94-6280. Lindane; Proposed Decision not to Initiate a Special Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-6280]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 18, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [OPP-30000/10H; FRL-4760-6]
    
     
    
    Lindane; Proposed Decision not to Initiate a Special Review
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's proposed decision not to initiate 
    a Special Review of pesticide products containing lindane. A Special 
    Review was proposed based on contentions of irreversible kidney effects 
    from certain lindane exposure. EPA has determined that the kidney 
    effects observed are specific to the male rat and are not relevant to 
    human health risk assessment; therefore, a Special Review is not 
    appropriate.
    DATES: Written comments, identified by the document control number OPP-
    30000/10H, must be received on or before May 17, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit comments to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, deliver comments to: Rm. 1128, Crystal 
    Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this notice may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will 
    not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 
    CFR part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be 
    submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked 
    confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All 
    written comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1128 at 
    the address given above, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Brian Steinwand, Special 
    Review and Reregistration Division (7508W), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Special Review Branch, 
    Rm. WF32G5, Crystal Station #1, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. 
    Telephone: 703-308-8174.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces EPA's decision not to 
    initiate a Special Review of lindane (gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane) and 
    sets forth the rationale for this proposed decision. In summary, EPA 
    has reevaluated the concerns raised in the September 18, 1985 
    preliminary notification to registrants and applicants in light of 
    subsequent relevant information. Based on this review, EPA has 
    determined that a Special Review of lindane is not warranted based on 
    its effects in the male rat kidney.
    
    I. Introduction
    
    A. Legal Background
    
        A pesticide product may be sold or distributed in the United States 
    only if it is registered or exempt from registration under the Federal 
    Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended (7 U.S.C. 
    136 et seq.). Before a product can be registered it must be shown that 
    it can be used without causing ``unreasonable adverse effects on the 
    environment'' (FIFRA section 3(c)(5), 7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)), that is, 
    without causing ``any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, 
    taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and 
    benefits of the use of the pesticide'' (FIFRA section 2(bb), 7 U.S.C. 
    136(bb)). The burden of proving that a pesticide meets this standard 
    for registration is, at all times, on the proponent of initial or 
    continued registration. If at any time the Agency determines that a 
    pesticide no longer meets this standard for registration, the 
    Administrator may cancel this registration under FIFRA section 6, 7 
    U.S.C. 136d.
        The Special Review process provides a mechanism to permit public 
    participation in EPA's deliberations prior to issuance of any Notice of 
    Final Determination describing the regulatory action which the 
    Administrator has selected. The Special Review process, which was 
    previously called the Rebuttable Presumption Against Registration 
    (RPAR) process, is described in 40 CFR part 154, published in the 
    Federal Register of November 27, 1985 (50 FR 49015).
        Prior to formal initiation of a Special Review, a preliminary 
    notification is sent to registrants and applicants for registration 
    pursuant to 40 CFR 154.21 announcing that the Agency is considering 
    commencing a Special Review.
        If the Agency determines, after issuance of a preliminary 
    notification pursuant to 40 CFR 154.21, that it will not conduct a 
    Special Review, it is required under 40 CFR 154.23 to issue a proposed 
    decision to be published in the Federal Register. That regulation 
    requires that a period generally not less than 30 days be provided for 
    public comment on the Proposed Decision Not To Initiate a Special 
    Review. Subsequent to receipt and evaluation of comments on the 
    Proposed Decision Not To Initiate a Special Review, the Administrator 
    is required by 40 CFR 154.25 to publish in the Federal Register his/her 
    final decision regarding whether or not a Special Review will be 
    conducted.
    
