94-6414. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to Proposed Rule Change by Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc., Amending Its Listing and Maintenance Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-6414]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 18, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    Release No. 34-33759; File No. SR-PSE-93-12]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to Proposed Rule Change by 
    Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc., Amending Its Listing and Maintenance 
    Requirements
    
    March 14, 1994.
        Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on August 
    11, 1993, the Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc. (``PSE'' or ``Exchange'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change, and on January 10, 1994, filed Amendment No. 1 to 
    the proposed rule change,\1\ and on February 3, 1994, filed Amendment 
    No. 2 to the proposed rule change,\2\ as described in Items I, II and 
    III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
    organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Amendment No. 1: (1) Provided additional qualitative 
    requirements in determining a company's listing eligibility under 
    proposed Rule 3.2(a)(7) and more stringent requirements for 
    convertible preferred stock and bonds under proposed Rule 3.2(d) and 
    (e); (2) replaced the term ``Small Corporate Offering Registration'' 
    (``SCOR'') with ``Small Business Stock Offering'' (``SBSO''); (3) 
    expanded the Tier II designation to include listing requirements for 
    initial and continued listing of secondary issues; (4) revised the 
    public distribution criteria in proposed Rule 3.5(m)(1) and (2) to 
    more closely conform with the Philadelphia Stock Exchange's proposed 
    Tier II common stock maintenance requirements; (5) added reasons for 
    suspending or delisting the securities of a company under Rule 3.5; 
    and (6) made stylistic changes.
        \2\Amendment No. 2 replaced the term ``Small Business Stock 
    Offering'' (``SBSO'') with ``Small Corporate Offering Registration/
    Regulation A'' (``SCOR'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change.
    
        The PSE is submitting this proposed rule change in order to 
    strengthen its listing requirements and practices.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries set forth in Section A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Introduction. The development and enforcement of adequate 
    regulations governing the listing of securities on the Exchange is of 
    critical importance to the investing public. Therefore, the Exchange 
    proposes to amend Rule 3 of its rules to revise its listing 
    requirements for initial and continued listing of securities on the 
    Exchange.
        The Exchange seeks to impose more stringent listing requirements by 
    establishing mandatory minimum requirements. The Exchange believes that 
    the employment of mandatory requirements, as opposed to mere 
    guidelines, will serve as a mechanism to equitably screen issuers and 
    to provide listed status only to bona fide companies (i.e., companies 
    with sufficient financial resources to meet their financial 
    obligations). Limited exceptions to the mandatory minimum requirements 
    will be made only in cases, described more fully below, where a 
    security is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE''), 
    American Stock Exchange (``Amex'') or NASDAQ National Market System 
    (``NASDAQ/NMS''). However, no exceptions will be made for any security 
    listed under the Tier I designation under the Exchange's rules.
        Initial Listing Requirements. The amendments proposed by the 
    Exchange are substantial and comprehensive, as they impact not only 
    common stock but also preferred stock, warrants, and debt instruments. 
    In addition to reorganizing and defining specific terms within Rule 
    3.1,\3\ the Exchange is proposing to add Rule 3.2(a), which outlines 
    definitive requirements to be considered in an application for listing. 
    The Exchange will consider not only established numerical requirements, 
    but also other qualitative factors, including the nature and scope of 
    the company's operations, the financial condition and accounting 
    practices, composition of assets, management experience, and the extent 
    of competition and economic conditions within the particular industry.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\The Exchange rules governing the listing of currency and 
    index warrants have been incorporated into Rule 7.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Most significantly, the Exchange is proposing a multi-tiered 
    structure for original listing and maintenance of securities on the 
    Exchange. Securities may be listed pursuant to either the Tier I or 
    Tier II listing requirements, and are distinguished with respect to 
    blue-sky exemptions, transaction reporting, listing fees, and 
    corresponding maintenance requirements.
        A listing under the Tier I designation generally signifies that the 
    company has achieved maturity and high status in its industry in terms 
    of assets, earnings, and shareholder interest and acceptance. The Tier 
    I listing requirements for common stock include numerical as well as 
    corporate governance policies that conform with the standards set forth 
    in the Memorandum of Understanding between the North American 
    Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (``NASAA'') and the Chicago 
    Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'').\4\ Any other securities that are 
    listed pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 3.2, paragraphs 
    (d) through (i), including any equity option or index product listed in 
    accordance with Rule 3.6 or Rule 7, respectively, shall qualify for 
    inclusion under the Tier I designation. These requirements are in 
    uniformity with the CBOE, and also meet the same standards established 
    by the NYSE and Amex.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\The Memorandum of Understanding was approved by NASAA and the 
    CBOE on May 30, 1991. The Memorandum is reprinted in the NASAA 
    Reports at page 601.
