95-6651. Receipt of Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Genetically Engineered Tomato Lines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 14413-14414]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6651]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Notices
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
    or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
    and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
    delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
    statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
    appearing in this section.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / 
    Notices
    [[Page 14413]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    [Docket No. 95-016-1]
    
    
    Receipt of Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for 
    Genetically Engineered Tomato Lines
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
    Inspection Service has received a petition from Zeneca Plant Science 
    and Petoseed Company, Inc., seeking a determination of nonregulated 
    status for tomato lines designated as B, Da, and F that have been 
    genetically engineered for suppressed polygalacturonase enzyme 
    activity. The petition has been submitted in accordance with our 
    regulations concerning the introduction of certain genetically 
    engineered organisms and products. In accordance with those 
    regulations, we are soliciting public comments on whether these tomato 
    lines present a plant pest risk.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 16, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Please send an original and three copies of your comments to 
    Docket No. 95-016-1, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Policy 
    and Program Development, Regulatory Analysis and Development, 4700 
    River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1228. Please state that your 
    comments refer to Docket No. 95-016-01. A copy of the petition and any 
    comments received may be inspected at USDA, room 1141, South Building, 
    14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. 
    and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing 
    access to that room to inspect the petition or comments are asked to 
    call in advance of visiting at (202) 690-2817.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Subhash Gupta, Biotechnologist, 
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Biotechnology, Biologics, 
    and Environmental Protection, Biotechnology Permits, 4700 River Road 
    Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737-1228; (301) 734-7612. To obtain a copy of 
    the petition, contact Ms. Kay Peterson at (301) 734-7612.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, 
    ``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced Through 
    Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to 
    Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the 
    introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the 
    environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through 
    genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to 
    believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered organisms and 
    products are considered ``regulated articles.''
        The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may submit 
    a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 
    seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated under 7 
    CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe the form 
    that a petition for determination of nonregulated status must take and 
    the information that must be included in the petition.
        On February 7, 1995, APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition No. 
    94-290-01p) from Zeneca Plant Science of Wilmington, DE, and Petoseed 
    Company, Inc., of Woodland, CA, (Zeneca/Petoseed) requesting a 
    determination of nonregulated status under 7 CFR part 340 for modified 
    T7 processing tomato inbred lines designated as B, Da, and F that have 
    been genetically engineered for suppressed polygalacturonase (PG) 
    enzyme activity. As described in the petition, tomato lines B, Da, and 
    F have been developed from an unmodified proprietary inbred tomato line 
    coded as T7, genetically engineered to contain a fragment of the tomato 
    PG gene in the sense or antisense orientation. The PG enzyme is 
    responsible for the breakdown of pectin molecules in the cell walls of 
    tomato fruit during ripening. The inhibition of the PG enzyme resulting 
    from the transcription of the PG gene fragment results in an increased 
    thickness of the tomato, which is a desired characteristic in 
    processing tomatoes.
        The PG gene fragment in the subject tomato lines is regulated by 
    the 35S promoter from the plant pathogen cauliflower mosaic virus. 
    Tomato lines B, Da, and F were transformed through the use of disarmed 
    vectors from a common soil-borne bacterium, the plant pathogen 
    Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The subject tomato lines also contain the 
    bacterial neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) gene that is used as a 
    selectable marker.
        The subject tomato lines are currently considered regulated 
    articles under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because they contain 
    gene sequences (vectors, promoters, and terminators) derived from plant 
    pathogens. Tomato lines B, Da, and F were evaluated in field trials 
    conducted under APHIS permits in l991, 1992, and 1993, and under APHIS 
    notifications in 1994. In the process of reviewing the applications for 
    those field trials, APHIS determined that the vectors and other 
    elements were disarmed and that the trials, which were conducted under 
    conditions of reproductive confinement, would not present a risk of 
    plant pest introduction or dissemination.
        In the Federal Plant Pest Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 150aa et seq.), 
    ``plant pest'' is defined as ``any living stage of: Any insects, mites, 
    nematodes, slugs, snails, protozoa, or other invertebrate animals, 
    bacteria, fungi, other parasitic plants or reproductive parts thereof, 
    viruses, or any organisms similar to or allied with any of the 
    foregoing, or any infectious substances, which can directly or 
    indirectly injure or cause disease or damage in any plants or parts 
    thereof, or any processed, manufactured or other products of plants.'' 
    APHIS views this definition very broadly. The definition covers direct 
    or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural crops, 
    but also to plants in general, for example, native species, as well as 
    to organisms that may be beneficial to plants, for example, honeybees, 
    rhizobia, etc.
        Food or animal feed uses of the subject tomato lines may be subject 
    to regulation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the 
    [[Page 14414]] authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.). The FDA published a statement of 
    policy on foods derived from new plant varieties in the Federal 
    Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22984-23005). The FDA statement of 
    policy includes a discussion of the FDA's authority for ensuring food 
    safety under the FFDCA, and provides guidance to industry on the 
    scientific considerations associated with the development of foods 
    derived from new plant varieties, including those plants developed 
    through the techniques of genetic engineering. Zeneca has notified the 
    FDA that it has completed its food safety and nutritional assessment 
    for the subject tomato lines.
        In accordance with Sec. 340.6(d) of the regulations, we are 
    publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept 
    written comments regarding the Petition for Determination of 
    Nonregulated Status from any interested person for a period of 60 days 
    from the date of this notice. The petition and any comments received 
    are available for public review, and copies of the petition may be 
    ordered (see the ADDRESSES section of this notice).
        After the comment period closes, APHIS will review the data 
    submitted by the petitioner, all written comments received during the 
    comment period, and any other relevant information. Based on the 
    available information, APHIS will furnish a response to the 
    petitioners, either approving the petition in whole or in part, or 
    denying the petition. APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal 
    Register announcing the regulatory status of Zeneca/Petoseed's tomato 
    lines B, Da, and F and the availability of APHIS' written decision.
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 150aa-150jj, 151-167, and 1622n; 31 U.S.C. 
    9701; 7 CFR 2.17, 2.51, and 371.2(c).
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 1995.
    Terry L. Medley,
    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-6651 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/17/1995
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-6651
Dates:
Written comments must be received on or before May 16, 1995.
Pages:
14413-14414 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-016-1
PDF File:
95-6651.pdf