    B. Regulatory Background
    
        Lindane (gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane) is a broad-spectrum 
    organochlorine insecticide/acaricide registered for control of insects 
    and other invertebrates on a wide variety of sites. Lindane is 
    currently used for agricultural crop seed treatments, livestock, 
    hardwood lumber/logs, pecans, commercial ornamentals, and a variety of 
    other sites including households and structures, forest trees, pets, 
    and assorted fruits and vegetables.
        1. Special Review (1977-1983). The regulatory history of lindane 
    includes a full Special Review based on questions of carcinogenicity, 
    fetotoxicity/teratogenicity, reproductive effects, its potential to 
    cause blood dyscrasias, and acute toxicity to aquatic wildlife. 
    Previous Position Documents (PD) published on lindane include:
        a. A PD-1 (which initiated a Special Review) in 1977, on the basis 
    of carcinogenicity, chronic reproductive and fetotoxic effects, and 
    acute effects on aquatic organisms.
        b. A PD-2/3 (which provided a full discussion of hazards, 
    exposures, risks, benefits, regulatory options and a proposed 
    regulatory decision) in July 1980 proposed to cancel most of the uses 
    of lindane. The proposal was based on a risk/benefit determination 
    which suggested that the risks considerably outweighed the benefits 
    associated with lindane's continued use.
        c. A PD-4 (final determination)/NOIC, published in the Federal 
    Register of October 19, 1983 (48 FR 48512), presented EPA's final 
    determination on lindane. It was based on a revised analysis of the 
    risks and benefits, following careful consideration of the comments EPA 
    had received from the Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP), the U.S. 
    Department of Agriculture, members of the affected industries, and the 
    general public. The decision described in the PD-4/NOIC was quite 
    different from the proposed decision in the PD-2/3. EPA originally 
    planned to cancel all of lindane's uses except for the commercial 
    ornamental, livestock, and dog wash uses. The final decision was to 
    continue registration of most uses of lindane. The Agency cancelled the 
    indoor uses of smoke fumigation devices and the use of dog dips to 
    control pests other than mites. All other uses were continued with 
    various restrictions. Those restrictions varied according to the degree 
    of hazard associated with the use, but typical requirements included 
    protective clothing, label statements describing necessary precautions, 
    and restrictions of some products to certified pesticide applicators.
        The carcinogenic effect was not rebutted by information submitted 
    in response to the PD-4/NOIC. Following an Agency risk/benefit analysis 
    based on the carcinogenic risk, the registrations for lindane smoke 
    fumigation devices for indoor domestic use were phased out (with 
    cancellation becoming effective May 1986), and lindane dog dips for the 
    control of pests other than mites were cancelled. The dog dip 
    cancellation was challenged, and subsequently the dog dip use for pests 
    other than mites was permitted for commercial use (kennel, farm, and 
    sport dog uses only) provided additional precautions to limit 
    applicator exposure appeared on the labeling. The PD-4/NOIC stated 
    EPA's intent to restrict certain lindane products to Certified 
    Applicators or persons under their direct supervision. The restricted 
    uses include avocados, pecans, livestock sprays, forestry, Christmas 
    trees, commercial ornamentals, structural treatment, dog shampoos, and 
    dog dusts. The PD4/NOIC also stated EPA's intent to require the use of 
    protective clothing for applicators using lindane products for seed 
    treatment by manual means, livestock sprays, avocados, pecans, 
    forestry, Christmas trees, hardwood lumber, ornamentals, crawl space 
    treatments, dog dips, and dog shampoos.
        2. Special Review Preliminary Notification (1985). Just prior to 
    publication of the PD-4, the Agency received from the registrants of 
    lindane a 90-day subchronic rat feeding study showing kidney effects. 
    In order to properly evaluate the study, a thorough review of the 
    complete subchronic and chronic data base was necessary. The Agency 
    decided not to delay issuance of the PD-4 until this review was 
    complete because it did not want to delay the implementation of the 
    regulatory measures outlined in the PD4. Pursuant to 40 CFR 154.21, on 
    September 18, 1985, EPA notified registrants and applicants for 
    registrations for lindane that it was considering initiating a new 
    Special Review based on the study results showing kidney effects. This 
    notification, which is the subject of today's notice, noted the 
    Agency's concern for workers who are exposed to lindane for the 
    forestry and uninhabited building uses. Registrants and applicants for 
    registration were given 30 days to comment on the Agency's proposal to 
    commence a Special Review for certain uses including forestry and 
    warehouses. Registrants requested and received a 3-week extension for 
    submitting comments.
        Registrant rebuttal comments were submitted by Centre International 
    d'Etudes du Lindane (CIEL) on October 22, 1985. (CIEL represents all 
    lindane registrants holding U.S. registrations for the insecticide 
    lindane). These comments will be briefly addressed in Unit III. of this 
    notice. Furthermore, a Registration Standard was scheduled to be issued 
    which would include a complete review of lindane's general toxic 
    effects.
        3. Registration Standard. A Registration Standard was published on 
    lindane in September 1985 (EPA RS-85-027) and reflected a reassessment 
    of the data base used in the Special Review for lindane as well as a 
    review of all other data available to the Agency, including the 90-day 
    subchronic rat feeding study.
        Based on a comprehensive rereview of previous submissions and some 
    new data, the Agency determined that for most use sites, the benefits 
    of use of lindane exceeded the risks, so long as the precautions 
    mandated by the PD-4 were adhered to. As discussed above, potential 
    unacceptable risks to workers were calculated for spray uses for 
    forestry and warehouses (uninhabited buildings and empty storage bins) 
    based on irreversible kidney toxicity observed in the rat 90-day 
    feeding study.
        4. Section 6(f) Notice. A notice, published in the Federal Register 
    of November 17, 1993 (58 FR 60630), pursuant to section 6(f)(1) of the 
    Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), announced 
    EPA's receipt of requests from a number of registrants to voluntarily 
    amend registrations of pesticide products containing lindane to delete 
    certain uses. The section 6(f) notice included one site (uninhabited 
    buildings) which is also a subject of today's notice.
    
