99-7115. How to Use Health Claims and Nutrient Content Claims in Food Labeling; Public Meeting  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 24, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 14178-14180]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-7115]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 101
    
    [Docket No. 99N-0554]
    
    
    How to Use Health Claims and Nutrient Content Claims in Food 
    Labeling; Public Meeting
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Announcement of public meeting.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a 
    forthcoming public meeting concerning implementation of sections 303 
    and 304 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 
    (FDAMA). Those provisions provide for use, in food labeling, of health 
    claims and nutrient content claims based on authoritative statements 
    published by certain Federal scientific bodies or the National Academy 
    of Sciences (NAS) or any of its subdivisions. We are holding the 
    meeting to allow you to provide information and recommendations to 
    assist us in identifying appropriate approaches for implementing 
    sections 303 and 304 of FDAMA. We anticipate that the discussion will 
    include presentations from people whom we invite to participate as well 
    as from members of the public.
    
    DATES: We will hold the meeting on May 11, 1999, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
    Please register by April 27, 1999. Written comments should be submitted 
    by May 11, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSEES: The meeting will be held at the Jefferson Auditorium, U.S. 
    Department of Agriculture, South Bldg., 1400 Independence Ave. SW., 
    Washington, DC.
        You may submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
    Rockville, MD 20852. You may also send comments to the Dockets 
    Management Branch at the following e-mail address: 
    ``FDADockets@bangate.fda.gov'' or via the FDA Website ``http://
    www.fda.gov''.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne E. Latham, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-456), Food and Drug Administration, 
    200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4697, or e-mail to 
    ``JLatham@bangate.fda.gov''.
    
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On November 21, 1997, the President signed FDAMA (Pub. L. 105-115) 
    into law. FDAMA made amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
    Act (the act). In particular, sections 304 and 303 of FDAMA amended 
    section 403(r)(2) and (r)(3) of the act by adding new paragraphs 
    (r)(2)(G), (r)(2)(H), (r)(3)(C), and (r)(3)(D) to section 403 of the 
    act (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(2)(G), (r)(2)(H), (r)(3)(C), and (r)(3)(D), 
    respectively). These new paragraphs provide for the use in food 
    labeling of nutrient content claims and health claims, respectively,
    
    [[Page 14179]]
    
    based on authoritative statements 120 days after a notification of the 
    claim is submitted to the agency. This notification process added by 
    FDAMA supplements the petition process for nutrient content and health 
    claims provided by section 403(r)(4) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(4)) 
    and Secs. 101.69 and 101.70 (21 CFR 101.69 and 101.70, respectively). 
    It does so by providing a less time-consuming and less burdensome 
    alternative for establishing the scientific basis for such claims 
    through use of authoritative statements of certain scientific bodies.
        Since the passage of FDAMA, FDA has been reviewing both the statute 
    and the accompanying legislative history to determine the most 
    appropriate approach for implementing these new provisions. We issued a 
    guidance document in early June 1998 (Ref. 1). In this guidance, we 
    focused on the submission procedures for notifications of claims, 
    identified appropriate Federal scientific bodies, discussed the nature 
    of authoritative statements and the scientific standard with respect to 
    health claims, outlined the content of a notification and other 
    statutory requirements, and indicated that we intended to propose that 
    health claims based on authoritative statements be permitted for use in 
    dietary supplement labeling. We published that proposed rule in the 
    Federal Register of January 21, 1999 (64 FR 3250) (Ref. 2).
        Moreover, because section 403(r)(2)(G) and (r)(3)(C) of the act 
    provide that authoritative statements from appropriate Federal 
    scientific bodies may be the basis of nutrient content claims and 
    health claims, we believed there was benefit in identifying key persons 
    within each such Federal body who could provide us with information on 
    authoritative statements if needed. At our request, the Secretary of 
    Health and Human Services sent a letter to scientific bodies within the 
    Public Health Service (Ref. 3) and to the U.S. Department of 
    Agriculture (Ref. 4) requesting that they identify such a contact 
    person.
        On February 23, 1998, we received a notification containing nine 
    prospective claims that were identified in the notification as health 
    claims (Ref. 5). We created nine separate dockets, one for each claim, 
    and issued a separate interim final rule responding to each claim 
    (Refs. 6 through 14). In one of these rules (Ref. 6), we included in 
    the preamble our thinking about the requirements of section 
    403(r)(2)(G), (r)(2)(H), (r)(3)(C), and (r)(3)(D) of the act as well as 
    procedures that we would use to review notifications for claims under 
    those provisions.
        We received a number of comments on these nine interim final rules. 
    Some comments supported the approach that we had taken and others 
    opposed it. Some comments offered alternative approaches for our 
    consideration. You can find these comments in Docket Nos. 98N-0419 
    through 98N-0424 and 98N-0426 through 98N-0428 at our Dockets 
    Management Branch (see address in section IV of this document). In 
    addition, on August 13, 1998 (Ref. 15), and October 26, 1998 (Ref. 16), 
    we received congressional requests for information about the nine 
    interim final rules. We responded to these requests on September 16, 
    1998 (Ref. 17), and December 8, 1998 (Ref. 18).
        We believe that our efforts to implement section 304(r)(2)(G), 
    (r)(2)(H), (r)(3)(C), and (r)(3)(D) of the act would benefit from a 
    public meeting and an open discussion of all possible approaches to 
    implementing these provisions. We anticipate that this discussion will 
    be most useful to us if it involves those that commented on FDA's 
    tentative approach and other members of the public, as well as 
    representatives of scientific bodies that may be sources of 
    authoritative statements.
    
