[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14371-14378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-7646]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-300628; FRL-5778-3]
RIN 2070-AB78
Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of the
insecticide 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
imidazolidinimine and its metabolites in or on sorghum grain 0.05 parts
per million (ppm), forage 0.10 ppm, and stover 0.10 ppm. Gustafson,
Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104-170) requesting these tolerances.
DATES: This regulation is effective March 25, 1998. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received by EPA on or before May 26,
1998.
ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the
document control number, [OPP-300628], must be submitted to: Hearing
Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St.,
SW., Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying objections and hearing
requests shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to:
EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees),
P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any objections and
hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk identified by the
document control number, [OPP-300628], must also be submitted to:
Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources
and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
In person, bring a copy of objections and hearing requests to Rm. 119,
CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing
Clerk may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail
(e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Copies of objections and
hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of
special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of objections and
hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1
file format or ASCII file format. All copies of objections and hearing
requests in electronic form must be identified by the document control
number [OPP-300628]. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should
be submitted through e-mail. Electronic copies of objections and
hearing requests on this rule may be filed online at many Federal
Depository Libraries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Elizabeth T. Haeberer,
Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Crystal Mall #2,
1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, (703) 308-2891, e-mail:
haeberer.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 29, 1997
(62 FR 56171)(FRL-5752-2), EPA, issued a notice pursuant to section 408
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e)
announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 4F4415) by Gustafson,
Inc., 1400 Preston Road, Suite 400, Plano, Texas 75093, to establish
tolerances for the residues of the insecticide 1-[(6-chloro-3-
pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidiinimine in or on sorgum grain at
0.05 parts per million (ppm), forage 0.10 ppm, and stover 0.10 ppm.
This notice included a summary of the petition prepared by Gustafson,
Inc., the registrant. There were no comments received in response to
the notice of filing.
The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.472(a) be amended by
establishing tolerances for the insecticide, 1-[(6-chloro-3-
pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidiinimine, in or on sorghum grain,
forage, and stover at 0.05, 0.10, and 0.10 ppm respectively.
I. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
EPA establishes maximum legal levels (tolerances) for pesticide
residues on food under section 408 of the FFDCA. EPA performs a number
of analyses to determine the risk from aggregate exposure to pesticide
residues. For further discussion of the regulatory requirements of
section 408 and a complete description of the risk assessment process,
see the Final Rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances in the Federal
Register, of November 26, 1997, (62 FR 62961-62970)(FRL-5754-7).
II. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action, EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of 1-[(6-
chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine and its
metabolites containing the 6-chloropyridinyl moiety, all calculated as
imidacloprid, and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2), for a tolerance for 1-[(6-chloro-3-
pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine and its metabolites
containing the 6-chloropyridinyl
[[Page 14372]]
moiety, all calculated as imidacloprid, in or on sorghum grain, forage,
and stover at 0.05, 0.10, and 0.10 ppm respectively. EPA's assessment
of the dietary exposures and risks associated with establishing the
tolerance follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by 1-[(6-chloro-3-
pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine and its metabolites
containing the 6-chloropyridinyl moiety are discussed below.
1. A battery of acute toxicity studies placing technical
imidacloprid in Toxicity Category II for oral LD50, Category
IV for dermal LD50, inhalation LC50, eye
iritation and dermal irritation. Imidacloprid is a non-sensitizer.
2. In an acute neurotoxicity study, groups of Sprague-Dawley rats
(18/sex/dose) were given a single oral administration of imidacloprid
(97.6%) in 0.5% methylcellulose with 0.4% Tween 80 in deionized water
at 0, 42, 151 or 307 mg/kg. Parameters evaluated included: clinical
pathology (6/sex/dose); Functional Observation Battery (FOB)
measurements (12/sex/dose); and neuropathology (6/sex/dose). FOB
measurements were made approximately 90 minutes post dosing, and on
days 7 and 14. Motor activity measurements were made at approximately
2.5 hours post dosing.
At 307 mg/kg/day, 4/18 males and 10/18 females died and both sexes
of rats at this dose exhibited decreased numbers of rears, grip
strength (forelimb and hindlimb) and response to stimuli (auditory,
touch, or tail pinch) as well as increased gait abnormalities, righting
reflex impairments and body temperatures. These symptoms regressed by
day 5. At 151 milligram/kilograms/day (mg/kg/day), cage side FOB
assessments revealed tremors in one male and one female and red nasal
staining in one male. On the day of dosing, a dose-related decrease in
total session motor activity was observed in males at 151 mg/kg/day
(25% decrease) and 307 mg/kg/day (73%) and in females at all dose
levels with the decreases (25, 48, and 81%, respectively at 42, 151 and
307 mg/kg/day) reaching statistical significance (p <0.05) at="" 151="" and="" 307="" mg/kg/day="" dose="" levels.="" decreases="" in="" motor="" activity="" were="" seen="" at="" all="" time="" intervals.="" total="" session="" locomotor="" activity="" was="" also="" decreased="" to="" about="" the="" same="" percentage="" difference="" but="" statistical="" significance="" was="" not="" reported.="" on="" days="" 7="" and="" 14,="" decreases="" (not="" statistically="" significant)="" were="" still="" observed="" in="" motor="" and="" locomotor="" activity="" in="" surviving="" high-dose="" males.="" the="" lowest-observed-effect="" level="" (loel)="" was="" 42="" mg/kg="" based="" on="" the="" decrease="" in="" motor="" and="" locomotor="" activities="" observed="" in="" females;="" a="" no-observed-effect="" level="" (noel)="" was="" not="" established.="" 3.="" in="" a="" subchronic="" oral="" toxicity="" study,="" groups="" of="" fischer="" 344="" rats="" (12/sex/dose)="" were="" fed="" diets="" containing="" imidacloprid="" (98.8%)="" at="" 0,="" 150,="" 1,000,="" or="" 3,000="" ppm="" (0,="" 9.3,="" 63.3,="" or="" 196="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" 0,="" 10.5,="" 69.3="" or="" 213="" mg/kg/day="" in="" females,="" respectively)="" for="" 90="" days.="" no="" treatment-related="" effects="" were="" seen="" at="" 150="" ppm.="" treatment-related="" effects="" included="" decreases="" in="" body="" weight="" gain="" during="" the="" first="" 4="" weeks="" of="" the="" study="" at="" 1,000="" ppm="" (22%="" in="" males="" and="" 18%="" in="" females)="" and="" 3,000="" ppm="" (50%="" in="" males="" and="" 25%="" in="" females)="" with="" an="" associated="" decrease="" in="" forelimb="" grip="" strength="" especially="" in="" males.="" the="" noel="" was="" 150="" ppm="" (9.3="" and="" 10.5="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively)="" and="" the="" loel="" was="" 1,000="" ppm="" (63.3="" and="" 69.3="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively).="" 4.="" in="" a="" subchronic="" dermal="" toxicity="" study,="" groups="" of="" 5="" male="" and="" 5="" female="" new="" zealand="" white="" rabbits="" received="" repeated="" dermal="" applications="" of="" imidacloprid="" (95%)="" at="" 1,000="" mg/kg/day="" (limit="" dose),="" 6="" hours/day,="" 5="" days/week="" for="" three="" weeks.="" no="" dermal="" or="" systemic="" toxicity="" was="" seen.="" for="" systemic="" and="" dermal="" toxicity,="" the="" noel="" was=""> 1,000 mg/kg/day; a LOEL
was not established.
