99-7210. Medtronic Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 24, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 14249-14251]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-7210]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [File No. 9810329]
    
    
    Medtronic Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
    violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or 
    practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to 
    Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft 
    complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the 
    consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle 
    these allegations.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 24, 1999.
    
    ADDRESS: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 600 Pa. Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Riddell or Mark Menna, FTC/H-
    2105, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580, (202) 326-
    2721 or (202) 326-2722.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46 and Section 2.34 of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby 
    given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent 
    order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject 
    to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public 
    record for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid 
    Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
    allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of 
    the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page 
    (for March 8, 1999), on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/
    actions97.htm.'' A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public 
    Reference Room, Room H-130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
    D.C. 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627. Public 
    comment is invited. Such comments or views will be considered by the 
    Commission and will be available for inspection and copying at its 
    principal office in accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
    Analysis of the Proposed Consent Order and Draft Complaint to Aid 
    Public Comment
    
        The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted for 
    public comment from Medtronic, Inc. (``Medtronic'' or ``proposed 
    Respondent'') an Agreement Containing Consent Order (``the proposed 
    consent order''). The proposed Respondent has also reviewed a draft 
    complaint contemplated by the Commission. The proposed consent order is 
    designed to remedy likely anticompetitive effects arising from the 
    acquisition of Avecor Cardiovascular, Inc. (``Avecor''). Both Medtronic 
    and Avecor are medical technology companies that compete in the 
    manufacture and sale of non-occlusive arterial pumps, perfusion devices 
    used in heart/lung machines. The proposed consent order remedies the 
    acquisition's anticompetitive effects by requiring Medtronic to divest 
    Avecor's non-occlusive arterial pump assets (``Avecor Pump Assets'') as 
    a viable, on-going product line. Medtronic has entered into an 
    agreement to divest the Avecor Pump Assets to Baxter Healthcare 
    Corporation (``Baxter'').
        Medtronic, which is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is 
    engaged in the research, development, manufacture and sale of medical 
    devices, including implantable devices, such as pacemakers and 
    defibrillators, which regulate heart rhythm; tissue and mechanical 
    heart valves; coronary stents; and perfusion devices for heart/lung 
    machines. Medtronic's perfusion devices include non-occlusive arterial 
    pumps. Medtronic's Bio-Pump is the market leader in non-occlusive 
    arterial pumps. Avecor, also headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, 
    is engaged in the research, development, manufacture and sale of 
    perfusion devices, including,
    
    [[Page 14250]]
    
