95-7206. Proposal to Issue a Nationwide Permit  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 15440-15443]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-7206]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 15439]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part VII
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Defense
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Proposal to Issue a Nationwide Permit; Notice
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 1995 / 
    Notices 
    [[Page 15440]] 
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Department of the Army
    Corps of Engineers
    
    
    Proposal to Issue a Nationwide Permit
    
    agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
    
    action: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    summary: As a part of our effort to improve the regulatory program, the 
    Army Corps of Engineers is proposing to issue a new nationwide general 
    permit (NWP) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of 
    the Rivers & Harbors Act for single-family residential development. The 
    NWP will provide for effective protection of the aquatic environment 
    while substantially reducing regulatory burdens on landowners.
        In August 1993, the Clinton Administration announced a 
    comprehensive package of improvements to the Federal wetlands program 
    that identified measures to enhance the fairness, flexibility, and 
    effectiveness of the wetlands program. A major focus of the 
    Administration's Wetland Plan is intended to address the concerns of 
    landowners by streamlining Section 10 and 404 permitting programs where 
    possible while maintaining needed environmental protection.
        The public is invited to provide comments on this proposal and is 
    being given the opportunity to request a public hearing on the proposed 
    NWP.
    
    dates: Comments must be received by May 8, 1995.
    
    addresses: Comments should be submitted in writing to: Office of the 
    Chief of Engineers, ATTN: CECW-OR, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, 
    Washington, DC 20314-1000. Comments will be available for examination 
    at the Office of the Chief of Engineers, Room 6225, Pulaski Building, 
    20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
    
    for further information contact: Mr. Peter Kube or Mr. Sam Collinson, 
    Regulatory Branch, Office of the Chief of Engineers at (202) 272-0817.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The White House Office on Environmental Policy announced the 
    President's Wetlands Plan on August 24, 1993. The plan set forth a 
    comprehensive package of improvements to the Federal wetlands 
    protection programs. A major goal of the plan is to ensure that 
    programs are fair, flexible, and effective. To achieve this goal, the 
    Corps regulatory program must continue to provide effective protection 
    of wetlands while conveying to the public a clear understanding of 
    regulatory requirements. In its implementation, the regulatory program 
    must be administratively efficient, flexible yet predictable, and avoid 
    unnecessary impacts to private property and the regulated public.
        We are proposing this new NWP to support the objectives in the 
    President's Wetlands Plan. The new NWP would authorize activities in 
    wetlands related to the construction or expansion of a single-family 
    home. This would allow, for example, a couple to build a retirement 
    home on wetlands property they own without applying for an individual 
    Section 404 permit. The NWP includes limits and conditions to minimize 
    impacts on the aquatic environment.
        There is a perception by many in the country that the regulatory 
    process has become too burdensome on small landowners simply desiring 
    to build a home. This nationwide general permit has been developed to 
    reduce the regulatory burden on small landowners proposing to build or 
    expand a single-family home while simultaneously maintaining 
    environmental safeguards. It seeks to strike this balance by allowing a 
    landowner to build or expand a home with minimal regulatory oversight 
    while protecting the aquatic resource through specific limitations. If 
    finalized, the new NWP will allow the Corps to focus better its 
    resources on areas that have the potential for greater environmental 
    impacts. Further, as the Corps realizes workload savings resulting from 
    this NWP it should be able to improve service to other sectors of the 
    regulated public (e.g., large developments).
    
    Proposed NWP for Single Family Housing
    
        In order to address the above concerns, the Corps proposes to issue 
    the following NWP.
        Discharges of dredged or fill material into non-tidal wetlands for 
    the construction or expansion of a single-family home and attendant 
    features, such as a garage, driveway, storage shed, and/or septic 
    field, provided:
        a. The discharge into waters of the United States does not cause 
    the loss of more than \1/2\ acre;
        b. The permittee notifies the District Engineer in accordance with 
    the ``Notification'' general condition (as modified for this NWP only);
        c. The permittee has taken necessary actions to minimize the on-
    site and off-site impacts of the discharge. For example, the location 
    of the home may need to be adjusted on-site to avoid flooding of 
    adjacent property owners;
        d. The discharge is part of a single and complete project and that 
    for any subdivision created after March 6, 1995 the permittee notifies 
    the District Engineer of any discharge which would cause the aggregate 
    total loss of waters of the United States for the entire subdivision to 
    exceed \1/2\ acre; and
        e. an individual may use this nationwide permit only once.
        For the purposes of this nationwide permit, the acreage of loss of 
    waters of the United States includes the filled area plus any other 
    waters of the United States that are adversely affected by flooding, 
    excavation, or drainage as a result of the project. (Sections 10 & 404)
        The above NWP is being proposed under the authority of Section 
    404(e) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section 10 of the 
    Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.).
    
