98-7140. Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 13404-13409]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-7140]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [PF-796; FRL-5776-6]
    
    
    Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of pesticide 
    petitions proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of 
    certain pesticide chemicals in or on various agricultural commodities.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-796, must 
    be received on or before April 20, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail submit written comments to: Public Information and 
    Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Divison 
    (7502C), Office of Pesticides Programs, Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person bring comments 
    to: Rm. 119, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically to: docket@epamail.epa.gov. Following the instructions under 
    ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.'' No confidential business information 
    should be submitted through e-mail.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public
    
    [[Page 13405]]
    
    inspection in Rm. 119 at the address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 
    p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The product manager listed in the 
    table below:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Office location/                     
     Product Manager/Petition No.     telephone number/e-        Address    
                                         mail address                       
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bipin Gandhi (PM 5); (PP        Rm. 4W53, Crystal       2800 Crystal    
     7E4918).                        Station, 703-308-       Dr., Arlington,
                                     8380, e-mail:           VA             
                                     gandhi.bipin@epamail..                               
    Sidney Jackson (PM 5); (PP      Rm. 233, CM #2, 703-    1921 Jefferson  
     5E4463).                        305-7610, e-mail:       Davis Hwy,     
                                     [email protected]   Arlington, VA  
                                     l.epa.gov.                             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received pesticide petitions as 
    follows proposing the establishment and/or amendment of regulations for 
    residues of certain pesticide chemicals in or on various raw 
    agricultural commodities under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Comestic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that these 
    petitions contain data or information regarding the elements set forth 
    in section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the 
    sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data 
    supports grantinig of the petition. Additional data may be needed 
    before EPA rules on the petition.
        The official record for this notice, as well as the public version, 
    has been established for this notice of filing under docket control 
    number PF-796 (including comments and data submitted electronically as 
    described below). A public version of this record, including printed, 
    paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
    information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 a.m. 
    to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
    official record is located at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comment and data 
    will also be accepted on disks in Wordperfect 5.1/6.1 file format or 
    ASCII file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be 
    identified by the docket control number PF-796 and appropriate petition 
    number. Electronic comments on this notice may be filed online at many 
    Federal Depository Libraries.
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Food additives, 
    Feed additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Dated: March 5, 1998.
    
    James Jones,
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    Summaries of Petitions
    
        Below summaries of the pesticide petitions are printed. The 
    summaries of the petitions were prepared by the petitioners. The 
    petition summary announces the availability of a description of the 
    analytical methods available to EPA for the detection and measurement 
    of the pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why no such 
    method is needed.
    
    1. Hercon Environmental Corporation
    
    PP 7E4918
    
        EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP 7E4918) from Hercon 
    Environmental Corporation, Aberdeen Road, P.O. box 467, Emigsville, PA 
    17318-0467, proposing pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to 
    establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Trioctyl 
    Trimellitate (TOTM) as an inert ingredient under 40 CFR 180.1001(c).
    
    A. Product Identity/Chemistry
    
        Tris(2-ethylhexyl)1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylate, the chemical name 
    for TOTM, CAS # [3319-31-1], has a molecular formula of C33 
    H45 O6, and a molecular weight of 546.8.
        TOTM is a primary plasticizer used in applications requiring good 
    elongation retention such as high-temperature PVC wire coatings. Its 
    excellent resistance to soapy water extraction also makes it attractive 
    for use in vinyl film and vinyl-coated fabrics. Its stereochemical 
    properties make it especially attractive in pheromone formulations as a 
    control-release agent, and its extremely low vapor pressure (0.7  x  
    10-7 mm Hg), assures its retention in the formulation to 
    perform its intended purpose.
    
    B. Residue Chemistry
    
        No residue chemistry data are available. However, arguments 
    provided above relative to modes of exposure, support the lack of 
    potential for any residues of TOTM to be present in raw agricultural 
    product of the foods from them.
        Since this petition requests an exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance, Hercon believes that an analytical method for the detection 
    and measurement of TOTM residues is not necessary. The low rate of 
    application and the fact that it is encapsulated in the product leads 
    to the conclusion that TOTM will not migrate into a food from the 
    treatment of crops to any degree that would be detectable.
    
    C. Toxicological Profile
    
        Hercon has submitted to the EPA acute toxicological information and 
    studies of chronic toxicology which exhibit the low toxicity of TOTM. 
    In addition, it was determined from a manufacturer that no reports have 
    been submitted on TOTM under TSCA 8(e) Substantial Risk Notification 
    requirements.
        1. Acute toxicity. Acute toxicology studies conducted with the 
    ``neat'' material show:
        Acute Toxicity:   At most only slightly toxic. Slight skin 
    irritant. LD50 >3200 mg/kg.
        Skin Absorption and Irritation:   No evidence of skin 
    absorption. LD50 >20 mg/kg
        Skin Sensitization:   Sensitized 0/5 guinea pigs in drop-on 
    test.
        Inhalation:   At lowest exposure of 0.23 mg/l, no mortality was 
    experienced.
        Eye Irritation:   In unwashed eye, there was an initial moderate 
    effect after 1 hour, but the effect disappeared after 48 hours. No 
    effects reported in the washed eye.
    
