2014-06080. Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; Final Results of Re-Conducted Administrative Review of Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. and Intent Not To Revoke; 2008-2009  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

    SUMMARY:

    On September 18, 2013, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published its Preliminary Results of the re-conducted administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp (“shrimp”) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”) of Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (“Grobest”) and intent not to revoke.[1] The period of review (“POR”) is February 1, 2008, through January 31, 2009. The final dumping margin is listed below in the “Final Results of the Review” section of this notice.

    DATES:

    Effective Date: March 19, 2014.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4031.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    On September 18, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.[2] On November 4, 2013, we received a case brief from Grobest.[3] On November 12, 2013, we received a rebuttal brief from Domestic Producers.[4]

    As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from October 1, through October 16, 2013.[5] Therefore, all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 16 days. Further, on January 28, 2014, the Department extended the deadline in this proceeding by 60 days.[6] The revised deadline for these final results is April 4, 2014.

    Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) item numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description, available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice, remains dispositive.[7]

    Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this Notice. A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (“CRU”), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (“IA ACCESS”). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Start Printed Page 15310Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

    Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have not made any changes to the Preliminary Results.

    Determination Not To Revoke Order in Part

    We continue to find that Grobest has not satisfied the requirements of 19 CFR 351.222(b). Thus, under section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), we determine not to revoke in part the order with respect to Grobest.

    Final Results of the Review

    The dumping margin for the POR is as follows:

    ExporterWeighted-­average margin (Percent)
    Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam)25.76

    Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of this review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of sales.[8] We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

    The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (“NME”) cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of this practice, see NME Antidumping Proceedings.[9]

    Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

    Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (“APO”) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.

    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Start Signature

    Dated: March 13, 2014.

    Paul Piquado,

    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.  See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Re-conducted Administrative Review of Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. and Intent Not To Revoke; 2008-2009, 78 FR 57532 (September 18, 2013) (“Preliminary Results”).

    Back to Citation

    2.  See id.

    Back to Citation

    3.  See Letter from Grobest, to the Department, regarding “Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Vietnam: Case Brief on behalf of Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co, Ltd.,” dated November 4, 2013.

    Back to Citation

    4.  See Letter from Domestic Producers, to Commerce, regarding “Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (2008-2009) for Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.: Rebuttal Brief,” dated November 12, 2013.

    Back to Citation

    5.  See Memorandum for the Record from Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government” (October 18, 2013).

    Back to Citation

    6.  See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, through James Doyle, from Susan Pulongbarit, “Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Re-conducted Administrative Review of Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., dated January 27, 2014.

    Back to Citation

    7.  See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, regarding Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Re-Conducted Administrative Review of Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., dated concurrently with these results.

    Back to Citation

    8.  See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).

    Back to Citation

    9.  See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (“NME Antidumping Proceedings”).

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2014-06080 Filed 3-18-14; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P