98-7115. Federal-Mogul Corporation, et al.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 13410-13412]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-7115]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [File No. 981-0011]
    
    
    Federal-Mogul Corporation, et al.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 13411]]
    
    SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
    violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or 
    practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to 
    Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft 
    complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the 
    consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle 
    these allegations.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 18, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Krauss, FTC/H-386, Washington, 
    D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2713.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46 and Section 2.34 of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby 
    given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent 
    order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject 
    to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public 
    record for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid 
    Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
    allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of 
    the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page 
    (for March 6, 1998), on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/
    actions97.htm.'' A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public 
    Reference Room, Room H-130, Sixth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627. 
    Public comment is invited. Such comments or views will be considered by 
    the Commission and will be available for inspection and copying at its 
    principal office in accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
    Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
    
        The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject 
    to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Order 
    (``Agreement'') from Federal-Mogul Corporation (``Federal-Mogul'') and 
    T&N plc (``T&N'').
        The proposed Consent Order has been placed on the public record for 
    sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons. 
    Comments received during this period will become part of the public 
    record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the 
    Agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should 
    withdraw from the Agreement or make final the Agreement's proposed 
    Order.
        Both Federal-Mogul, a Michigan corporation, and T&N, a corporation 
    organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, design, manufacture and 
    sell fluid film or ``plain'' thinwall bearings (``thinwall bearings''). 
    These are bearings that do not have roller or ball elements, but have a 
    surface coating of oil which reduces friction. Among the thinwall 
    bearings Federal-Mogul and T&N manufacture and sell are thinwall 
    bearings for use in automobile and light truck engines (``light duty 
    engine bearings'') and thinwall bearings for use in heavy truck and 
    heavy equipment engines (``heavy duty engine bearings''). Both Federal-
    Mogul and T&N sell light duty and heavy duty engine bearings to 
    original equipment manufacturers (``OEMs''), which buy bearings and use 
    them to manufacture engines, and to aftermarket companies, which buy 
    bearings and use them to repair or service engines after the engines' 
    warranty periods have expired. Federal-Mogul and T&N are the largest 
    competitors in the manufacture and sale of thinwall bearings to OEMs 
    and the aftermarket in the United States. On October 16, 1997, Federal-
    Mogul notified T&N of Federal-Mogul's intention to commence a cash 
    tender offer to acquire 100 percent of the voting securities of T&N for 
    approximately $2.4 billion.
    
    The Proposed Complaint
    
        The proposed complaint alleges that the proposed acquisition may 
    substantially lessen competition in the development, manufacture, and 
    sale of (1) thinwall bearings, (2) light duty engine bearings sold to 
    OEMs, (3) heavy duty engine bearings sold to OEMs, and (4) engine 
    bearings sold to the aftermarket. The proposed complaint also alleges 
    that the relevant geographic market for evaluating the acquisition's 
    effect on the thinwall bearings market is the world. Every engine has a 
    unique set of bearings which, with few exceptions, cannot be used in 
    any other engine. The bearings are engineered in terms of materials, 
    shapes and sizes to meet the bearing performance demands of a 
    particular engine. While engines built for the United States market 
    have different performance characteristics from engines built for other 
    markets, and require bearings engineered for those performance 
    requirements, engine manufacturers in the United States are willing to 
    buy engine bearings from anywhere in the world if the bearings meet the 
    performance requirements for the United States market.
        The proposed complaint alleges that Federal-Mogul and T&N are the 
    two leading producers in the four different bearings markets. The 
    complaint further alleges that the proposed transaction would give 
    Federal-Mogul the ability to unilaterally exercise market power and 
    that the transaction could also substantially increase the likelihood 
    of collusion or coordinated anticompetitive conduct between Federal-
    Mogul and the other remaining bearings producers.
        The proposed complaint alleges that entry into the four alleged 
    markets would not be timely, likely, or sufficient to deter or offset 
    the adverse effects of the acquisition on competition in these markets. 
    Entry into the markets to sell engine bearings to OEM customers 
    requires developing appropriate bearings and precision manufacturing 
    capabilities and extensive testing before sales can be made. This 
    process, from development to the completion of testing, would take 
    substantially more than two years. In the aftermarket, the entrant 
    would have to develop a broad product line to compete with Federal-
    Mogul and T&N, which would take more than two years, and a new entrant 
    would be at a significant cost disadvantage to the incumbent firms.
    
