[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14435-14439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-7716]
[[Page 14435]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Research
Energy Research Financial Assistance Program Notice 98-14;
Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Program (NABIR)
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice inviting research grant applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) of
the Office of Energy Research (ER), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),
hereby announces its interest in receiving applications for research
grants in the Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research (NABIR)
Program. Grant applications are being solicited for five of the eight
NABIR Program research elements: (1) Assessment; (2) Biotransformation
and Biodegradation; (3) Community Dynamics and Microbial Ecology; (4)
System Engineering, Integration, Prediction, and Optimization; and
Bioremediation and its Social Implications and Concerns (BASIC).
DATES: Applicants should submit a Notice of Intent to Apply, containing
a title, a list of investigators, and a five-line summary of proposed
research by April 15, 1998.
The deadline for receipt of formal applications is 4:30 p.m.,
E.D.T., May 13, 1998, to be accepted for merit review and to permit
timely consideration for award in fiscal year 1998.
ADDRESSES: Notices of Intent to Apply, referencing Program Notice 98-
14, should be sent by E-mail to john.houghton@oer.doe.gov.
Formal applications, referencing Program Notice 98-14, must be sent
to: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Grants and
Contracts Division, ER-64, 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 20874-
1290, ATTN: Program Notice 98-14. This address must also be used when
submitting applications by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail or any
other commercial overnight delivery service, or when hand-carried by
the applicant.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John Houghton, Environmental
Sciences Division, ER-74, Office of Biological and Environmental
Research, Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, 19901
Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 20874-1290, telephone (301) 903-8288,
E-mail john.houghton@oer.doe.gov, fax (301) 903-8519. The full text of
Program Notice 98-14 is available via the Internet using the following
web site address: http://www.er.doe.gov/production/grants/grants.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the NABIR Program is to
provide the scientific understanding needed to use natural in situ
processes and to develop new methods to accelerate those processes for
bioremediation at DOE facilities. The NABIR program is initially
emphasizing the bioremediation of metals and radionuclides in the
subsurface below the root zone, including both thick vadose and
saturated zones. The program is implemented through seven interrelated
scientific research elements (Acceleration, Assessment, Biogeochemical
Dynamics, Biomolecular Science and Engineering, Biotransformation and
Biodegradation, Community Dynamics and Microbial Ecology, and System
Engineering, Integration, Prediction, and Optimization); and a social
and legal element called Bioremediation and its Social Implications and
Concerns (BASIC). A document entitled Natural and Accelerated
Bioremediation Research Program Plan (DOE/ER-0659T) containing an
initial planning description of the NABIR Program and each of the
science elements is available via the Internet using the following web
site address: http://www.er.doe.gov/production/ober/nabir/cover.html.
The NABIR Program Plan is also available from the Office of Scientific
and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (DOE and
DOE grantees only) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology
Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA
22161, (703) 487-4650 (public source). Additional information about
NABIR, such as references to infrastructure that could be available to
the research community, can be accessed from the NABIR Homepage: http:/
/www.lbl.gov/NABIR/. Abstracts of currently funded projects are
available via the Internet using the following web site address: http:/
/www.lbl.gov/NABIR/awardees.html.
Each scientific research element is directed by a program manager
from OBER, who is responsible for providing support and overall
direction for the element, including determining the relevance of the
proposed research to the goals and objectives of the program element to
the NABIR and other DOE programs. The NABIR program also has Science
Team Leaders, selected through an earlier peer review process, who
provide scientific leadership and coordination to the community of
NABIR investigators. Information on the current Science Team Leaders
and DOE program staff is available via the Internet using the following
web site address: http://www.lbl.gov/NABIR/research__5.html.
Program Focus
The NABIR Program supports long-term, hypothesis-driven research
directed at specific topics that will provide the understanding
necessary to develop effective new bioremediation technologies for DOE
site cleanup. This research will help determine the future viability of
bioremediation technologies at the DOE sites. The NABIR Program will
not support research to evaluate the risk to humans. Although the
program is directed at specific goals, it supports research that is
more fundamental in nature than demonstration projects.