        \5\See CBOE, Rule 31.5; NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 7; 
    Amex Company Guide Sections 103 to 107. In formulating these 
    requirements, the CBOE standards were used as a benchmark because 
    the CBOE was the most recent national securities exchange to be 
    recognized in every state of the United States as an approved 
    marketplace for registration exemption purposes.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange's proposed Tier II designation is limited to the 
    listing of common stock, preferred stock, bonds, debentures, and common 
    stock purchase warrants. These listing requirements are less stringent 
    than the requirements under Tier I, but they nevertheless include both 
    quantitative and non-quantitative (such as corporate governance 
    standards) requirements that are materially higher than the Exchange's 
    existing listing standards.\6\ The Exchange believes that the listing 
    of a company's securities under this designation is important because 
    it will continue to provide small companies with access to the capital 
    markets and will supply much-needed liquidity to public investors 
    within a regulated marketplace. The Exchange notes that it previously 
    submitted to the Commission a rule filing to list and trade common 
    stock that qualifies under the Small Corporate Offering Registration/
    Regulation A (``SCOR'') designation.\7\ The proposed rule is also 
    intended to facilitate the capital formation process for small 
    companies. The SCOR listing requirements would, in effect, constitute a 
    third tier of listing requirements; however, for purposes of the 
    exchange exemption under most state blue sky laws, SCOR securities will 
    not be deemed ``listed'' on the Exchange.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\In formulating these listings requirements, the Exchange 
    conducted a comparative analysis of the other regional stock 
    exchanges' standards. The PSE's proposed listing requirements are at 
    least equal to or higher than those of the other regional stock 
    exchanges.
        \7\These were previously designated as Small Corporate Offering 
    Registration securities. See Exchange Act Release No. 32514 (June 
    25, 1993), 58 FR 35496 (July 1, 1993) (File No. SR-PSE-92-42).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In cases where a company's security does not qualify for inclusion 
    under the Tier I designation, yet the security is listed or has been 
    approved for listing on either the NYSE, Amex (except for so-called 
    ``ECM'' securities)\8\ or NASDAQ/NMS, the Exchange may list such 
    security under the Tier II designation in reliance upon the listing 
    requirements of the applicable exchange (or association).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\The Amex's Emerging Company Marketplace (``ECM'') 
    accommodates the listing of growth companies which are to small to 
    meet the Exchange's regular listing criteria. See Amex Company Guide 
    Section 1102 (listing criteria for ECM securities).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Maintenance Requirements and Delisting Procedures. The proposal 
    will establish under Rule 3.5 more stringent numerical maintenance 
    requirements, and also includes other factors or events that would 
    invoke the suspension or delisting of a company's securities.\9\ As 
    with its initial listing requirements, the Exchange's maintenance 
    requirements will be strictly enforced.\10\ Whenever the issuer fails 
    to meet any provision of the proposed maintenance requirements, the 
    matter will be immediately evaluated by the Equity Listing Committee. 
    The Committee will determine whether to suspend dealings in the 
    security and/or request the issuer to take immediate action to remedy 
    any identified deficiency. Should the issuer fail to correct any 
    deficiency by the prescribed date, the Committee shall take action to 
    delist the security. In cases where the issuer's security fails to meet 
    the applicable maintenance requirements under Tier I of Rule 3.5, the 
    security will be removed as soon as practicable from trading under this 
    designation. The security of the company will be admitted to trading 
    under Tier II should it meet the applicable maintenance 
    requirements.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\These are substantially similar to the COBE's requirements 
    (except for securities listed under the Tier II and SCOR criteria).
        \10\Securities listed under the Tier I designation will not be 
    granted waivers from the Exchange's maintenance requirements. Any 
    security that no longer meets the Tier I maintenance requirements, 
    but meets the applicable Tier II maintenance requirements, will be 
    reclassified as a Tier II security. The Exchange, however, may grant 
    a waiver for the continued listing of any security in cases where 
    the security remains listed on either the NYSE, Amex (except for so-
    called ``ECM'' securities), or NASDAQ/NMS; provided, however, that 
    the Exchange determines that there is reasonable basis for a waiver. 
    In such cases, the security will be included under the Tier II 
    designation.