5. In a rat inhalation study (28-day study in which rats were
exposed 6 hours/day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks), the no observable
effect concentration (NOEC) for imidacloprid was 5.5 mg/m3.
6. In a chronic oral toxicity study, groups of beagle dogs (4/sex/
dose) were fed diets containing imidacloprid (94.9%) at 0, 200 or
1,250/2,500 ppm (0, 6.1, 15 or 41/72 mg/kg/day, respectively) for 52
weeks. The 1,250 ppm dose was increased to 2,500 ppm from week 17
onwards. The threshold NOEL was 1250 ppm (41 mg/kg/day). The LOEL was
2,500 ppm (72 mg/kg/day) based on increased cytochrome-P-450 levels in
both sexes and was considered to be a threshold dose. Due to the lack
of toxicity at 1,250 ppm, a NOEL was not established in this study;
following the dose increase to the 2,500 ppm level, toxicity was
observed, thus making 1,250 ppm the threshold NOEL and 2,500 ppm the
threshold LOEL.
7. In a combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study, groups of
Bor WISW rats (50/sex/dose) received imidacloprid (95.3%) at 0, 100,
300 or 900 ppm (0, 5.7, 16.9 or 51.3 mg/kg/day in males and 0, 7.6,
24.9, or 73 mg/kg/day in females, respectively) for 104 weeks. In
another study, rats of the same strain (50/sex) received imidacloprid
at 0 or 1,800 ppm (0, 102.6 and 143.7 mg/kg/day in males and females,
respectively) for 104 weeks. For chronic toxicity, the NOEL was 100 ppm
(5.7 mg/kg/day) and the LOEL was 300 ppm (16.9 mg/kg/day) based on
decreased body weight gains in females and increased thyroid lesions in
males. There was no evidence of carcinogenicity in either sex.
8. In a carcinogenicity study groups of B6C3F1 mice (50/sex/dose)
were fed diets containing imidacloprid (95%) at 0, 100, 330 or 1,000
ppm (0, 20, 66 or 208 mg/kg/day in males and 0, 30, 104 or 274 mg/kg/
day in females, respectively) for 2 years. In a supplementary study
conducted to evaluate the adequacy of the high dose tested in the main
study, the same strain of mice (50/sex) received 0 or 2,000 ppm (414
and 424 mg/kg/day in males and females, respectively) for the same time
period. For chronic toxicity, the NOEL was 1,000 ppm (208 mg/kg/day).
The LOEL was 2,000 ppm (414 mg/kg/day) based on decreased body weight
gain, food consumption and water consumption. There was no evidence of
carcinogenicity in either sex.
9. In a developmental toxicity study with Sprague-Dawley rats,
groups of pregnant animals (25/group) received oral administration of
imidacloprid (94.2%) at 0, 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day during gestation
days 6 through 16. Maternal toxicity was manifested as decreased body
weight gain at all dose levels and reduced food consumption at 100 mg/
kg/day. No treatment-related effects were seen in any of the
reproductive parameters (i.e., cesarean section evaluation). At 100 mg/
kg/day, developmental toxicity manifested as wavy ribs (fetus =7/149 in
treated vs. 2/158 in controls and litters, 4/25 vs. 1/25). For maternal
toxicity, the LOEL was 10 mg/kg/day lowest dose tested (LDT) based on
decreased body weight gain; a NOEL was not established. For
developmental toxicity, the NOEL was 30 mg/kg/day and the LOEL was 100
mg/kg/day based on increased wavy ribs.
10. In a developmental toxicity study with Chinchilla rabbits,
groups of 16 pregnant does were given oral doses of imidacloprid
(94.2%) at 0, 8, 24 or 72 mg/kg/day during gestation days 6 through 18.
For maternal toxicity, the NOEL was 24 mg/kg/day and the LOEL was 72
mg/kg/day based on mortality,
[[Page 14373]]
decreased body weight gain, increased resorptions, and increased
abortions. For developmental toxicity, the NOEL was 24 mg/kg/day and
the LOEL was 72 mg/kg/day based on decreased fetal body weight,
increased resorptions, and increased skeletal abnormalities.
11. In a 2-generation reproductive toxicity study, imidacloprid
(95.3%) was administered to Wistar/Han rats at dietary levels of 0,
100, 250, or 700 ppm (0, 7.3, 18.3, or 52.0 mg/kg/day for males and 0,
8.0, 20.5, or 57.4 mg/kg/day for females). For parental/systemic/
reproductive toxicity, the NOEL was 250 ppm (18.3 mg/kg/day) and the
LOEL was 750 ppm (52 mg/kg/day), based on decreases in body weight in
both sexes in both generations. Based on these factors, the Data
Evaluation Record should be revised to indicate the parental/systemic/
reproductive NOEL and LOEL to be 250 and 700 ppm, respectively, based
upon the body weight decrements observed in both sexes in both
generations.
