98-7128. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 13784-13787]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-7128]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [IL167-1a; FRL-5978-8]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois 
    submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request to the EPA 
    regarding rules for controlling Volatile Organic Material (VOM) 
    emissions from Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry 
    (SOCMI) reactor processes and distillation operations in the Chicago 
    and Metro East (East St. Louis) areas. VOM, as defined by the State of 
    Illinois, is identical to ``Volatile Organic Compounds'' (VOC), as 
    defined by EPA. VOC is an air pollutant which combines with nitrogen 
    oxides in the atmosphere to form ground-level ozone, commonly known as 
    smog. Ozone pollution is of particular concern because of its harmful 
    effects upon lung tissue and breathing passages. This plan was 
    submitted to meet the Clean Air Act (Act) requirement for States to 
    adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules for sources 
    that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline (CTG) documents. This 
    rulemaking action approves, through direct final, the Illinois SIP 
    revision request.
    
    DATES: The ``direct final'' approval is effective on May 22, 1998, 
    unless EPA receives adverse or critical written comments by April 22, 
    1998. If the effective date is delayed timely notice will be published 
    in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision request are available for inspection 
    at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
    5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
    Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you telephone Mark J. Palermo 
    at (312) 886-6082 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)
        Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
    Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
    Illinois 60604.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Environmental 
    Protection Specialist, at (312) 886-6082.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        Section 182(b)(2) of the Act requires all moderate and above ozone
    
    [[Page 13785]]
    
    nonattainment areas to adopt RACT rules for sources covered by CTG 
    documents, such as SOCMI reactor processes and distillation operations. 
    In Illinois, the Chicago area is classified as ``severe'' nonattainment 
    for ozone, while the Metro East area is classified as ``moderate'' 
    nonattainment. See 40 CFR 81.314.
        The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) held public 
    hearings on the SOCMI rules on November 4, 1994, December 2, 1994, and 
    December 16, 1994. The rules, which require compliance by March 15, 
    1996, were published in the Illinois Register on May 19, 1995. The 
    rules became effective at the State level on May 9, 1995. The IEPA 
    formally submitted the SOCMI rules to EPA on May 5, 1995, and May 26, 
    1995, as a revision to the Illinois SIP for ozone. The submittal amends 
    35 Illinois Administrative Code (Ill.Adm.Code) Parts 211, 218 and 219, 
    to include control measures for SOCMI reactor processes and 
    distillation operations.
        The submittal includes the following new or revised rules:
    
    Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions
    
    Subpart B: Definitions
    
    211.980  Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit
    211.1780  Distillation Unit
    211.2365  Flexible Operation Unit
    211.5065  Primary Product
    
    Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the 
    Chicago Area
    
    Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant
    
    218.431  Applicability
    218.432  Control Requirements
    218.433  Performance and Testing Requirements
    218.434  Monitoring Requirements
    218.435  Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
    218.436 Compliance Date
    
    Appendix G: TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and 
    Distillation Units
    
    Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the 
    Metro East Area
    
    Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant
    
    219.431  Applicability
    219.432  Control Requirements
    219.433  Performance and Testing Requirements
    219.434  Monitoring Requirements
    219.435  Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
    219.436  Compliance Date
    
    Appendix G: TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and 
    Distillation Units
    
        The SOCMI rules contained in Part 218 are identical to those in 
    Part 219 except for the areas of applicability. Part 218 applies to the 
    Chicago Area, while Part 219 applies to the Metro East area.
        Illinois' SOCMI rules are based largely on EPA's final CTG for 
    control of VOCs from SOCMI reactor processes and distillation 
    operations, which was issued on November 15, 1993 (58 FR 60197). This 
    document contains the recommended presumptive norm for RACT for these 
    sources.
        The applicability measure for RACT is dependent upon the 
    facilities' calculated Total Resource Effectiveness (TRE) index. The 
    TRE index is a measure of the cost per unit of VOC emission reduction 
    and is normalized so that the decision point has a defined value of 
    1.0. It considers variables such as the emission stream characteristics 
    (i.e., heat value, flow rate, VOC emission rate) and a maximum cost 
    effectiveness. A TRE index value of less than or equal to 1.0, as 
    calculated by using the specific stream characteristics, ensures that 
    the stream could be effectively controlled further by a combustion 
    device without an unreasonable cost burden. The use of the TRE index 
    applicability measure provides an incentive for pollution prevention by 
    letting a facility consider alternatives to installing add-on control 
    devices. Facilities can choose to improve product recovery so that the 
    calculated TRE index falls above the cutoff value of 1.0.
        The technology underlying RACT for SOCMI reactor processes and 
    distillation operations is combustion via either thermal incineration 
    or flaring. These control techniques generally achieve the highest 
    emission reduction among demonstrated VOC technologies. The EPA 
    believes that a thermal incinerator that is well operated and 
    maintained according to manufacturer's specifications can achieve at 
    least 98 percent control efficiency, by weight. Likewise, flares that 
    conform with the design and operating specifications set forth in 40 
    CFR 60.18, can achieve at least 98 percent control, by weight, of VOC 
    emissions.
    
