95-7138. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Pacific Stock Exchange Incorporated; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Implementation of a Three-Day Settlement Standard  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 15315-15316]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-7138]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35502; File No. SR-PSE-94-27]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Pacific Stock Exchange 
    Incorporated; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
    Implementation of a Three-Day Settlement Standard
    
    March 16, 1995.
        On December 19, 1994, The Pacific Stock Exchange Incorporated 
    (``PSE'') filed a proposed rule change (File No. SR-PSE-94-27) with the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to Section 
    19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of 
    the proposal was published in the Federal Register on January 12, 1995 
    to solicit comments from interested persons.\2\ The Commission received 
    one written comment.\3\ As discussed below, this order approves the 
    proposed rule change.
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b) (1988).
        \2\Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35193 (January 4, 1995), 
    60 FR 3015.
        \3\Letter from P. Howard Edelstein, President, Electronic 
    Settlements Group, Thomson Trading Services, Inc., to Jonathan G. 
    Katz, Secretary, Commission (February 1, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description
    
        In October 1993, the Commission adopted Rule 15c6-1 under the 
    Act\4\ which establishes three business days after the trade date 
    (``T+3''), instead of five business days (``T+5''), as the standard 
    settlement cycle for most securities transactions. The rule will become 
    effective June 7, 1995.\5\ Several of the PSE's rules are interrelated 
    with the standard settlement time frame. The purpose of the proposed 
    rule change is to amend PSE's rules to be consistent with a T+3 
    settlement standard for securities transactions.
    
        \4\17 CFR 240.15c6-1 (1994).
        \5\Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 33023 (October 6, 1993), 
    58 FR 52891 (order adopting Rule 15c6-1 and 34952 (November 9, 
    1994), 59 FR 59137 (changing effective date from June 1, 1995, to 
    June 7, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Under PSE Rule 5.7, transactions in stocks traded ``regular'' will 
    be ``ex-dividend'' or ``ex-rights,'' as the case may be, on the second 
    business day preceding the record date fixed by the company or the date 
    of the closing of transfer books, except when PSE's board of directors 
    rules otherwise. Rule 5.7 also provides that should such record date or 
    such closing of transfer books occur upon a day other than a business 
    day, this rule applies for the third preceding business day.
        Under Rule 5.9(a)(2), transactions in securities admitted to 
    dealings on an ``issued'' basis settling ``regular way'' will be for 
    delivery on the third business day following the day of the contract. 
    Rule 5.9(a)(3) provides that transactions on a ``seller's option'' 
    basis will be made for delivery at the option of the seller within the 
    time specified in the option, which time may not be less than four 
    business days following the date of the contract. Rule 5.9(a)(4) 
    provides that transactions in rights and warrants may be made on a 
    ``next day'' basis only during the three business days preceding the 
    final day for trading therein.
        Rule 9.12(a)(4) requires that no member organization may grant 
    delivery versus payment (``DVP'') or receipt versus payment (``RVP'') 
    privileges to a customer without obtaining an agreement from the 
    customer to provide instructions to its agent no later than the second 
    day after the trade date for RVP trades or no later than the first 
    business day after trade date for DVP trades.
        PSE has requested that the proposed rule change become effective on 
    the same date as Rule 15c6-1. Rule 15c6-1 will become effective on June 
    7, 1995.\6\
    
        \6\The transition from five day settlement to three day 
    settlement will occur over a four day period. Friday, June 2, will 
    be the last trading day with five business day settlement. Monday, 
    June 5, and Tuesday, June 6, will be trading days with four business 
    day with three business day settlement. As a result, trades from 
    June 2 and June 5 will settle on Friday, June 9. Trades from June 6 
    and June 7 will settle on Monday, June 12.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Written Comment
    
        The Commission received one comment letter from Thomson Trading 
    Services, Inc. (``Thomson'') suggesting that additional regulatory 
    changes may be necessary to implement T+3 [[Page 15316]] settlement.\7\ 
    Thomas believes that the PSE should amend Rule 9.12(a)(5) which 
    requires the use of the facilities of a registered securities 
    depository for confirmation and acknowledgement of all transaction in 
    depository-eligible securities.
    
