99-6576. Recirculated Supplement; Environmental Impact Statement; Notice of availability; Imperial Project; Proposed Gold Mining/Processing Operations; Imperial County, California  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 52 (Thursday, March 18, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 13437-13438]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-6576]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Land Management
    [CA-670-7122-6606); CACA 35511]
    
    
    Recirculated Supplement; Environmental Impact Statement; Notice 
    of availability; Imperial Project; Proposed Gold Mining/Processing 
    Operations; Imperial County, California
    
    AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability of the Recirculated Draft Supplement to 
    the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report 
    for the Imperial Project Proposed Gold Mining/Processing Operation, 
    Imperial County, California.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969, notice is hereby given of the availability for 
    comment of the Recirculated Supplement to the Draft Environmental 
    Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, which adds a new, lower 
    threshold of significance to assess the significance of Project-related 
    impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on 
    ``endangered, rare or threatened species'' listed under the state or 
    federal Endangered Species Acts. This change affects only the 
    assessment of the significance of impacts under CEQA; BLM's threshold 
    of significance to assess the significance of Project-related impact on 
    these same biological resources under NEPA remains as described in the 
    Draft.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be post-marked or otherwise delivered by 
    4:30 p.m. on May 19, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Imperial County 
    Planning/Building Department, 939 Main Street, El Centro, California 
    92243.
    
    
    [[Page 13438]]
    
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Glen Miller (760) 337-4400.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document is a supplement to the 
    analysis of biological resources in the November 1997 Draft 
    Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (``EIS/
    EIR'') for the proposed Imperial Project (``Project''). As discussed in 
    the Draft EIS/EIR, the Project is a proposal by Glamis Imperial 
    Corporation to develop an open-pit, precious metal mining operation 
    utilizing heap leach processes which is located entirely on public 
    lands administered by the BLM in eastern Imperial County, California. 
    In response to a recent decision by the San Deigo County Superior 
    Court, this supplement adds a new, lower threshold of significance to 
    assess the significance of Project-related impacts under CEQA on 
    ``endangered, rare or threatened species'' listed under the state or 
    federal Endangered Species Acts. This change affects only the 
    assessment of the significance of impacts under CEQA; BLM's threshold 
    of significance to assess the significance of Project-related impact on 
    these same biological resources under NEPA remains as described in the 
    Draft EIS/EIR. This supplement explicitly relies on and incorporates by 
    reference the underlying data, biological surveys, and other relevant 
    information in the Draft EIS/EIR regarding biological resources; no new 
    factual information is included in this supplement. Based upon this 
    new, lower threshold of significance under CEQA, this supplement finds 
    significant and unavoidable under CEQA the impacts resulting from the 
    loss of on-site habitat for the desert tortoise, Gila woodpecker and 
    peregine falcon; the loss of individual desert tortoise; and the 
    cumulative effects of the identified cumulative projects on habitat for 
    listed species and on individual desert tortoise. BLM's assessment of 
    these same effects under NEPA remains unchanged from that presented in 
    the Draft EIS/EIR; that these effects can and will be mitigated below 
    the level of significance. Written comments regarding this supplement 
    will be received during a 60-day public review period, but only 
    comments received which are within the scope of this supplement will be 
    addressed in the Final EIS/EIR.
        Comments, including names and street addresses of respondents, will 
    be available for public review. Individual respondents may request 
    confidentially. If you wish to withhold your name or street address 
    from public review or from disclosure under the Freedom of Information 
    Act, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your written 
    comment. Such requests will be honored to the extend allowed by law. 
    All submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
    identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations 
    or businesses, will be made available for public inspection in their 
    entirely.
    
        Dated: March 12, 1999.
    
    Thomas Zale,
    Acting Field Manager, El Centro Resource Area.
    [FR Doc. 99-6576 Filed 3-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/18/1999
Department:
Land Management Bureau
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability of the Recirculated Draft Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Imperial Project Proposed Gold Mining/Processing Operation, Imperial County, California.
Document Number:
99-6576
Dates:
Written comments must be post-marked or otherwise delivered by 4:30 p.m. on May 19, 1999.
Pages:
13437-13438 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA-670-7122-6606), CACA 35511
PDF File:
99-6576.pdf