98-7777. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company; Notice of Petition for Adjustment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 14449-14450]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-7777]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. SA98-30-000]
    
    
    Kaiser-Francis Oil Company; Notice of Petition for Adjustment
    
    March 19, 1998.
        Take notice that on March 9, 1998, Kaiser-Francis Oil Company 
    (Kaiser-Francis) filed a petition for adjustment under section 502(c) 
    of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA),\1\ requesting that the 
    refund procedures in the Commission's September 10, 1997 order in 
    Docket Nos. RP97-369-000, GP97-3-000, GP97-4-000, and GP97-5-000,\2\ be 
    altered with respect to Kaiser-Francis' Kansas ad valorem tax refund 
    liability.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 3142(c) (1982).
        \2\ See 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997); order denying reh'g issued 
    January 28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 61,058 (1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission's September 10 order on remand from the D.C. Circuit 
    Court of Appeals \3\ directed first sellers under the NGPA to make 
    Kansas ad valorem tax refunds, with interest, for the period from 1983 
    to 1988. The Commission issued a January 28, 1998 order in Docket No. 
    RP98-39-001, et al. (January 28 Order),\4\ clarifying the refund 
    procedures, stating that producers could request additional time to 
    establish the uncollectability of royalty refunds, and that first 
    seller may file requests for NGPA section 502(c) adjustment relief from 
    the refund requirement and the timing and procedures for implementing 
    the refunds, based on the individual circumstances applicable to each 
    first seller.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ Public Service Company of Colorado v. FERC, 91 F.3d 1478 
    (D.C. 1996), cert. denied, Nos. 96-954 and 96-1230 (65 U.S.L.W. 3751 
    and 3754, May 12, 1997).
        \4\ 82 FERC para. 61,059 (1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Kaiser-Francis requests authorization, pursuant to the Commission's 
    January 28 Order, to defer payment to Williams Natural Gas Company 
    (Williams) of principal and interest refunds attributable to 
    unrecovered royalties for one year until March 9, 1999. In addition, 
    Kaiser-Francis requests that it be allowed to place into an escrow 
    account during the requested 1-year deferral period: (1) An amount 
    equal to the principal and interest on royalty refunds which have not 
    been recovered; (2) an amount equal to the interest on royalty refunds 
    recovered (the principal of which was paid to Williams (to protect the 
    interests of royalty owners); and (3) an amount equal to the interest 
    on the total remaining amount of refunds allegedly due (i.e., the 
    interest due on principal), excluding royalties.
        Kaiser-Francis argues that it seeks to establish these procedures 
    to ensure that it pays only that which is legitimately owed, and that 
    it will be able to recover the overpayment, if it is subsequently 
    determined that Kaiser-Francis's refund liability was less than that 
    originally claimed by Williams. Kaiser-Francis asserts that a one-year 
    deferral in the obligation to make royalty refunds is necessary in 
    order to allow it to confirm the appropriate refund amounts due, to 
    attempt to locate the prior royalty owners, and to seek recovery of 
    such amounts from the proper royalty owners.
    
    [[Page 14450]]
    
        On or before March 9, 1999, Kaiser-Francis proposes to file 
    documentation with the Commission, of those royalties which were not 
    collectible and disburse the recovered royalty refund principal only to 
    Williams. Until that time, Kaiser-Francis proposes to place the 
    interest from royalty refunds which was recovered in its escrow account 
    to protect the royalty owners. In addition, Kaiser-Francis argues that 
    its proposal for an escrow account is necessary to protect its property 
    and that of its royalty owners.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said petition should on or before 15 days after the date 
    of publication in the Federal Register of this notice, file with the 
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214, 385.211, 385.1105, and 385.1106). All 
    protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
    determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
    make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
    become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
    hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
    Commission's Rules.
    David P. Boergers,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-7777 Filed 3-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/25/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-7777
Pages:
14449-14450 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. SA98-30-000
PDF File:
98-7777.pdf