94-6873. Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Filing Requirements for Use of Mutual Fund Rankings and Elimination of Sunset Provisions in Pre-Filing ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-6873]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: March 24, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-33780; File No. SR-NASD-93-66]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities 
    Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Filing 
    Requirements for Use of Mutual Fund Rankings and Elimination of Sunset 
    Provisions in Pre-Filing Requirements of Advertising and Government 
    Securities Rules
    
    March 17, 1994.
        On February 7, 1994, the National Association of Securities 
    Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') filed with the Securities 
    and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')\1\ a proposed rule 
    change pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
    1934 (``Act''),\2\ and rule 19b-4 thereunder.\3\ The proposed rule 
    change amends Article III, section 35 of the NASD Rules of Fair 
    Practice\4\ and section 8 of the NASD Government Securities Rules\5\ 
    to: (1) Require filing of advertisements and sales literature relating 
    to investment companies; (2) made the pre-filing requirement of Article 
    III, subsection 35(c)(2) of the Rules of Fair Practice and in 
    subsection 8(c)(1)(B) of the Government Securities Rules permanent; and 
    (3) properly reference the ``Advertising Regulation Department'' 
    throughout Article III, section 35 of the Rules of Fair Practice and 
    the Government Securities Rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The NASD initially submitted the proposed rule change on 
    November 4, 1993. However, on February 7, 1994, the NASD filed 
    Amendment No. 1, which amended and superseded the original rule 
    filing.
        \2\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \3\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1993).
        \4\NASD Manual, Rules of Fair Practice, Article III, Sec. 35 
    (CCH) 2195.
        \5\NASD Manual, Government Securities Rules, Sec. 8 (CCH) 2428.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Notice of the proposed rule change, together with the substance of 
    the proposal, was provided by issuance of a Commission release 
    (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33603, February 8, 1994) and by 
    publication in the Federal Register (59 FR 7282, February 15, 1994). 
    One comment letter favoring the proposed rule change was received. This 
    order approves the proposed rule change.
        As the number of mutual funds has increased substantially in recent 
    years, so has the number of mutual fund ranking entities (``Ranking 
    Entities''). Ranking Entities, as well as mutual funds and fund 
    affiliates, categorize and rank mutual funds by, for example, fund 
    type, performance over a given period of years, total return, 
    standardized yield calculated pursuant to Commission rules, the 
    variations in sales charges, and risk/reward. References to such 
    rankings in mutual fund advertisements and sales literature have also 
    increased substantially in recent years as members have attempted to 
    boost the sale of fund shares by touting the performance of various 
    mutual funds.
        The Commission believes that it is important that the NASD review 
    and regulate the use of ranking materials and the development of 
    customized rankings in order to prevent the misleading use of such 
    rankings. The NASD, therefore, has proposed to amend Article III, 
    section 35(c) of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice to require that copies 
    of mutual fund rankings and the data on which the rankings are based be 
    submitted to the Association's Advertising Regulation Department for 
    review. The proposed rule change requires members filing advertisements 
    or sales literature for review which use or incorporate mutual fund 
    rankings to include in the filing a copy of the ranking or 
    comparison.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\The NASD also has proposed Guidelines for the Use of Rankings 
    in Mutual Fund Advertisements and Sales Literature (``Guidelines'') 
    on which the NASD review will be based. See Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 33606 (Feb. 8, 1994), 59 FR 7276 (Feb. 15, 1994) 
    (noticing File No. SR-NASD-93-69).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Subsection 35(c)(1) will require that any member that files any 
    investment company advertisements or items of sales literature pursuant 
    to subsection 35(c)(1) which include or incorporate rankings or 
    comparisons of the investment company with other investment companies, 
    shall include a copy of the ranking or comparison used in the 
    advertising or sales literature. The requirements of this provision 
    will permit the staff to immediately determine whether the use of the 
    ranking complies with the Guidelines, and avoid the need for the NASD 
    staff to research the ranking or attempt to obtain a copy of the source 
    information in order to verify the accuracy of the material.
        The proposed rule change amends subsection 35(c)(2), which 
    currently requires certain advertisements to be filed by members 10 
    days prior to use, to require such pre-use filing for all investment 
    company advertisements or items of sales literature which incorporates 
    rankings or comparisons of the investment company with other investment 
    companies where the ranking or comparison is not generally published or 
    is the creation, directly or indirectly, of the investment company, its 
    underwriter or an affiliate.\7\ While the NASD is concerned about 
    permitting ranking categories to be created by investment companies or 
    their affiliates, rather than by a Ranking Entity, customized ranking 
    nonetheless may provide meaningful information to the investor. Such 
    filing also must include a copy of the data, ranking or comparison on 
    which the ranking or comparison is based.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\The proposed Guidelines permit the use of a ranking based on 
    a category or subcategory created by a fund or a fund affiliate 
    rather than by a Ranking Entity, so long as the ranking is based on 
    the performance measurements of a Ranking Entity.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The NASD also is amending Article III, subsection 35(c)(2) of the 
    Rules of Fair Practice and subsection 8(c)(1)(B) of the Government 
    Securities Rules to eliminate sunset provisions relating to 
    collateralized mortgage obligations (``CMOs''). This change would make 
    the pre-filing requirement for CMO advertisements permanent.
        Finally, the NASD is modifying references to the Advertising 
    Department to reference the Advertising Regulation Department in 
    Article III, Section 35 of the Rules of Fair Practice and the 
    Government Securities Rules.
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the provisions of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act\8\ because it 
    ensures that the use of rankings of investment companies in advertising 
    and sales literature is accurate and presents investors with fair and 
    meaningful data upon which to make an informed investment decision. 
    With respect to the proposed elimination of the sunset provisions for 
    the prefiling of CMO advertisements, the Commission believes that the 
    positive regulatory benefits seen since implementation of the 
    provision, i.e., the reduction in misleading advertising, warrants 
    making the prefiling requirement provision permanent. Finally, the 
    clarifications referring to the phrase ``Advertising Regulation 
    Department,'' rather than ``Advertising Department'' will reduce 
    unnecessary confusion among NASD members.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that File No. SR-NASD-93-66 be, and hereby is approved.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority, 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-6873 Filed 3-23-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/24/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-6873
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 24, 1994, Release No. 34-33780, File No. SR-NASD-93-66