    
        2. Genotoxicty. -- a. TOTM evaluation in the CHO/HGPRT forward 
    mutation assay. TOTM was considered to be inactive under the conditions 
    of testing in this assay. The test material did not induce dose-related 
    increases in the mutant frequency at the HGPRT locus in CHO cell 
    cultures. TOTM was not toxic to CHO cells at concentrations up to 5,000 
    nl/ml either with or without S9 metabolic activation. Mutation assays 
    were performed in duplicate both with
    
    [[Page 13406]]
    
    a nd without S9 metabolic activation using 6 concentrations of TOTM 
    ranging from 10.0 nl/ml to 200 nl/ml.
        b. Evaluation of TOTM in the rat primary hepatocyte unscheduled DNA 
    synthesis assay. The test material did not induce significant changes 
    in the nuclear labeling of primary rat hepatocytes for an applied 
    concentration range of 5000 nl/ml to 250 nl/ml. Little or no toxicity 
    was observed (88.4% to 102.2% survival) but higher concentrations could 
    not be assayed because of the insoluble nature of TOTM in medium. None 
    of the criteria used to indicate UDS were approached by the treatments, 
    and no dose-related response was observed. Therefore, the test material 
    was evaluated as inactive in the Primary Rat Hepatocyte UDS Assay.
        3. Subchronic toxicity. Twenty-eight Day Toxicity Study with TOTM 
    in the Rat: The results of this study demonstrates that TOTM caused 
    slight peroxisome proliferation but was less potent than DEHP [di(2-
    ethylhexyl) phthalate], with 2.0% TOTM producing less effects than 
    0.67% DEHP. There was no effect of feeding TOTM on the body weight or 
    food intakes of the male rats. The females fed 2.0% TOTM showed an 
    initial rejection of the diet which did not have any marked effect on 
    their weight gain.
        4. Chronic toxicity. Chronic Toxicity of TOTM to Daphnia magna 
    Under Flow-Through Test Conditions: The daphnid lengths in all TOTM 
    mean measured concentrations after 21 days of testing were not 
    significantly different (a = 0.05) from the control. Statistical 
    analysis of survival for Daphnia magna after a 21 days exposure to TOTM 
    indicated that survival rates in all the mean measured test 
    concentrations were not significantly different from the control. The 
    mean young/adult/reproduction day after 21 days was not significantly 
    affected in a deleterious manner in all mean measured test 
    concentrations of TOTM. Based on the statistical analysis of adult mean 
    length, survival and young/adult/reproduction day from the 21 day 
    Daphnia magna dynamic life cycle study, the MATC (Maximum Acceptable 
    Toxicant Concentration) limits were estimated to be greater than the 
    TOTM mean measured concentration of 82 g/l.
        5. Metabolite toxicology. Study No. 4: Absorption and Metabolism of 
    [Hexyl-2-14C] TOTM: TOTM is called TEHT in this study. These studies 
    show that TEHT was hydrolyzed to a limited extent in the 
    gastrointestinal tract and was largely excreted unchanged in the feces. 
    Sixteen percent was excreted in the urine as metabolites and 1.9% was 
    expired as CO2.
    
    D. Aggregate Exposure
    
        Hercon's pheromone formulations containing TOTM will not result in 
    an application rate of product in which more than 25 grams/acre of TOTM 
    on food related crops will result. Depending on an extended or delayed 
    infestation of target pests, no more than 3 applications per crop 
    should be necessary.
        It must be remembered that this amount of TOTM is contained in the 
    formulated device, a 0.05 square inch laminated PVC flake, and 
    therefore the TOTM itself does not come into direct contact with the 
    plants or crops treated. At the maximum application rate, there are 
    approximately 0.26 flakes per square foot. This equates to 
    approximately 0.5 mg TOTM / sq.ft. At the lowest recommended 
    application rate, this amount is halved.
        To present a worst case scenario for dietary exposure to humans, 
    Hercon has selected applications to a sugar cane crop. This worst case 
    scenario hypothetically presumes that all available TOTM in the product 
    is finally present in the processed sugar.
        At an application rate corresponding to 0.5 mg TOTM/sq.ft, and a 
    harvest resulting in 3.3 tons of sugar per acre, the available 
    concentration of TOTM in the sugar would calculate to be 8.4 mg TOTM / 
    Kg of sugar.
        The assumption of an intake of 20 gms of sugar per day, would 
    equate to a daily intake of 0.168 mg of TOTM. This hypothetical intake 
    is much lower than the NOEL from a 28 day Chronic oral study in the 
    male rat of 185 mg/kg/day noted in the MSDS.
        Actually, it is expected that since the TOTM is contained in the 
    formulated devise, that no detectable TOTM would be found in the sugar.
        Exposure to drinking water will be minimal. Hercon's products 
    containing TOTM are not sprayed on lawns or gardens, around swimming 
    pools, etc., and due to the low rates of application, even drift from 
    an agricultural application to lakes or waterways, will not affect 
    drinking water.
        Data, calculations, low exposure potential and low toxicity 
    discussed and presented in this petition request, precludes a concern 
    for significant dietary or non-dietary exposure to infants and 
    children.
        Non-dietary exposure to TOTM will be mitigated through the use of 
    personal protective equipment which is described on the label of 
    products for personnel which may be around or in a treated field.
    
