97-6540. Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company (Formerly Beech Aircraft Corporation) 35 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 12533-12534]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-6540]
    
    
    
    [[Page 12533]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-CE-44-AD; Amendment 39-9968; AD 97-06-11]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company (Formerly 
    Beech Aircraft Corporation) 35 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    applies to certain Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) 35 series 
    airplanes (formerly referred to as Beech 35 series airplanes). This 
    action requires inspecting the ruddervator differential tail control 
    rod assembly for corrosion or cracks, repairing or replacing any 
    cracked or corroded part, and applying anti-corrosion sealant to the 
    ruddervator control pushrods. This action results from a report of a 
    split in the ruddervator control push rod on an affected airplane that 
    was found during a routine inspection. The split occurred when water 
    froze in the internal area of the control push rod and then expanded. 
    The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the 
    differential tail control rod assembly, which could result in loss of 
    control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective May 16, 1997.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of May 16, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained 
    from the Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
    0085. This information may also be examined at the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-CE-44-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the 
    Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, 
    DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry Engler, Aerospace Safety 
    Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport 
    Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 
    946-4122; facsimile (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Events Leading to the Issuance of the This AD
    
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to certain Raytheon 35 
    series airplanes (formerly referred to as Beech 35 series airplanes) 
    was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed 
    rulemaking (NPRM) on October 18, 1996 (61 FR 54372). The NPRM proposed 
    to require inspecting the ruddervator differential tail control rod 
    assembly for corrosion or cracks, repairing or replacing any cracked or 
    corroded part, and applying anti-corrosion sealant to the ruddervator 
    control pushrods. Accomplishment of the proposed actions as specified 
    in the NPRM would be in accordance with Raytheon Mandatory Service 
    Bulletin (MSB) No. 2668, Issued: September, 1996.
        The NPRM was the result of a report of a split in the ruddervator 
    control push rod on an affected airplane that was found during a 
    routine inspection. The split occurred when water froze in the internal 
    area of the control push rod and then expanded.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the 
    proposed AD or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
        Raytheon has revised MSB No. 2668 to clarify certain steps 
    contained in the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section. The FAA has 
    determined that the AD could be accomplished in accordance with either 
    Raytheon MSB No. 2668, Revised December, 1996; or Raytheon MSB No. 
    2668, Issued: September, 1996, and has incorporated this service 
    bulletin revision into the final rule.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After careful review of all available information related to the 
    subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the 
    public interest require the adoption of the AD as proposed except for 
    the incorporation of the revised service information and minor 
    editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that this incorporation 
    and the minor corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and 
    will not add any additional burden upon the public than was already 
    proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 10,405 airplanes in the U.S. registry will 
    be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 workhours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required action, and that the average labor 
    rate is approximately $60 an hour. Based on these figures, the total 
    cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,497,200. 
    This figure is based on the presumption that no affected airplane will 
    have a corroded or cracked part in the ruddervator differential tail 
    control rod assembly that will need to be repaired or replaced. The FAA 
    has no way of determining how many ruddervator control push rods that 
    will be corroded or cracked.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this 
    action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    [[Page 12534]]
    
    Sec. 39.13   [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    97-06-11  Raytheon Aircraft Company (formerly Beech Aircraft 
    Corporation): Amendment 39-9968; Docket No. 96-CE-44-AD.
    
        Applicability: Models 35, 35R, A35, B35, C35, D35, E35, F35, 
    G35, H35, J35, K35, M35, N35, P35, S35, V35, V35TC, V35A, V35A-TC, 
    V35B, and V35B-TC airplanes, serial numbers D-1 through D-10403, D-
    15001, and D-15002, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished.
        To prevent failure of the ruddervator differential tail control 
    rod assembly, which could result in loss of control of the airplane, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect the ruddervator differential tail control rod 
    assembly for cracks and corrosion in accordance with the 
    ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Raytheon Mandatory Service 
    Bulletin (MSB) No. 2668, Revised: December, 1996; or Raytheon MSB 
    No. 2668, Issued: September, 1996. Prior to further flight, repair 
    or replace any corroded or cracked part as specified in and in 
    accordance with the service information referenced above.
        (b) Apply anti-corrosion sealant to the ruddervator control 
    pushrods in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section 
    of Raytheon MSB No. 2668, Revised: December, 1996; or Raytheon MSB 
    No. 2668, Issued: September, 1996.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office 
    (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, 
    Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate 
    FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to 
    the Manager, Wichita ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Wichita ACO.
    
        (e) The inspection, repair or replacement (if necessary), and 
    application required by this AD shall be done in accordance with 
    either Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 2668, Issued: 
    September, 1996; or Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 2668, 
    Revised: December, 1996. This incorporation by reference was 
    approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 
    5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from the 
    Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. 
    Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the 
    Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, 
    Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (f) This amendment (39-9968) becomes effective on May 16, 1997.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 7, 1997.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-6540 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/16/1997
Published:
03/17/1997
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule
Document Number:
97-6540
Dates:
Effective May 16, 1997.
Pages:
12533-12534 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-CE-44-AD, Amendment 39-9968, AD 97-06-11
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-6540.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13