97-7884. John C. Turley, III, M.D.; Denial of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 14948-14949]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-7884]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    John C. Turley, III, M.D.; Denial of Application
    
        On July 1, 1996, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
    Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
    Order to Show Cause to John C. Turley, III, M.D., of Memphis, 
    Tennessee, notifying him of an opportunity to show cause as to why DEA 
    should not deny his application for a DEA Certificate of Registration 
    as a practitioner pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), as being inconsistent 
    with the public interest. The order also notified Dr. Turley that 
    should not request for a hearing be filed within 30 days, his hearing 
    right would be deemed waived.
        The DEA mailed the show cause order to Dr. Turley at the address 
    listed on his application for registration. Subsequently, the DEA 
    received a signed receipt showing that the order was received on July 
    8, 1996. No request for a hearing or any other reply was received by 
    the DEA from Dr. Turley or anyone purporting to represent him in this 
    matter. Therefore, the Acting Deputy Administrator, finding that (1) 
    thirty days have passed since the receipt of the Order to Show Cause, 
    and (2) no request for a hearing having been received, concludes that 
    Dr. Turley is deemed to have waived his hearing right. After 
    considering relevant material from the investigative file in this 
    matter, the Acting Deputy Administrator now enters his final order 
    without a hearing pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 1301.54(e) and 1301.57.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that an investigation in 1986 
    by the Memphis Metro Narcotics Unit revealed that beginning in at least 
    1984, Dr. Turley issued prescriptions to three individuals for 
    Dilaudid, a Schedule II controlled substance, in exchange for sexual 
    favors and/or cash and for no legitimate medical purpose. Sometimes, 
    Dr. Turley issued the prescriptions to one of the individuals using the 
    names of her husband or son.
        In June 1990, a local police department arrested an individual who 
    attempted to fill a prescription for Lorcet, a Schedule III controlled 
    substance, bearing Dr. Turley's name as the prescribing physician. It 
    was believed that the prescription was forged. Subsequently, Dr. Turley 
    verified that he had in fact issued the prescription to the individual, 
    and therefore all charges against the individual were dismissed. The 
    individual then agreed to cooperate in an investigation of Dr. Turley.
        The individual indicated that commencing in late 1986 or early 
    1987, he began receiving controlled substances and/or prescriptions for 
    such substances from Dr. Turley in exchange for various items such as 
    televisions, stereos, automobile alarms, and guns. On July 19, 1990, 
    the individual, while being monitored by Federal agents, gave Dr. 
    Turley two fully automatic machine guns with silencers in exchange for 
    100 Ultragesic capsules, a Schedule III controlled substance.
        As a result, on August 29, 1990, an information was filed in the 
    United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee 
    charging Dr. Turley with one count of unlawful distribution of a 
    controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and two counts 
    of unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm. On February 19, 1991, 
    following his guilty plea, Dr. Turley was convicted of all three counts 
    and sentenced to six months imprisonment as to each count to run 
    concurrently, followed by three years of supervised released and was 
    fined $13,000.00. As part of the plea agreement, no charges would be 
    brought against Dr. Turley for his unlawful prescribing of Dilaudid to 
    the three individuals in exchange for sexual favors.
        On August 31, 1990, Dr. Turley surrendered his previous DEA 
    Certificate of Registration, and on September 19, 1990, the Tennessee 
    Board of Medical Examiners (Board) issued an Order summarily suspending 
    his license to practice medicine in the State of Tennessee. The Board 
    found that emergency action was necessary ``to prevent [Dr. Turley] 
    from continuing his repeated and dangerous prescribing of addictive or 
    contra-indicated controlled substances and to stop his criminal 
    behavior involving the dispensing or prescribing of controlled 
    substances for illegal reasons.'' On February 14, 1992, the Board 
    ordered that Dr. Turley's medical license remain suspended for at least 
    six months. Thereafter, on July 27, 1992, the Board reinstated Dr. 
    Turley's license to practice medicine, placing him on probation for two 
    years and ordering him to maintain a contract with the Tennessee 
    Medical Foundation's Impaired Physicians Program for two years. 
    Subsequently, on September 14, 1994, the Board terminated Dr. Turley's 
    probation, and as a result, Dr. Turley's medical license is 
    unrestricted.
        Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), the Deputy Administrator may deny an 
    application for a DEA Certificate of Registration, if he determines 
    that the registration would be inconsistent with the public interest. 
    Section 823(f) requires that the following factors be considered:
        (1) The recommendation of the appropriate State licensing board or 
    professional disciplinary authority.
        (2) The applicant's experience in dispensing, or conducting 
    research with respect to controlled substances.
        (3) The applicant's conviction record under Federal or State laws 
    relating to the manufacture, distribution, or dispensing of controlled 
    substances.
        (4) Compliance with applicable, State, Federal, or local laws 
    relating to controlled substances.
    
    [[Page 14949]]
    
        (5) Such other conduct which may threaten the public health and 
    safety.
        These factors are to be considered in the disjunctive; the Deputy 
    Administrator may rely on any one or a combination of factors and may 
    give each factor the weight he deems appropriate in determining whether 
    a registration should be revoked or an application for registration be 
    denied. See Henry J. Schwarz, Jr., M.D., Docket No. 88-42, 54 FR 16,422 
    (1989).
        Regarding factor one, the recommendation of the appropriate state 
    licensing board, the Acting Deputy Administrator finds that while 
    serious action was taken against Dr. Turley's Tennessee medical license 
    in the past, this license is currently unrestricted. The Acting Deputy 
    Administrator also finds however, that an unrestricted medical license 
    is not dispositive of whether an applicant's registration with DEA is 
    in the public interest.
        As to Dr. Turley's experience in dispensing controlled substances, 
    it is undisputed that Dr. Turley seriously abused his privileges as a 
    DEA registrant. He dispensed controlled substances on numerous 
    occasions for no legitimate medical purpose and in exchange for sexual 
    favors and merchandise.
        Regarding factors three and four, the record is clear that Dr. 
    Turley was convicted of one count of unlawful distribution of 
    controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). This 
    conviction was the result of the exchange of Ultragesic capsules for 
    the two machine guns with silencers. However, it is evident that Dr. 
    Turley failed to comply with 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) on numerous other 
    occasions. He dispensed Dilaudid, an extremely addictive and dangerous 
    substance, to at least three individuals for no legitimate medical 
    purpose in exchange for sexual favors. In addition, he dispensed a 
    variety of controlled substances to an individual for no legitimate 
    medical purpose in exchange for merchandise.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator concludes that Dr. Turley's past 
    behavior as a DEA registrant was reprehensible. There is no indication 
    that he can now be trusted to responsibly handle controlled substances, 
    and therefore Dr. Turley's registration with DEA would be inconsistent 
    with the public interest.
        Accordingly, the Acting Deputy Administrator of the Drug 
    Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 
    21 U.S.C. 823, and 28 C.F.R. 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders that the 
    application submitted by John C. Turley, III, M.D. for a DEA 
    Certificate of Registration be, and it hereby is, denied. This order is 
    effective April 28, 1997.
    
        Dated: March 14, 1997.
    James S. Milford,
    Acting Deputy Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-7884 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/28/1997
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-7884
Pages:
14948-14949 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-7884.pdf