    E. Cumulative Exposure
    
        No cumulative mode of exposure is expected. Again, the application 
    rate is extremely low, and encapsulation of the TOTM in the product 
    prevents direct exposure.
        Normal use patterns will not lead to accumulation of TOTM in the 
    environment.
    
    F. Safety Determinations
    
        Hercon believes that the use of pheromone products containing TOTM, 
    which is of low toxicity and which is used in such low concentrations, 
    is compatible with EPA's objectives to register reduced risk 
    pesticides.
        In an absorption and metabolism study on rats, which is included in 
    this package, 75% of the dose was excreted in the feces, 16% in the 
    urine, and 1.9% was expired as CO2. Less than 0.6% remained in the 
    tissues.
        At an acute oral LD50 toxicity level of >3200 mg/kg in 
    the rat and mouse, TOTM is a low level toxin with at most a class III 
    toxicity rating. A 28 day Chronic Oral toxicity study resulted in a 
    NOEL of 184 mg/kg/day.
        Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity data showed negative results in 
    Salmonella typhimurium assay, DHO/HGPRT assay and the Unscheduled DNA 
    synthesis assay.
        Because of the low toxcicity of TOTM and the low rate of 
    application, and encapsulation in the product, and more importantly 
    because no residue is expected in the final food product, a 
    determination can be made that there is little or no exposure to the 
    general population or to children and infants.
    
    G. List of International Tolerances
    
        The petitioner understands that therte are no current or known 
    established residue levels for TOTM.
    
    H. Environmental Fate Summary
    
        This summary is taken directly from the Material Safety Data Sheet 
    from Eastman Chemical Co.
        ``Data for this material have been used to estimate its 
    environmental impact. It has the following properties: a low 
    biochemical oxygen demand and little potential to cause oxygen 
    depletion in aqueous systems, a low potential to affect aquatic 
    organisms, a low potential to biodegrade (high persistence) with 
    acclimated microorganisms from activated sludge, a low potential to 
    bio-concentrate. After dilution with a large amount of water, 
    followed by secondary waste treatment, this material is not expected 
    to cause adverse environmental effects.''
    
    
    
    [[Page 13407]]
    
    
    
    2. IR-4 Project
    
    PP 5E4463
    
        EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP 5E4463) from the 
    Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), proposing pursuant to 
    section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 
    U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR Part 180 by establishing a tolerance 
    for residues of the insecticide cypermethrin ((+) alpha-cyano(3-
    phenoxyphenyl)methyl (+) cis, trans 3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) in or on the raw agricultural 
    commodity green onions at 6.0 parts per million (ppm). EPA has 
    determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the 
    elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has 
    not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time 
    or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data 
    may be needed before EPA rules on the petition. This notice contains a 
    summary of the petition submitted by FMC Corporation, the registrant.
    
    A. Residue Chemistry
    
        1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of cypermethrin in plants is 
    adequately understood. Studies have been conducted to delineate the 
    metabolism of radiolabelled cypermethrin in various crops all showing 
    similar results. The residue of concern is the parent compound only.
        2. Analytical method. There is a practical analytical method for 
    detecting and measuring levels of cypermethrin in or on food with a 
    limit of detection that allows monitoring of food with residues at or 
    above the levels set in these tolerances. The analytical method is Gas 
    Chromatography with Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD).
        3. Magnitude of residues. Field residue trials meeting EPA study 
    requirements have been conducted at the maximum label rate for the crop 
    green onions. Results from these trials demonstrate that the proposed 
    cypermethrin tolerance on green onions at 6.0 ppm will not be exceeded 
    when the product is applied following the proposed use directions. 
    These data have previously been reviewed and classified by the Agency 
    as supportive of this tolerance.
    