    Discussion
    
        We are requesting comments on the following specific issues:
        MAXIMUM ACREAGE: General permits are designed to authorize 
    categories of activities in waters of the United States that will have 
    minimal individual and cumulative impacts. This NWP would allow 
    discharges affecting up to \1/2\ acre of non-tidal waters and wetlands 
    for the construction or expansion of a single-family home and attendant 
    features, such as the construction of a driveway, garage, and/or septic 
    field. For purposes of this NWP, impacts include the filled area plus 
    any wetlands adversely affected by flooding, excavation, or drainage. 
    The actual loss of wetlands that would be authorized under the NWP 
    would be limited to the minimum necessary for construction of the house 
    and attendant features. (See discussion below on mitigation.) The NWP 
    may not be used in combination with other general permits if the 
    cumulative impacts from all activities are more than minimal.
        We believe that \1/2\ acre is sufficient for the vast majority of 
    single-family homes. However, we are interested in receiving comments 
    regarding the maximum acreage of impact to be allowed under this 
    authorization. Should the maximum acreage be reduced to \1/8\ or \1/4\ 
    acre or should the maximum acreage of impact be increased to \3/4\ or 1 
    acre? The maximum acreage allowed under this NWP will be dependant on 
    how the term ``attendant features'' is defined. We are interested in 
    comments regarding a definition of [[Page 15441]] the term ``attendant 
    features''. Should the authorization be limited to fill for foundations 
    and building pads or should fill also be allowed for any attendant 
    amenity as currently proposed, such as a yard, tennis courts, and/or 
    swimming pool under this NWP?
        2. PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION: Individuals proposing to use the 
    NWP will have to first notify the Corps in accordance with procedures 
    of General Condition #13, Notification, as modified below. We propose 
    to streamline the pre-construction notification (PCN) procedure by not 
    requiring the Corps to coordinate with the Federal resource agencies, 
    nor requiring the applicant to submit advance notice to the Fish & 
    Wildlife Service or the State Historic Preservation Officer. 
    Specifically, the Notification condition would be modified for this NWP 
    as follows:
        13. Notification. (a) The prospective permittee must notify the 
    District Engineer with a Pre-construction Notification (PCN) as early 
    as possible and shall not begin the activity authorized by this NWP:
        (1) Until notified by the District Engineer that the activity may 
    proceed under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the 
    District or Division Engineer; or
        (2) If notified by the District or Division Engineer that an 
    individual permit is required; or
        (3) Unless 30 days have passed from the District Engineer's receipt 
    of the notification and the prospective permittee has not received 
    notice from the District or Division Engineer. Subsequently, the 
    permittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be modified, suspended, 
    or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 
    330.5(d)(2).
        (b) The notification must be in writing and include the following 
    information:
        (1) Name, address and telephone number of the prospective 
    permittee;
        (2) Location of the proposed project;
        (3) Brief description of the proposed project; the project's 
    purpose; direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the project 
    would cause; any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s) or individual 
    permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the 
    proposed project or any related activity.
        (c) The standard individual permit application form (Form ENG 4345) 
    may be used as the notification but must clearly indicate that it is a 
    PCN and must include all of the information required in (b) (1)-(3) of 
    this General Condition.
        (d) In reviewing an activity under the notification procedure, the 
    District Engineer will determine whether the activity will result in 
    more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental 
    effects or will be contrary to the public interest. The District 
    Engineer will consider any optional mitigation the applicant has 
    included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse 
    environmental effects of the proposed work are minimal. If the District 
    Engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and 
    conditions of the NWP and that the adverse effects are minimal, he will 
    notify the permittee and include any agreed upon special conditions 
    and/or mitigation. If the District Engineer determines that the adverse 
    effects of the proposed work are more than minimal, then he will notify 
    the applicant that the project does not qualify for authorization under 
    the NWP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to seek 
    authorization under an individual permit.
        (e) Wetlands Delineations: When necessary, wetland delineations 
    must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the 
    Corps. The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the wetland. 
    However, there may be some delay if the Corps does the delineation and 
    the 30-day period will not start until the wetland delineation has been 
    completed.
        We are requesting comments on the PCN. Should the requirement for 
    Corps and applicant coordination of project impacts with the resource 
    agencies be retained? Is the PCN to the Corps needed in all cases? 
    Should there be a size limit such as \1/10\, \1/8\, \1/4\ acre where no 
    PCN is required?
        3. MITIGATION: No compensatory wetland mitigation is required under 
    this authorization. However, the landowner must take reasonable on-site 
    measures to minimize adverse impacts to aquatic resources. For example, 
    the location of a home may need to be adjusted on-site to avoid 
    flooding of adjacent property. Further, on-site minimization steps must 
    be taken to minimize the loss of waters of the United States. For 
    example, if a landowner currently owns 20 acres of land, 15 acres of 
    which is non-wetland, we do not believe it is unreasonable to require 
    the use of the non-wetland portion of the property where practicable.
        We are requesting comments on our proposal to require no 
    compensatory mitigation for this NWP. Should we require mitigation for 
    all wetland losses as a result of this permit or should we require it 
    if the fill exceeds a certain acreage, such as \1/4\ acre? 
    Alternatively, should compensatory mitigation only be required for 
    certain attendant features such as the fill necessary for a yard?
        4. SUBDIVISIONS: In order to ensure that only minimal individual 
    and cumulative impacts occur, this authorization is not intended to 
    allow individual landowners to impact more than a total of \1/2\ acre 
    of waters of the United States. Discharges authorized by this NWP must 
    be part of a single and complete project and individuals may use this 
    NWP only once for all property owned now and in the future. For any 
    real estate subdivision legally created or subdivided before March 6, 
    1995, the owner of each legally plated lot site may use this NWP. 
    Should we allow individuals to use this nationwide permit more than 
    once (e.g. twice, for a primary residence and a second home) or should 
    its use by individuals not be limited.
        For any real estate subdivision created or subdivided after March 
    6, 1995, discharges authorized under this NWP may not exceed an 
    aggregate total loss of waters of the United States of \1/2\ acre for 
    the entire subdivision. For purposes of this NWP, the term ``real 
    estate subdivision'' shall be interpreted to include circumstances 
    where a landowner or developer divides a tract of land into smaller 
    parcels for the purpose of selling, conveying, transferring, leasing, 
    or developing said parcels. This would include the entire area of a 
    residential, commercial or other real estate subdivision, including all 
    parcels and parts thereof.
        March 6, 1995 is being proposed because that is the date this NWP 
    was announced to the public. Should the March 6, 1995 date be changed 
    to be consistent with the NWP #26 subdivision clause of October 5, 
    1984, or some other date? Also, are there other options, rather than 
    the Subdivision provision, that would prevent developers from dividing 
    and selling building sites, in the future, to circumvent the limits of 
    this nationwide permit?
    