The initial emphasis of the NABIR Program is on field-scale
research and metal and radionuclide contamination, specifically on the
metals and radionuclides associated with past weapons production
activities. However, the research program will support laboratory,
theoretical, modeling, and other non-field research projects, if they
fill important gaps that would be necessary to complete understanding
for field-scale studies. The study of real problems might iterate
between, for example, the laboratory and the field. Investigators
without access to laboratories licensed to work with radionuclides may
propose research with non-radioactive surrogates of radionuclides, or
collaborate with a licensed laboratory. Typically, the bioremediation
of metals and radionuclides involves, but is not limited to,
mobilization and immobilization scenarios. Consideration of organic
contaminants, such as solvents and complexing agents that would be
important substrates, facilitators, inhibitors, or sources of carbon or
electron donors or acceptors, can be included in the proposed research
to the extent that they influence the primary goal of understanding the
remediation of metals and radionuclides. Applicants are encouraged to
review Chemical Contaminants on DOE Lands, DOE/ER-0547T, available at
the OBER Homepage: http://www.er.doe.gov/production/ober/EPR/
contam.pdf, for a compilation of wastes and waste mixtures at the DOE
sites.
NABIR is a research program designed to serve as a foundation for
microbial in situ bioremediation techniques. Although ``spillover''
benefits of the research to other cleanup needs such as the use of
bioreactors to process waste streams are anticipated, NABIR
[[Page 14436]]
emphasizes investigations into bioremediation of subsurface waste sites
and their by-products released to the environment. This emphasis
includes research that will assist the application of in situ
bioremediation in conjunction with other cleanup methods, for example,
using bioremediation to mobilize radionuclides so that pump-and-treat
techniques could be more effective. Problems characterized by large
areas with low-concentration contamination are emphasized over problems
of localized, high concentration contamination. Research on
phytoremediation will not be supported during this funding period.
In research plans that involve the potential release of chemicals,
enzymes, and/or microorganisms to the field (both at contaminated and
non-contaminated control sites), applicants must discuss how they will
involve the public or stakeholders in their research, beginning with
experimental design through completion of the project. All applicants
should discuss other relevant societal issues, where appropriate, which
may include intellectual property protection, and communication with
and outreach to affected communities (including members of affected
minority communities where appropriate) to explain the proposed
research.
NABIR Infrastructure
The NABIR program anticipates selecting at least one Field Research
Center (FRC) located at a DOE site. The FRC will serve as a central
facility for researchers to use at their option. However, FRCs will not
be identified for at least a year from the date of this solicitation
and until National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review of the NABIR
Program is complete. Applicants may use any available contaminated or
uncontaminated field site that is presently available to them,
including but not limited to DOE sites. However, investigators are
encouraged to consult the listing of current FRC-related field research
sites and facilities available to NABIR investigators on the NABIR
Homepage, at http://www.lbl.gov/NABIR/research__6.html. Investigators
should describe how their research will interface with or transfer to
field-scale research at the site they are using, to FRC-related sites,
or to the FRC site that will be available in the future. A centrally
maintained database will be developed to provide limited information,
such as site characterization and kinetics data, that will be needed by
a broad segment of investigators. When appropriate, applications must
include a short discussion of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control
(QA/QC) measures that will be applied in data gathering and analysis
activities. Successful applicants will be expected to coordinate their
QA/QC protocols with NABIR program personnel. A draft of guidelines to
be used by Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research (NABIR)
program investigators in managing their information and data can be
found on the NABIR Homepage: http://www.lbl.gov/NABIR/data-guide.html.
Scientific Research Elements
The following sections describe each of the NABIR scientific
research elements that are emphasized in this solicitation. Applicants
may propose research that transcends more than one research element; it
is also anticipated that many applications could be placed in more than
one element. However, each application should identify the one science
element most closely aligned with the proposed research, to facilitate
scientific review.
Assessment: Current methods for measuring and predicting the
effectiveness of bioremediation are inadequate and, in most cases,
poorly developed. Demonstrating the effectiveness of bioremediation
will require documentation for direct measures, such as alteration of
contaminant mobility, or indirect measures, such as accumulation of
undesirable by-products. The Assessment program seeks the development
of innovative and effective methods to assess:
Bioremediation rate and activity, including microbial
community structure and dynamics, biotransformation processes and
rates, and electron flow; and
Bioremediation endpoints, including not only the
concentrations of contaminants and byproducts but also the stability,
bioavailability, and toxicity of residual end-products. NABIR will not,
however, fund projects that examine human health risks of endpoints.