    B. Toxicological Profile
    
        1. Acute toxicity. The required battery of acute toxicity studies 
    has been submitted and found adequate. The findings were as follows: 
    oral toxicity, lethal dose (LD)50 of 263 milligram (mg) per 
    kilogram (kg); dermal toxicity, LD50 2,460 mg/kg; inhalation 
    toxicity lethal concentration LC50 2.5 mg/liter (L); primary 
    eye irritation is Toxicity Category III; primary dermal irritation is 
    Toxicity Category IV. Cypermethrin is considered to be a dermal 
    sensitizer.
        2. Genotoxicity. All reported results from the following 
    genotoxicity tests were all negative: gene mutation (Ames); chromosome 
    aberration in Chinese hamster bone marrow cells; host mediated assay in 
    mice; dominant lethal assay in mice.
        3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. No evidence of 
    additional sensitivity to young rats or rabbits was reported following 
    pre- or postnatal exposure to cypermethrin.
        a. A 3-generation reproductive toxicity study in rats demonstrated 
    a no observed effect level (NOEL) of 2.5 mg/kg/day and a lowest 
    observed effect level (LOEL) of 7.5 mg/kg/day for parental/systemic 
    toxicity based on decreased body weight gain in both sexes. There were 
    no adverse effects in reproductive performance. The NOEL for 
    reproductive toxicity was considered to be 37.5 mg/kg/day, the highest 
    dose level tested.
        b. A developmental study in rats demonstrated a maternal NOEL of 
    17.5 mg/kg/day and a LOEL of 35 mg/kg/day based on decreased body 
    weight gain. There were no signs of developmental toxicity at 70 mg/kg/
    day, the highest dose level tested.
        c. A developmental study in rabbits demonstrated a maternal NOEL of 
    100 mg/kg/day and a LOEL of 450 mg/kg/day based on decreased body 
    weight gain. There were no signs of developmental toxicity at 700 mg/
    kg/day, the highest dose level tested.
        4. Subchronic toxicity. The systemic NOEL of 5.0 mg/kg/day from the 
    chronic toxicity study in dogs is also used for short- and 
    intermediate-term margin of exposure (MOE) calculations (as well as 
    acute toxicity, discussed in (1) above). This NOEL was based on 
    neurotoxic clinical signs observed in the first week of treatment of 
    the study.
        5. Chronic toxicity. The Reference Dose (RfD) has been established 
    at 0.010 mg/kg/day. This RfD is based on a chronic toxicity study in 
    dogs with a NOEL of 1.0 mg/kg/day, based on gastrointestinal 
    disturbances observed at the LOEL of 5.0 mg/kg/day during the first 
    week of the study; an uncertainty factor of 100 is used.
        Cypermethrin is classified as a Group C chemical (possible human 
    carcinogen with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals) based 
    upon limited evidence for carcinogenicity in female mice; assignment of 
    a Q* has not been recommended.
        6. Animal metabolism. The metabolism of cypermethrin in animals is 
    adequately understood. Cypermethrin has been shown to be rapidly 
    absorbed, distributed, and excreted in rats when administered orally. 
    Cypermethrin is metabolized by hydrolysis and oxidation.
        7. Metabolite toxicology. The Agency has previously determined that 
    the metabolites of cypermethrin are not of toxicological concern and 
    need not be included in the tolerance expression.
        8. Endocrine disruption. No evidence of potential estrogenic or 
    other endocrine effects of cypermethrin were reported in the standard 
    battery of required toxicology studies which have been completed and 
    found acceptable. Based on these studies, there is no evidence to 
    suggest that cypermethrin has an adverse effect on the endocrine 
    system.
    
    C. Aggregate Exposure
    
        1. Dietary exposure. a. Food. Tolerances have been established for 
    the residues of cypermethrin, in or on a variety of raw agricultural 
    commodities. Tolerances, in support of registrations, currently exist 
    for residues of cypermethrin on cottonseed; pecans; lettuce, head; 
    onions, bulb; cabbage; Brassica, head and stem; Brassica, leafy and 
    livestock commodities of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep as well 
    as this pending tolerance for green onions. For the purposes of 
    assessing the potential dietary exposure for these existing and pending 
    tolerances, FMC has utilized available information on anticipated 
    residues, monitoring data and percent crop treated as follows:
        i. Acute exposure and risk. Acute dietary exposure risk assessments 
    are performed for a food-use pesticide if a toxicological study has 
    indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result 
    of a one day or single exposure. For the purposes of assessing acute 
    dietary risk for cypermethrin, the maternal NOEL of 1.0 mg/kg/day from 
    the chronic toxicity study in dogs was used. The LOEL of this study of 
    5.0 mg/kg/day was based on gastrointestinal disturbances observed in 
    the first week of the study. This acute dietary endpoint was used to 
    determine acute dietary risks to all population subgroups. Available 
    information on anticipated residues, monitoring data and percent crop 
    treated was incorporated into a Tier 3 analysis, using Monte Carlo 
    modeling for commodities that may be consumed in a single serving. 
    These assessments show that the MOEs are significantly greater than the 
    EPA standard of 100 for all subpopulations. The 95th percentile
    
