94-6638. Testing of Pressed and Toughened (Specially Tempered) Glassware  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-6638]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 22, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    
    Customs Service
    [T.D. (94-25)]
    
     
    
    Testing of Pressed and Toughened (Specially Tempered) Glassware
    
    AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Final notice on the testing of pressed and toughened (specially 
    tempered) glassware.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Customs has completed a review of the comments submitted by 
    interested parties on the testing of certain articles of glass to 
    ascertain if they have been ``pressed and toughened (specially 
    tempered).'' These articles are normally imported under Subheading 
    numbers 7013.29.05, 7013.32.10, 7013.39.10, and 7013.99.20 of the 
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert L. Zimmerman, Jr., Office 
    of Laboratories & Scientific Services, (202) 927-1060.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The U.S. Customs Service published the last in a series of requests 
    for comments on a proposed method for the testing of ``pressed and 
    toughened (specially tempered)'' glassware in the Federal Register 
    (Vol. 58, No. 192, October 6, 1993). Specifically, comments were 
    requested on a part of the proposed method entitled ``Cutting Test for 
    Opaque Glassware''. These glassware articles are normally imported 
    under Subheading numbers 7013.29.05, 7013.32.10, 7013.39.10, and 
    7013.99.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). Articles of ``safety glass, consisting of toughened (tempered) 
    * * * glass'' normally imported under Heading 7007 of the HTSUS, e.g., 
    architectural plate glass, vehicle windshields, were not within the 
    purview of the notice.
        The U.S. Customs Service received responses from two interested 
    parties as a result of the October 6, 1993, Notice. Both respondents 
    endorsed the incorporation of the cutting test into the overall method.
        Issue 1--Fluorosilicate glass. Respondent A offered a caution on 
    the behavior of fluorosilicate glass articles when subjected to the 
    cutting test. According to their comments, ``while soda lime tempered 
    glass and borosilicate tempered glass does indeed break almost 
    immediately upon contact with the saw, fluorosilicate glass will not 
    break until the saw has passed through at least a part of the glass.'' 
    Customs has studied this point and has found that the respondent's 
    comments are valid. This study has also shown that, while a deeper cut 
    into the glass article is necessary, the article will not sever 
    ``cleanly'' into two pieces as does annealed glass. Therefore, 
    appropriate changes have been made to the method to address the 
    fluorosilicate issue.
        Issue 2--Thermal Shock Conditions. Respondent B included a comment 
    on thermal shock conditions. These issues have been discussed in 
    previous Federal Register Notices on this subject. Customs has no 
    further comments on this topic at this time.
    
    Conclusion
    
        Effective as of the date of publication of this Notice in the 
    Federal Register, Customs will conduct the analysis of all glassware 
    falling under the purview of the aforementioned HTSUS item numbers, 
    using the following method.
    
    METHOD
    
        Safety Precaution: Certain procedures described in this method pose 
    a potential hazard to personnel from the proximity to or handling of 
    breaking or broken glass. This method shall not be undertaken without 
    supervisory concurrence that adequate precautions for personal safety 
    have been implemented.
    
    I. Apparatus
    
    A. Photographic Equipment
    
        A camera (equipped with flash or supplemented by adequate lighting) 
    is recommended for making a permanent record of unusual samples and 
    test results.
    
    B. Polariscope
    
        The basic instrument consists of a light source, a polarizer, and 
    an analyzer. The addition of a full-wave retardation, or tint, plate 
    permits observation of color-enhanced stress patterns. Ideally, the 
    working space, or distance between the polarizer and the analyzer, 
    should be large enough to accommodate samples ranging up to eight 
    inches in height.
    
    C. Tile Saw (or Similar Table-Mounted Circular Saw)
    
        A tile saw having a cutting head which can be adjusted horizontally 
    and vertically and which is equipped with an 8 to 12 inch diameter 
    continuous rim diamond blade designed for wet cutting glass is adequate 
    for testing opaque glassware articles.
    
    D. Other Apparatus and Supplies
    
        The method requires various common laboratory articles such as a 
    caliper or similar device for measuring the diameter of the opening and 
    the maximum inside diameter of the sample, an oven and water bath, and 
    other equipment and supplies. Appropriate safety devices and personal 
    protective equipment are also required.
    