This element will focus on developing techniques for assessing the
bioremedial activities of individual microbial strains and functional
groups within a community and on validating existing and emerging
laboratory and field techniques. Priority will be given to research
applications that could result in techniques and/or instrumentation
that: (i) Operate in real time; (ii) operate in field-scale
heterogeneous environments; (iii) are cost-effective; and (iv)
determine endpoints that more closely approximate limited or non-
bioavailability. Research is sought to answer questions such as:
Can quantitative techniques be adapted or developed for
measurement of microbial community structure, movement, activity, and
effectiveness during bioremediation?
How can geophysical, geochemical, and hydrologic
properties critical to bioremediation effectiveness be determined?
What new methods might be developed to interpret complex
data sets, including temporal and spatial variability in support of
bioremediation management?
Can bioremediation endpoints that accurately measure
bioavailability be quantitatively established?
An important priority is the development of ``core scale'' and
field scale technologies to measure viable biomass, community
composition, and nutritional status and ``core scale'' interrogation
technologies. These technologies would address such items as
biogeochemical processes that control mineral and contaminant
distribution, metabolic activity (especially low-level),
biotransformation rates, and hydraulic and hydrogeochemical variables
that control microbial distribution. Priority will be given to new and
advanced techniques that are likely to be available for use at the
NABIR Field Research Center in two to three years (http://www.lbl.gov/
NABIR/research__6.html).
Biotransformation and Biodegradation: The goal of all
bioremediation efforts is to reduce the potential toxicity of chemical
contaminants in the field by using living organisms or their products
to mineralize, degrade, transform, mobilize, or immobilize
contaminants. There is already a significant base of knowledge about
many pathways for organic chemical degradation, and several important
contaminant degradation mechanisms are presently under detailed
investigation. However, the understanding of biotransformation and
biodegradation pathways and mechanisms in the field is incomplete.
Although the degradation of many organic compounds and the
biotransformation of some inorganic compounds in laboratory cultures
have been well described, it is often unclear how this information
relates to bioremediation processes under field conditions. The
biotransformation of metals and radionuclides in thick, variably
saturated, vadose zones is poorly understood. Successful laboratory
studies have not allowed for predictions about the fate of complex
chemical mixtures that include metals and radionuclides in the field.
It would
[[Page 14437]]
be useful to understand: (i) The metabolic pathways taken by mixtures
of chemicals in the presence of complex microbial communities in vadose
zones and their interfaces with saturated zones and the waste plume;
(ii) the kinetics of desirable metal and radionuclide
biotransformations and the physicochemical factors affecting the
kinetics of those transformations; and (iii) the relationships between
microbial cell microenvironments and aqueous geochemistry related to
the sequestration, release, precipitation, solubility, organic
complexation, or chemical modification (e.g., oxidation/reduction) of
metals and radionuclides. Priority will be given to applications for
research: (i) Using multiple contaminants; (ii) using microbial
consortia; and (iii) on microbial processes that permanently sequester
or chemically alter metallic or radioactive constituents of mixed
wastes. Research is needed to address questions such as:
How can laboratory studies, especially those involving
interdisciplinary approaches or mixed culture approaches, be used to
accurately represent field situations and allow for predictions of
chemical fate?
How important are microbial species interactions in the
biotransformation of metals and radionuclides?
How do organic and inorganic co-contaminants, i.e., mixed
wastes, affect the rates of microbial biotransformation of metals and
radionuclides?
What factors control the fates and kinetics of microbial
metal and radionuclide biotransformations in vadose and saturated
zones?
What are the critical characteristics of sites where
natural biotransformation and biodegradation of mixed metal and
radionuclide wastes are occurring that promote these processes?
Can microbiological processes be harnessed to permanently
sequester metals and/or radionuclides in the subsurface?
What are the metal- and radionuclide-transforming
capabilities, including metabolic pathways, of indigenous
microorganisms in deep vadose or saturated zones representative of DOE
sites?
Community Dynamics and Microbial Ecology: Fundamental research in
Community Dynamics and Microbial Ecology at both the molecular and the
organismal level is needed to understand better the natural intrinsic
processes of bioremediation in mixed contaminant sites. A more complete
understanding of energetics at the community level may ultimately
provide the ability to control or stimulate communities capable of
transformation and to channel carbon flow (including natural- and
polluting-organic compounds) through these communities or populations.