    II. Analysis of State Submittal
    
        The Illinois SOCMI rules affect vent streams associated with 
    reactor processes and distillation operations that manufacture a SOCMI 
    chemical which is both listed in Appendix A of Illinois' Rules and 
    Regulations for Air Pollution Control (35 Ill.Adm.Code 218 and 219) and 
    qualifies as a ``primary product'' under the rules. The rules exclude 
    any reactor or distillation unit that (1) is part of a polymer 
    manufacturing operation, (2) is included in a batch operation, (3) has 
    a total design capacity of less than 1,100 tons per year for the 
    primary product, (4) has a primary product not listed in Appendix A, 
    (5) has a vent stream VOC concentration of less than 500 parts per 
    million by volume or a flow rate of less than 0.0085 standard cubic 
    meter per minute, or (6) is included in the hazardous air pollutants 
    early reduction program, as specified in 40 CFR Part 63 and published 
    at 50 FR 60970 on October 22, 1993. Any other process vent stream from 
    a reactor process or distillation operation in SOCMI that does not 
    satisfy the above exclusion criteria must perform a TRE determination. 
    If the TRE index value, calculated at a point immediately after the 
    associated recovery device, is less than or equal to 1.0, then VOC 
    emissions (less methane and ethane) must be reduced by 98 percent by 
    weight or to 20 parts per million by volume, on a dry basis, corrected 
    to 3 percent oxygen. The compliance date in the Illinois rules is March 
    15, 1996.
        Illinois' SOCMI rules were reviewed against EPA's August 1993 CTG 
    for SOCMI distillation and reactors. Based on the CTG, Illinois' SOCMI 
    reactor and distillation rules require RACT level control efficiencies. 
    However, the State rules' applicability criteria is different than the 
    applicability criteria recommended by the CTG. Under the States' rules, 
    a reactor or distillation unit has the requisite total design capacity 
    to trigger applicability when it produces (1) at least 1,100 tons per 
    year of primary product, and (2) the primary product falls under a list 
    of SOCMI chemicals under Appendix A, the same list used for 
    applicability purposes under the State's SOCMI leaks rule (see 35 
    Ill.Adm.Code 218/219, Subpart Q and Appendix A, approved by EPA 
    September 9, 1994, 59 FR 46562). In contrast, the CTG recommends that 
    applicability be based on whether a unit produces at least 1,100 tons 
    per year of one or more final or intermediate products which fall under 
    the CTG's list of SOCMI chemicals, a list that includes more chemicals 
    than Appendix A.
        RACT rule applicability provisions may vary from State to State 
    dependent upon what sources are in the State's nonattainment area(s). 
    In the case of Illinois, the differences in applicability criteria 
    between the State rules and the CTG is insignificant because the State 
    has only two affected sources in the States' nonattainment areas, both 
    of which meet the applicability criteria of the CTG and the States' 
    rules.
        To demonstrate that the State rules are essentially equivalent to 
    the CTG in
    
    [[Page 13786]]
    
    terms of applicability, the IEPA submitted documentation on November 8, 
    1996, regarding its search for potentially affected facilities 
    applicable to the SOCMI CTG. First, the IEPA searched the State's 
    Emission Inventory System (EIS) database to establish a list of SOCMI 
    continuous distillation operations or reactor processes in the Chicago 
    or Metro East nonattainment areas (SOCMI batch facilities were excluded 
    from the search because they are exempt from the rules). The IEPA 
    evaluated air permit information for these units and eliminated from 
    the list those units which are not producing any chemical found on the 
    SOCMI CTG list. IEPA further eliminated from the list those units which 
    are specifically excluded from the SOCMI CTG, including facilities 
    involved in polymer manufacturing operations or covered under the 
    State's SOCMI air oxidation rules.
        After this complete review, the SOCMI facilities that remained 
    containing emission units applicable to the CTG were Stepan Company's 
    Millsdale facility (Stepan), and Monsanto Chemical Group's Sauget 
    facility (Monsanto). The Illinois SOCMI reactor and distillation rules 
    as they apply to Stepan has already been approved on June 17, 1997, (62 
    FR 32694), and the approval of the rules as they apply to Monsanto has 
    been signed by the Regional Administrator on February 24, 1998, and is 
    awaiting publication in the Federal Register.
        Based on IEPA's documentation, all SOCMI reactor and distillation 
    units in the Chicago and Metro East areas which are required to meet 
    RACT under the SOCMI CTG are covered by the Illinois rule. Therefore, 
    there is no environmental benefit to be gained by requiring Illinois to 
    revise its SOCMI rule to mirror the CTG's applicability provisions. 
    Because the State rules are, for practical purposes, as stringent as 
    the CTG in respect to SOCMI distillation and reactor units existing in 
    the Chicago and Metro East areas, EPA is approving the State rules. 
    However, if a new SOCMI distillation or reactor unit is constructed in 
    the Chicago or Metro East nonattainment areas which is required to meet 
    RACT under the CTG and is not subject to the New Source Performance 
    Standards (NSPS) for SOCMI distillation operations (40 CFR part 60, 
    subpart NNN), the NSPS for SOCMI reactor processes (40 CFR part 60, 
    subpart RRR), or the State rules, then the State will be required to 
    revise its rules so that the new unit is subject to RACT.
    