    II. Preparation of the Sample
    
        When available a representative number of samples should be 
    analyzed. However, it is recognized that for any of several reasons, 
    e.g., cost of the item, only a limited number of samples may be 
    submitted for analysis. The possibility exists that only one sample may 
    be available for testing.
    
    III. Analysis Procedures
    
        The following procedures may be conducted in whatever order the 
    analyst deems is appropriate for the particular sample being examined. 
    The test protocol should be terminated at the point that a sample fails 
    to meet any of the key criteria, i.e., ``pressed'', ``toughened'', 
    ``tempered'', or ``specially''.
    
    A. Macroscopic Analysis
    
        Examine each article of glassware as follows:
        1. Visual Inspection:
        Inspect the sample for the following:
         Identifying marks, labels, sizes, etc., especially those 
    that may have been caused by a push-up valve and a mold that have been 
    pressed into the article;
         The style (stemware, tumbler, bowl, plate, etc.);
         The presence of ribs, handles, flutes, etc.;
         The size of the rim or opening, if applicable;
         The size of the most bulbous portion of the article;
         Any other unusual characteristics (e.g., chips, cracks)
        Interpretation of Visual Inspection results: Characteristics such 
    as mold marks, ribs, handles, and flutes are often indicative of a 
    pressed rather than blown glass article.
        2. Dimensional Measurement (applies only to stemware, tumblers, 
    bowls, etc.):
         Using a caliper or similar device, measure the minimum 
    diameter of the mouth, opening, or upper rim of the sample. With the 
    same device, measure the maximum inside diameter. Record both 
    measurements.
        Interpretation of Dimensional Measurement results: A sample having 
    a maximum inside diameter greater than the minimum diameter of the 
    mouth, opening, or upper rim is not likely to have been ``pressed''.
        Interpretation of the Macroscopic Analysis Test: The analyst is 
    advised to consider the overall features of the article and the 
    dimensional analysis test results in determining that an article has 
    been ``pressed''. If the results show that the sample is not 
    ``pressed'' the testing sequence for this sample should be terminated 
    at this point.
    
    B. Thermal Shock Test
    
         Heat the sample(s) in an oven to 160  deg.C for 30 
    minutes.
         Remove 1 sample from the oven and immediately immerse it 
    in a water bath set at 25  deg.C. This effects a 135  deg.C difference 
    in temperature.
    
        Note: Reasonable alternate oven and water bath settings up to 
     10  deg.C acceptable as long as the 135  deg.C 
    difference in temperature is maintained.
    
        Interpretation of Thermal Shock Test results: Annealed glassware 
    and inadequately or partially tempered glassware will generally not 
    survive this test of durability or toughness. If breakage occurs, the 
    sample is not ``toughened'' for Customs purposes. Record the findings, 
    and terminate the analysis.
    