        \11\Special transition rules will apply to securities listed or 
    approved for listing prior to the effective date of this proposed 
    rule change. At such time, to qualify for inclusion under the Tier I 
    designation, a security must meet the applicable initial listing 
    requirements as set forth in Rule 3.2 (including any equity option 
    or index product listed pursuant to Rule 3.6 or Rule 7, 
    respectively); however, a security listed on either the NYSE, Amex 
    (except for so-called ``ECM'' securities), or NASDAQ/NMS may be 
    designated as a Tier I security so long as it meets the applicable 
    Tier I maintenance requirements in Rule 3.5. Any security not 
    qualifying as a Tier I security will be designated a Tier II 
    security. Such Security must meet the Tier II maintenance 
    requirements within two years of the effective date of this rule 
    change. Until that time, the Exchange's former delisting standards 
    under PSE Rule 3.5 will be applied.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the proposal will also establish as Rule 3.5(t) specific 
    delisting procedures to provide the issuer with the opportunity to 
    appeal a delisting decision.
        Corporate Governance and Disclosure Policies. As set forth in Rule 
    3.3, the proposal will require that specific corporate governance and 
    disclosure policies be established by domestic issuers of any equity 
    security listed on the Exchange.\12\ The Exchange believes that 
    effective and responsive corporate governance ensures that 
    shareholders' interests are sufficiently protected. Therefore, each 
    listed company will be expected to follow certain practices aimed at 
    maintaining appropriate standards of corporate responsibility, 
    integrity, and accountability to their shareholders. This rule also 
    includes the Exchange's formal disclosure policy, which describes 
    procedures for a listed company to employ in their communication of 
    material information to the Exchange and investing public.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\The Exchange will not require an issuer of a security under 
    the Tier II or SCOR designation to comply with the provision for an 
    audit committee as set forth in Rule 3.3(b).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Trading Environment and Transaction Reporting. All securities, 
    regardless of the requirements used for their admission to listing, 
    will be subject to auction market trading rules and real-time 
    reporting. Transactions in Tier II and SCOR designated securities will 
    be identified by a special suffix to the ticker symbol so that members, 
    public investors and others can distinguish these securities from other 
    securities traded on the Exchange.\13\ Finally, all of the Exchange's 
    rules and surveillance procedures will be applicable to transactions in 
    securities listed under the Tier I, Tier II and SCOR designations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\The suffix will not be applied, however, to a security 
    listed on either the NYSE, Amex, or NASDAQ/NMS even though it is 
    designated by the Exchange as a Tier II security.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. The Exchange believes that the 
    heightened listing requirements will serve to enhance the integrity of 
    the marketplace and to protect the public interest. As recognized by 
    the Commission,\14\ adequate listing criteria are necessary to screen 
    out companies that lack substantial float, assets and shareholders, 
    thereby assuring sufficient liquidity for fair and orderly markets. The 
    Exchange believes that the proposed rule change also acts in 
    furtherance of the interests of Rule 15c2-6 of the Securities Exchange 
    Act of 1934.\15\ Rule 15c2-6, also referred to as the Penny Stock Rule, 
    was enacted by the Commission in response to concerns of widespread 
    misconduct by broker-dealers in the recommendation, to persons who are 
    not established customers, of low-priced securities that are not 
    registered on an exchange or authorized for quotation on NASDAQ. The 
    Commission noted that, due to the effect that the Rule may have on 
    small business capital formation, many such businesses may seek listing 
    on an exchange in order to avoid the restrictions of the Rule.\16\ As 
    such, and since broker-dealer abuses may extend to exchange traded low-
    priced securities, the Commission stated its expectation that self-
    regulatory organizations develop new regulatory initiatives designed to 
    address fraud and manipulation in low-priced securities. The Exchange 
    believes that the heightening of its listing requirements, thereby 
    precluding the listing of many low-priced securities, addresses the 
    Commission's concern.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\See Exchange Act Release No. 28293 (August 1, 1990), 55 FR 
    32518 (August 9, 1990) (File No. SR-CSE-90-04).
        \15\17 C.F.R. 240.15c2-6 (1993).
        \16\See Exchange Act Release No. 27160 (August 22, 1989), 54 FR 
    35468 (August 28, 1989) (File No. S7-3-89).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change serves 
    to create uniformity of enhanced listing standards among the various 
    exchanges and that general uniformity in raising the standards will 
    benefit the marketplace as a whole, thereby further serving the 
    public's interest. With the enactment of Rule 15c2-6, the Exchange has 
    been made aware of the necessity for higher listing requirements, and 
    with this rule change is seeking to address the Commission's concerns.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 
    Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5), in 
    particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
    manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
    principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
    of a free and open market, and to protect investors and the public 
    interest.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited 
    nor received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such other period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies 
    of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements 
    with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 
    Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street NW., 
    Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the PSE. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-PSE-93-12 and should be 
    submitted by April 8, 1994.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-6414 Filed 3-17-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/18/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-6414
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 18, 1994