    [[Page 13408]]
    
    of exposure for the overall U. S. population was estimated to be 
    0.000488 mg/kg/day (MOE of 2,047); 99th percentile 0.002014 mg/kg/day 
    (MOE of 496); and 99.9th percentile 0.004438 mg/kg/day (MOE of 225). 
    The 95th percentile of exposure for all infants < one="" year="" old="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.00007="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 14,240);="" 99th="" percentile="" 0.000345="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 2,902);="" and="" 99.9th="" percentile="" 0.000997="" mg/="" kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 1,003).="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" of="" exposure="" for="" nursing="" infants="">< one="" year="" old="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000033="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 30,026="" );="" 99th="" percentile="" 0.000241="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 4,144);="" and="" 99.9th="" percentile="" 0.001400="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 714).="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" of="" exposure="" for="" non-nursing="" infants="">< one="" year="" old="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000075="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 13,331);="" 99th="" percentile="" 0.000375="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 2,667);="" and="" 99.9th="" percentile="" 0.000748="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 1,337).="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" of="" exposure="" for="" children="" 1="" to="" 6="" years="" old="" (the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroup)="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000361="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 2,767);="" 99th="" percentile="" 0.002088="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 479);="" and="" 99.9th="" percentile="" 0.005465="" mg/kg/day="" (moe="" of="" 183).="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" the="" acute="" dietary="" risk="" of="" cypermethrin,="" as="" estimated="" by="" the="" dietary="" risk="" assessment,="" does="" not="" appear="" to="" be="" of="" concern.="" ii.="" chronic="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" the="" acceptable="" rfd="" is="" based="" on="" a="" noel="" of="" 1.0="" mg/kg/day="" from="" the="" chronic="" dog="" study="" and="" an="" uncertainty="" factor="" of="" 100="" is="" 0.010="" mg/kg/day.="" the="" endpoint="" effect="" of="" concern="" was="" based="" on="" gastrointestinal="" disturbances="" observed="" in="" the="" first="" week="" of="" the="" study="" at="" the="" loel="" of="" 5.0="" mg/kg/day.="" a="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure/risk="" assessment="" has="" been="" performed="" for="" cypermethrin="" using="" the="" above="" rfd.="" available="" information="" on="" anticipated="" residues,="" monitoring="" data="" and="" percent="" crop="" treated="" was="" incorporated="" into="" the="" analysis="" to="" estimate="" the="" anticipated="" residue="" contribution="" (arc).="" the="" arc="" is="" generally="" considered="" a="" more="" realistic="" estimate="" than="" an="" estimate="" based="" on="" tolerance="" level="" residues.="" the="" arc="" is="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000025="" mg/kg="" body="" weight="" (bwt)/="" day="" and="" utilize="" 0.3="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" overall="" u.="" s.="" population.="" the="" arcs="" for="" non-nursing="" infants=""><1 year)="" and="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old="" (subgroups="" most="" highly="" exposed)="" are="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000014="" mg/kg="" bwt/day="" and="" 0.000042="" mg/kg="" bwt/day="" and="" utilizes="" 0.1="" percent="" and="" 0.4="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd,="" respectively.="" generally="" speaking,="" the="" epa="" has="" no="" cause="" for="" concern="" if="" the="" total="" dietary="" exposure="" from="" residues="" for="" uses="" for="" which="" there="" are="" published="" and="" proposed="" tolerances="" is="" less="" than="" 100="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd.="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" risk="" of="" cypermethrin,="" as="" estimated="" by="" the="" dietary="" risk="" assessment,="" does="" not="" appear="" to="" be="" of="" concern.="" b.="" drinking="" water.="" laboratory="" and="" field="" data="" have="" demonstrated="" that="" cypermethrin="" is="" immobile="" in="" soil="" and="" will="" not="" leach="" into="" groundwater.="" other="" data="" show="" that="" cypermethrin="" is="" virtually="" insoluble="" in="" water="" and="" extremely="" lipophilic.