    II. Risk Concerns Underlying Preliminary Notification
    
    A. Toxicity Concerns
    
        The Registration Standard discussed the results of the subchronic 
    90-day feeding study in the rat which showed that lindane causes 
    adverse pathological effects (i.e., lesions), primarily in the kidney 
    of male rats, but also in the liver of male and female rats. Kidney 
    lesions were not completely reversed after allowing 6 weeks for 
    recovery on a lindane-free diet. No adverse effects on kidney structure 
    in fe2male rats were noted. Renal changes, which included tubular 
    degeneration, hyaline droplets, tubular casts, tubular distention, 
    interstitial nephritis, and basophilic tubules, were stated to be 
    irreversible with a no-observable-effect level (NOEL) of 4 parts per 
    million (ppm) in the diet equivalent to 0.3 milligram per kilogram of 
    body weight per day (mg/kg/day). Hepatocellular hypertrophy was noted 
    at the same lowest effect level (LEL) as the kidney lesions. The liver 
    toxicity results from the increased need to produce enzymes to detoxify 
    lindane and are considered a typical response and defensive mechanism 
    to the presence of foreign substances. The liver toxicity was not 
    regarded as a specific response to lindane.
    
    B. Exposure
    
        The September 18, 1985 preliminary notification to affected 
    registrants and applicants stated that the Agency's concerns were 
    limited to exposure from two uses: forestry and warehouse (uninhabited 
    buildings and empty storage bins). The Margins of Exposure (MOE) for 
    forestry applicator/mixer/loaders and for warehouse applicators were 11 
    and 20, respectively. MOE's for forestry applicator uses ranged from 20 
    to 90. Applicators, mixers, and loaders were assumed to follow 
    precautions on the registered labels current at that time. The 
    notification indicated that the Agency would consider all comments in 
    its determination of whether to initiate a Special Review of pesticide 
    products containing lindane. Since the issuance of the preliminary 
    notification, the Agency has determined that the kidney effects do not 
    meet the risk criteria for initiation of Special Review. Because EPA no 
    longer believes there is a kidney-related hazard posed to humans, a 
    discussion of exposure will not be presented. A more detailed 
    discussion of the exposure assessment used as a basis for the September 
    18, 1985 preliminary notification may be found in the Registration 
    Standard.
    
