96-6720. Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods; Reference and Equivalent Method Designations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 20, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 11404-11405]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-6720]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [FRL-5440-7]
    
    
    Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods; 
    Reference and Equivalent Method Designations
    
        Notice is hereby given that the EPA, in accordance with 40 CFR part 
    53, has designated one additional reference method and two additional 
    equivalent methods for ambient air monitoring. The reference method is 
    for the measurement of ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide. The 
    first equivalent method is for the measurement of ambient 
    concentrations of ozone. The other equivalent is for the determination 
    of lead in suspended particulate matter collected from ambient air.
        The new reference method for nitrogen dioxide is an automated 
    method (analyzer) which utilizes the measurement principle based on the 
    chemiluminescent reaction between nitric oxide and ozone and the 
    calibration procedure specified in Appendix F of 40 CFR part 50. This 
    new designated method is identified as follows:
        RFNA-0196-111, ``Horiba Instruments, Incorporated Model APNA-360 
    Ambient NO-NO2-NOx Monitor,'' operated with a full scale 
    range of 0-0.5 ppm, at any temperature in the range of 10  deg.C to 40 
    deg.C, with a Line Setting of ``MEASURE'', and an Analog Output of 
    ``MONETARY VALUE'', and with or without the optional Rack Mounting 
    Plate and Side Rails.
        The new equivalent method for ozone is an automated method 
    (analyzer) which utilizes the measurement principle based on the 
    absorption of ultraviolet radiation by ozone at a wavelength of 254 nm 
    and the calibration procedure specified in Appendix C of 40 CFR part 
    50. This new designated method is identified as follows:
        EQOA-0196-112, ``Horiba Instruments, Incorporated Model APOA-360 
    Ambient Ozone Monitor,'' operated with a full scale range of 0-0.5 ppm, 
    at any temperature in the range of 10  deg.C to 40  deg.C, with a Line 
    Setting of ``MEASURE'', and an Analog Output of ``MOMENTARY VALUE'', 
    and with or without the optional Rack Mounting Plate and Side Rails.
        These two automated methods are available from Horiba Instruments, 
    Incorporated, 17671 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine, California 92714. The 
    applications for designation of these nitrogen dioxide and ozone 
    methods were received on September 15, 1995 and August 21, 1995 
    respectively.
        A test analyzer representative of each of these methods has been 
    tested by the applicant, in accordance with the test procedures 
    specified in 40 CFR part 53. After reviewing the results of those tests 
    and other information submitted by the applicant, EPA has determined, 
    in accordance with part 53, that these methods should be designated as 
    a reference method and an equivalent method, respectively.
        The new equivalent method for the determination of lead in 
    suspended particulate matter collected from ambient air is identified 
    as follows:
        EQL-0196-113, ``Determination of Lead Concentration in Ambient 
    particulate Matter by Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma-Optical Emission 
    Spectrometry (Doe Run Company).''
        The applicant's request for an equivalent method determination for 
    the above method was received on July 11, 1995. This method has been 
    tested by the applicant, the Doe Run Company, Smelting Division, 
    Herculaneum, Missouri, in accordance with the test procedures 
    prescribed in 40 CFR part 53. After reviewing the results of these 
    tests and other information submitted by the applicant, EPA has 
    determined, in accordance with part 53, that this method should be 
    designated as an equivalent method.
        This method uses the sampling procedure specified in the reference 
    method for the determination of lead in suspended particulate matter 
    collected from ambient air (40 CFR 50, Appendix G). In this method, 
    lead in the particulate matter is solubilized by extraction with nitric 
    acid facilitated by heat. The lead content of the sample extract is 
    analyzed with a Baird ICP 2000 inductively coupled argon plasma--
    optical emission spectrometer operating at a frequency of 40.68 MHz and 
    using the 220.353 nm lead adsortion line. The instrumental operating 
    conditions have been optimized by the user-laboratory. Technical 
    questions concerning this method should be directed to the Doe Run 
    Company, Smelting Division, 881 Main Street, Herculaneum, Missouri 
    63048.
        The information submitted by these applicants will be kept on file 
    at EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, 
    North Carolina 27711 and will be available for inspection to the extent 
    consistent with 40 CFR part 2 (EPA's regulations implementing the 
    Freedom of Information Act).
        As a designated reference or equivalent method, each of these 
    methods is acceptable for use by states and other air monitoring 
    agencies under the requirements of 40 CFR part 58,
    
