95-6321. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model B-17E, F, and G Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 14233-14235]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6321]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-15-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model B-17E, F, and G Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to all Boeing Model B-17E, F, and G 
    airplanes. This proposal would require inspections to detect cracking 
    and corrosion of the wing spar chords, bolts and bolt holes of the spar 
    chords, and wing terminals; and correction of any discrepancy found 
    during these inspections. This proposal is prompted by reports of 
    cracking and corrosion of the wing spar. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent reduced structural integrity of the 
    wing of the airplane due to the problems associated with corrosion and 
    cracking of the wing spar.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by April 18, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-NM-15-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Forde, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2771; fax (206) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-NM-15-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 95-NM-15-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        Recently, during routine inspections of several Boeing Model B-17 
    series airplanes, extensive corrosion and numerous cracks were found on 
    the tubular spar chords of the inner wing. These tubular spar chords 
    mate with the circular inner wing attach fitting inserts that are held 
    together by close tolerance bolts. (There are four such joints on each 
    wing of the airplane.) Investigation revealed that moisture trapped in 
    the inner wing spars caused some of the bolts in the joint assemblies 
    to seize and corrode. The FAA has determined that the wing spar 
    assembly is susceptible to moisture accumulation, which may result in 
    internal corrosion and subsequent cracking in this area. Since this 
    area is subject to maximum bending and stress loads, cracking in this 
    area is particularly critical.
        This condition, if not corrected and detected in a timely manner, 
    could result in reduced structural integrity of the wing of the 
    airplane.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require a dye penetrant inspection to 
    [[Page 14234]] detect cracking and corrosion of the aluminum wing spar 
    chords; an eddy current inspection to detect cracking and corrosion of 
    the bolts and bolt holes of the spar chords; and correction of any 
    discrepancies found. The FAA has determined that the spar-to-wing 
    terminal joint must be separated, including removing the wing of the 
    airplane from the fuselage, to adequately detect cracking and corrosion 
    of the bolts, inner wing fittings, and tubular spar chords. This action 
    would also require visual and eddy current inspections to detect 
    cracking and corrosion of the wing terminals and spar chords; and 
    repair of any cracking or corrosion found.
        There are approximately 12 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 10 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 
    1,500 work hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed actions, and 
    that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these 
    figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $900,000, or $90,000 per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 95-NM-15-AD.
    
        Applicability: All Model B-17E, F, and G airplanes, certificated 
    in any category.
    
        Note 1: For airplanes on which the terminal fitting-to-spar 
    chord joint was separated prior to the effective date of this AD, 
    and inspection(s) of and/or repair(s) to the wing terminals-to-spar 
    chords were accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD: 
    Applications for an alternative method of compliance to the 
    requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD should be 
    submitted to the FAA, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 
    (d) of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent reduced structural integrity of the wing of the 
    airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, 
    accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) 
    of this AD.
        (1) Perform a dye penetrant inspection to detect cracking of 
    each inboard end of the eight aluminum wing spar chords, in 
    accordance with MIL-STD-6866. If any cracking is detected that is 
    beyond the limits specified in the acceptance/rejection criteria 
    contained in sensitivity level Group IV, MIL-I-25135, prior to 
    further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the 
    Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate.
    
        Note 2: The part number (P/N) for the upper wing spar chords is 
    3-14231-0, and the P/N for the lower wing spar chords is 3-14231-1.
    
        (2) Perform a high frequency eddy current inspection to detect 
    cracking of the bolt holes of the spar chords, in accordance with a 
    method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. The inboard-most 
    bolt on each of the eight wing terminal fitting-to-wing spar chord 
    tube joints must be removed to perform this inspection.
    
        Note 3: The following are the P/N's for the terminal fitting-to-
    spar chord joint assemblies:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Assembly  
                            Assemblies-                           part No.  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Left Upper Front Spar Joint Assembly-.....................     75-4781-0
    Right Upper Front Spar Joint Assembly-....................     75-4781-1
    Left Lower Front Spar Joint Assembly-.....................   65-4782-512
    Right Lower Front Spar Joint Assembly-....................   65-4782-513
    Left Upper Rear Spar Joint Assembly-......................     75-4783-0
    Right Upper Rear Spar Joint Assembly-.....................     75-4783-1
    Left Lower Rear Spar Joint Assembly-......................     75-4784-0
    Right Lower Rear Spar Joint Assembly-.....................     75-4784-1
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Note 4: The following are the P/N's for the bolts for the spar 
    chords:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Bolts for                          Bolt part No. 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Upper and Lower Front Spar Chords-....................  NAS56A36        
    Upper Rear Spar Chord-................................  NAS56A34        
    Lower Rear Spar Chord-................................  NAS56A40-5      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (3) Perform a visual inspection to detect corrosion of the bolts 
    and replace any corroded bolt with a new bolt having a P/N in the 
    NAS 6606 series in accordance with Army Technical Order Number 01-
    20EF-2. Prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of 
    paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), and (a)(3)(iii) of this AD in 
    accordance with Army Technical Order Number 01-20EF-2.
    
        Note 4: The following are the P/N's for the replacement bolts 
    for the spar chords:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Replacement bolt
                    Replacement bolts for-                      part No.    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Upper and Lower Front Spar-...........................  NAS 6606-51     
    Upper Rear Spar-......................................  NAS 6606-47     
    Lower Rear Spar-......................................  NAS 6606-56     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (i) Install a washer having P/N MS 20002C6 under the head of the 
    bolt, a self-locking nut having P/N NAS 1804-6, and a washer having 
    P/N MS 200026 under the nut, for each replacement bolt.
        (ii) Torque any replacement bolt to 95-105 inch-pounds.
        (iii) Oversize replacement bolts by 1/16 inch, as necessary.
        (b) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, 
    accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of 
    this AD.
        (1) Perform visual and high frequency eddy current inspections, 
    that include separating all eight wing terminal-to-spar chord 
    joints, to detect cracking and corrosion of the wing terminals and 
    spar chords, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
    Seattle ACO. Or
        (2) Perform an equivalent inspection(s) to that required by 
    paragraph (b)(1) of this AD, [[Page 14235]] that may not include 
    separating the terminal fitting from the spar chord to detect 
    cracking and corrosion of all eight wing terminal-to-spar chord 
    joints, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle 
    ACO. To be considered acceptable, the equivalent inspection(s) must 
    include, at a minimum, the criteria specified in paragraphs 
    (b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(ii), and (b)(2)(iii) of this AD.
        (i) The inspection must include removal of all 64 bolts that 
    join the eight wing terminals to the eight spar chords; and
        (ii) The inspection must adequately detect cracking of the spar 
    chord, and corrosion between the terminal fitting and the spar 
    chord; and
        (iii) The inspection must include a visual inspection to detect 
    corrosion of the attachment bolts; and a high frequency eddy 
    current, and boroscope inspection at 10 power magnification, of the 
    bolt holes common to the spar chord-to-wing terminal interface.
        (c) If any cracking and/or corrosion is detected during any of 
    the inspections required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, prior 
    to further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by 
    the Manager, Seattle ACO.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit 
    their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 1995.
    
    Neil D. Schalekamp,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-6321 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/16/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-6321
Dates:
Comments must be received by April 18, 1995.
Pages:
14233-14235 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-15-AD
PDF File:
95-6321.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39