97-7820. Modification of Michigan's Assumed Program to Administer Section 404 Permitting Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 14846-14848]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-7820]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 233
    
    [FRL-5803-4]
    
    
    Modification of Michigan's Assumed Program to Administer Section 
    404 Permitting Program
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed approval; request for public comment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document announces EPA's intention to approve 
    modification of Michigan's assumed Clean Water Act Section 404 (Section 
    404) permitting program, specifically, to explicitly and formally 
    recognize that a recent internal reorganization of Michigan's 
    environmental agencies is consistent with the minimum requirements of 
    the State Section 404 program regulations. EPA invites public comment 
    on its approval of any modification of the State program that may have 
    resulted from the reorganization.
    
    DATES: Comments on this document must be received in writing by April 
    28, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments on today's notice may be submitted to Jo 
    Lynn Traub, Director, Water Division, Attn: Michigan Section 404 
    Program Modification, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West 
    Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. In the alternative, EPA 
    will accept comments electronically. Comments should be sent to the 
    following Internet Email address: pierard.kevin@epamail.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted in an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. EPA will print electronic 
    comments in hard-copy paper form for the official administrative 
    record. EPA will attempt to clarify electronic comments if there is an 
    apparent error in transmission. Comments provided electronically will 
    be considered timely if they are submitted electronically by 11:59 p.m. 
    (Central time) April 28, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Pierard, Chief, Watersheds and 
    Non-Point Source Programs Branch, at the EPA address noted above or 
    telephone at (312) 886-4448.
        A copy of the supporting information for today's notice is 
    available for review at: EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 16th 
    Floor, Chicago, Illinois; Library of Michigan, Government Documents 
    Section, 717 West Allegan, Lansing, Michigan; Olson Library, Northern 
    Michigan University, Harden Circle Drive, Marquette, Michigan; and 
    Detroit Public Library Main Branch, Sociology and Economics Department, 
    5201 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Michigan. To arrange for access to the 
    docket materials in Chicago, call (312) 886-4448 between 8 a.m. and 
    4:30 p.m. (Central time); in Lansing, call 517-373-9489 between 9 a.m. 
    and 6 p.m. on Mondays through Saturdays and between 12 p.m. and 4 p.m. 
    on Sundays (Eastern time); in Marquette, call 906-227-2260 between 8 
    a.m. and 12 a.m. on Mondays through Thursdays, between 8 a.m. and 9 
    p.m. on Fridays, and between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Sundays (Eastern 
    time); and in Detroit, call 313-833-1440 between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 
    p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays through Saturdays, and between 1 p.m. 
    and 9 p.m. on Wednesdays (Eastern time).
        The supporting information for today's notice includes: a copy of 
    Executive Order 1995-18 signed by the Governor of Michigan on July 31, 
    1995; copies of the correspondence from Michigan to EPA dated January 
    19, 1996, regarding the effects of the executive order on Michigan's 
    Section 404 program; a statement of the Michigan Attorney General dated 
    June 13, 1996; Program documents submitted to EPA in support of 
    Michigan's original (1983) assumption request; the materials submitted 
    by Michigan and considered by EPA in approving revisions to Michigan's 
    Section 404 program on November 25, 1994; May 20, 1994, comments 
    submitted by the National Wildlife Federation and Michigan United 
    Conservation Club to EPA which EPA is treating as a petition to 
    withdraw Michigan's Section 404 program; a June 14, 1996, letter from 
    the Michigan Environmental Council to EPA regarding Michigan Public Act 
    132 of 1996; a February 4, 1997, letter and attached report from the 
    Michigan Environmental Council to EPA requesting that EPA withdraw 
    Michigan's Section 404 program; and EPA's preliminary finding of no 
    substantial modification and preliminary approval of any revisions 
    resulting from Executive Order 1995-18.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The State of Michigan assumed Federal Clean 
    Water Act Section 404 permitting authority on October 16, 1984. 
    Procedures for revision of State programs at 40 CFR 233.16 require that 
    EPA review any revisions to state assumed Section 404 programs, 
    determine whether such revisions are substantial, and approve or 
    disapprove the revisions.
        On July 31, 1995 Governor Engler of Michigan issued Executive Order 
    1995-18, which elevated the former Environmental Protection Bureau of 
    the
    
    [[Page 14847]]
    