It is essential to understand the roles and interactions of diverse
microbial communities in order to understand how and to what extent the
structure of the biological community influences the course of
bioremediation and to what extent the environmental factors influence
community dynamics in sites containing metals and radionuclides. This
need is especially critical to successful bioremediation of diffuse
metals and radionuclides in thick vadose and deep saturated zones.
Research should be directed toward: (i) Identifying and characterizing
microbial communities at contaminated sites; (ii) understanding the
dynamics of in situ microbial communities in the presence of metals and
radionuclides; (iii) bacterial survival, including toxic effects from
metals and radionuclides; and (iv) measuring key microbial metabolic
and transformation processes including reduction, oxidation,
mobilization/immobilization, and bacterial survival, including
bacterial predation. A specific interest is the understanding of
bacterial activity in biofilms that can alter contaminants during
intrinsic bioremediation and in situ biostimulation. Research utilizing
column and in situ environments is encouraged particularly with non-
destructive techniques and real or near-time monitoring.
Particular attention should be given to:
The distribution, composition and metabolic activity of
biofilms particularly at the field scale;
The ecology and dynamics of microbial communities as a
function of local environmental conditions;
Quantifying the spatial distribution of in situ microbial
communities, particularly at the field scale;
Environmental factors that affect the presence, abundance,
and diversity of in situ, subsurface microbial communities; and
Fluxes of nutrients and electron donors in the saturated/
vadose zones across stratigraphic boundaries where differences in
microbial activity occur.
System Engineering, Integration, Prediction, and Optimization: This
research element primarily supports modeling activities. One goal of
the NABIR program is to produce a model or series of models that will
help stimulate bioremediation in the field, predict whether
bioremediation will be successful and, if so, how to optimize the
approach. Models that take advantage of advanced computational tools
can be useful for many reasons, including providing a better
understanding of the underlying processes, serving as a way to focus
attention on the intersection or coupling between processes and subject
areas, and identifying priority or rate-limiting processes. One of the
distinguishing features of the NABIR program is its emphasis on
integrating among the disciplines and research projects. Models can
serve as effective tools to improve integration.
This announcement solicits applications that would, at the end of
one year of research, define the structure and the content of an
integrative model for the NABIR program. However, the investigators
would not necessarily construct the model. Instead, they would identify
possible data, tools, resources, or information needed for the
development of an integrative model. The investigators might, for
example, hold workshops or prepare reviews of existing models,
including their advantages and limitations. They might identify
criteria for a successful integrative model, suggesting parameters for
input and output.
Models eventually developed by and for the NABIR program will focus
on the in situ bioremediation of metals and radionuclides. An
integrative model will include functions such as water flow and
transport, chemical and microbiological reactions, as well as
peripheral capabilities, such as statistics, geographic information
systems, visualization, and uncertainty analysis. The model must be
flexible enough to capture and test process models developed in NABIR
research projects. Models will be used, in part, to help set future
research priorities of the NABIR program by highlighting missing
research topics.
The application should describe the manner in which the
investigators will interact with the rest of the NABIR research
community and the breadth of capability of the investigators proposing
the research. It is anticipated that a future solicitation will be
offered for the development of an integrative model following the
selection of a Field Research Center and on the results of this
solicitation. Awards will be made for up to one year. Anticipated
levels of funding are $250,000 or less, contingent on the availability
of appropriated funds.
Bioremediation and its Societal Implications and Concerns (BASIC):
The introduction of non-native or genetically engineered microorganisms
or the manipulation of the environment to
[[Page 14438]]
change its microbial composition or chemical characteristics may raise
concerns among those who live or work nearby. Even the reintroduction
of native microorganisms into their natural environment can raise
people's concerns. Great care is required to involve the affected
communities and stakeholders in any plans to use novel agents and/or
processes to remediate a contaminated site. Although it may be many
years before work in the NABIR program supports any or all of these
activities, it is wise to begin consideration of some of the issues
involved now. The Bioremediation and its Societal Implications and
Concerns (BASIC) component of the NABIR program is directed at these
societal implications of bioremediation.
