99-7408. Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 58 (Friday, March 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 14577-14578]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-7408]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
    
    12 CFR Part 229
    
    [Regulation CC; Docket No. R-1027]
    
    
    Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks.
    
    AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the 
    Board) recognizes that banks are currently dedicating their automation 
    resources to addressing Year 2000 and leap year computer problems and 
    may be challenged to make and test other programming changes, including 
    those that may be required to comply with Regulation CC's merger 
    transition provisions, without jeopardizing their Year 2000 or other 
    programming efforts. Therefore, the Board is amending Regulation CC to 
    allow banks that consummate a merger on or after July 1, 1998, and 
    before March 1, 2000, greater time to implement software changes 
    related to the merger.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Anderson, Staff Attorney, Legal 
    Division (202/452-3707). For the hearing impaired only, 
    Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD), Diane Jenkins (202/452-
    3544).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 2, 1998, the Board proposed 
    amending Regulation CC to allow banks that consummate merger 
    transactions on or after July 1, 1998, and before June 1, 1999, greater 
    time to implement software changes related to the merger. (63 FR 
    66499). The proposal did not affect applications under the Bank Merger 
    Act or the Bank Holding Company Act. The Board proposed this amendment 
    because it recognizes that banks are currently dedicating their 
    automation resources to addressing Year 2000 and leap year computer 
    problems and may be challenged to make and test other programming 
    changes, including those that may be required to comply with Regulation 
    CC, without jeopardizing their Year 2000 or other programming efforts.
        The Board received 15 comments on the proposed rule from the 
    following types of institutions:
    
    Banks/thrifts--3
    Trade associations--3
    Federal Reserve Banks--3
    Clearinghouses--3
    Bank holding companies--3
    
    All of the commenters generally supported the Board's proposal and 
    viewed it as aiding banks' efforts to focus programming resources on 
    renovating and testing software systems to address Year 2000 rollover 
    and leap year computer problems. Nine commenters urged the Board, 
    however, to lengthen the proposed extension of the transition period, 
    and generally recommended that a more liberal transition period be 
    applicable to banks that consummate mergers in 2000.
        These commenters stated that adopting an extension into the Year 
    2000 would enable banks to delay merger programming work so that they 
    may focus greater resources on addressing the Year 2000 computer 
    problem. In particular, it would enable merged banks that were Year 
    2000 compliant as separate entities to delay merging their systems 
    until after key Year 2000 events (the century rollover and leap year), 
    which would enable them to avoid reprogramming and retesting already 
    Year 2000 compliant systems prior to spring 2000. Finally, one 
    commenter noted that extending the period into the Year 2000 would help 
    ensure that banks have sufficient resources to address unanticipated 
    Year 2000 problems that may arise at the turn of the century.
        For these reasons, the Board has decided to further extend the 
    transition period. The final rule allows banks that consummate a merger 
    on or after July 1, 1998, and before March 1, 2000, to be treated as 
    separate banks until March 1, 2001. Beginning in March 2000, banks that 
    merge will be subject to the normal one-year transition period.
    
    Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        Two of the three requirements of a final regulatory flexibility 
    analysis (5 U.S.C. 604), (1) a succinct statement of the need for and 
    the objectives of the rule and (2) a summary of the issues raised by 
    the public comments, the agency's assessment of the issues, and a 
    statement of the changes made in the final rule in response to the 
    comments, are discussed above. The third requirement of a final 
    regulatory flexibility analysis is a description of significant 
    alternatives to the rule that would minimize the rule's economic impact 
    on small entities and reasons why the alternatives were rejected.
        The final rule will apply to all depository institutions regardless 
    of size. The amendments are intended to provide relief to banks 
    involved in mergers, including small institutions, by reducing required 
    changes to their automation environment during the period surrounding 
    the century rollover, and should not have a negative economic effect on 
    small institutions. Because the amendments should not have a negative 
    economic effect on small institutions there were no significant 
    alternatives that would have minimized the economic impact on those 
    institutions.
    
    List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 229
    
        Banks, banking, Federal Reserve System, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board proposes to 
    amend Regulation CC, 12 CFR Part 229 as set forth below:
    
    PART 229--AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND COLLECTION OF CHECKS 
    (REGULATION CC)
    
        1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.
    
        2. In Sec. 229.19, paragraph (g) is redesignated as paragraph 
    (g)(1), a heading is added for newly designated paragraph (g)(1), and a 
    new paragraph (g)(2) would be added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 229.19  Miscellaneous.
    
    * * * * *
        (g) Effect of merger transaction. (1) In general. * * *
        (2) Merger transactions on or after July 1, 1998, and before March 
    1, 2000. If banks have consummated a merger transaction on or after 
    July 1, 1998, and before March 1, 2000, the merged banks may be 
    considered separate banks until March 1, 2001.
        3. Section 229.40 is redesignated as Sec. 299.40 (a), a heading is 
    added for newly designated paragraph (a), and a new paragraph (b) would 
    be added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 229.40  Effect of merger transaction.
    
        (a) In general. * * *
        (b) Merger transactions on or after July 1, 1998, and before March 
    1, 2000. If banks have consummated a merger transaction on or after 
    July 1, 1998, and
    
    [[Page 14578]]
    
    before March 1, 2000, the merged banks may be considered separate banks 
    until March 1, 2001.
    
        By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
    System, March 22, 1999.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 99-7408 Filed 3-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/1/1999
Published:
03/26/1999
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-7408
Dates:
April 1, 1999.
Pages:
14577-14578 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Regulation CC, Docket No. R-1027
PDF File:
99-7408.pdf
CFR: (2)
12 CFR 229.19
12 CFR 229.40