="" as="" a="" result,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" residues="" reaching="" surface="" waters="" from="" field="" runoff="" will="" quickly="" adsorb="" to="" sediment="" particles="" and="" be="" partitioned="" from="" the="" water="" column.="" further,="" a="" screening="" evaluation="" of="" leaching="" potential="" of="" a="" typical="" pyrethroid="" was="" conducted="" using="" epa's="" pesticide="" root="" zone="" model="" (przm3).="" based="" on="" this="" screening="" assessment,="" the="" potential="" concentrations="" of="" a="" pyrethroid="" in="" groundwater="" at="" depths="" of="" 1="" and="" 2="" meters="" are="" essentially="" zero=""><0.001 parts="" per="" billion).="" surface="" water="" concentrations="" for="" pyrethroids="" were="" estimated="" using="" przm3="" and="" exposure="" analysis="" modeling="" system="" (exams)="" using="" standard="" epa="" cotton="" runoff="" and="" mississippi="" pond="" scenarios.="" the="" maximum="" concentration="" predicted="" in="" the="" simulated="" pond="" was="" 0.052="" parts="" per="" billion(ppb).="" concentrations="" in="" actual="" drinking="" water="" would="" be="" much="" lower="" than="" the="" levels="" predicted="" in="" the="" hypothetical,="" small,="" stagnant="" farm="" pond="" model="" since="" drinking="" water="" derived="" from="" surface="" water="" would="" normally="" be="" treated="" before="" consumption.="" based="" on="" these="" analyses,="" fmc="" believes="" that="" the="" contribution="" of="" water="" to="" the="" dietary="" risk="" estimate="" is="" negligible.="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" together="" these="" data="" indicate="" that="" residues="" of="" cypermethrin="" are="" not="" expected="" to="" occur="" in="" drinking="" water.="" 2.="" non-dietary="" exposure.="" analyses="" were="" conducted="" which="" included="" an="" evaluation="" of="" potential="" non-dietary="" (residential)="" applicator,="" post-="" application="" and="" chronic="" dietary="" aggregate="" exposures="" associated="" with="" cypermethrin="" products="" used="" for="" residential="" flea="" infestation="" control="" and="" agricultural/commercial="" applications.="" the="" aggregate="" analysis="" conservatively="" assumes="" that="" a="" person="" is="" concurrently="" exposed="" to="" the="" same="" active="" ingredient="" via="" the="" use="" of="" consumer="" or="" professional="" flea="" infestation="" control="" products="" and="" to="" chronic="" level="" residues="" in="" the="" diet.="" in="" the="" case="" of="" potential="" non-dietary="" health="" risks,="" conservative="" point="" estimates="" of="" non-dietary="" exposures,="" expressed="" as="" total="" systemic="" absorbed="" dose="" for="" each="" product="" use="" category="" (indoor="" total="" release="" fogger="" and="" lawn="" care)="" and="" exposed="" population="" group="" (adults,="" children="" 1-="" 6="" years,="" and="" infants="">< 1="" year)="" are="" compared="" to="" the="" systemic="" absorbed="" dose="" noel="" for="" cypermethrin="" to="" provide="" estimates="" of="" the="" moes.="" based="" on="" the="" toxicity="" endpoints="" selected="" by="" epa="" for="" cypermethrin,="" inhalation="" and="" incidental="" oral="" ingestion="" absorbed="" doses="" were="" combined="" and="" compared="" to="" the="" relevant="" systemic="" noel="" for="" estimating="" moes.="" in="" the="" case="" of="" potential="" aggregate="" health="" risks,="" the="" above="" mentioned="" conservative="" point="" estimates="" of="" non-dietary="" exposure="" (expressed="" as="" systemic="" absorbed="" dose)="" are="" combined="" with="" estimates="" (arithmetic="" mean="" values)="" of="" chronic="" average="" dietary="" (oral)="" absorbed="" doses.="" these="" aggregate="" absorbed="" dose="" estimates="" are="" also="" provided="" for="" adults,="" children="" 1="" -="" 6="" years="" and="" infants="">< 1="" year.="" the="" combined="" or="" aggregated="" absorbed="" dose="" estimates="" (summed="" across="" non-dietary="" and="" chronic="" dietary)="" are="" then="" compared="" with="" the="" systemic="" absorbed="" dose="" noel="" to="" provide="" estimates="" of="" aggregate="" moes.="" the="" total="" non-dietary="" moes="" (combined="" across="" all="" product="" use="" categories)="" for="" the="" inhalation="" plus="" incidental="" oral="" routes="" are="" 97,000="" for="" adults,="" 2,100="" for="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old,="" and="" 1,900="" for="" infants="">< 1="" year).="" the="" aggregate="" moe="" (inhalation="" +="" incidental="" oral="" +="" chronic="" dietary,="" summed="" across="" all="" product="" use="" categories)="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 65,000="" for="" adults,="" 2,000="" for="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old="" and="" 1,900="" for="" infants=""><1 year).="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" the="" potential="" non-dietary="" and="" aggregate="" (non-dietary="" +="" chronic="" dietary)="" exposures="" for="" cypermethrin="" are="" associated="" with="" substantial="" margins="" of="" safety.