    Nationwide Permit Conditions
    
        This proposed NWP will be subject to the conditions that apply to 
    all nationwide permits. These conditions are found at 33 CFR Part 330 
    Appendix A(C). As noted above, condition #13 has been modified for 
    purposes of this NWP only.
    
    Regional Conditions
    
        Concurrent with this Federal Register notice, District Engineers 
    are issuing local public notices. In addition to the NWP conditions 
    being proposed by the Chief of Engineers, the Division and District 
    Engineers may propose regional [[Page 15442]] conditions or propose 
    revocation of NWP authorization for all or portions of this NWP. 
    Regional conditions may also be required by state Section 401 water 
    quality certification or for state coastal zone consistency. Comments 
    on the Federal Register notice that address national concerns relating 
    to the proposed NWP and its conditions should be sent to the U.S. Army 
    Corps of Engineers, CECW-OR, 20 Massachusetts Avenue N.W., Washington, 
    D.C 20314-1000. Comments on regional issues and regional conditions 
    should be sent to the appropriate District Engineer as indicated below.
    
    ALABAMA
        Mobile District Engineer, ATTN: CESAM-OP-S, P.O. Box 2288, Mobile, 
    AL 36628-0001
    ALASKA
        Alaska District Engineer, ATTN: CENPA-CO-R, P.O. Box 898, 
    Anchorage, AK 99506-0898
    ARIZONA
        Los Angeles District Engineer, ATTN: CESPL-CO-R, P.O. Box 2711, Los 
    Angeles, CA 90053-2325
    ARKANSAS
        Little Rock District Engineer, ATTN: CESWL-CO-P, P.O. Box 867, 
    Little Rock, AR 72203-0867
    CALIFORNIA
        Sacramento District Engineer, ATTN: CESPK-CO-O, 1325 J Street, 
    Sacramento, CA 95814-4794
    COLORADO
        Albuquerque District Engineer, ATTN: CESWA-CO-R, P.O. Box 1580, 
    Albuquerque, NM 87103-1580
    CONNECTICUT
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo Road, 
    Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    DELAWARE
        Philadelphia District Engineer, ATTN: CENAP-OP-R, Wannamaker 
    Building, 100 Penn Square, East Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390
    FLORIDA
        Jacksonville District Engineer, ATTN: CESAJ-RD, P.O. Box 4970, 
    Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019
    GEORGIA
        Savannah District Engineer, ATTN: CESAS-OP-F, P.O. Box 889, 
    Savannah, GA 31402-0889
    HAWAII
        Honolulu District Engineer, ATTN: CEPOD-CO-O, Building 230, Fort 
    Shafter, Honolulu, HI 96858-5440
    IDAHO
        Walla Walla District Engineer, ATTN: CENPW-OP-RF, Building 602, 
    City-County Airport, Walla Walla, WA 99362-9265
    ILLINOIS
        Rock Island District Engineer, ATTN: CENCR-OD-S, Clock Tower 
    Building, P.O. Box 2004, Rock Island, IL 61201-2004
    INDIANA
        Louisville District Engineer, ATTN: CEORL-OR-F, P.O. Box 59, 
    Louisville, KY 40201-0059
    IOWA
        Rock Island District Engineer, ATTN: CENCR-OD-S, Clock Tower 
    Building, Rock Island, IL 61201-2004
    KANSAS
        Kansas City District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRK-OD-P, 700 Federal 
    Building, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106-2896
    KENTUCKY
        Louisville District Engineer, ATTN: CEORL-OR-F, P.O. Box 59, 
    Louisville, KY 40201-0059
    LOUISIANA
        New Orleans District Engineer, ATTN: CELMN-OD-S, P.O. Box 60267, 
    New Orleans, LA 70160-0267
    MAINE
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo Road, 
    Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    MARYLAND
        Baltimore District Engineer, ATTN: CENAB-OP-R, P.O. Box 1715, 
    Baltimore, MD 21203-1715
    MASSACHUSETTS
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo Road, 
    Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    MICHIGAN
        Detroit District Engineer, ATTN: CENCE-CO-L, P.O. Box 1027, 
    Detroit, MI 48231-1027
    MINNESOTA