    among other things, non-occlusive arterial pumps. Avecor introduced its 
    non-occlusive arterial pump is the Fall of 1997. Avecor's pump, which 
    utilizes different technology, is still in the early stages of gaining 
    market acceptance. Some in the industry believe that this new pump may 
    offer consumers advantages over the Bio-Pump and other conventional 
    non-occlusive pumps.
        Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (``Merger Agreement''), 
    signed July 12, 1998, and as subsequently amended, Medtronic agreed to 
    acquire 100% of the voting stock of Avecor for approximately $106 
    million. The proposed Complaint alleges that the Merger Agreement 
    violates Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 45, and 
    that the acquisition violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 
    15 U.S.C. Sec. 15, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 
    45, in the United States market for the research, development, 
    manufacture and sale of non-occlusive arterial pumps.
        The draft complaint alleges that medtronic's proposed acquisition 
    of Avecor would lessen competition in the United States market for 
    research, development, manufacture and sale of non-occlusive arterial 
    pumps. Arterial pumps are a perfusion device used primarily to stand in 
    for the heart and lungs during surgical procedures involving those 
    organs. Perfusion devices are products that handle blood in heart/lung 
    machines. These devices circulate and oxygenate the blood and regulate 
    body temperature during heart bypass surgery and other procedures where 
    the heart must be relieved of its pumping function. Arterial pumps 
    circulate the blood. According to the complaint, there are no 
    competitive substitutes for non-occlusive arterial pumps.
        The complaint alleges that the United States is the relevant 
    geographic market in which to analyze the effects of the proposed 
    acquisition.
        The complaint alleges that the United States market for research, 
    development, manufacture and sale of non-occlusive arterial pumps is 
    highly concentrated, and would become significantly more concentrated 
    as a result of the acquisition. Premerger concentration in this market, 
    as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschamann Index,\1\ exceeds 5,700, and 
    the acquisition would increase the HHI by more than 340 to more than 
    6,050.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ The Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index, or ``HHI,'' is a 
    measurement of market concentration calculated by summing the 
    squares of the individual market shares of all participants in the 
    market. Under section 1.51 of the Horizontal Merger Guidelines 
    issued April 2, 1992, by the Federal Trade Commission and the 
    Department of Justice, the Commission considers concentration levels 
    exceeding 1,800 as ``highly concentrated'' and concentration levels 
    between 1,000 and 1,800 as ``moderately concentrated.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        According to the draft complaint, entry into the United States 
    market for research, development, manufacture and sale of non-occlusive 
    arterial pumps is difficult and would not be timely, likely or 
    sufficient to prevent the adverse competitive effects that may result 
    from the proposed acquisition.
        The proposed consent order remedies the Commission's competitive 
    concerns about the proposed acquisition. Under Paragraph II of the 
    proposed consent order, Medtronic must divest all of the assets 
    relating to Avecor's non-occlusive arterial pump to Baxter or to 
    another acquirer approved by the Commission. Baxter is a major producer 
    of medical devices used in cardiac surgery and has substantial 
    experience in the research, development, manufacture and sale of other 
    perfusion devices used in cardiac surgery bypass operations. Baxter 
    also is a major provider of perfusion services. In the event that 
    Medtronic does not sell these assets to Baxter or another Commission-
    approved buyer within ninety (90) days of the Order's becoming final, 
    the Commission may appoint a trustee to divest the Avecor Pump Assets.
        The Commission's purpose in evaluating possible purchasers of 
    divested assets is to maintain the competitive environment that existed 
    prior to the acquisition. A proposed buyer must not itself present 
    competitive problems. The Commission believes that Baxter is well 
    qualified to operate the divested assets and that divestiture to Baxter 
    will not be anticompetitive in this market.
        The proposed consent order requires Medtronic to provide 
    substantial assistance to the buyer of the Avecor Pump Assets to enable 
    the buyer to obtain FDA approval to manufacture and market the Avecor 
    pumps and reservoirs to use with the pump. First, Medtronic must 
    contract manufacture a supply of the Avecor pumps and the reservoirs 
    used with the Avecor pumps for a year while the buyer establishes its 
    own manufacturing capability. Medtronic must continue to supply the 
    buyer with such reservoirs for a second year if the buyer determines 
    that it needs additional time to establish the manufacturing capability 
    to produce a reservoir to use with the Avecor pump. Second, Medtronic 
    must provide technical assistance to help the buyer obtain necessary 
    FDA approvals and to acquire the capability to manufacture the Avecor 
    pump. Finally, the proposed consent order provides the buyer with the 
    opportunity to hire Avecor employees associated with the Avecor Pump 
    Assets.
        In order to facilitate the smooth transfer of assets and ensure 
    that the buyer will get the assistance necessary to independenty 
    manufacture the Avecor pump, the proposed consent order also provides 
    for the appointment of an interim trustee. The interim trustee will 
    serve until the acquirer has received all necessary FDA approvals to 
    manufacture the Avecor pump and becomes an independent producer of the 
    Avecor pump.
        Under certain circumstances if the Commission-approved buyer fails 
    to become a viable, independent manufacturer and seller of Avecor pump, 
    the Commission may terminate the divestiture and appoint a divestiture 
    trustee to find a new buyer for the Avecor pump assets. If, prior to 
    obtaining the necessary FDA approvals and beginning to manufacture 
    Avecor pump and a compatible reservoir, the buyer stops selling the 
    Avecor pump for 60 days or otherwise fails to make good faith efforts 
    to sell it, the Commission may step in and terminate the divestiture. 
    The Commission may also terminate the divestiture if the buyer fails to 
    make good faith efforts to obtain the necessary FDA approvals. 
    Similarly, the Commission may revoke the divestiture if the buyer fails 
    to obtain the FDA approvals or to begin manufacturing within one year. 
    Under this last scenario, the Commission may refrain from revoking the 
    divestiture (for a second year) if it appears that the buyer is likely 
    to obtain the FDA approvals or begin to manufacture the products in 
    that time period.
        The proposed consent order also required Medtronic to provide to 
    the Commission a report of compliance with the divestiture and 
    assistance provisions of the proposed consent order within sixty (60) 
    days following the date the proposed consent order becomes final and 
    every ninety (90) days thereafter until Medtronic has completed the 
    divestiture and the acquire has obtained all necessary FDA approvals 
    and has become an independent manufacturer of the Avecor pump and a 
    reservoir that can be used with the Avecor pump. The proposed consent 
    order also requires Medtronic to notify the Commission at least thirty 
    (30) days prior to any change in the structure of Medtronic that may 
    affect compliance with the proposed consent order.
    
    [[Page 14251]]
    
        The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for 
    sixty (60) days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments 
    received during this period will become part of the public record. 
    After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the agreements 
    and the comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw 
    the argument or make the proposed consent order final.
        By accepting the proposed consent order subject to final approval, 
    the Commission anticipates that the competitive problems alleged in the 
    complaint will be resolved. The purpose of this analysis is to 
    facilitate public comment on the proposed consent order, including the 
    proposed sale of the Avecor pump assets to Baxter, in order to aid the 
    Commission in its determination of whether to make the proposed consent 
    order final. This analysis is not intended to constitute an official 
    interpretation of the proposed consent order, nor is it intended to 
    modify the terms of the proposed consent order in any way.
    
        By direction of the Commission.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-7210 Filed 3-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/24/1999
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed consent agreement.
Document Number:
99-7210
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before May 24, 1999.
Pages:
14249-14251 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 9810329
PDF File:
99-7210.pdf