12. Studies on gene mutation and other genotoxic effects: an Ames
Salmonella Assay which was negative up to 5,500 g/plate
concentration; recombination assay-yeast, negative for cross-over in
yeast up to 10,000 g; In Vivo Chromasomal Aberration, negative
for chromosome breakage up to 2,000 g/ml; In Vitro Chromasomal
Aberrations, positive at 500 g/ml -S9 and 1,300 g/ml
+S9, both toxic doses (acceptable study); In Vivo Sister Chromatid
assay, negative up to 2,000 g/ml; In Vitro Cytogenetics-CHO
cells, negative for producing forward mutation in CHO (mammalian) cells
treated up to 1222 g/ml; Micronucleus - mouse, negative up to
(toxic) 50 g/ml (ip); DNA repair test, negative for cross-over
in yeast up to 10,000 g; HGPRT assay-CHO, negative up to 2,000
g/ml. Mutagenicity studies have demonstrated that imidacloprid
is non-mutagenic both in vivo and in vitro.
B. Toxicological Endpoints
1. Special sensitivity to infants and children. In assessing the
potential for additional sensitivity of infants and children to
residues of imidacloprid, EPA considered data from developmental
toxicity studies in the rat and rabbit and a 2-generation reproduction
study in the rat. These studies are described in unit II A. of this
document. The developmental toxicity data demonstrated no increased
sensitivity of rats or rabbits to in utero exposure to imidacloprid. In
addition, the multi-generation reproductive toxicity study data did not
identify any increased sensitivity of rats to in utero or postnatal
exposure. Parental NOELs were lower or equivalent to developmental or
offspring NOELs. The developmental toxicity studies are designed to
evaluate adverse effects on the developing organism resulting from
maternal pesticide exposure gestation. Reproduction studies provide
information relating to effects from exposure to the pesticide on the
reproductive capability of mating animals and data on systemic
toxicity.
Section 408 of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for pre-and post-natal toxicity and the
completeness of the database unless EPA determines that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. Margins of
safety are incorporated into EPA risk assessments either directly
through use of a MOE analysis or through using uncertainty (safety)
factors in calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk to
humans. EPA believes that reliable data support using the standard
uncertainty factor (usually 100 for combined inter- and intra-species
variability)) and not the additional tenfold MOE/uncertainty factor
when EPA has a complete data base under existing guidelines and when
the severity of the effect in infants or children or the potency or
unusual toxic properties of a compound do not raise concerns regarding
the adequacy of the standard MOE/safety factor.
Although developmental toxicity studies showed no increased
sensitivity in fetuses as compared to maternal animals following in
utero exposures in rats and rabbits, no increased sensitivity in pups
as compared to adults was seen in the two generation reproduction
toxicity study in rats, and the toxicology data base is complete as to
core requirements, the Agency determined that the additional safety
factor for the protection of infants and children will be retained but
reduced to 3x based on the following weight-of-the-evidence
considerations relating to potential sensitivity and completeness of
the data:
(i) There is concern for structure activity relationship.
Imidacloprid, a chloronicotinyl compound, is an analog to nicotine and
studies in the published literature suggests that nicotine, when
administered causes developmental toxicity, including functional
deficits, in animals and/or humans that are exposed in utero.
(ii) There is evidence that imidacloprid administration causes
neurotoxicity following a single oral dose in the acute study and
alterations in brain weight in rats in the 2-year carcinogenicity
study.
(iii) The concern for structure activity relationship along with
the evidence of neurotoxicity dictates the need of a developmental
neurotoxicity study for assessment of potential alterations on
functional development.
Because a developmental neurotoxicity study potentially relates to
both acute and chronic effects in both the mother and the fetus, the
additional UF for FQPA is being applied for all population subgroups,
and both acute and chronic risk.
2. Acute toxicity. Acute dietary risk assessment is required for
all population subgroups. LOEL=42 mg/kg/day based on decreased motor
activity in female rats; MOE=300, as discussed above. Conventionally,
when a LOEL from the critical study is used for risk assessment, an
additional UF will be applied. For acute risk assessment with
imidacloprid, however, the Committee determined that an additional
uncertainty factor is not necessary because: (i) of the low confidence
in the endpoint based on the minimal nature of the effect (decreased
motor activity only in females); (ii) this effect was seen in adult
rats; and (iii) the same effect was not seen in the subchronic toxicity
study following repeated doses.
3. Short - and intermediate - term toxicity. In a dermal toxicity
study, groups of 5 male and 5 female New Zealand White rabbits received
repeated dermal applications of imidacloprid (95%) at 1,000 mg/kg/day
(Limit Dose), 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for three weeks. No dermal or
systemic toxicity was seen. For systemic and dermal toxicity, the NOEL
was > 1,000 mg/kg/day; a LOEL was not established (MRID No. 42256329).
In an oral toxicity study, groups of Fischer 344 rats (12/sex/dose)
were fed diets containing imidacloprid (98.8%) at 0, 150, 1,000, or
3,000 ppm (0, 9.3, 63.3, or 196 mg/kg/day in males and 0, 10.5, 69.3 or
213 mg/kg/day in females, respectively) for 90 days. No treatment-
related effects were seen at 150 ppm. Treatment-related effects
included decreases in body weight gain during the first four weeks of
the study at 1,000 ppm (22% in males and 18% in females) and 3,000 ppm
(50% in males and 25% in females) with an associated decrease in
forelimb grip strength especially in males. The NOEL was 150 ppm (9.3
and 10.5 mg/kg/day in males and females, respectively) and the LOEL was
1,000 ppm (63.3 and 69.3 mg/kg/day in males and females, respectively)
(MRID No. 43286401).
In a rat inhalation study (28-day study in which rats were exposed
6 hours/day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks), the no observable effect
concentration (NOEC)
[[Page 14374]]
for imidacloprid was 5.5 mg/m3 (MRID No. 422730-01).