    II. Scope of Discussion
    
        We intend that the scope of the meeting be limited to issues 
    related to implementing section 403(r)(2)(G), (r)(2)(H), (r)(3)(C), and 
    (r)(3)(D) of the act. More specifically, comments to the nine interim 
    final rules raised questions concerning both the need for and the 
    nature of a definition for ``authoritative statement.'' We seek 
    clarification of issues and approaches that relate to these questions. 
    These questions focused on FDA's role in overseeing the provisions that 
    allow such claims, as well as our role in relation to the Federal 
    scientific bodies and NAS. In addition, we seek input about which of 
    the regulatory requirements applicable to health claims and nutrient 
    content claims that FDA authorizes by regulation under the petition 
    process in section 403(r)(4) of the act should apply to health claims 
    and nutrient content claims authorized based on authoritative 
    statements. Finally, we seek input on several definitional and 
    procedural issues. Based on the questions and comments that we have 
    already received, we are particularly interested in discussions of the 
    following questions:
    1. The Scientific Basis for Claims
        a.  What is an ``authoritative statement''?
        b. Who defines ``authoritative statement''?
        c. Who decides if a particular statement is an ``authoritative 
    statement''?
        d. Is the ``context'' of a statement in the publication in which it 
    appears relevant to that determination? If so, how?
        e.   How does the significant scientific agreement standard apply 
    to health claims based on authoritative statements?
    2. Existing Regulatory Requirements
        a. What requirements of 21 CFR 101.13 and part 101, subpart D 
    should we apply to nutrient content claims based on authoritative 
    statements?
        b. What requirements of 21 CFR 101.14 should we apply to health 
    claims based on authoritative statements?
    3.  Procedural and Definitional Issues
        a.  Which agencies should we identify as scientific bodies of the 
    U.S. Government with official responsibility for public health 
    protection or research directly relating to human nutrition under 
    section 403(r)(2)(G)(i) and (r)(3)(C)(i) of the act?
        b. Should we provide by regulation that health claims based on 
    authoritative statements may be used in the labeling of dietary 
    supplements?
        c. What should we require that you submit with a notification of a 
    health or nutrient content claim based on an authoritative statement?
        d.  Should we require you to submit in a notification an analytical 
    methodology for measuring the substance that is the subject of your 
    submitted claim?
        e. What is a balanced presentation of the scientific literature 
    relating to the subject to which a claim refers that is required under 
    section 403(r)(2)(G)(ii)(III) and (r)(3)(C)(ii)(III) of the act?
        f. Should FDA keep notifications confidential for 120 days after 
    the date of their submission or should we place them in a public docket 
    upon receipt?
        g. If a notification is incomplete or does not support a claim, 
    should we respond to it by letter or by issuing a regulation, and what 
    should be the legal effect of letters were we to use them?
    
    III.   Registration and Requests to Make Oral Presentation
    
        If you would like to attend the meeting, you must register with the 
    contact person (address above) by April 27, 1999, by providing your 
    name, title, business affiliation, address, telephone and fax number. 
    To expedite processing, registration information may also be
    
    [[Page 14180]]
    
    faxed to 202-260-8957. If you need special accommodations due to 
    disability, please inform the contact person when you register. If, in 
    addition, you desire to make an oral presentation during the meeting, 
    when you register to attend you must inform the contact person of that 
    desire and submit: (1) A brief written statement of the general nature 
    of the evidence or arguments that you wish to present, (2) the names 
    and addresses of the persons who will give the presentation, and (3) an 
    indication of the approximate time that you request to make your 
    presentation. Depending upon the number of people who register to make 
    presentations, we may have to limit the time allotted for each such 
    presentation. We anticipate that, if time permits, those attending the 
    meeting will have the opportunity to ask questions during the meeting.
    