    [[Page 11405]]
    
    Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes, the method must be 
    used in strict accordance with the operation or instuction manual 
    associated with the method or the procedures and specifications 
    provided in the method description and subject to any limitations 
    (e.g., operating temperature range) specified in the applicable 
    designation (see identification of the methods above). Vendor 
    modifications of a designated method used for purposes of part 58 are 
    permitted only with prior approval of the EPA, as provided in part 53. 
    Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are 
    specified under Section 2.8 of Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58 
    (Modifications of Methods by Users).
        In general, an automated method designation applies to any analyzer 
    which is identical to the analyzer described in the designation. In 
    some cases, similar analyzers manufactured prior to the designation may 
    be upgraded (e.g., by minor modification or by substitution of a new 
    operation or instruction manual) so as to be identical to the 
    designated method and thus achieve designated status at a modest cost. 
    The manufacturer should be consulted to determine the feasibility of 
    such upgrading. States or other agencies wishing to use a method 
    similar to the new lead equivalent method that employs procedures and 
    specifications significantly different from those in EQL-0196-113 must 
    seek specific approval for their particular method under the provisions 
    of Section 2.8 of Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58 (Modification of Methods 
    by Users), or agencies may seek designation of such a method as an 
    equivalent method under the provisions of 40 CFR part 53.
        Part 53 requires that sellers of designated method analyzers comply 
    with certain conditions. These conditions are given in 40 CFR 53.9 and 
    are summarized below:
        (1) A copy of the approved operation or instruction manual must 
    accompany the analyzer when it is delivered to the ultimate purchaser.
        (2) The analyzer must not generate any unreasonable hazard to 
    operators or to the environment.
        (3) The analyzer must function within the limits of the performance 
    specifications given in Table B-1 of part 53 for at least one year 
    after delivery when maintained and operated in accordance with the 
    operation manual.
        (4) Any analyzer offered for sale as a reference or equivalent 
    method must bear a label or sticker indicating that it has been 
    designated as a reference or equivalent method in accordance with part 
    53.
        (5) If such an analyzer has two or more selectable ranges, the 
    label or sticker must be placed in close proximity to the range 
    selector and indicate which range or ranges have been included in the 
    reference or equivalent method designation.
        (6) An applicant who offers analyzers for sale as reference or 
    equivalent methods is required to maintain a list of ultimate 
    purchasers of such analyzers and to notify them within 30 days if a 
    reference or equivalent method designation applicable to the analyzer 
    has been canceled or if adjustment of the analyzer is necessary under 
    40 CFR part 53.11(b) to avoid a cancellation.
        (7) an applicant who modifies an analyzer previously designated as 
    a reference or equivalent method is not permitted to sell the analyzer 
    (as modified) as a reference or equivalent method (although he may 
    choose to sell it without such representation), nor to attach a label 
    or sticker to the analyzer (as modified) under the provisions described 
    above, until he has received notice under 40 CFR part 53.14(c) that the 
    original designation or a new designation applies to the method as 
    modified, or until he has applied for and received notice under 40 CFR 
    53.8(b) of a new reference or equivalent method determination for the 
    analyzer as modified.
        Aside from occasional breakdown or malfunctions, consistent or 
    repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported 
    to: Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Air Measurements 
    Research Division (MD-78A), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
        Desingation of these reference and equivalent methods is intended 
    to assist the States in establishing and operating their air quality 
    surveillance systems under part 58. Technical questions concerning any 
    of the methods should be directed to the appropriate applicant. 
    Additional information concerning this action may be obtained from 
    Frank F. McElroy, Air Measurements Research Division (MD-77), National 
    Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, (919) 541-2622.
    Joseph K. Alexander,
    Deputy Assistant Administrator for Research and Development.
    [FR Doc. 96-6720 Filed 3-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/20/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-6720
Pages:
11404-11405 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5440-7
PDF File:
96-6720.pdf