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) to full independent 
    departmental status as the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 
    (MDEQ). MDEQ retained all of its environmental responsibilities and 
    virtually all of the personnel formerly assigned to it as a bureau in 
    the MDNR, including its statutory and regulatory obligations and 
    responsibilities to administer Michigan's federally approved CWA 
    section 404 program.
        EPA announces today that has made preliminary determinations that 
    the executive order did not make any substantial changes in Michigan's 
    Section 404 program, and that any changes to the Michigan program 
    resulting from the executive order should be approved. While not 
    required to do so according to the State section 404 program 
    regulations, EPA invites public comment concerning the Agency's 
    conclusions, specifically, its preliminary determination that the 
    executive order caused no substantial revisions to Michigan's Section 
    404 program, as well as EPA's preliminary decision to approve any 
    revisions to Michigan's Section 404 program that resulted from the 
    executive order. EPA may conduct a public hearing, if there is 
    significant public interest based on requests received.
        EPA notes that it currently has pending before it a May 20, 1994, 
    petition to withdraw that was filed by the National Wildlife Federation 
    (NWF) and Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC), as well as a 
    February 4, 1997, petition to withdraw that was filed by the Michigan 
    Environmental Council (MEC). EPA has commenced informal investigations 
    into the allegations in those Petitions to determine whether there is 
    cause to commence withdrawal proceedings.
        EPA further notes that MEC, by letter dated June 14, 1996, has 
    raised concerns regarding the impact of Michigan's recent enactment of 
    Public Act 132 of 1996 on Michigan's Section 404 program. In response 
    to that letter, EPA is currently conducting an informal investigation 
    into Michigan's Public Act 132 of 1996 and its potential impact on 
    Michigan's federally delegated and authorized programs, including 
    Section 404.
        EPA's preliminary decision only addresses, and this notice is 
    seeking comment only on, the impact of the executive order noted above 
    on Michigan's Section 404 program. EPA's preliminary decision does not 
    address the issues raised by NWF, MUCC and MEC in their Petitions or by 
    MEC regarding Public Act 132 of 1996. EPA intends to address those 
    issues in the course of the separate informal investigations described 
    above.
    
    Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735; October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether a regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the 
    Executive Order. The Order defines ``significant regulatory action'' as 
    one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
        (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, 
    or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
    economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
    health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
    communities;
        (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency;
        (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or
        (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    the Executive Order.
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted EPA action 
    on State Section 404 programs from OMB review.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
    Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
    effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
    governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA 
    generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
    analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
    may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in 
    the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
    one year.
        If EPA finally determines that any revisions to Michigan's Section 
    404 program resulting from the executive order should be approved, 
    EPA's determination would contain no Federal mandates (under the 
    regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or 
    tribal governments or the private sector. Instead, EPA's determination 
    would merely recognize an internal reorganization of an existing 
    assumed State Section 404 program. EPA has determined that such a 
    determination would not contain any Federal mandate that may result in 
    expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal 
    governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. 
    Therefore, EPA's determination would not be subject to the requirements 
    of section 202 of the UMRA.
        Before EPA establishes any regulatory requirements that may 
    significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including tribal 
    governments, it must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a 
    small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying 
    potentially affected small governments, enabling officials of affected 
    small governments to have meaningful and timely input in the 
    development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant Federal 
    intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising 
    small governments on compliance with the regulatory requirements. 
    Because EPA's determination to approve of any revisions to Michigan's 
    Section 404 program resulting from the executive order would merely 
    recognize an internal reorganization of an existing assumed State 
    Section 404 program, EPA has determined that such a determination would 
    contain no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely 
    affect small governments.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) provides that, whenever an 
    agency promulgates a final rule under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 553, after being 
    required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, an agency 
    must prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis unless the head of 
    the agency certifies that the final rule will not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 604 
    & 605. The Regional Administrator today certifies, pursuant to section 
    605(b) of the RFA, that approval of any revisions to Michigan's Section 
    404 program resulting from the executive order will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
        The basis for the certification is that EPA's approval would simply 
    result in an administrative change in the structure of the assumed 
    Section 404 program, rather than a change in the substantive 
    requirements imposed on any small entity in the State of Michigan. Such 
    an approval would not affect the substantive regulatory requirements 
    under existing State law to which small entities are already subject. 
    Additionally, approval of the Section 404 program modification would 
    not
    
    [[Page 14848]]
    
    impose any new burdens on small entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This preliminary determination contains no requests for information 
    and consequently is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 
    U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    
        Dated: March 14, 1997.
    David A. Ullrich,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-7820 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/28/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed approval; request for public comment.
Document Number:
97-7820
Dates:
Comments on this document must be received in writing by April 28, 1997.
Pages:
14846-14848 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5803-4
PDF File:
97-7820.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 233