="" d.="" cumulative="" effects="" in="" consideration="" of="" potential="" cumulative="" effects="" of="" cypermethrin="" and="" other="" substances="" that="" may="" have="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity,="" to="" our="" knowledge="" there="" are="" currently="" no="" available="" data="" or="" other="" reliable="" information="" indicating="" that="" any="" toxic="" effects="" produced="" by="" cypermethrin="" would="" be="" cumulative="" with="" those="" of="" other="" chemical="" compounds;="" thus="" only="" the="" potential="" risks="" of="" cypermethrin="" have="" been="" considered="" in="" this="" assessment="" of="" its="" aggregate="" exposure.="" fmc="" intends="" to="" submit="" information="" for="" the="" epa="" to="" consider="" concerning="" potential="" cumulative="" effects="" of="" cypermethrin="" consistent="" with="" the="" schedule="" established="" by="" epa="" at="" in="" the="" federal="" register="" of="" august="" 4,="" 1997,="" (62="" fr="" 42020),="" and="" other="" epa="" publications="" pursuant="" to="" the="" food="" quality="" protection="" act.="" [[page="" 13409]]="" e.="" safety="" determination="" 1.="" u.s.="" population.="" based="" on="" a="" complete="" and="" reliable="" toxicology="" database,="" the="" acceptable="" reference="" dose="" rfd="" is="" 0.010="" mg/kg/day,="" based="" on="" a="" loel="" of="" 5.0="" mg/kg/day="" from="" the="" chronic="" dog="" study="" and="" an="" uncertainty="" factor="" of="" 100.="" available="" information="" on="" anticipated="" residues,="" monitoring="" data="" and="" percent="" crop="" treated="" was="" incorporated="" into="" an="" analysis="" to="" estimate="" the="" anticipated="" residue="" contribution="" (arc)="" for="" 26="" population="" subgroups.="" the="" arc="" is="" generally="" considered="" a="" more="" realistic="" estimate="" than="" an="" estimate="" based="" on="" tolerance="" level="" residues.="" the="" arc="" are="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000025="" mg/kg="" body="" weight="" (bwt)/day="" and="" utilize="" 0.3="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" overall="" u.="" s.="" population.="" the="" arc="" for="" non-nursing="" infants=""><1 year)="" and="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old="" (subgroups="" most="" highly="" exposed)="" are="" estimated="" to="" be="" 0.000014="" mg/kg="" bwt/="" day="" and="" 0.000042="" mg/kg="" bwt/day="" and="" utilizes="" 0.1="" percent="" and="" 0.4="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd,="" respectively.="" generally="" speaking,="" the="" epa="" has="" no="" cause="" for="" concern="" if="" the="" total="" dietary="" exposure="" from="" residues="" for="" uses="" for="" which="" there="" are="" published="" and="" proposed="" tolerances="" is="" less="" than="" 100="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd.="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" risk="" of="" cypermethrin,="" as="" estimated="" by="" the="" aggregate="" risk="" assessment,="" does="" not="" appear="" to="" pose="" significant="" risk.="" for="" the="" overall="" u.s.="" population,="" the="" calculated="" margins="" of="" exposure="" (moe)="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 2,047;="" 496="" at="" the="" 99th="" percentile;="" and="" 225="" at="" the="" 99.9th="" percentile.="" for="" all="" infants="">< one="" year="" old,="" the="" calculated="" moe="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 14,240;="" 2,902="" at="" the="" 99th="" percentile;="" and="" 1,003="" at="" the="" 99.9th="" percentile.="" for="" nursing="" infants="">< one="" year="" old,="" the="" calculated="" margins="" of="" exposure="" (moe)="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 30,026;="" 4,144="" at="" the="" 99th="" percentile;="" and="" 714="" at="" the="" 99.9th="" percentile.="" for="" non-nursing="" infants="">< one="" year="" old,="" the="" calculated="" margins="" of="" exposure="" (moe)="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 13,331;="" 2,667="" at="" the="" 99th="" percentile;="" and="" 1,337="" at="" the="" 99.9th="" percentile.="" for="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroup,="" children="" 1="" -="" 6="" years="" old,="" the="" calculated="" moe="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" was="" estimated="" to="" be="" 2,767="" ;="" 479="" at="" the="" 99th="" percentile;="" and="" 183="" at="" the="" 99.9th="" percentile.="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" reasonable="" certainty="" that="" no="" harm="" will="" result="" from="" acute="" exposure="" to="" cypermethrin.="" 2.="" infants="" and="" children.="" --a.="" general.