4. Chronic toxicity. EPA has established the RfD for 1-[(6-chloro-
3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine at 0.019 mg/kg/day.
This RfD is based upon increased number of thyroid lesions in male and
decreased body weight gains in female Bor WISW rats, with a NOEL of 5.7
mg/kg/day, and LOEL of 16.9/24.9 mg/kg/day (males and females
respectively); UF=300, as discussed above.
5. Carcinogenicity. This chemical has been classified as a Group E
- no evidence of carcinogenicity for humans. A cancer risk assessment
is not required.
C. Exposures and Risks
1. From food and feed uses. Tolerances have been established 40 CFR
180.472(a) for the combined residues of 1-[(6-chloro-3-
pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine and its metabolites, in
or on a variety of raw agricultural commodities. Risk assessments were
conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures and risks from
imidacloprid as follows:
i. Acute exposure and risk. Acute dietary risk assessments are
performed for a food-use pesticide if a toxicological study has
indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result
of a one day or single exposure. An acute dietary risk assessment is
required for all population subgroups.
This acute dietary (food) risk assessment used the Theoretical
Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC). Resulting exposure values and
Margins of Exposure (MOEs; MOE = Acute Endpoint Exposure) are
shown below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High-End\1\ Exposure @ 99th
Population Subgroup Exposure (mg/kg/ MOE\2\ Percentile (mg/kg/ MOE
day) day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population (48 states)......... 0.10 420 0.05\3\ 840
Infants (< 1="" yr)....................="" 0.15="" 280="" 0.10="" 420="" children="" (1-6="" yrs)..................="" 0.15="" 280="" 0.10="" 420="" females="" (13+="" yrs)...................="" 0.05="" 840="" 0.04="" 1050="" males="" (13+="" yrs).....................="" 0.10="" 420="" 0.05="" 840="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\=""> 99.5th Percentile.
\2\ MOE = Margin of Exposure.
\3\ @ 98th Percentile (U.S. Pop. only).
These results should be viewed as a very conservative risk
estimate; refinement using anticipated residue values and percent crop-
treated information in conjunction with Monte Carlo analysis would
result in a lower estimate (i.e., higher MOE) of acute dietary
exposure.
ii. Chronic exposure and risk. The endpoint selected for chronic
risk assessment is decreased body weight gains in females and increased
thyroid lesions observed at 7.6 mg/kg/day in male rats in a combined
chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study. The NOEL was 5.7 mg/kg/day. A
UF of 300 is required as discussed above.
In conducting this chronic dietary (food) risk assessment, EPA
used: (i) tolerance level residues for pecans, grain sorghum, and all
other commodities with published, permanent or time-limited
imidacloprid tolerances, the pending proposed tolerance for the citrus
crop group; and, (ii) percent crop-treated (%CT) information on some of
these crops. Thus, this risk assessment should be viewed as partially
refined. Further refinement using anticipated residue values and
additional %CT information would result in a lower estimate of chronic
dietary exposure.
The results are summarized below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposure(mg/
Population Subgroup kg/day) %RfD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Population (48 states) 0.003596 19
Nursing Infants (<1 year="" old)="" 0.002824="" 15="" non-nursing="" infants=""><1 year="" old)="" 0.009983="" 53="" children="" (1-6="" years="" old)="" 0.007514="" 40="" children="" (7-12="" years="" old)="" 0.005305="" 28="" u.s.="" population="" -="" fall="" season="" 0.003716="" 20="" northeast="" region="" 0.003771="" 20="" western="" region="" 0.003842="" 20="" hispanics="" 0.003879="" 20="" non-hispanic="" others="" 0.003906="" 21="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" the="" subgroups="" listed="" above="" are:="" (1)="" the="" u.s.="" population="" (48="" states);="" (2)="" those="" for="" infants="" and="" children;="" and,="" (3)="" the="" other="" subgroups="" for="" which="" the="" percentage="" of="" the="" rfd="" occupied="" is="" greater="" than="" that="" occupied="" by="" the="" subgroup="" u.s.="" population="" (48="" states).="" section="" 408(b)(2)(f)="" states="" that="" the="" agency="" may="" use="" data="" on="" the="" actual="" percent="" of="" food="" treated="" for="" assessing="" chronic="" dietary="" risk="" only="" if="" the="" agency="" can="" make="" the="" following="" findings:="" (1)="" that="" the="" data="" used="" are="" reliable="" and="" provide="" a="" valid="" basis="" for="" showing="" the="" percentage="" of="" food="" derived="" from="" a="" crop="" that="" is="" likely="" to="" contain="" residues;="" (2)="" that="" the="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" underestimate="" the="" exposure="" for="" any="" significant="" subpopulation="" and;="" (3)="" where="" data="" on="" regional="" pesticide="" use="" and="" food="" consumption="" are="" available,="" that="" the="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" understate="" exposure="" for="" any="" regional="" population.="" in="" addition,="" the="" agency="" must="" provide="" for="" periodic="" evaluation="" of="" any="" estimates="" used.="" to="" provide="" for="" the="" periodic="" evaluation="" of="" these="" estimates="" of="" percent="" crop="" treated="" as="" required="" by="" the="" section="" 408(b)(2)(f),="" epa="" may="" require="" registrants="" to="" submit="" data="" on="" percent="" crop="" treated.="" the="" agency="" used="" percent="" crop="" treated="" (pct)="" information="" as="" follows.="" a="" routine="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" for="" imidacloprid="" was="" based="" on="" likely="" maximum="" percent="" of="" crop="" treated="" as="" follows:="" 6%="" grapefruits,="" 3%="" oranges,="" 13%="" other="" citrus,="" 19%="" apples,="" 2%="" pears,="" 11%="" grapes,="" 30%="" eggplants/peppers,="" 32%="" head="" lettuce,="" 21%="" cole="" crops,="" 15%="" melons,="" 10%="" tomatoes,="" 6%="" cotton.="" the="" agency="" believes="" that="" the="" three="" conditions="" listed="" above="" have="" been="" met.