96-7047. ``Medical Device Design Control Guidance'' and ``Do It By Design;'' Draft Guidance; Availability  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 58 (Monday, March 25, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 12075-12076]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-7047]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Docket No. 96D-0065]
    
    
    ``Medical Device Design Control Guidance'' and ``Do It By 
    Design;'' Draft Guidance; Availability
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
    availability of two draft guidance documents entitled, ``Medical Device 
    Design Control Guidance'' and ``Do It By Design.'' The ``Medical Device 
    Design Control Guidance'' draft document is intended to provide a 
    general understanding of design control theory, principles, and 
    methods, and to update a previous guidance document on the subject of 
    preproduction quality assurance. The ``Do It By Design'' draft guidance 
    document is intended to provide a general understanding of the human 
    factors theory as it relates to designing a medical device. Both draft 
    guidance documents, once finalized, are intended to be basic 
    educational tools for industry and FDA field investigators, and they 
    will be used to aid implementation of the new ``quality system 
    regulation,'' now in the final stages of development.
    
    DATES: Written comments by April 30, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft 
    guidances to the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance (DSMA), 
    Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-220), Food and Drug 
    Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850. Send two self-
    addressed adhesive labels to assist the office in processing your 
    request. Copies of a facsimile of the draft guidances are available 
    from CDRH Facts on Demand (1-800-899-0381). Copies of the draft 
    guidances may also be obtained from the Electronic Docket administered 
    by DSMA and are available to anyone with a video terminal or personal 
    computer (1-800-252-1366).
        Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-
    
    [[Page 12076]]
    305), Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, 
    Rockville, MD 20857. Comments for the two draft guidance documents 
    should be kept separate and identified by their respective titles. 
    Requests and comments should be identified with the docket number found 
    in brackets in the heading of this document. A copy of the draft 
    guidances and received comments are available for public examination in 
    the Dockets Management Branch (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 
    p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly A. Trautman, Office of 
    Compliance, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-341), Food 
    and Drug Administration, 2098 Gaither Rd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-
    594-4648.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (the SMDA) (Pub. L. 101-629), 
    enacted on November 28, 1990, amended section 520(f) of the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360j (f)), providing FDA with 
    the authority to add preproduction design controls to the current good 
    manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulation part 820 (21 CFR part 820). 
    This change in law was based on findings that a significant proportion 
    of device recalls were attributed to faulty product design. FDA found 
    that approximately 44 percent of the quality problems that led to 
    voluntary recall actions during a 6-year period were attributed to 
    errors or deficiencies that had been designed into particular devices 
    and that may have been prevented by adequate design controls. These 
    design-related defects involved both noncritical devices (e.g., patient 
    chair lifts, in vitro diagnostics, and administration sets) and 
    critical devices (e.g., pacemakers and ventilators). Also in 1990, the 
    Department of Health and Human Services' Inspector General conducted a 
    study which reached similar conclusions.
        FDA undertook the revision of the CGMP regulation to add the design 
    controls authorized by the SMDA to the CGMP regulation and because the 
    agency believed that it would be beneficial to the public and the 
    medical device industry for the CGMP regulation to be consistent, to 
    the extent possible, with the requirements for quality systems 
    contained in international standards. The agency's extensive efforts to 
    revise the CGMP regulation included making publicly available a working 
    draft of a final rule in July 1995, followed by a public workshop on 
    August 23, 1995 (see 60 FR 37856, July 24, 1995), and an open public 
    GMP Advisory Committee meeting on September 13 and 14, 1995 (see 60 FR 
    44037, August 24, 1995). The final regulation, generally referred to as 
    the quality system regulation, is now in the final stages of 
    development.
        The ``Medical Device Design Control Guidance'' and ``Do It By 
    Design'' draft guidance documents are intended to provide assistance in 
    understanding what design controls are and provide recommendations on 
    how to establish design controls, which would be consistent with the 
    new design control requirements. The draft guidance ``Medical Device 
    Design Control Guidance'' updates the Center for Devices and 
    Radiological Health's ``Preproduction Quality Assurance Planning: 
    Recommendations for Medical Device Manufacturers,'' announced as a 
    final document in the Federal Register of October 5, 1989 (54 FR 
    41165). The draft guidance documents are projected to be finalized 
    later this year, soon after the new quality system regulation is 
    published.
    
    II. Significance of a Guidance
    
        A guidance document does not bind FDA or the public, and does not 
    create or confer any rights, privileges, or benefits for or on any 
    person; however, it does represent the agency's current thinking on the 
    subjects discussed therein. The draft guidance documents announced in 
    this notice represent the agency's tentative thinking on design 
    controls and the relationship of human factors with design controls.
    
    III. Request for Comments
    
        Interested persons may, on or before April 30, 1996, submit to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments regarding 
    the draft guidances. Two copies of any comments are to be submitted, 
    except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be 
    identified by the title of the respective draft guidance and with the 
    docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. The 
    two draft guidance documents and received comments may be seen in the 
    office above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        Received comments will be considered in revising the draft guidance 
    documents.
    
        Dated: March 15, 1996.
    Joseph A. Levitt,
    Deputy Director for Regulations Policy, Center for Devices and 
    Radiological Health.
    [FR Doc. 96-7047 Filed 3-22-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/25/1996
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
96-7047
Dates:
Written comments by April 30, 1996.
Pages:
12075-12076 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96D-0065
PDF File:
96-7047.pdf