    III. New Information
    
        After the initial demonstration that lindane produces kidney 
    lesions, the Agency required and received 90-day subchronic inhalation 
    studies in rats (HED Document No.: 005059, April 25, 1986), and mice 
    (HED Document No.: 007304, June 30, 1989), dermal studies in rats (HED 
    Document No.: 007189, May 18, 1989) and rabbits (HED Document No.: 
    008610, September 27, 1991) and a chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study 
    in rats (HED Document Nos.: 007461, August 30, 1989 and 009909, 
    December 30, 1992). In summary, only studies in rats demonstrated the 
    occurrence of lesions in the kidneys, and only the males were affected. 
    There was no evidence that the kidneys of mice, rabbits, or female rats 
    were similarly affected. After publication of the Registration 
    Standard, the Agency received a 90-day rat subchronic inhalation study 
    with lindane which was written in German. Translations of this study 
    indicated a NOEL for the kidney changes of 0.1 mg/cubic meter. The 
    kidney lesions noted were transient in nature and were not noted in 
    rats after allowing 6 weeks for a recovery phase. The study results did 
    not demonstrate any signs of kidney dysfunction.
        The chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study did not indicate any 
    evidence of lindane-induced kidney tumors or preneoplastic lesions. 
    However, the characteristic nonneoplastic lesions produced by a protein 
    (Alpha 2u-Globulin (2u-g)), found in the kidneys of male rats 
    which induces kidney effects were present. For example, one aspect of 
    this study included a chemical analysis of the kidney for increased 
    levels of the 2u-g protein. Clear and pronounced increases in 
    this protein were demonstrated in a dose-related manner (HED Document 
    No.: 007859, April 10, 1990). Independent industrial and academic 
    researchers had, a few years earlier, reported similar effects in the 
    male rat kidney due to responses to certain chlorinated hydrocarbons 
    and other chemicals. A pattern of effects emerged that indicated that 
    only the male rat kidney, but not the kidney of female rats or the male 
    and female kidneys of other species, was affected by this special group 
    of chemicals. This particular kidney lesion was ultimately demonstrated 
    to be linked to the potential for this special group of chemicals to 
    increase levels of 2u-g. This special group of chemicals 
    apparently bind the 2u-g in such a manner that it is not 
    excreted in the urine but accumulates in the kidney of male rats and 
    ultimately causes pathological lesions. For some, but not all, 
    2u-g binding chemicals, the pathological condition progresses 
    to neoplasia (kidney tumors). Thus, consistent with the chemical 
    structure of lindane, animal models and analytical chemistry, lindane 
    was demonstrated to be a classical example of an 2u-g-inducing 
    kidney pathogen in the male rat kidney.
        The Agency published a document outlining the policy for risk 
    assessment for chemical agents that affect the male rat kidney through 
    the 2u-g mechanism (refer to document EPA/625/391/019F, 
    September 1991, Risk Assessment Forum Monograph entitled ``Alpha2u-
    Globulin: Association with Chemically Induced Renal Toxicity and 
    Neoplasia in the Male Rat''). Consistent with this policy, chemicals 
    which cause lesions in the male rat kidney through the 2u-g 
    mechanism exclusively are not regulated on the basis for their 
    potential to cause kidney effects in male rats.
    