    C. Evaluation of Temper
    
    1. Polariscopic Examination
        This method for the qualitative evaluation of temper in glassware 
    should be conducted only on transparent or translucent articles. This 
    method is not applicable to opaque items or to articles which have been 
    tempered by a process other than thermal tempering. In addition, some 
    translucent articles will not transmit enough polarized light to permit 
    the observation of stress patterns; these items should be evaluated for 
    temper using the Cutting Test.
         Place the full-wave retardation plate (tint plate) between 
    the polarizer and the analyzer. The polarized light must pass through 
    both the sample and the retardation plate for the color-enhanced 
    polariscopic pattern to be observed through the analyzer. Position the 
    retardation plate in direct contact with the polarizer or, 
    alternatively, just in front of the analyzer.
         Turn on the light source.
         Evaluate the stress in the bottom of the intact article by 
    placing its bottom surface in contact with the polarizer so that the 
    polarized light passes perpendicularly through the bottom surface, or 
    as close to perpendicularly as possible, depending upon the article's 
    shape. [This positioning does not work well with stemware because of 
    color patterns caused by the stem itself. With these items, it will be 
    necessary to hold the glass at a slight angle to view the base and the 
    bowl separately.]
         Evaluate the stress in the sides of the intact article, 
    especially near the rim or edge, by positioning the article so that the 
    polarized light passes perpendicularly through the sides near the rim, 
    or as close to perpendicularly as possible, depending upon the 
    article's shape. Observation of the stress patterns in the sidewall and 
    rim areas should be made while viewing through a single thickness of 
    glass. For some items, especially stemware, tumblers, and mugs, this 
    will require holding the article at a slight angle to the polarizer 
    (open end raised slightly).
        Interpretation of the Polariscopic Examination: Thermal tempering 
    of glassware involves heating to the softening point followed by rapid 
    cooling. The surfaces cool first and reach a temperature where they 
    become rigid. With further cooling, the interior or core tries to 
    shrink but is prevented from doing so by the rigid surface layers. This 
    results in the surfaces being locked into a state of high compression 
    and the interior locked into compensating tension.
        When polarized light rays travel through a stressed material, they 
    divide into slow and fast fronts. As a result of the difference in 
    speed of the slow and fast rays, interferences occur and a pattern of 
    colors is observed. These colors can be used to evaluate the stresses 
    in the article. As the stress increases, the observed color changes to 
    reflect the amount of stress. The color changes follow a rigorous 
    sequence as the stress-induced retardation, or distance between the 
    fast and slow rays, increases. In low-stress areas, black and shades of 
    gray are seen. Evaluation of low stress is simplified by using a color-
    enhancing retardation or tint plate which adds a shift of one fringe 
    order, or 565 nm, in the color pattern throughout the observed field. 
    With the tint plate in place, even low and moderately stressed areas 
    will exhibit a contrasting color effect.
        Annealed glassware will exhibit a uniform coloration of the 
    polarized light passing through it; there will be essentially no change 
    from background. Tempered articles will exhibit non-uniform coloration 
    of the polarized light on the bottom surface and sidewalls and bands of 
    color parallel to the rim or lip. [Note: With highly colored articles, 
    it may be helpful to conduct the polariscopic exam without the tint 
    plate. There will be no color enhancement, but the gray to black 
    interference patterns should be readily discernible in tempered 
    articles.]
        If the sample passes the Thermal Shock Test and shows evidence of 
    full-surface tempering (as opposed to rim-tempering or partial 
    tempering) when examined polariscopically, the sample has been 
    ``toughened (specially tempered)'' for Customs purposes.
    2. Cutting Test for Opaque Glassware
        This test is applicable to opaque articles and to those translucent 
    articles which can not be examined polariscopically because of 
    inadequate transmission of the polarized light.
         Ensure that the saw is equipped with a continuous rim 
    diamond blade designed for wet cutting glass.
         Adjust the cutting head of the saw vertically and 
    horizontally, as necessary, to accommodate the glassware article.
         Be sure the water supply to both sides of the diamond-
    rimmed blade is adequate.
         Turn on the saw.
         While holding or otherwise securing the article to prevent 
    twisting and binding during the cutting, slowly and gently move the 
    article into contact with the blade.
         Proceed with the cutting.
        Interpretation of the Cutting Test: Annealed (non-tempered) 
    glassware will readily accept the diamond-rimmed blade and will be 
    cleanly cut in half. Tempered glass, on the other hand, will break into 
    pieces when cut. Tempered soda lime and borosilicate glass will break 
    almost immediately, whereas tempered fluorosilicate glass will not 
    break until the blade has cut through at least part of the article. The 
    extent of cutting needed to induce breakage may vary from item to item, 
    but in no event will tempered articles be cleanly cut in half by the 
    diamond-rimmed blade.
        A sample that passes the Thermal Shock Test and shows evidence of 
    tempering per the guidance given above for the Cutting Test has been 
    ``toughened (specially tempered)'' for Customs purposes.
    
        Dated: March 15, 1994.
    George D. Heavey,
    Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific Services.
    [FR Doc. 94-6638 Filed 3-21-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/22/1994
Department:
Customs Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final notice on the testing of pressed and toughened (specially tempered) glassware.
Document Number:
94-6638
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 22, 1994, T.D. (94-25)