    IV. Comments
    
        You may, by May 11, 1999, submit written comments to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers 
    Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. You may also send comments to the 
    Dockets Management Branch at the following e-mail address: 
    ``FDADockets@bangate.fda.gov'' or via the FDA Website ``http://
    www.fda.gov''. You should annotate and organize your comments to 
    identify the specific issues to which they refer. You must submit two 
    copies of any comments, identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document, except that you may submit 
    only one copy if you are an individual. You may see received comments 
    in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday.
    
    V. Transcripts
    
        You may request transcripts of the meeting in writing from the 
    Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug Administration, 
    5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857, approximately 15 
    working days after the meeting at a cost of 10 cents per page. You may 
    also examine the transcript of the meeting after May 21, 1999, at the 
    Dockets Management Branch (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday, as well as on the FDA Website ``http://
    www.fda.gov''.
    
    VI. References
    
        We have placed the following references on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above). You may see them at that office 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        1. ``Guidance for Industry: Notification of a Health Claim or 
    Nutrient Content Claim Based on an Authoritative Statement of a 
    Scientific Body,'' June 11, 1998.
        2. Food Labeling: Use on Dietary Supplements of Health Claims 
    Based on Authoritative Statements (64 FR 3250, January 21, 1999).
        3. Memorandum from Donna E. Shalala, DHHS, to scientific bodies 
    within the Public Health Service, March 17, 1998.
        4. Memorandum from Donna E. Shalala, DHHS, to The Honorable Dan 
    Glickman, USDA, March 17, 1998.
        5. Notification to Donna E. Shalala, DHHS, from Jonathan W. 
    Emord et al., Emord & Associates, P.C., Counsel for Weider Nutrition 
    International, Inc., February 23, 1998.
        6. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Antioxidant 
    Vitamins C and E and the Risk in Adults of Atherosclerosis, Coronary 
    Heart Disease, Certain Cancers, and Cataracts (63 FR 34084, June 22, 
    1998).
        7. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Antioxidant 
    Vitamin A and Beta-Carotene and the Risk in Adults of 
    Atherosclerosis, Coronary Heart Disease, and Certain Cancers (63 FR 
    34092, June 22, 1998).
        8. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; B-Complex 
    Vitamins, Lowered Homocysteine Levels, and the Risk in Adults of 
    Cardiovascular Disease (63 FR 34097, June 22, 1998).
        9. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Calcium 
    Consumption by Adolescents and Adults, Bone Density and The Risk of 
    Fractures (63 FR 34101, June 22, 1998).
        10. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Chromium 
    and the Risk in Adults of Hyperglycemia and the Effects of Glucose 
    Intolerance (63 FR 34104, June 22, 1998).
        11. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Omega-3 
    Fatty Acids and the Risk in Adults of Cardiovascular Disease (63 FR 
    34107, June 22, 1998).
        12. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Garlic, 
    Reduction of Serum Cholesterol, and the Risk of Cardiovascular 
    Disease in Adults (63 FR 34110, June 22, 1998).
        13. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Zinc and 
    the Body's Ability to Fight Infection and Heal Wounds in Adults (63 
    FR 34112, June 22, 1998).
        14. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Interim Final Rule; Vitamin K 
    and Promotion of Proper Blood Clotting and Improvement in Bone 
    Health in Adults (63 FR 34115, June 22, 1998).
        15. Letter of August 13, 1998, to Michael A. Friedman, FDA, from 
    The Honorable Dan Burton, House of Representatives, regarding the 
    nine interim final rules that FDA published in the Federal Register 
    of June 22, 1998.
        16. Letter of October 26, 1998, to Jane Henney, FDA, from The 
    Honorable Dan Burton, House of Representatives, regarding the nine 
    interim final rules that FDA published in the Federal Register of 
    June 22, 1998.
        17. Letter of September 16, 1998, to The Honorable Dan Burton, 
    House of Representatives, from Diane E. Thompson, FDA, regarding the 
    nine interim final rules that FDA published in the Federal Register 
    of June 22, 1998.
        18. Letter of December 8, 1998, to The Honorable Dan Burton, 
    House of Representatives, from Diane E. Thompson, FDA, regarding the 
    nine interim final rules that FDA published in the Federal Register 
    of June 22, 1998.
    
        Dated: March 18, 1999.
     William K. Hubbard,
     Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    [FR Doc. 99-7115 Filed 3-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/24/1999
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Announcement of public meeting.
Document Number:
99-7115
Dates:
We will hold the meeting on May 11, 1999, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Please register by April 27, 1999. Written comments should be submitted by May 11, 1999.
Pages:
14178-14180 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99N-0554
PDF File:
99-7115.pdf
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 101