99-7165. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 24, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 14275-14276]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-7165]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318]
    
    
    Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power 
    Plant; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
    Part 50, Appendix R, Section III.J, Emergency lighting, to Baltimore 
    Gas and Electric Company (the licensee) for operation of the Calvert 
    Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in Calvert 
    County, Maryland.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed exemption would grant relief from the requirements of 
    10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section III.J, Emergency lighting, as 
    follows:
    
    [[Page 14276]]
    
        (1) Security lighting, required by 10 CFR 73.55, powered by the 
    diesel generator, would be used for exterior lighting in lieu of 8-hour 
    battery powered emergency lighting units specified by Section III.J;
        (2) Portable lights powered by an 8-hour battery supply, for 
    actions in high radiation areas would be used in lieu of 8-hour battery 
    powered emergency lighting units; and
        (3) Helmet lanterns would be used inside of switchgear cabinets in 
    lieu of 8-hour battery powered emergency lighting units.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated October 6, 1997, as supplemented by 
    letter dated July 22, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The exemption is needed to reduce the hardships or costs associated 
    with complying with Appendix R, Section III.J.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that the proposed action will not adversely affect 
    safety.
        The proposed action will not increase the probability or 
    consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of 
    any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no 
    significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. 
    Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not involve any historic sites. It does not affect non-
    radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. 
    Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed action.
        Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
    Denial of the application would result in no change in current 
    environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action 
    and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the 
    Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on February 10, 1999, the 
    staff consulted with the Maryland State official, Richard J. McLean of 
    the Department of Natural Resources, regarding the environmental impact 
    of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        On the basis of the environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated October 6, 1997, as supplemented by letter 
    dated July 22, 1998, which are available for public inspection at the 
    Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, 
    NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at 
    the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L 
    Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
    located at the Calvert County Library, Prince Frederick, Maryland.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of March 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    S. Singh Bajwa,
    Director, Project Directorate I-1, Division of Licensing Project 
    Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 99-7165 Filed 3-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/24/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-7165
Pages:
14275-14276 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318
PDF File:
99-7165.pdf