    IV. Comments Received on Preliminary Notifications
    
        The Centre Internationale d'Etudes du Lindane (CIEL), which 
    represents all the lindane registrants, commented in detail on the 
    Agency's preliminary notification. The main points of CIEL's comments 
    and the Agency's responses are summarized below.
        CIEL Comment: CIEL challenged the Agency's claim that lindane 
    exposure produced irreversible renal effects in rats by pointing out 
    that the 90-day subchronic data show a trend toward reversibility of 
    renal effects; only the lack of a longer recovery period in the study 
    prevented a full reversibility of renal changes.
        Agency Response: After reinspecting the pathology report and data 
    sheets, the Agency concurs with CIEL that the kidney pathology should 
    not be described as permanent or irreversible, but that the term 
    ``slowly reversible'' more appropriately describes the effect. Although 
    some signs of pathology are evident after a 6-week recovery period, the 
    intensity or severity is much reduced and there is no tubular 
    degeneration, the lesion that was considered to be the most serious. In 
    addition, the Agency believes that the kidney effects were the result 
    of 2u-g and are specific to male rats and not found in other 
    species.
        CIEL Comments: The MOE values should be increased by a factor of 5 
    to 10 because the rats in the 90-day study received oral administration 
    of lindane, whereas the lindane applicators for the uses in question 
    have mainly dermal exposure. CIEL commented that there is a 5- to 10-
    fold lower acute toxicity after dermal exposure than after oral 
    administration.
        Agency Response: The Agency's original review of existing studies 
    on lindane indicated that there were no adequate studies to assess 
    lindane toxicity through the dermal route of application. Therefore, 
    the Agency required that registrants perform additional studies to 
    clarify this point. A rat dermal toxicity study was submitted on May 
    18, 1989, and a rabbit dermal toxicity study on September 27, 1991. 
    These studies support the hypothesis that lindane induces a lesion 
    specific to the male rat kidney. The Agency will use the 90-day dermal 
    toxicity studies for future risk assessments.
        CIEL Comment: Studies on humans, including occupational exposure, 
    revealed no kidney damage.
        Agency Response: The Agency originally determined that the results 
    of the studies on human occupational exposure were inconclusive. 
    Although the studies reporting the results of human exposure did not 
    include specific kidney function tests, the available data indicate 
    that individuals potentially exposed to lindane did not develop overt 
    kidney functional changes. Although two studies showed decreases in 
    levels of blood creatinine and increases in reticulocytes and 
    polymorphonuclear leukocytes relative to controls, it is not conclusive 
    that these changes were the direct result of exposure to lindane per 
    se. However, the epidemiology studies have several weaknesses which 
    include a small number of subjects, failure to report the health status 
    of absentees at the time the blood samples were taken, and failure to 
    test for subtle changes in kidney functions. Also, pathological changes 
    in the kidney may occur in the absence of overt functional changes; the 
    studies designed could not assess this possibility. The Agency has no 
    evidence that human kidney function has been affected by lindane.
        CIEL Comment: The Agency's estimates of applicator exposure are 
    inaccurate because: (1) For forestry uses, the estimates are based on a 
    surrogate study using grassland application (Lavy et al., 1980), rather 
    than forest trees; (2) the forestry use exposure figure should be 1.3 
    mg/hour with a dermal absorption of 5 percent; and (3) for warehouse 
    exposure, a study with aerosol application should be used instead of 
    the surrogate DDT fan-type spray study used by the Agency to estimate 
    exposure.
        Agency Response: Regarding points (1) and (2), the Agency's 
    assessment for forestry use of lindane utilized three surrogate studies 
    in addition to the study by Lavy et al., in order to increase 
    replicates and minimize bias that could result from the selection of a 
    single surrogate study. The Lavy et al. study had a number of 
    weaknesses by Agency standards, including failure to specify the height 
    of application; brush application when backpack equipment was used; 
    failure to measure hand dermal exposure (often an appreciable part of 
    the total dermal exposure); and failure to measure exposure to the 
    legs.
        The Agency's mean value of 5.3 milligrams per hour is considered 
    reasonable, given the degree of variability inherent in exposure 
    studies. The Agency is not aware of any dermal absorption study showing 
    5 percent dermal absorption and therefore assumed a dermal absorption 
    of 10 percent based on data on liquid formulations as described in the 
    preliminary determination (PD 2/3) of the earlier Special Review of 
    lindane. EPA still considers the 10 percent dermal absorption factor 
    appropriate. Risk assessments, however, should be based on the 90-day 
    dermal studies.
        Regarding point (3) in which CIEL claims that a study using an 
    aerosol sprayer would be more appropriate for warehouse exposure 
    assessment, the Agency realizes that the aerosol characteristics are 
    partially dependent on the type of equipment used. However, there is no 
    evidence that a very fine spray is used for storage bin application; in 
    fact, the label of one registered product instructs the user to apply 
    the material as a coarse spray, not a fine aerosol as claimed by CIEL. 
    Therefore, after careful consideration of the CIEL's comments about 
    exposure, the Agency believes that the exposure estimate used to 
    calculate the MOE's were reasonable and appropriate for the forestry 
    and warehouse uses.
    