        St. Paul District Engineer, ATTN: CENCS-CO-R, 190 Fifth Street, 
    East, St. Paul, MN 55101-1638
    MISSISSIPPI
        Vicksburg District Engineer, ATTN: CELMV-CO-O, P.O. Box 80, 
    Vicksburg, MS 39180-0080
    MISSOURI
        Kansas City District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRK-OD-P, 700 Federal 
    Building, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106-2896
    MONTANA
        Omaha District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRO-OP-R, P.O. Box 5, Omaha, NE 
    68101-0005
    NEBRASKA
        Omaha District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRO-OP-R, 215 North 17th Street, 
    Omaha, NE 68101-4978
    NEVADA
        Sacramento District Engineer, ATTN: CESPK-CO-O, 1325 J Street, 
    Sacramento, CA 95814-2922
    NEW HAMPSHIRE
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo Road, 
    Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    NEW JERSEY
        Philadelphia District Engineer, ATTN: CENAP-OP-R, Wanamaker 
    Building, 100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, PA 19106-2991
    NEW MEXICO
        Albuquerque District Engineer, ATTN: CESWA-CO-R, P.O. Box 1580, 
    Albuquerque, NM 87103-1580
    NEW YORK
        New York District Engineer, ATTN: CENAN-OP-R, Jacob K. Javits 
    Federal Building, New York, NY 10278-0090
    NORTH CAROLINA
        Wilmington District Engineer, ATTN: CESAW-CO-E, P.O. Box 1890, 
    Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
    NORTH DAKOTA
        Omaha District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRO-OP-R, 215 North 17th Street, 
    Omaha, NE 68102-4978
    OHIO
        Huntington District Engineer, ATTN: CEORH-OR-F, 502 8th Street, 
    Huntington, WV 25701-2070
    OKLAHOMA
        Tulsa District Engineer, ATTN: CESWT-OD-RF, 1645 South 101 East 
    Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74128-4629
    OREGON
        Portland District Engineer, ATTN: CENPP-PL-R, P.O. Box 2946, 
    Portland, OR 97208-2946
    PENNSYLVANIA
        Baltimore District Engineer, ATTN: CENAB-OP-R, P.O. Box 1715, 
    Baltimore, MD 21203-1715
    RHODE ISLAND
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo Road, 
    Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    SOUTH CAROLINA
        Charleston District Engineer, ATTN: CESAC-CO-P, P.O. Box 919, 
    Charleston, SC 29402-0919
    SOUTH DAKOTA
        Omaha District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRO-OP-R, 215 North 17th Street, 
    Omaha, NE 68102-4978
    TENNESSEE
        Nashville District Engineer, ATTN: CEORN-OR-F, P.O. Box 1070, 
    Nashville, TN 37202-1070
    TEXAS
        Ft. Worth District Engineer, ATTN: CESWF-OD-O, P.O. Box 17300, Ft. 
    Worth, TX 76102-0300
    UTAH
        Sacramento District Engineer, ATTN: CESPK-CO-O, 1325 J Street, CA 
    95814-4794
    VERMONT
        New England Division Engineer, ATTN: CENED-OD-R, 424 Trapelo 
    [[Page 15443]] Road, Waltham, MA 02254-9149
    VIRGINIA
        Norfolk District Engineer, ATTN: CENAO-OP-P, 803 Front Street, 
    Norfolk, VA 23510-1096
    WASHINGTON
        Seattle District Engineer, ATTN: CENPS-OP-RG, P.O. Box 3755, 
    Seattle, WA 98124-2255
    WEST VIRGINIA
        Huntington District Engineer, ATTN: CEORH-OR-F, 502 8th Street, 
    Huntington, WV 25701-2070
    WISCONSIN
        St. Paul District Engineer, ATTN: CENCS-CO-R, 190 Fifth Street, 
    East, St. Paul, MN 55101-1638
    WYOMING
        Omaha District Engineer, ATTN: CEMRO-OP-R, 215 North 17th Street, 
    NE 68102-4978
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
        Baltimore District Engineer, ATTN: CENAB-OP-R, P.O. Box 1715, 
    Baltimore, MD 21203-1715
    PACIFIC TERRITORIES
        Honolulu District Engineer, ATTN: CEPOD-CO-O, Building 230, Fort 
    Shafter, Honolulu, HI 96858-5440
    PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS
        Jacksonville District Engineer, ATTN: CESAJ-RD, P.O. Box 4970, 
    Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019
    
