98-6605. National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Line K California Road Replacement Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 50 (Monday, March 16, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 12798-12799]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-6605]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP98-142-000]
    
    
    National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Intent To Prepare 
    an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Line K California Road 
    Replacement Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
    
    March 10, 1998.
        The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or 
    Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
    discuss the environmental impacts of replacing approximately 0.5 mile 
    of 20-inch-diameter pipeline proposed in the Line K California Road 
    Replacement Project.\1\ This EA will be used by the Commission in its 
    decision-making process to determine whether the project is in the 
    public convenience and necessity.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation's application was filed 
    with the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 
    157 of the Commission's regulation.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary of the Proposed Project
    
        National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation (National Fuel) would replace 
    2,735 feet of its 20-inch-diameter Line K pipeline with 3,210 feet of 
    same size pipeline along California Road in Erie County, New York. The 
    reroutes on the east and west ends of the project are proposed to avoid 
    homes and businesses which have encroached on the right-of-way since 
    its original construction in 1910.
        The abandoned pipeline would be removed except for two segments 
    (644- and 562-foot lengths) which would be abandoned in place to avoid 
    disrupting traffic.
        The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 
    1.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being 
    printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the 
    Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 
    First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. 
    Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this 
    notice in the mail.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Land Requirements for Construction
    
        In front of residences (milepost 0.22 to 0.46) the construction 
    area would consist of a corridor 60-feet-wide from the edge of the 
    California Road pavement. Construction of the proposed facilities would 
    require about 4.72 acres of land. Following construction, about 3 acres 
    would be maintained as permanent right-of-way for the operation of the 
    project. The remaining
    
    [[Page 12799]]
    
    1.72 acres of land would be restored and allowed to revert to its 
    former use.
    
    The EA Process
    
        The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
    Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
    result from the action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
    Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
    to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
    We call this ``scoping.'' The main goal of the scoping process is to 
    focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
    this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
    scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
    are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local 
    government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents 
    of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of 
    concern.
        The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
    construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
    headings:
    
     geology and soils
     water resources, fisheries, and wetlands
     vegetation and wildlife
     endangered and threatened species
     land use
     cultural resources
     hazardous waste
     public safety
    
        We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
    or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
    or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
        Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending 
    on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
    published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public 
    interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
    newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
    this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
    is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make 
    our recommendations to the Commission.
    
    Currently Identified Environmental Issues
    
        Based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and the 
    environmental information provided by National Fuel, we have identified 
    the following issues which deserve attention:
         Construction adjacent to homes on the east side of 
    California Road; and
         Alternate route deviations.
        Additional issues may be considered based on your comments and our 
    analysis.
    
    Public Participation
    
        You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your 
    specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on 
    the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to 
    the proposal including relocating the pipeline to the opposite (west 
    side) of California Road, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental 
    impact. The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. 
    Please carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your comments 
    are received in time and properly recorded:
         Send two copies of your letter to: David P. Boergers, 
    Acting Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., 
    N.E., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
         Label one copy of the comments for the attention of the 
    Environmental Review and Compliance Branch, PR-11.2;
         Reference Docket No. CP98-142-000; and
         Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
    Washington, DC on or before April 9, 1998.
        You may request detailed maps or additional information about the 
    proposed project by contacting Paul McKee, in the Commission's Office 
    of External Affairs, at (202) 208-1088.
    
    Becoming an Intervenor
    
        In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
    to become an official party to the proceeding or become an 
    ``intervenor.'' Among other things, intervenors have the right to 
    receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by 
    other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its 
    filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you 
    must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see 
    appendix 2).
        The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding 
    has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions 
    must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this 
    time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed 
    as good cause for late intervention.
        You do not need intervenor status to have your environmental 
    comments considered.
    David P. Boergers,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-6605 Filed 3-13-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/16/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-6605
Pages:
12798-12799 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP98-142-000
PDF File:
98-6605.pdf