94-7182. Northern Natural Gas Co., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-7182]
    
    
    [Federal Register: March 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP94-277-000, et al.]
    
    
    Northern Natural Gas Co., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings
    
    March 17, 1994.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. Northern Natural Gas Company
    
    [Docket No. CP94-277-000]
    
        Take notice that on March 10, 1994, Northern Natural Gas Company 
    (Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
    in Docket No. CP94-277-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 
    157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for 
    authorization to install and operate a new delivery point to 
    accommodate natural gas deliveries to Northern States Power Company 
    (NSP), under its blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000, 
    all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
    Commission and open to public inspection.
        Northern states that it requests authority to install a delivery 
    point to accommodate natural gas deliveries under an existing 
    transportation service agreement. According to Northern NSP has 
    requested the new delivery point to serve residential and commercial 
    end-users north of Brainerd, Minnesota. Northern indicates that the 
    estimated total volume proposed to be delivered to NSP is expected to 
    result in an increase in Northern's peak day deliveries of 10,000 Mcf 
    per day and 991,728 Mcf on an annual basis. Northern estimates the 
    total cost of installing the delivery point to be $191,000.
        Comment date: May 2, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G 
    at the end of this notice.
    
    2. Ozark Gas Transmission System
    
    [Docket No. CP94-280-000]
    
        Take notice that on March 11, 1994, Ozark Gas Transmission System 
    (Ozark), 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, filed in Docket No. 
    CP94-280-000 an application pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas 
    Act for permission and approval to abandon one lateral line compressor, 
    all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with 
    the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Ozark states that the 620 horsepower compressor unit which is 
    subject to this abandonment filing is called the Hurley compressor and 
    is located in Section 28, Township 10 North, Range 24 West, Johnson 
    County, Arkansas. Ozark further states that this unit is no longer 
    needed to provide service on the Hurley lateral. Ozark asserts that gas 
    supply produced from the wells located behind this compressor may be 
    delivered without this unit, and therefore, service would not be 
    interrupted upon abandonment of the unit.
        Comment date: April 7, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    F at the end of this notice.
    
    3. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-284-000]
    
        Take notice that on March 14, 1994, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
    Company (East Tennessee), Building E, Suite 424, Cross Park II, 9111 
    Cross Park Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37923, filed in Docket No. CP94-
    284-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
    Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
    157.212) for authorization to modify certain existing metering 
    facilities under East Tennessee's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
    No. CP82-412-000 pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
    more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
    and open to public inspection.
        East Tennessee proposes to replace existing meter tubes at two 
    locations in order to increase the measurement accuracy of the metering 
    facilities. East Tennessee explains that it transports natural gas for 
    Jamestown Natural Gas (Jamestown) and Middle Tennessee Utility District 
    (MTUD) and delivers the gas at flow rates that exceed the flow rates 
    that can be accurately measured by the existing metering facilities. 
    East Tennessee states that to improve the measurement accuracy of the 
    facilities, East Tennessee would replace (a) One of the existing 2-inch 
    meter tubes with a 4-inch meter tube at the Jamestown Sales Station 
    (Meter No. 75-9084) in Fentress County, Tennessee, and (b) two 4-inch 
    meter tubes with two 6-inch meter tubes at Meter No. 75-9031, Monterey 
    Sales Station in Putnam County, Tennessee, for MTUD. East Tennessee 
    estimates that the cost of renovating each of the facilities is $10,000 
    for a total of $20,000 which would be absorbed by East Tennessee.
        Comment date: May 2, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G 
    at the end of this notice.
    
    4. Northern Natural Gas Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-286-000]
    
        Take notice that on March 14, 1994, Northern Natural Gas Company 
    (Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124, filed in 
    Docket No. CP94-286-000 an application pursuant to section 7(b) of the 
    Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon by Sale to Amax 
    Oil and Gas Inc. (Amax) certain compression and pipeline facilities, 
    with appurtenances, located in Crockett County, Texas, all as more 
    fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission 
    and open to public inspection.
        Northern proposes to convey to Amax approximately 112 miles of 
    pipeline and appurtenant facilities, with pipe diameters ranging 
    between 2-inches and 12-inches, and four lateral compressor stations.
        Northern states that Amax desires to purchase the Crockett County 
    facilities to allow it to consolidate its processing plants in the 
    Crockett County area. Northern states further that Amax intends to 
    construct facilities to bypass Northern's existing pipeline facilities 
    if Northern does not sell the subject facilities to Amax. The 
    facilities, it is said, would be conveyed to Amax for $3,590,000 at the 
    time of the closing.
        Comment date: April 7, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    F at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs
    
        F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before the comment date, 
    file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
    20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
    requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
    CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
    (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
    considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
    will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
    person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
    party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
    accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
    this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
    required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
    finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval 
    for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if 
    the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
        G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
    issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to rule 
    214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
    intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
    Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
    request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
    proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
    after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
    not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
    protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
    authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-7182 Filed 3-25-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/28/1994
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-7182
Dates:
May 2, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: March 28, 1994, Docket No. CP94-277-000, et al.