="" with="" respect="" to="" (1),="" epa="" finds="" that="" the="" pct="" information="" described="" above="" for="" imidacloprid="" is="" reliable="" and="" has="" a="" valid="" basis,="" the="" agency="" has="" utilized="" the="" latest="" statistical="" data="" from="" rff="" (resources="" for="" the="" future),="" doane,="" and="" usda,="" the="" best="" available="" sources="" for="" such="" information.="" concerning="" (2)="" and="" (3),="" regional="" consumption="" information="" and="" consumption="" information="" for="" significant="" subpopulations="" is="" taken="" into="" account="" through="" epa's="" computer-based="" model="" [[page="" 14375]]="" for="" evaluating="" the="" exposure="" of="" significant="" subpopulations="" including="" several="" regional="" groups.="" use="" of="" this="" consumption="" information="" in="" epa's="" risk="" assessment="" process="" ensures="" that="" epa's="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" understate="" exposure="" for="" any="" significant="" subpopulation="" group="" and="" allows="" the="" agency="" to="" be="" reasonably="" certain="" that="" no="" regional="" population="" is="" exposed="" to="" residue="" levels="" higher="" than="" those="" estimated="" by="" the="" agency.="" other="" than="" data="" available="" through="" national="" food="" consumption="" surveys,="" epa="" does="" not="" have="" available="" information="" on="" the="" consumption="" of="" food="" bearing="" imidacloprid="" in="" a="" particular="" area.="" 2.="" from="" drinking="" water.="" epa="" used="" the="" estimated="" environmental="" concentration="" (eec)="" data="" to="" calculate="" acute="" and="" chronic="" exposure="" estimates="" for="" imidacloprid="" in="" surface="" water="" using="" the="" following="" formulas:="" adult="" male:="" exposure="" (mg/kg/day)="(chemical" concentration="" in="">g/L in consumed water) * (10-3 mg/g)
(70 kg body weight) * (2 L water consumed/day)
Adult Female: Exposure (mg/kg/day) = (chemical concentration in g/L
in consumed water) * (10-3 mg/g) (60 kg body weight)
* (2 L water consumed/day)
Child (1-6 years): Exposure (mg/kg/day) = (chemical concentration
in g/L in consumed water) * (10-3 mg/g)
(10 kg body weight) * (1 L water consumed/day)
Acute MOE: Acute Endpoint (42 mg/kg/day) Exposure (mg/kg/
day)
Chronic Risk (%RfD): Exposure (mg/kg/day) RfD (0.019 mg/
kg/day) * 100
The 2 liters (L) of drinking water consumed/day by adults and the 1
L per day consumed by children are default assumptions used by the
Office of Water. The Agency's default body weights for males is 70 kg
and for females, 60 kg. HED's default body weight for children is 10
kg.
The results are summarized below:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute Scenario Chronic Scenario
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Subgroup g/L in Exposure (mg/kg/ g/L in Exposure (mg/kg/
Water Consumed day) MOE Water Consumed day) % RfD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adult male............................ 50.9 0.00145 29,000 19.1 0.00055 2.9
Adult Female.......................... 50.9 0.00170 24,700 19.1 0.00064 3.4
Child (1-6 yrs)....................... 50.9 0.00509 8,250 19.1 0.00191 10.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These results should be viewed as a very conservative risk
estimate. Refinement by applying factors to account for the percent of
acreage planted in a watershed, the percent of crop-treated, and the
water flow rate would result in a lower estimate of acute and chronic
exposure from consumption of surface waters containing imidacloprid
residues.
3. From non-occupational non-dietary exposure. Imidacloprid is
currently registered for use on the following residential non-food
sites: ornamentals (e.g., flowering and foliage plants, ground covers,
turf, lawns, et al.), tobacco, golf courses, walkways, recreational
areas, bathrooms, household or domestic dwellings (indoor/outdoor),
cats/dogs, and wood protection treatment to buildings. Available data
do not demonstrate that imidacloprid has either dermal or inhalation
toxicity potential, therefore, non-occupational non-dietary risk
assessments are not required. Since data show no toxicity from short
term exposure via the dermal or inhalation route, the Agency feels
there is no contribution to toxicity from these routes of exposure, and
no increase in aggregate risk is anticipated from this exposure.
Therefore residential exposure does not aggregate with dietary exposure
for any risk assessments.
4. Cumulative exposure to substances with common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.'' An explanation of the current Agency
approach to assessment of pesticides with a common mechanism of
toxicity may be found in the Final Rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide
Tolerances in the Federal Register, of November 26, 1997, (62 FR 62961-
62970)(FRL-5754-7).
EPA does not have, at this time, available data to determine
whether imidacloprid has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances or how to include this pesticide in a cumulative risk
assessment. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a
cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity,
imidacloprid does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore,
EPA has not assumed that imidacloprid has a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. Imidacloprid is the sole member to date
of the new chloronicotinyl class of pesticides.
D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety for U.S. Population,
Infants and Children
1. Acute risk. Acute aggregate dietary risk (combined food and
water) is estimated by adding the acute exposures to food and water
(highest of ground or surface water) and comparing this exposure to the
acute dietary endpoint:
Aggregate MOEACUTE = acute dietary endpoint
aggregate exposure.
The results of the acute aggregate dietary (food and water) risk
assessment are given below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposure from Aggregate
Population Subgroup Exposure from Surface Water (mg/ Exposure (mg/kg/ Aggregate Acute
Food (mg/kg/day) kg/day) day) MOE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population (48 states)......... 0.101 0.0023 0.102 412
Infants (<1 yr).....................="" 0.102="" 0.0054="" 0.105="" 4005="" children="" (1-6="" yrs)..................="" 0.102="" 0.005="" 0.105="" 4005="" females="" (13+="" yrs)...................="" 0.051="" 0.002="" 0.052="" 808="" males="" (13+="" yrs).....................="" 0.101="" 0.002="" 0.102="" 412="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\="" high-end="" exposure="" (="">99.5th Percentile).