        \7\Supra note 3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission believes the proposal is consistent with the 
    requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\8\ Specifically, Section 6(b)(5) 
    states that the rules of the exchange must be designed to foster 
    cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
    clearing, settling, and processing information. The PSE rules and other 
    self-regulatory organizations' rules currently establish the standard 
    time frame for settlement of securities transactions. On June 7, 1995, 
    the new settlement cycle of T+3 will be established as mandated by the 
    Commission's Rule 15cb-1. As a result, the PSE's current rule providing 
    for a T+5 settlement cycle will be inconsistent with the Commission 
    rule. This proposal will amend the PSE's rules to harmonize them with 
    the Commission's Rule 15cb-1 and a T+3 settlement cycle.
    
        \8\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78f (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change 
    is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it protects 
    investors and the public interest by reducing risks to clearing 
    corporations, their members, and public investors which are inherent in 
    settling securities transactions. The reduction of the time period for 
    settlement of most securities transactions will correspondingly 
    decrease the number of unsettled trades in the clearance and settlement 
    system at any given time. Thus, fewer unsettled trades will be subject 
    to credit and market risk, and there will be less time between trade 
    execution and settlement for the value of those trades to 
    deteriorate.\9\
    
        \9\The Commission release adopting Rule 15c6-1 stated that ``the 
    value of securities positions can change suddenly causing a market 
    participant to default on unsettled positions. Because the markets 
    are interwoven through common members, default at one clearing 
    corporation or by a major market participant or end-user could 
    trigger additional failures resulting in risk to the national 
    clearance and settlement system.'' Securities Exchange Act Release 
    No. 33023 (October 6, 1993), 58 FR 52891.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        While Thomson's letter supports the PSE's efforts to shorten the 
    settlement cycle for securities transactions, Thomson believes that the 
    PSE should amend Rule 9.12(a)(5), which requires the use of the 
    facilities of a registered securities depository for the confirmation 
    and acknowledgement of all transactions in depository-eligible 
    securities where payment for securities purchased or delivery of 
    securities sold is to be made by or to an agent of the customer. The 
    Commission believes that the issue raised by the Thomson letter need 
    not be resolved prior to the approval of the proposed rule change. 
    Discussions regarding Thomson's concerns are underway among the 
    Commission, Thomson, and DTC. DTC has submitted a rule filing that will 
    establish a linkage between DTC and vendors such as Thomson.\10\ The 
    Commission intends to consider whether self-regulatory organization 
    rules should continue to preclude use of private vendor systems for 
    confirmation/affirmation services in DVP/RVP trades. However, if the 
    PSE's proposed rule change being approved by this order is not approved 
    prior to the June 7, 1995, effective date of Rule 15c6-1, the PSE rules 
    will conflict with the Commission's Rule 15c6-1.
    
        \10\Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35332 (February 3, 
    1995), 60 FR 8102 (notice of proposed rule filing).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Thomson letter suggests that approval of the proposed rule 
    change without amendments to Rule 9.12(a)(5) raises competitive 
    concerns. Under the Act, the Commission's responsibility is to balance 
    the perceived anticompetitive effects of a regulatory policy or 
    decision against the purpose of the Act that would be advanced by the 
    policy or decisions and the costs associated therewith. The Commission 
    notes that any anticompetitive effects pointed to by Thomson are not 
    caused by the proposed rule change being approved by this order but 
    rather by an existing PSE rule. The Commission is reviewing Thomson's 
    claim but does not believe that approval of this proposal will itself 
    create any burdens on competition. Moreover, as discussed above, the 
    rule advances fundamental purposes under the Act, namely the efficient 
    clearance and settlement of securities.
    
    IV. Conclusion
    
        For the reasons stated above, the Commission finds that PSE's 
    proposal is consistent with Section 6 of the Act.\11\
    
        \11\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78f (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-PSE-94-27) be and 
    hereby is approved and will become effective on June 7, 1995.
    
        \12\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(2) (1988)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
    
        \13\17 CFR 200.30(a) (12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-7138 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/23/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-7138
Pages:
15315-15316 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35502, File No. SR-PSE-94-27
PDF File:
95-7138.pdf