94-4750. Pesticide Tolerances for Cyromazine  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-4750]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 2, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 1F4016 and PP 2F4053/R2039; FRL-4756-8]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
     
    
    Pesticide Tolerances for Cyromazine
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes tolerances for residues of the insect 
    growth regulator cyromazine (N-cyclopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-
    triamine) and its metabolite melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine), 
    calculated as cyromazine, in or on leafy vegetables (except Brassica) 
    at 10.0 ppm and in or on cucurbits vegetables at 2.0 ppm. This 
    regulation to establish maximum permissible levels for residues of the 
    insecticide was requested pursuant to petitions submitted by Ciba-Geigy 
    Corp.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective March 2, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections, identified by the document control 
    number, [PP 1F4016 and PP 2F4053/R2039], may be submitted to: Hearing 
    Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., 
    SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the 
    document control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
    request to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
    22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance 
    Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting 
    Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, 
    PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Phillip O. Hutton, Product 
    Manager (PM 18), Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 202, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, 703-557-2386.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 11, 1992 
    (57 FR 8658 -8659), EPA issued notices which announced that Ciba-Geigy 
    Corp., P.O. box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, had submitted pesticide 
    petitions (PP 1F4016 and PP 2F4039) to EPA proposing to amend 40 CFR 
    180.414 by establishing tolerances, under section 408 of the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a, for residues of the 
    insecticide cyromazine (N-cyclo-propyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) 
    plus its major metabolite melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) in 
    or on the raw agricultural commodities leafy vegetables crop group at 
    10.0 ppm and cucurbit vegetables crop group at 2.0 ppm.
        There were no comments or requests for referral to an advisory 
    committee received in response to these notices of filing. The 
    scientific data submitted in the petition and other relevant material 
    have been evaluated. A discussion of the toxicological data considered 
    in support of the tolerance as well as a discussion of the risk of 
    cyromazine and its metabolite melamine can be found in a rule (FAP 
    2H5355/P344) published in the Federal Register of April 27, 1984 (49 FR 
    18120); in the Notice of Conditional Registration for Larvadex 0.3% 
    Premix, published in the Federal Register of May 15, 1985 (50 FR 20373) 
    and in the proposed rule regarding the establishment of a tolerance for 
    residues of cyromazine and its metabolite melamine, calculated as 
    cyromazine, in or on mushrooms at 10.0 ppm in the Federal Register of 
    June 30, 1993 (58 FR 34972).
        A chronic dietary exposure/risk assessment for the proposed use on 
    cucurbit vegetables and leafy vegetables (except Brassica) based on 
    tolerance residue levels of 2.0 ppm and 10.0 ppm, respectively, was 
    performed. This chronic analysis compared exposure estimates to a 
    Reference Dose (RfD) of 0.0075 mg/kg/ body weight/day based on a no-
    observable-effects level (NOEL) of 0.75 mg/kg body weight/day and an 
    uncertainty factor of 100. The NOEL is based on a 6-month dog feeding 
    study which demonstrated decreased hematocrit and hemoglobin levels. 
    The Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC) from established 
    tolerances for cyromazine utilizes 30% of the RfD for the overall U.S. 
    population. With the inclusion of leafy vegetables (except Brassica) 
    and cucurbit vegetables, dietary risk is raised to 60 percent of the 
    RfD. Therefore, the contribution of the leafy vegetables (except 
    Brassica) and cucurbit vegetables tolerances takes up an additional 30 
    percent of the RfD. Further, with the inclusion of the leafy vegetables 
    (except Brassica) and cucurbit vegetables, the estimates for the total 
    percent RfD occupied for infants aged less than 1 year and children 1 
    through 6 years of age become 44% and 66%, respectively. Since the 
    exposure estimates are based on theoretically maximum residues, and are 
    typically overestimates of actual exposure, and since they do not 
    exceed the Reference Dose, the chronic dietary risk of cyromazine does 
    not appear to be of concern.
        The nature of the residue in plants is adequately understood for 
    the purposes of these tolerances. An adequate analytical method, high-
    pressure liquid chromatograph with UV detection, is available for 
    enforcement purposes in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. II (PAM 
    II).
        There is no reasonable expectation that secondary residues will 
    occur in milk, eggs, or meat of livestock and poultry since there are 
    no livestock or poultry feed items asssociated with this action.
        Based on the information cited above, the Agency has determined 
    that the establishment of the tolerance by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    will protect the public health. The pesticide is considered useful for 
    the purposes for which the tolerances are sought and capable of 
    achieving the intended physical or technical effect. Therefore, the 
    tolerance is established as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by these regulations may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections and/or request a hearing with the Hearing Clerk, at 
    the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/
    or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to 
    the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must 
    specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the 
    grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each objection must be 
    accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is 
    requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual 
    issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions 
    on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the 
    objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing will be granted if 
    the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the 
    following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a 
    reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the 
    requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in 
    favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts 
    to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner 
    sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
    requested (40 CFR 178.32).
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. Under section 3(f), 
    the order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that 
    is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the 
    economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting 
    a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal 
    governments or communities (also referred to as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations or recipients 
    thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising out of 
    legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth 
    in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Dated: February 22, 1994.
    
    Douglas D. Campt,
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. In part 180:
        a. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        b. By amending Sec. 180.414(e) in the table therein by adding and 
    alphabetically inserting the following entries, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.414   Cyromazine; tolerances for residues.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) *  *  *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                      *****                                 
    Cucurbit vegetables........................................          2.0
    Leafy vegetables (except Brassica).........................         10.0
                                                                            
                                      *****                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 94-4750 Filed 3-1-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/2/1994
Published:
03/02/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-4750
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective March 2, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 2, 1994, PP 1F4016 and PP 2F4053/R2039, FRL-4756-8
RINs:
2070-AB78
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.414