\2\ Exposure @ 99th percentile; high-end exposure = 0.15 mg/kg/day.
[[Page 14376]]
\3\ 3 Exposure value used was that calculated for females (13+ years) and males (13+ years).
\4\ Exposure value used was that calculated for children (1-6 years).
\5\ Based on exposure @ 99th percentile; MOE is 271 @ high-end exposure (>99.5th percentile).
For imidacloprid, an (aggregate) acute dietary MOE of
300 is needed to protect the safety of all population
subgroups. The aggregate MOEs for the general population, females (13+
years), and males (13+ years) are >400 at the high-end exposure. The
aggregate MOEs for infants and children are calculated to be 400 at the
99th percentile of exposure, and 271 at the high-end exposure (>99.5th
percentile).
In conducting the acute dietary (food) risk assessment the
Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC) was used. There was no
refinement using anticipated residue values and percent crop-treated
information in conjunction with Monte Carlo analysis which would result
in a much lower estimate (i.e., higher MOE) of acute dietary exposure.
Because of the very conservative nature of the assumptions used in
these calculations, and the fact that refinement would lower the risk
estimates (i.e., result in higher MOE values) for both
MOEfood and MOEwater, EPA concludes that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants, children,
or adults from acute aggregate risk (food and water) exposure to
imidacloprid residues.
2. Chronic risk. Dermal and inhalation exposure endpoints were not
selected due to the demonstrated absence of toxicity, thus, there is no
residential component for assessing chronic aggregate exposure and
risk.
In conducting the chronic dietary (food) risk assessment, EPA used:
(i) tolerance level residues for pecans, grain sorghum, and all other
commodities with published, permanent or time-limited imidacloprid
tolerances, the pending proposed tolerance for the citrus crop group;
and, (ii) percent crop-treated (%CT) information on some of these
crops. Thus, this risk assessment should be viewed as partially
refined. Further refinement using anticipated residue values and
additional %CT information would result in a lower estimate of chronic
dietary exposure.
Chronic aggregate dietary risk (combined food and water) will be
estimated by adding the chronic exposures to food and water (highest of
ground or surface water) and comparing this exposure to the RfD:
Aggregate %RfD Occupied = (aggregate exposure RfD) x 100.
The results of the chronic aggregate dietary (food and water) risk
assessment are given below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposure from Aggregate
Population Subgroup Exposure from Surface Water (mg/ Exposure (mg/kg/ % RfD Occupied
Food (mg/kg/day) kg/day) day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population (48 states)......... 0.0036 0.00061 0.0042 22
Nursing infants (<1 yr="" old).........="" 0.0028="" 0.00192="" 0.0047="" 25="" non-nursing="" infants=""><1 yr="" old).....="" 0.0100="" 0.00192="" 0.0119="" 63="" children="" (1-6="" yrs="" old)..............="" 0.0075="" 0.0019="" 0.0094="" 49="" children="" (7-12="" yrs="" old).............="" 0.0053="" 0.00192="" 0.0072="" 38="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\="" used="" average="" value="" based="" on="" adult="" male="" (0.00055="" mg/kg/day)="" and="" adult="" female="" (0.00064="" mg/kg/day).="" \2\="" data="" not="" available;="" used="" the="" value="" for="" children="" (1-6="" years).="" this="" chronic="" aggregate="" dietary="" risk="" assessment="" is="" based="" on="" conservative="" exposure="" consumptions.="" refinement="" of="" the="" assumptions="" used="" in="" estimating="" exposure="" from="" food="" and="" water="" sources="" would="" result="" in="" lower="" estimates="" of="" chronic="" aggregate="" dietary="" risk.="" the="" calculated="" results="" indicate="" that="" the="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" to="" imidacloprid="" utilizes="" 22%="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" u.s.="" general="" population.="" for="" infants="" and="" children,="" the="" percentage="" of="" the="" rfd="" that="" is="" utilized="" by="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" to="" imidacloprid="" ranges="" from="" 25%="" for="" nursing="" infants="" less="" than="" 1="" year="" old,="" up="" to="" 63%="" for="" non-nursing="" infants="" less="" than="" 1="" year="" old.="" the="" agency="" generally="" has="" no="" concern="" for="" exposures="" below="" 100%="" of="" the="" rfd="" because="" the="" rfd="" represents="" the="" level="" at="" or="" below="" which="" daily="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" over="" a="" lifetime="" will="" not="" pose="" appreciable="" risks="" to="" human="" health.="" epa="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" a="" reasonable="" certainty="" that="" no="" harm="" will="" result="" to="" infants,="" children,="" or="" adults="" from="" chronic="" aggregate="" (food="" plus="" water)="" exposure="" to="" imidacloprid="" residues.="" 3.="" short="" -="" intermediate="" -="" term="" risk.="" short="" -="" and="" intermediate="" -="" term="" aggregate="" exposure="" take="" into="" account="" chronic="" dietary="" food="" and="" water="" plus="" indoor="" and="" outdoor="" residuential="" exposure.="" this="" risk="" assessment="" is="" not="" required="" for="" imidacloprid.="" e.="" aggregate="" cancer="" risk="" for="" u.s.="" population="" imidacloprid="" has="" been="" classified="" as="" a="" group="" e="" chemical,="" no="" evidence="" of="" carcinogenicity="" for="" humans,="" therefore,="" a="" cancer="" risk="" assessment="" is="" not="" required.="" iii.="" other="" considerations="" a.="" metabolism="" in="" plants="" and="" animals="" the="" nature="" of="" imidacloprid="" residues="" in="" plants="" and="" animals="" is="" adequately="" understood.="" the="" residue="" of="" concern="" is="" imidacloprid="" and="" its="" metabolites="" containing="" the="" 6-chloropyridinyl="" moiety,="" all="" expressed="" as="" parent,="" as="" specified="" in="" 40="" cfr="" 180.472.="" b.="" analytical="" enforcement="" methodology="" adequate="" enforcement="" methods="" are="" available="" for="" determination="" of="" the="" regulated="" imidacloprid="" residue="" in="" plant="" (bayer="" gc/ms="" method="" 00200="" and="" bayer="" hplc-uv="" confirmatory="" method="" 00357)="" and="" animal="" (bayer="" gc/ms="" method="" 00191)="" commodities.="" the="" limit="" of="" quantitaion="" (loq)="" is="" 0.05="" ppm,="" and="" the="" limit="" of="" detection="" (ld)="" is="" 0.01="" ppm="" for="" grain="" sorgum,="" sorghum="" forage="" and="" fodder.="" these="" methods="" have="" successfully="" completed="" epa="" tolerance="" method="" validation,="" and="" are="" awaiting="" publication="" in="" pesticide="" analytical="" manual="" ii="" (pam="" ii).="" in="" the="" interim,="" these="" methods="" are="" available="" from="" calvin="" furlow,="" epa,="" opp,="" irsd,="" pirib.="" c.="" magnitude="" of="" residues="" a="" total="" of="" three="" field="" residue="" trials="" were="" conducted="" in="" 1995="" in="" three="" different="" states,="" located="" in="" regions="" 6,="" 7,="" and="" 8.="" a="" single="" application="" of="" imidacloprid="" was="" made="" to="" seed="" at="" a="" rate="" of="" 1x.="" two="" replicate="" samples="" of="" forage="" were="" harvested="" from="" each="" treated="" plot="" 90-="" 119="" days="" after="" planting;="" samples="" of="" grain="" and="" fodder,="" 118-139="" days.="" the="" samples="" were="" frozen="" and="" analyzed="" within="" 3="" months="" of="" harvest,="" using="" the="" validated="" enforcement="" method.="" the="" average="" recovery="" was="" 82="">
10% in grain,
[[Page 14377]]
79 4% in forage, and 83 6% in fodder.
