[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-6880]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: March 24, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP94-266-000, et al.]
Cheyenne Light Fuel and Power Company, et al. Natural Gas
Certificate Filings
March 11, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Cheyenne Light Fuel and Power Company
[Docket No. CP94-266-000]
Take notice that on March 4, 1994, Cheyenne Light Fuel and Power
Company (Cheyenne), 108 W. 18th Street, P. O. Box 1409, Cheyenne,
Wyoming 82003-1409, filed in Docket No. CP94-266-000 an application
pursuant to Sec. 284.224 of the Commission's Regulations for a blanket
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the
transportation of natural gas, all as more fully set forth in the
application on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
It is stated that Cheyenne agrees to comply with the conditions set
forth in Sec. 284.224(e) and understands that any transaction
authorized under a blanket certificate shall be subject to the same
rates and charges, terms, conditions and reporting requirements that
would apply if the transactions were authorized for an intrastate
pipeline by subparts C, D and E of part 284 of the Commission's
Regulations.
Comment date: April 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
2. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
[Docket No. CP94-271-000]
Take notice that on March 8, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,
S. E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314, filed in Docket No. CP94-271-
000, an application pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for
a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the
construction and operation of replacement storage pipeline facilities,
all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection.
Columbia proposes to construct and operate 9.5 miles of various
sized storage pipeline in the Coco Storage ``A'' Field ranging in size
from 4-inch to 20-inch diameter. Columbia states that the proposed
facilities would replace two looped segments of mainline totaling 10.1
miles and 4.4 miles of well lines. Columbia also proposes to construct
appurtenant facilities consisting of 5.5 miles of 2-inch and 5.7 miles
of 1-inch pressurized methanol injection system connected to each well,
the replacement of well head measurement at 26 existing wells, and the
installation of an on-line pigging system. Columbia estimates the
construction cost to be $9,533,000.
Columbia asserts the existing facilities have deteriorated to the
extent that replacement is required in order to maintain safe and
reliable storage service.
Comment date: April 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
F at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to said application should on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter
finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval
for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-6880 Filed 3-23-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