    State Certification of Nationwide Permits
    
        Section 401 of the Clean Water Act: This Federal Register notice of 
    this NWP serves as the Corps application to the states or EPA, where 
    appropriate, for 401 water quality certification of the activities 
    authorized by this NWP. The states and EPA, where appropriate, are 
    requested to issue, deny, or waive certification pursuant to 33 CFR 
    330.4(c) for this NWP.
        Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management Act: This Federal 
    Register notice serves as the Corps determination that the activities 
    authorized by this NWP are consistent with States' coastal zone 
    management programs, where applicable. This determination is contingent 
    upon the addition of State CZM conditions and/or regional conditions or 
    the issuance by the state of an individual consistency concurrence, 
    where necessary. The states are requested to agree or disagree with 
    this consistency determination pursuant to 33 CFR 330.4(d) for this 
    NWP.
    
    Environmental Documentation
    
        We have made a preliminary determination that this action does not 
    constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality 
    of the human environment. Preliminary environmental documentation has 
    been prepared for the proposed nationwide permit. This documentation 
    includes a preliminary environmental assessment and a preliminary 
    Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines compliance review. Copies of these 
    documents are available for inspection at the office of the Chief of 
    Engineers and at each Corps District office. Based on these documents 
    the Corps has provisionally determined that the proposed NWP complies 
    with the requirements for issuance under general permit authority.
    
        Dated: March 15, 1995.
    Stanley G. Genega,
    Major General, USA, Director of Civil Works.
    [FR Doc. 95-7206 Filed 3-21-95; 9:25 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/23/1995
Department:
Engineers Corps
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-7206
Dates:
Comments must be received by May 8, 1995.
Pages:
15440-15443 (4 pages)
PDF File:
95-7206.pdf