95-6919. Acute Toxicity of Elemental (Reduced, Metallic Powder) Forms of Iron Relative to That of Iron Salts; Notice of a Public Workshop  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 14918-14919]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-6919]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
     21 CFR Parts 101, 111, 170, and 310
    
    [Docket Nos. 91P-0186 and 93P-0306]
    
    
    Acute Toxicity of Elemental (Reduced, Metallic Powder) Forms of 
    Iron Relative to That of Iron Salts; Notice of a Public Workshop
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice of public workshop.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public 
    workshop on the acute toxicity of elemental (reduced, metallic powder) 
    forms of iron. The purpose of this workshop is to solicit scientific 
    data and information from interested persons about the acute toxicity 
    of elemental forms of iron with regard to whether such forms are 
    sufficiently safe in dietary supplement and drug products to warrant 
    exemption from the special packaging and labeling requirements that FDA 
    has proposed for products containing iron salts.
    
    DATES: The public workshop will be held on April 20, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 
    5 p.m. Submit written comments by April 20, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The public workshop will be held at the Parklawn Bldg., 
    conference room G, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Written 
    comments regarding the workshop may be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John N. Hathcock, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-465), Food and Drug Administration, 
    8301 Muirkirk Rd., Laurel, MD 20708, 301-594-6006.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 6, 1994 
    (59 FR 51030), FDA issued a proposal (the initial proposal) on actions 
    that it tentatively concluded were necessary to stem the recent 
    epidemic of pediatric poisonings from over-consuming iron-containing 
    products. In the Federal Register of February 16, 1995 (60 FR 8989), 
    the agency issued a supplementary proposal to clarify changes in its 
    legal authority with the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and 
    Education Act (Pub. L. 103-417).
        In the initial proposal, FDA briefly described the three basic 
    types of elemental iron powders that are marketed for use in foods. The 
    three types are reduced iron, electrolytic iron, and carbonyl iron. The 
    term ``carbonyl'' refers to the production process, not the composition 
    of the product. The bioavailability of these various elemental iron 
    sources is dependent primarily on their physical characteristics, which 
    in turn depend on the manufacturing method. For example, higher 
    relative bioavailabilities of elemental iron are obtained with smaller 
    particle sizes.
        Some evidence suggests that carbonyl iron may be a useful 
    substitute for the more commonly used chemical compounds of iron in 
    reducing the risk of accidental iron poisonings. Data from studies in 
    animals suggest that carbonyl iron may be only 1/100th as toxic as 
    ferrous sulfate in single doses, i.e., the LD50 (lethal dose for 
    50 percent of the test group) of ferrous sulfate is approximately 0.30 
    gram ferrous per kilogram (g Fe/kg) (The Merck Index, 11th ed., p. 635 
    (1989)), and the LD50 for carbonyl iron is approximately 30.0 g 
    Fe/kg body weight. At the same time, data from human subjects indicate 
    that the overall bioavailability of carbonyl iron in supporting the 
    nutritional functions of iron is about 70 percent that of ferrous 
    sulfate. Thus, carbonyl iron, in comparison with ferrous sulfate, 
    appears to have a much larger margin of safety between the level that 
    would provide adequate iron nutrition and the level that causes acute 
    toxicity. Consequently, carbonyl iron may be inherently safer to use, 
    and its use may help to reduce the risk of iron poisoning in children, 
    than ferrous sulfate.
        In the initial proposal, FDA expressed interest in receiving data 
    on the potential of elemental iron to have acute toxicity in humans, 
    and particularly in children, and stated that the agency would 
    carefully consider any information that it received on this subject. 
    FDA stated that, if the information it received was persuasive in 
    establishing that the use of elemental iron would substantially 
    decrease the risk of pediatric poisoning while allowing for effective 
    dietary iron supplementation, FDA would consider exempting iron-
    containing products that incorporate elemental iron from any 
    regulations that result from this rulemaking.
        In response to this request for information, FDA received several 
    comments that supplied information on this topic. Some of the comments 
    included citations to scientific literature or copies of scientific 
    articles. The comments argued that the information supports an 
    exemption of products formulated with elemental iron from the labeling 
    and packaging requirements applied to products containing iron salts. 
    These comments have convinced FDA that the issues and data that they 
    have presented should be discussed in a public workshop.
        The purpose of the workshop on the acute toxicity of elemental iron 
    is to:
        1. Identify data that objectively describe the acute toxicity of 
    elemental iron.
        2. Identify the market uses of elemental iron and any adverse 
    reaction reporting systems or processes used by manufacturers and 
    vendors.
        3. Identify any data on acute, accidental exposure of children or 
    adults to products containing elemental iron.
        4. Discuss a possible conceptual framework for evaluation of the 
    effects of elemental forms of iron upon acute exposure.
        5. Discuss the validity, and limitations, of acute toxicity data in 
    experimental animals in predicting the risk in young children.
        Specific topics that may be relevant and on which discussion is 
    invited include:
        1. Physiological factors that influence acute toxicity of elemental 
    forms of iron, in comparison with those for iron salts.
        2. The quality, results, and relevance of animal studies on acute 
    toxicity of elemental iron and iron salts.
        3. The quality and results of human studies for evaluating the 
    effects of elemental iron.
        4. Factors influencing the validity of extrapolation of 
    experimental animal data on acute toxicity of various forms of iron for 
    predicting the risk in young children.
        5. Current uses of elemental iron in dietary supplements and drugs 
    and the data available on potential adverse effects.
         Discussion of these topics will be considered by FDA in the 
    development of any final rule on the packaging and labeling of products 
    containing iron salts. In conjunction with the workshop, FDA 
    specifically requests comments on the appropriateness of elemental iron 
    as a source of iron in drugs and dietary supplements. The comments 
    should focus on whether the use of elemental [[Page 14919]] iron in 
    iron-containing products will decrease the risk of pediatric 
    poisonings, while providing desirable iron nutrition to those who need 
    iron supplementation, and on whether an exemption for products that 
    contain elemental iron from any packaging and labeling requirements 
    that result from the underlying rulemaking is appropriate.
        Interested persons may on or before April 20, 1995, submit to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (address above) comments on the workshop. 
    Additional written comments may be submitted for 30 days after the date 
    of this workshop. Two copies of any comments are to be submitted, 
    except that individuals may submit one copy. Written comments and 
    submitted documents are to be identified with the docket numbers found 
    in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments and the 
    transcript of the discussion identified with the same docket numbers 
    may be seen in the office above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday.
    
        Dated: March 16, 1995.
    William B. Schultz,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    [FR Doc. 95-6919 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/21/1995
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of public workshop.
Document Number:
95-6919
Dates:
The public workshop will be held on April 20, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Submit written comments by April 20, 1995.
Pages:
14918-14919 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 91P-0186 and 93P-0306
PDF File:
95-6919.pdf
CFR: (4)
21 CFR 101
21 CFR 111
21 CFR 170
21 CFR 310