    V. Agency's Decision Regarding Special Review
    
        At this time, the Agency proposes not to initiate a Special Review 
    of pesticide products containing lindane based on the male rat kidney 
    effects. EPA has concluded that any renal lesions in male rats observed 
    in connection with 2u-g accumulation is a species-specific 
    effect that is not relevant to human risk assessment. The Agency agrees 
    that the evidence as provided in the 90-day subchronic rat study does 
    not raise as great a concern regarding lindane as originally suspected. 
    The available evidence does not establish a credible relationship 
    between lindane and potential renal effects in humans. In conclusion, 
    the Agency has determined that it is not appropriate to conduct a 
    Special Review of lindane based on male rat renal effects.
        The Agency is reexamining its assessment of lindane's potential to 
    cause liver tumors in mice and developmental toxicity in rats. Lindane 
    is currently classified by the Office of Research and Development 
    Carcinogenicity Assessment Group (ORD CAG, July 23, 1985) as a ``B2-C'' 
    (a probable-to- possible carcinogen) based on liver tumors primarily 
    from reports in the published literature. Based on these data CAG 
    provided a cancer potency Q1* of (1.1 mg/kg/day)-1 for risk 
    assessment. The Office of Pesticide Program's Health Effects Division 
    (HED) Reference Dose (RFD) Committee Peer Review met on July 8, 1993, 
    and determined that while the available mouse studies with lindane 
    provide some information, there are no mouse carcinogenicity studies 
    which meet current criteria for acceptability for regulatory purposes. 
    Thus, the reevaluation of lindane for carcinogenicity classification is 
    pending receipt and review of a new mouse carcinogenicity study to be 
    conducted under current guideline criteria which will be required in 
    the form of a Data Call In (DCI) to be published in the near future.
        The committee also determined that a developmental neurotoxicity 
    study should be conducted to assess the effects of lindane on the 
    development of the nervous system as previous studies suggest that 
    lindane is able to cross the placenta and to be a neurotoxicant. This 
    data request will also be included in the above-mentioned DCI.
        Upon receipt and review of the above studies, if such review 
    indicates any remaining concerns, EPA could initiate a Special Review 
    or take other appropriate regulatory action.
    
    VI. Public Comment Opportunity and Public Docket
    
        The Agency is providing a 60-day period to comment on this notice. 
    Comments must be submitted by May 17, 1994. All comments and 
    information should be submitted in triplicate to the address given in 
    this notice under ADDRESSES above. The comments and information should 
    bear the identifying notation OPP-30000/10H. After receipt and 
    evaluation of comments on this notice, the Agency will issue a final 
    decision in the Federal Register regarding whether or not a Special 
    Review will be conducted.
        The Agency has established a public docket (OPP-30000/10H) for this 
    proposal for not initiating a Special Review of Lindane. This public 
    docket will include this notice, any other notices pertinent to the 
    Agency's decision regarding the Special Review of Lindane, non-CBI 
    documents and copies of written comments or other materials submitted 
    to the Agency in response to the pre-special review registrant 
    notifications and this notice regarding Special Review of Lindane, and 
    a current index of materials in the public docket.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and 
    pests.
    
    Dated: March 4, 1994.
    
    Victor J. Kimm,
    Acting Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic 
    Substances.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-6280 Filed 3-17-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/18/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-6280
Dates:
Written comments, identified by the document control number OPP- 30000/10H, must be received on or before May 17, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 18, 1994, OPP-30000/10H, FRL-4760-6