DOE seeks applications that address effective ways to: (i)
Articulate the risks and benefits of in situ bioremediation to
stakeholders; and (ii) involve affected communities in bioremediation
research and decision making. This can include studies or conferences
that will identify and clarify the most urgent issues. It is essential
that studies, explorations, and discussions of the societal
implications of bioremediation research be firmly grounded in the
actual NABIR science. As a result, DOE solicits applications for the
preparation and dissemination of educational materials, in any
appropriate medium, that will enhance understanding of the scientific
as well as the societal aspects of bioremediation among the general
public or specified groups. Educational efforts that target specific
groups should include a detailed description of the relationship
between NABIR and that group or community in addition to assessment
measures for determining the effectiveness of the educational effort.
DOE also encourages applications for the support of conferences
focusing on the legal and societal implications of NABIR.
Applicants should demonstrate their knowledge of any relevant
literature and should include detailed plans for the gathering and
analysis of factual information and its societal implications. Where
appropriate, applicants may make use of relevant activities or field
sites where bioremediation experiments are planned or underway. All
research applications should address the issue of efficient
dissemination of results to the widest appropriate audience. Examples
of BASIC issues might include:
Effective education of stakeholders and others regarding
the underlying NABIR science;
Clarification of public perception of bioremediation
issues;
Past experiences and lessons learned from bioremediation
using exogenous or engineered organisms;
Bioremediation strategies and technologies involving
microbes--the experiences of the commercial sector; and
Intellectual property issues of microbes intended for use
in field level bioremediation.
Additional information on the NABIR Program, including those
elements which are not a part of this solicitation, is available at the
following web site: http://www.lbl.gov/NABIR/. For researchers who do
not have access to the world wide web, please contact Ms. Carlson;
Environmental Sciences Division, ER-74; U.S. Department of Energy;
19901 Germantown Road; Germantown, MD 20874-1290; phone (301) 903-3338;
fax (301) 903-8519; karen.carlson@oer.doe.gov; for hard copies of
background material mentioned in this solicitation.
Program Funding
It is anticipated that up to $3 million will be available for
multiple awards to be made in FY 1998 in the categories described
above, contingent on the availability of appropriated funds.
Applications may request project support up to three years, with out-
year support contingent on the availability of funds, progress of the
research, and programmatic needs. Annual budgets for research projects
in the first four scientific research elements are expected to range
from $200,000 to $500,000 total costs. Annual budgets for most of the
BASIC projects are not expected to exceed $100,000. Researchers are
encouraged to team with investigators in other disciplines where
appropriate. DOE may encourage collaboration among prospective
investigators, to promote joint applications or joint research
projects, by using information obtained through other forms of
communication.
Collaboration
Applicants are encouraged to collaborate with researchers in other
institutions, such as universities, industry, non-profit organizations,
federal laboratories and FFRDCs, including the DOE National
Laboratories, where appropriate, and to incorporate cost sharing and/or
consortia wherever feasible.
Collaborative research applications may be submitted in several
ways:
(1) When multiple private sector or academic organizations intend
to propose collaborative or joint research projects, the lead
organization may submit a single application which includes another
organization as a lower-tier participant (subaward) who will be
responsible for a smaller portion of the overall project. If approved
for funding, DOE may provide the total project funds to the lead
organization who will provide funding to the other participant via a
subcontract arrangement. The application should clearly describe the
role to be played by each organization, specify the managerial
arrangements and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational
effort.
(2) Alternatively, multiple private sector or academic
organizations who intend to propose collaborative or joint research
projects may each prepare a portion of the application, then combine
each portion into a single, integrated scientific application. A
separate Face Page and Budget Pages must be included for each
organization participating in the collaborative project. The joint
application must be submitted to DOE as one package. If approved for
funding, DOE will award a separate grant to each collaborating
organization.
(3) Private sector or academic organizations who wish to form a
collaborative project with a DOE FFRDC may not include the DOE FFRDC in
their application as a lower-tier participant (subaward). Rather, each
collaborator may prepare a portion of the proposal, then combine each
portion into a single, integrated scientific proposal. The private
sector or academic organization must include a Face Page and Budget
Pages for its portion of the project. The FFRDC must include separate
Budget Pages for its portion of the project. The joint proposal must be
submitted to DOE as one package. If approved for funding, DOE will
award a grant to the private sector or academic organization. The FFRDC
will be funded, through existing DOE contracts, from funds specifically
designated for new FFRDC projects. DOE FFRDCs will not compete for
funding already designated for private sector or academic
organizations. Other Federal laboratories who wish to form
collaborative projects may also follow guidelines outlined in this
section.