    III. Final Rulemaking Action
    
        The EPA approves the plan revision submitted to EPA by the State of 
    Illinois on May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, for SOCMI reactor processes 
    and distillation operations. While the limits contained in the rules 
    are generally of RACT stringency, the rules' applicability provisions 
    do not match the applicability criteria specified by the SOCMI CTG. 
    Illinois has shown, however, that the State rules apply to all existing 
    SOCMI facilities in the Chicago and Metro East ozone nonattainment 
    areas which are required to meet RACT under the CTG. Thus, the rules 
    are approvable. The EPA has already taken action on the Illinois rules 
    as they apply to Stepan Company's Millsdale facility (June 17, 1997, 62 
    FR 32694), and the rules as they apply to Monsanto Chemical Group's 
    Sauget facility have been approved by the Regional Administrator on 
    February 24, 1998, and the approval is awaiting publication in the 
    Federal Register.
        The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because 
    EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should specified written adverse or critical written comments be filed. 
    This action will become effective without further notice unless the 
    Agency receives relevant adverse written comment on the parallel 
    proposed rule (published in the proposed rules section of this Federal 
    Register) by April 22, 1998. Should the Agency receive such comments, 
    it will publish a final rule informing the public that this action did 
    not take effect. Any parties interested in commenting on this action 
    should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public 
    is advised that this action will be effective on May 22, 1998.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
    or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any 
    SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered 
    separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental 
    factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory 
    requirements.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory 
    action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. section 600 et seq., 
    EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact 
    of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. sections 603 
    and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act 
    do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
    that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP 
    approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator 
    certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small 
    entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State 
    relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would 
    constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of the 
    State action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions 
    concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 
    246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 
    signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must undertake various actions 
    in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal 
    mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal 
    governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million 
    or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under 
    state or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
    additional costs to state, local, or tribal governments, or the private 
    sector, result from this action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and
    
    [[Page 13787]]
    
    the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
    the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as 
    defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    E. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by May 22, 1998. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2)).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
    reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Dated: March 5, 1998.
    David A. Ullrich,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
        For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title 
    40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart O--Illinois
    
        2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(142)to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.720  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (142) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois 
    submitted State Implementation Plan revision requests for reactor 
    processes and distillation operations in the Synthetic Organic Chemical 
    Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for 
    Volatile Organic Material emissions for the Chicago and Metro-East 
    (East St. Louis) areas. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air 
    Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control 
    Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques 
    Guideline documents.
        (i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 
    35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: 
    Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and 
    Limitations for Stationary Sources.
        (A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; 
    Definitions, 211.980 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit, 211.1780 
    Distillation Unit, 211.2365 Flexible Operation Unit, 211.5065 Primary 
    Product, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
        (B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations 
    for the Chicago Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer 
    Manufacturing Plant, Sections 218.431 Applicability, 218.432 Control 
    Requirements, 218.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 218.434 
    Monitoring Requirements, 218.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting 
    Requirements, 218.436 Compliance Date, 218.Appendix G, TRE Index 
    Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 
    Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
        (C) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations 
    for the Metro East Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and 
    Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 219.431 Applicability, 219.432 
    Control Requirements, 219.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 
    219.434 Monitoring Requirements, 219.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting 
    Requirements, 219.436 Compliance Date, 219.Appendix G, TRE Index 
    Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 
    Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-7128 Filed 3-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/22/1998
Published:
03/23/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
98-7128
Dates:
The ``direct final'' approval is effective on May 22, 1998, unless EPA receives adverse or critical written comments by April 22, 1998. If the effective date is delayed timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
13784-13787 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IL167-1a, FRL-5978-8
PDF File:
98-7128.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.720