Analyses of the treated samples showed that the total residues of
imidacloprid and its metabolites were <0.05 ppm.="" these="" results="" support="" tolerances="" for="" residues="" of="" imidacloprid="" and="" its="" metabolites="" at="" 0.05="" ppm="" for="" sorghum="" grain,="" and="" for="" sorghum="" forage="" and="" fodder="" at="" 0.1="" ppm.="" d.="" magnitude="" of="" the="" residue="" in="" processed="" commodities="" there="" are="" no="" detectable="" total="" imidacloprid="" residues="" at="" or="" above="" the="" loq="" of="" 0.05="" ppm="" in="" the="" rac="" sorghum="" grain="" from="" an="" exaggerated="" 2x="" seed="" treatment="" application,="" thus="" a="" sorghum="" processing="" study="" is="" not="" required.="" e.="" magnitude="" of="" secondary="" residues="" in="" meat/milk/poultry/eggs="" based="" on="" the="" results="" of="" the="" imidacloprid="" bovine="" and="" poultry="" feeding="" studies,="" finite="" residues="" will="" occur="" in="" meat,="" milk,="" poultry,="" and="" eggs="" from="" the="" feeding="" of="" imidacloprid="" treated="" racs="" or="" their="" processed="" feed="" items="" from="" seed="" treatment="" uses.="" adequate="" total="" imidacloprid="" secondary="" tolerances="" have="" been="" established="" at="" 0.1="" ppm="" in="" milk,="" 0.3="" ppm="" in="" meat,="" fat,="" and="" meat="" by-products="" of="" cattle,="" goats,="" hogs,="" horses,="" and="" sheep,="" 0.02="" ppm="" in="" eggs,="" and="" 0.05="" ppm="" in="" meat,="" fat,="" and="" meat="" by-products="" of="" poultry,="" to="" cover="" this="" seed="" treatment="" use="" in/on="" sorgum.="" f.="" rotational="" crop="" restrictions.="" adequate="" limited="" field="" rotational="" crop="" studies="" have="" been="" presented="" from="" 3="" sites="" with="" an="" in-furrow="" soil="" application="" of="" the="" 2.5%="" granular="" formulation="" and="" soil="" aged="" 1,="" 4,="" 8,="" and="" 11="" months="" before="" replanting="" with="" the="" cereal="" grains="" wheat="" or="" sorghum,="" turnips="" as="" the="" root="" crop,="" and="" mustard="" greens="" or="" spinach="" as="" the="" leafy="" vegetable.="" total="" imidacloprid="" residues="" were="" at="" or="" about="" the="" minimum="" detection="" limit="" (mdl)="" of="" 0.01="" ppm="" by="" 11="" months.="" total="" imidacloprid="" residues="" present="" would="" be="" less="" after="" 12="" months="" in="" cereal="" or="" small="" grains,="" root="" crops,="" or="" leafy="" vegetables.="" these="" limited="" field="" crop="" rotational="" studies="" with="" the="" 3="" crop="" groups="" support="" an="" overall="" 12="" month="" plant="" back="" restriction="" for="" no="" detectable="" residues="" to="" be="" present="" in="" rotated="" crops.="" no="" rotational="" crop="" imidacloprid="" tolerances="" are="" necessary="" with="" such="" a="" restriction.="" g.="" international="" residue="" limits="" there="" are="" no="" codex="" or="" mexican="" maximum="" residue="" limits="" (mrls)="" for="" imidacloprid="" on="" any="" crop.="" there="" are="" canadian="" mrls="" for="" combined="" residues="" of="" imidacloprid="" plus="" metabolites="" with="" the="" 6-chlorophenyl="" moiety,="" but="" not="" on="" grain="" sorghum.="" international="" compatibility="" is="" thus="" not="" an="" issue.="" iv.="" conclusion="" therefore,="" the="" tolerance="" is="" established="" for="" residues="" of="" 1-[(6-="" chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-n-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine="" and="" its="" metabolites="" in="" or="" on="" grain="" sorghum="" at="" 0.05="" ppm,="" grain="" sorghum="" forage="" and="" stover="" at="" 0.10="" ppm.="" v.="" objections="" and="" hearing="" requests="" the="" new="" ffdca="" section="" 408(g)="" provides="" essentially="" the="" same="" process="" for="" persons="" to="" ``object''="" to="" a="" tolerance="" regulation="" issued="" by="" epa="" under="" new="" section="" 408(e)="" and="" (l)(6)="" as="" was="" provided="" in="" the="" old="" section="" 408="" and="" in="" section="" 409.="" however,="" the="" period="" for="" filing="" objections="" is="" 60="" days,="" rather="" than="" 30="" days.="" epa="" currently="" has="" procedural="" regulations="" which="" govern="" the="" submission="" of="" objections="" and="" hearing="" requests.="" these="" regulations="" will="" require="" some="" modification="" to="" reflect="" the="" new="" law.="" however,="" until="" those="" modifications="" can="" be="" made,="" epa="" will="" continue="" to="" use="" those="" procedural="" regulations="" with="" appropriate="" adjustments="" to="" reflect="" the="" new="" law.="" any="" person="" may,="" by="" may="" 26,="" 1998,="" file="" written="" objections="" to="" any="" aspect="" of="" this="" regulation="" and="" may="" also="" request="" a="" hearing="" on="" those="" objections.="" objections="" and="" hearing="" requests="" must="" be="" filed="" with="" the="" hearing="" clerk,="" at="" the="" address="" given="" above="" (40="" cfr="" 178.20).="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" objections="" and/or="" hearing="" requests="" filed="" with="" the="" hearing="" clerk="" should="" be="" submitted="" to="" the="" opp="" docket="" for="" this="" rulemaking.="" the="" objections="" submitted="" must="" specify="" the="" provisions="" of="" the="" regulation="" deemed="" objectionable="" and="" the="" grounds="" for="" the="" objections="" (40="" cfr="" 178.25).="" each="" objection="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" fee="" prescribed="" by="" 40="" cfr="" 180.33(i).