    The Proposed Order
    
        The proposed Order would remedy the alleged violation by preserving 
    the competition that would otherwise be lost as a result of Federal-
    Mogul's acquisition of T&N. The proposed Order requires Federal-Mogul 
    to divest the thinwall bearing business of T&N, which includes the 
    assets and plants that T&N now uses to make thinwall bearings, as well 
    as the assets, including intellectual property, that T&N now uses to 
    develop and design new bearings to meet the bearings needs of engines 
    that OEMs will develop in the future. To insure that the divested 
    thinwall bearing business would be in the same position that T&N had 
    been in terms of research, the proposed Order specifically identifies 
    the individuals in T&N who worked on bearings research and development 
    and requires Federal-Mogul and T&N to assign those personnel to the 
    business to be divested. In addition, certain employees who are 
    believed to be particularly important to the future research success of 
    the divested T&N thinwall business will be given incentives to remain 
    with the divested thinwall business. Finally, certain assets relating 
    the aftermarket
    
    [[Page 13412]]
    
    sales of bearings in North America, including the brand names under 
    which T&N has sold bearings, must be included in the divestiture.
        The proposed Order also addresses a relationship that T&N's 
    thinwall bearings business had with Daido Metals (``Daido''), a 
    Japanese bearing producer. For a number of years, T&N had cooperative 
    technology exchange arrangements with Daido, as well as a joint venture 
    to produce bearings at Bellefontaine, Ohio. In the past, these 
    arrangements between T&N and Daido may have allowed the two companies 
    together to compete better against other bearings producers and to meet 
    their customers' needs for high quality, low cost, sophisticated 
    bearings, better than either company could on its own. To allow for the 
    continuation of cooperation between Daido and the divested T&N bearings 
    business, the proposed Order prohibits Federal-Mogul from entering into 
    such arrangements with Daido for a period of five years. In addition, 
    because certain individuals at T&N are believed to be important to 
    maintaining the cooperative relationships between T&N and Daido, these 
    individuals are given incentives under the proposed Order to stay with 
    the divested T&N thinwall bearings business. The purpose of these 
    provisions is not to force the divested T&N thinwall bearing business 
    or Daido to form any particular cooperative arrangements, but to allow 
    any efficient cooperation between the two firms to continue as if T&N 
    had not been acquired by Federal-Mogul.
        The proposed Order also identifies certain assets related to dry 
    bearings or polymer bearings that are to be included in the 
    divestiture. Dry or polymer bearings are bearings that do not rely on a 
    film of oil, but instead on a polymer coating, to reduce friction. 
    These bearings are produced at T&N plants that also produce thinwall 
    bearings, and the inclusion of these bearings in the assets to be 
    divested may be important to the viability of the T&N plants to be 
    divested. Absent the specific references to polymer bearings, the 
    identification of the plants to be divested would require the 
    divestiture of the manufacturing lines for these dry or polymer 
    bearings that are contained in the named plants. However, Federal-Mogul 
    wishes to include these products by name in the proposed Order, to 
    insure the German Federal Cartel Office that the dry bearing products 
    listed will be divested. The German Federal Cartel Office has raised 
    concerns about a product overlap between Federal-Mogul and T&N in dry 
    bearings that would adversely impact competition in dry bearings in 
    Germany. By including these products in the Commission's proposed 
    Order, Federal-Mogul avoids having to enter into a separate divestiture 
    procedure, relating to the same plants, to satisfy the Federal Cartel 
    Office.
        The proposed Order requires that Federal-Mogul divest the 
    identified assets within six months after the proposed Order becomes 
    final. If Federal-Mogul does not divest the assets within that time 
    period, the proposed Order provides for the appointment of a trustee to 
    divest the assets.
        The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
    proposed Order. This analysis is not intended to constitute an official 
    interpretation of the Agreement or the proposed Order or in any way to 
    modify the terms of the Agreement or the proposed Order.
    
        By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Azcuenaga not 
    participating.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-7115 Filed 3-18-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/19/1998
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed Consent Agreement.
Document Number:
98-7115
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before May 18, 1998.
Pages:
13410-13412 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 981-0011
PDF File:
98-7115.pdf