Applications will be subjected to scientific merit review (peer
review) and will be evaluated against the following evaluation criteria
listed in descending order of importance as codified at 10 CFR
605.10(d):
1. Scientific and/or Technical Merit of the Project
2. Appropriateness of the Proposed Method or Approach
3. Competency of Applicant's Personnel and Adequacy of Proposed
Resources
[[Page 14439]]
4. Reasonableness and Appropriateness of the Proposed Budget
The evaluation will include program policy factors such as the
relevance of the proposed research to the terms of the announcement and
an agency's programmatic needs. Note, external peer reviewers are
selected with regard to both their scientific expertise and the absence
of conflict-of-interest issues. Non-federal reviewers may be used, and
submission of an application constitutes agreement that this is
acceptable to the investigator(s) and the submitting institution.
To provide a consistent format for the submission, review and
solicitation of grant applications submitted under this notice, the
preparation and submission of grant applications must follow the
guidelines given in the Application Guide for the Office of Energy
Research Financial Assistance Program 10 CFR Part 605.
Information about the development, submission of applications,
eligibility, limitations, evaluation, the selection process, and other
policies and procedures may be found in 10 CFR Part 605, and in the
Application Guide for the Office of Energy Research Financial
Assistance Program. Electronic access to the Guide and required forms
is made available via the World Wide Web at: http://www.er.doe.gov/
production/grants/grants.html. On the ER grant face page, form DOE F
4650.2, in block 15, also provide the PI's phone number, fax number and
E-mail address. The research description must be 20 pages or less,
exclusive of attachments, and must contain an abstract or summary of
the proposed research (to include the hypotheses being tested, the
proposed experimental design, and the names of all investigators and
their affiliations). Attachments include curriculum vitae, QA/QC plan,
a listing of all current and pending federal support, and letters of
intent when collaborations are part of the proposed research.
Although the required original and seven copies of the application
must be submitted, researchers are asked to submit an electronic
version of the abstract of the proposed research in ASCII format along
with a valid e-mail address to Ms. Karen Carlson by e-mail at
karen.carlson@oer.doe.gov. Curriculum vitae should be submitted in a
form similar to that of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the
National Science Foundation (NSF) (two to three pages), for example
see: http:/ /www.nsf.gov:80/bfa/cpo/gpg/fkit.htm#forms-9.
The Office of Energy Research, as part of its grant regulations,
requires at 10 CFR 605.11(b) that a recipient receiving a grant and
performing research involving recombinant DNA molecules and/or
organisms and viruses containing recombinant DNA molecules shall comply
with NIH ``Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA
Molecules'', which is available via the world wide web at: http://
www.niehs.nih.gov/odhsb/biosafe/nih/nih97-1.html (59 FR 34496, July 5,
1994), or such later revision of those guidelines as may be published
in the Federal Register. Grantees must also comply with other federal
and state laws and regulations as appropriate, for example, the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) as it applies to genetically modified
organisms. Although compliance with NEPA is the responsibility of DOE,
grantees proposing to conduct field research are expected to provide
information necessary for the DOE to complete the NEPA review and
documentation.
Related Funding Opportunities: Investigators may wish to obtain
information about the following related funding opportunities:
Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management: The
Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP). Contact: Mr. Mark
Gilbertson, Director, Office of Science and Risk Policy, Office of
Science and Technology, EM-52, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585, e-mail
mark.gilbertson@em.doe.gov. phone (202) 586-7150. The EMSP home page is
available at web site: http://www.em.doe.gov/science/.
DOE/EPA/NSF/ONR Joint Program on Bioremediation, Dr. Robert E.
Menzer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for
Environmental Research and Quality Assurance, 401 M Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20460, menzer.robert@epamail.epa.gov, phone (202) 260-
5779.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number for this program
is 81.049, and the solicitation control number is ERFAP 10 CFR Part
605.
Issued in Washington, DC, March 18, 1998.
John Rodney Clark,
Associate Director for Resource Management, Office of Energy Research.
[FR Doc. 98-7716 Filed 3-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
