96-7450. Pesticide Tolerance for Benzoic Acid  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 27, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 13426-13428]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-7450]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 13427]]
    
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 4E4375/R2219; FRL-5357-6]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Pesticide Tolerance for Benzoic Acid
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes a tolerance for residues of the 
    insecticide benzoic acid (3,5-dimethyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-(4-
    ethylbenzoyl) hydrazide), in or on the raw agricultural commodity 
    apples. The regulation to establish a maximum permissible level for 
    residues of the insecticide was requested in a petition submitted by 
    the Rohm and Haas Co.
    
     EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective March 27, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    docket number, [PP 4E4375/R2219], may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk 
    (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing requests 
    filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the docket number 
    and submitted to: Public Response and Program Resources Branch, Field 
    Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    In person, bring copy of objections and hearing requests to Rm. 1132, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Fees 
    accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' 
    and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP 
    (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. An electronic 
    copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk 
    may be submitted to OPP by sending electronic mail (e-mail) to: docket@epamail.epa.gov.
        Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests must be 
    submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and 
    any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing 
    requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1 file format 
    or ASCII file format. All copies of electronic objections and hearing 
    requests must be identified by the docket number [PP 4E4375/R2219] . No 
    Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be submitted through e-
    mail. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests on this rule 
    may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. Additional 
    information on electronic submissions can be found below in this 
    document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 
    Product Manager (PM) 10, Registration Division (7505C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 210, CM 
    #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, 703-305-6788; e-
    mail: keigwin.rick@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice (FRL-4948-2), published 
    in the Federal Register of April 5, 1995 (60 FR 17357), which announced 
    that Rohm and Haas Co. had submitted pesticide petition (PP) 4E4375 to 
    EPA requesting that the Administrator, pursuant to section 408(d) of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), 
    establish a tolerance for residues of the insecticide benzoic acid 
    (3,5-dimethyl-1,1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-(4-ethylbenzoyl)hydrazide), in 
    or on the raw agricultural commodity apples at 1.0 parts per million 
    (ppm). As of February 29, 1996 there are no U.S. registrations for 
    apples.
        The scientific data submitted in the petition and other relevant 
    material have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in 
    support of the tolerance include:
        1. A 1-year dog feeding study with a lowest-observable-effect 
    level(LOEL) of 250 ppm (8.7 mg/kg/day for male and 8.9 mg/kg/day for 
    female dogs) based on growth retardation in the male and in both sexes 
    decreases in RBC, HCT, and HGB, increases in Heinz bodies, 
    methemoglobin, MCV, MCH, reticulites, platelets, plasma total 
    bilirubin, spleen weight, and spleen/body weight ratio, and liver 
    weight and liver/body weight ratio. Hematopoiesis and sinusoidal 
    engorgement occurred in the spleen, and hyperplasia occurred in marrow 
    of the femur and sternum. The liver showed an increased pigment in the 
    Kupffer cells. The no-observable-effect level (NOEL) for systemic 
    toxicity is 50 ppm (1.8mg/kg/day for males and 1.9 mg/kg/day for 
    females).
        2. An 18-mounth mouse carcinogenicity study with no carcinogenicity 
    observed at dosage levels up to and including 1,000 ppm (males 155 mg/
    kg/day; females 186 mg/kg/day).
        3. A 2-year rat carcinogenicity study with no carcinogenicity 
    observed at dosage levels up to and including 2,000 ppm (97 mg/kg/day 
    and 125 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively).
        4. A 2-generation rat reproduction study with a NOEL of 150 ppm 
    (12.1 mg/kg/day) for reproductive effects compared to a systemic NOEL 
    of 10 ppm (0.85 mg/kg/day).
        5. A rat developmental study with a NOEL of 1,000 mg/kg/day for 
    developmental toxicity and a NOEL of 250 mg/kg/day for maternal 
    toxicity.
        6. A rabbit developmental study with a NOEL of 1,000 mg/kg/day for 
    developmental toxicity.
        7. Several mutagenicity tests which were all negative. These 
    include an Ames assay with and without metabolic activation, an in vivo 
    cytogenetic assay in rat bone marrow cells, an in vitro chromosome 
    aberration assay in CHO cells, a CHO/HGPRT assay, a reverse mutation 
    assay with E. coli, and an unscheduled DNA synthesis assay (UDS) in rat 
    hepatocytes.
        The reference dose (RFD), for chronic toxicity as defined in a 1-
    year chronic dog study is 0.018 mg/kg/day based upon a NOEL of 1.8 mg/
    kg/day in male dogs and applying an uncertainty factor of 100. Granting 
    this use of benzoic acid (3,5-dimethyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-(4-
    ethylbenzoyl)hydrazide) on apples raises the theoretical maximum 
    residue contribution (TMRC) for the overall U.S. population from 
    0.000001 mg/kg/day to 0.000792 mg/kg/day and represents 4.4% of the 
    RFD. The TMRC for the highest exposed subgroup, non-nursing infants is 
    raised from 0.000001 mg/kg/day to 0.008051 mg/kg/day and represents 
    44.7% of the RFD for that subgroup.
        The metabolism of benzoic acid, (3,5-dimethyl-1-(1,1-
    dimethylethyl)-2-(4-ethylbenzoyl)hyrazide), is adequately understood.
        An adequate analytical method, HPLC separation with UV detection, 
    is available for enforcement purposes.
        There are presently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    will protect the public health. The pesticide is considered useful for 
    the purposes for which the tolerance is sought. Therefore, the 
    tolerance is established as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
    those objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with 
    the Hearing Clerk, at the
    
    [[Page 13428]]
     address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/or 
    hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to 
    the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must 
    specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the 
    grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each objection must be 
    accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is 
    requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual 
    issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions 
    on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the 
    objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing will be granted if 
    the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the 
    following: There is genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a 
    reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the 
    requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in 
    favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts 
    to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner 
    sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
    requested (40 CFR 178.32).
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under the docket 
    number [PP 4E4375/R2219] (including any comments and data submitted 
    electronically). A public version of this record, including printed, 
    paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
    information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8 a.m. to 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public 
    record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing requests 
    received electronically into printed, paper form as they are received 
    and will place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which 
    will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The 
    official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained at the 
    Virginia address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlements, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 9-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator has 
    determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: March 15, 1996.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
    
        2. In Sec. 180.482, by adding alphabetically to the table, an entry 
    for the raw agricultural commodity ``apples'', to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.482  Benzoic acid; tolerances for residues.
    
    *    *    *    *    *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                            Commodities                            million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Apples.....................................................          1.0
                                                                            
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 96-7450 Filed 3-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/27/1996
Published:
03/27/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-7450
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective March 27, 1996.
Pages:
13426-13428 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 4E4375/R2219, FRL-5357-6
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
96-7450.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.482