
    secondary residues occurring in meat, fat, meat byproducts and milk of 
    cattle, goats, hogs, horses and sheep from the proposed use on carrots 
    will be covered by existing tolerances. There are no residues expected 
    to occur in poultry meat, meat byproducts, fat or eggs since carrots 
    are not considered a poultry feed item.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerances established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    would protect the public health. Therefore, it is proposed that the 
    tolerances be established as set forth below.
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
    registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
    ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
    of this document in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal 
    be referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) 
    of the FFDCA.
        Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the 
    proposed regulation. Comments must bear a notation indicating the 
    document control number, [PP 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 
    3E4162/P602]. All written comments filed in response to these petitions 
    will be available in the Public Response and Program Resources Branch, 
    at the address given above from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday, except legal holidays.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 28, 1995.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.412, by revising the section heading and the 
    introductory text of paragraphs (a) and (b) to correct the spelling of 
    the chemical name and by adding new paragraphs (c) and (d), to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.412   2-[1-(Ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-
    hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one; tolerances for residues.
    
        (a) Tolerances are established for the combined residues of the 
    herbicide 2-[1(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-
    cyclohexen-1-one) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one 
    moiety (calculated as the herbicide) in or on the following raw 
    agricultural commodities:
    *      *      *      *      *
        (b) Tolerances with regional registration, as defined in 
    Sec. 180.1(n), are established for the combined residues of the 
    herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino) butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-
    2-cyclohexen-1-one) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-
    one moiety (calculated as the herbicide) in or on the following raw 
    agricultural commodities:
    *      *      *      *      *
        (c) Time-limited tolerances to expire December 31, 1996, are 
    established for combined residues of the herbicide 2-[1-
    (ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-
    one) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one moiety 
    (calculated as the herbicide) in or on the following raw agricultural 
    commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Asparagus..................................................          4.0
    Carrot.....................................................          1.0
    Cranberry..................................................          2.0
    Peppermint.................................................         30.0
    Spearmint..................................................         30.0
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (d) Time-limited tolerances to expire December 31, 1996, are 
    established with regional registration, as defined in Sec. 180.1(n), 
    for combined residues of the herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-
    (ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one) and its metabolites 
    containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one moiety (calculated as the herbicide) 
    in or on the following raw agricultural commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
    Endive.....................................................          2.0
                                                                            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 95-6419 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/15/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-6419
Dates:
Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162/P602], must be received on or before April 14, 1995.
Pages:
13941-13943 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162/P602, FRL-4936-1
RINs:
2070-AC18
PDF File:
95-6419.pdf
CFR: (2)
40 CFR 180.1(n)
40 CFR 180.412