="" in="" assessing="" the="" potential="" for="" additional="" sensitivity="" of="" infants="" and="" children="" to="" residues="" of="" cypermethrin,="" fmc="" considered="" data="" from="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" in="" the="" rat="" and="" rabbit,="" and="" a="" three-generation="" reproductive="" study="" in="" the="" rat.="" the="" data="" demonstrated="" no="" indication="" of="" increased="" sensitivity="" of="" rats="" or="" rabbits="" to="" in="" utero="" and/or="" postnatal="" exposure="" to="" cypermethrin.="" the="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" are="" designed="" to="" evaluate="" adverse="" effects="" on="" the="" developing="" organism="" resulting="" from="" pesticide="" exposure="" during="" prenatal="" development="" to="" one="" or="" both="" parents.="" reproduction="" studies="" provide="" information="" relating="" to="" effects="" from="" exposure="" to="" the="" pesticide="" on="" the="" reproductive="" capability="" of="" mating="" animals="" and="" data="" on="" systemic="" toxicity.="" ffdca="" section="" 408="" provides="" that="" epa="" may="" apply="" an="" additional="" margin="" of="" safety="" for="" infants="" and="" children="" in="" the="" case="" of="" threshold="" effects="" to="" account="" for="" pre-="" and="" post-natal="" toxicity="" and="" the="" completeness="" of="" the="" database.="" b.="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies.="" in="" the="" prenatal="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" in="" rats="" and="" rabbits,="" there="" was="" no="" evidence="" of="" developmental="" toxicity="" at="" the="" highest="" doses="" tested="" (70="" mg/kg/day="" in="" rats="" and="" 700="" mg/kg/day="" in="" rabbits).="" decreased="" body="" weight="" gain="" was="" observed="" at="" the="" maternal="" loel="" in="" each="" study;="" the="" maternal="" noel="" was="" established="" at="" 17.5="" mg/kg/day="" in="" rats="" and="" 100="" mg/kg/day="" in="" rabbits.="" c.="" reproductive="" toxicity="" study.="" in="" the="" 3-generation="" reproduction="" study="" in="" rats,="" offspring="" toxicity="" (reduced="" mean="" litter="" weight="" gain)="" was="" observed="" only="" at="" the="" highest="" dietary="" level="" tested="" (37.5="" mg/kg/day),="" while="" toxicity="" in="" the="" parental="" animals="" was="" observed="" at="" the="" lower="" treatment="" levels.="" the="" parental="" systemic="" noel="" was="" 2.5="" mg/kg/day="" and="" the="" parental="" systemic="" loel="" was="" 7.5="" mg/kg/day.="" there="" were="" no="" developmental="" (pup)="" or="" reproductive="" effects="" up="" to="" 37.5="" mg/kg/day="" (highest="" dose="" tested).="" d.="" pre-="" and="" post-natal="" sensitivity.="" --i.="" pre-natal.="" there="" was="" no="" evidence="" of="" developmental="" toxicity="" in="" the="" studies="" at="" the="" highest="" doses="" tested="" in="" the="" rat="" (70="" mg/kg/day)="" or="" in="" the="" rabbit="" (700="" mg/kg/day).="" therefore,="" there="" is="" no="" evidence="" of="" a="" special="" dietary="" risk="" (either="" acute="" or="" chronic)="" for="" infants="" and="" children="" which="" would="" require="" an="" additional="" safety="" factor.="" ii.="" post-natal.="" based="" on="" the="" absence="" of="" pup="" toxicity="" up="" to="" dose="" levels="" which="" produced="" toxicity="" in="" the="" parental="" animals,="" there="" is="" no="" evidence="" of="" special="" post-natal="" sensitivity="" to="" infants="" and="" children="" in="" the="" rat="" reproduction="" study.="" based="" on="" the="" above,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" reliable="" data="" support="" use="" of="" the="" standard="" 100-fold="" uncertainty="" factor,="" and="" that="" an="" additional="" uncertainty="" factor="" is="" not="" needed="" to="" protect="" the="" safety="" of="" infants="" and="" children.="" as="" stated="" above,="" aggregate="" exposure="" assessments="" utilized="" significantly="" less="" than="" 1="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" either="" the="" entire="" u.="" s.="" population="" or="" any="" of="" the="" 26="" population="" subgroups="" including="" infants="" and="" children.="" therefore,="" fmc="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" reasonable="" certainty="" that="" no="" harm="" will="" result="" to="" infants="" and="" children="" from="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" cypermethrin="" residues.="" f.="" international="" tolerances="" there="" are="" no="" codex,="" canadian,="" or="" mexican="" residue="" limits="" for="" residues="" of="" cypermethrin="" in="" or="" on="" green="" onions.="" [fr="" doc.="" 98-7140="" filed="" 3-18-98;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 6560-50-f="">

Document Information

Published:
03/19/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
98-7140
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-796, must be received on or before April 20, 1998.
Pages:
13404-13409 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-796, FRL-5776-6
PDF File:
98-7140.pdf