94-4835. Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, - 200A, and -300A Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-4835]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 23, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Federal Aviation Administration
    14 CFR Part 39 
    [Docket No. 93-NM-144-AD; Amendment 39-8846; AD 94-05-08] 
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, -
    200A, and -300A Series Airplanes 
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and 
    -300A series airplanes, that requires modification of the electrical 
    power supply system. This amendment is prompted by a report that a 
    single phase fault current can cause sequential failure of all onboard 
    main electrical generators. The actions specified by this AD are 
    intended to prevent such failures and subsequent loss of electrical 
    power sources onboard the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective April 22, 1994.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of April 22, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from British Aerospace, PLC, Librarian for Service Bulletins, 
    P.O. Box 17414, Dulles International Airport, Washington, DC. This 
    information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Schroeder, Aerospace Engineer, 
    ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2148; fax (206) 227-
    1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is 
    applicable to certain British Aerospace Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and 
    -300A series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on October 
    13, 1993 (58 FR 52929). That action proposed to require modification of 
    the electrical power supply system.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        One commenter supports the proposal.
        Another commenter notes that a statement in the preamble to the 
    notice, which indicated that the cause of the subject single phase 
    fault currents ``had not been determined,'' was inaccurate. This 
    commenter advises that, following the original incident, an 
    investigation by the airplane manufacturer revealed that the cause was 
    due to the loosening of an adjustment locking nut in a remote control 
    circuit breaker (RCCB) that caused one phase of the 3-phase power 
    supply to remain energized. Replacement of the RCCB's was recommended 
    by British Aerospace Service Bulletin SB.24-69-70484A, Revision 1, 
    which was the subject of AD 91-04-07, Amendment 39-6899 (56 FR 5751, 
    February 13, 1991). Therefore, the cause of the original failure has 
    been determined and rectified. However, there may be other fault causes 
    that have not been identified; it is for this reason that the proposed 
    modification of the generator control unit (GCU) is necessary so that 
    the GCU can better handle failures of this type without causing the 
    loss of all primary electric power sources. The FAA acknowledges this 
    information.
        This same commenter also points out that certain wording in the 
    preamble to the notice that described the addressed unsafe condition 
    could be misinterpreted. The statement indicates that a single fault in 
    one phase of a 3-phase power supply can cause ``sequential failure of 
    all onboard main electrical generators and subsequent loss of 
    electrical power sources onboard the airplane.'' The commenter states 
    that it is unlikely that all generated power will be lost, however, 
    since these airplanes have a hydraulically-driven standby generator 
    that could provide essential AC and DC current if all main generators 
    fail. The FAA concurs with this observation. However, since loss of all 
    main generators has been determined to be an unsafe condition, the 
    requirements of this rule are intended to address that condition.
        This commenter also states that the description of the referenced 
    British Aerospace service bulletin in the preamble to the notice was 
    incomplete. This commenter states that, while British Aerospace Service 
    Bulletin SB.24-91-70488B&C does describe installation Modification 
    HCM70488B, which is the only modification referenced in the proposed AD 
    for mandatory installation, it also describes two other modifications: 
    Modification HCM70488C (which must be installed concurrently with 
    Modification HCM70488B) deletes the neutral connection from the Vickers 
    electrically-driven hydraulic pump; and Modification HCM01321A, 
    although not classified as mandatory, introduces into the GCU's 
    improved standard components that have a higher reliability. The 
    commenter also notes that Modification HCM70488B adds an unbalanced 
    current detector circuit into the GCU's, in addition to replacing the 
    lowest phase detector type undervoltage protection circuit with an 
    average voltage sensing detector circuit. The FAA acknowledges this 
    information.
        This same commenter requests that the proposed compliance time of 
    3,100 hours time-in-service be revised to ``December 15, 1995,'' since 
    the referenced British Aerospace service bulletin recommends that 
    airplanes be modified by that date. The manufacturer of the required 
    modification parts has estimated that it will take until that date to 
    accomplish the modification of all of the affected GCU's worldwide. In 
    light of this, the commenter states that it is possible that operators 
    who accumulate 3,100 hours prior to December 15, 1995, may not be able 
    to obtain the required modified units. The FAA does not concur that a 
    change to the compliance time is necessary. It is the FAA's normal 
    policy to use a calendar date as a compliance time only when a direct 
    analytical relationship can be established between that date and 
    failure of subject component. In developing an appropriate compliance 
    times for AD actions, the FAA normally takes into account the safety 
    implications, the fleet's average utilization rate, logistical support 
    considerations (parts availability, repair facility availability), 
    normal maintenance schedules for timely accomplishment of the 
    modification, and parameters to which failure of subject component is 
    related. The FAA took into account all of these factors, as well as the 
    manufacturer's recommended time for modification installation, and has 
    determined that 3,100 flight hours is the appropriate compliance time 
    interval. Since the average operating time for most of the affected 
    U.S.-registered Model BAe 146 series airplanes is 148 hours per month, 
    most U.S. operators will have accumulated 3,100 flight hours by 
    approximately December 15, 1995.
        This commenter also requests that the proposed rule be revised to 
    cite the latest revision of the referenced service bulletin. British 
    Aerospace has issued Service Bulletin SB.24-91-70488B&C, Revision 2, 
    dated July 19, 1993, which provides additional details concerning the 
    effectivity listing in the service bulletin. This revision also 
    specifies that the Model BAe 146RJ series of airplanes are not affected 
    by the service bulletin. The FAA concurs and has revised the final rule 
    to include this later revision of the referenced service bulletin as an 
    additional source of service information.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
        The FAA estimates that 49 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor 
    rate is $55 per work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $10,780, or $220 
    per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 
    39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    94-05-08 British Aerospace: Amendment 39-8846. Docket 93-NM-144-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A series 
    airplanes, on which Modification HCM70488B has not been 
    accomplished, certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent sequential failure of all onboard main electrical 
    generators and subsequent loss of electrical power sources onboard 
    the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 3,100 hours time-in-service after the effective date 
    of this AD, modify the electrical power supply system by installing 
    Modification HCM70488B in accordance with British Aerospace Service 
    Bulletin SB.24-91-70488B&C, Revision 1, dated March 29, 1993, or 
    Revision 2, dated July 19, 1993.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the 
    airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be 
    accomplished.
        (d) The modification shall be done in accordance with British 
    Aerospace Service Bulletin SB.24-91-70488B&C, Revision 1, dated 
    March 29, 1993; or British Aerospace Service Bulletin SB.24-91-
    70488B&C, Revision 2, dated July 19, 1993, which contains the 
    following list of effective pages: 
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Revision                                
                                      level                                 
               Page No.             shown on        Date shown on page      
                                      page                                  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1.............................        2   July 19, 1993                 
    2.............................        2   (none)                        
    3-10..........................        1   (none)                        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of 
    the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from British Aerospace, PLC, 
    Librarian for Service Bulletins, P.O. Box 17414, Dulles 
    International Airport, Washington, DC. Copies may be inspected at 
    the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
    Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on April 22, 1994.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 25, 1994.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-4835 Filed 3-22-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/22/1994
Published:
03/23/1994
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-4835
Dates:
Effective April 22, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 23, 1994, Docket No. 93-NM-144-AD, Amendment 39-8846, AD 94-05-08
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13