="" if="" a="" hearing="" is="" requested,="" the="" objections="" must="" include="" a="" statement="" of="" the="" factual="" issues="" on="" which="" a="" hearing="" is="" requested,="" the="" requestor's="" contentions="" on="" such="" issues,="" and="" a="" summary="" of="" any="" evidence="" relied="" upon="" by="" the="" requestor="" (40="" cfr="" 178.27).="" a="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" will="" be="" granted="" if="" the="" administrator="" determines="" that="" the="" material="" submitted="" shows="" the="" following:="" there="" is="" genuine="" and="" substantial="" issue="" of="" fact;="" there="" is="" a="" reasonablepossibility="" that="" available="" evidence="" identified="" by="" the="" requestor="" would,="" if="" established,="" resolve="" one="" or="" more="" of="" such="" issues="" in="" favor="" of="" the="" requestor,="" taking="" into="" account="" uncontested="" claims="" or="" facts="" to="" the="" contrary;="" and="" resolution="" of="" the="" factual="" issues="" in="" the="" manner="" sought="" by="" the="" requestor="" would="" be="" adequate="" to="" justify="" the="" action="" requested="" (40="" cfr="" 178.32).="" information="" submitted="" in="" connection="" with="" an="" objection="" or="" hearing="" request="" may="" be="" claimed="" confidential="" by="" marking="" any="" part="" or="" all="" of="" that="" information="" as="" cbi.="" information="" so="" marked="" will="" not="" be="" disclosed="" except="" in="" accordance="" with="" procedures="" set="" forth="" in="" 40="" cfr="" part="" 2.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" information="" that="" does="" not="" contain="" cbi="" must="" be="" submitted="" for="" inclusion="" in="" the="" public="" record.="" information="" not="" marked="" confidential="" may="" be="" disclosed="" publicly="" by="" epa="" without="" prior="" notice.="" vi.="" public="" docket="" epa="" has="" established="" a="" record="" for="" this="" rulemaking="" under="" docket="" control="" number="" [opp-300628]="" (including="" any="" comments="" and="" data="" submitted="" electronically).="" a="" public="" version="" of="" this="" record,="" including="" printed,="" paper="" versions="" of="" electronic="" comments,="" which="" does="" not="" include="" any="" information="" claimed="" as="" cbi,="" is="" available="" for="" inspection="" from="" 8:30="" a.m.="" to="" 4="" p.m.,="" monday="" through="" friday,="" excluding="" legal="" holidays.="" the="" public="" record="" is="" located="" in="" room="" 119="" of="" the="" public="" information="" and="" records="" integrity="" branch,="" information="" resources="" and="" services="" division="" (7502c),="" office="" of="" pesticide="" programs,="" environmental="" protection="" agency,="" crystal="" mall="" #2,="" 1921="" jefferson="" davis="" highway,="" arlington,="" va.="" electronic="" comments="" may="" be="" sent="" directly="" to="" epa="" at:="">opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov.
Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form of encryption.
The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public
version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly,
EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing requests
received electronically into printed, paper form as they are received
and will place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which
will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The
official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained at the
Virginia address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
VII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
This final rule establishes tolerances for the residues of
imidacloprid and its metabolites in or on grain sorghum at 0.05 ppm,
grain sorghum forage and stover at 0.10 ppm under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
[[Page 14378]]
This final rule does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require any prior consultation as
specified by Executive Order 12875, entitled Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), or
special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994),
or require OMB review in accordance with Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
In addition, since these tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such
as the tolerances for the residues of imidacloprid and its metabolites
in or on grain sorghum at 0.05 ppm, grain sorghum forage and stover at
0.10 ppm in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. Nevertheless, the Agency has
previously assessed whether establishing tolerances, exemptions from
tolerances, raising tolerance levels or expanding exemptions might
adversely impact small entities and concluded, as a generic matter,
that there is no adverse economic impact. The factual basis for the
Agency's generic certification for tolerance actions published on May
4, 1981 (46 FR 24950) and was provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
VIII. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 16, 1998
James Jones,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180-[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.472, paragraph (a) is amended by alphabetically
adding the commodities to read as follows:
Sec. 180.472 Imidacloprid; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Grain, sorghum...................... 0.05
Grain, sorghum forage............... 0.10
Grain, sorghum stover............... 0.10
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 98-7646 Filed 3-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
